You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

December 6, 2018

New Legislation Clarifies the Landscape for Representative Offices in Laos

Informed Counsel

Although Laos is generally acknowledged as a small nation with notable potential, it is also viewed as a niche market for specific industries, such as energy (especially hydropower) or mining, due to its preponderance of natural resources. While it is true that these industries do well here, there are myriad other investment opportunities in this emerging economy that potential investors have the opportunity to capitalize and benefit from. However, other sectors are often hampered by a lack of clear intelligence on them for prospective investors to base investment decisions on.

Representative Offices (ROs) provide the gateway to such opportunities, and are an unmatched resource for prospective investors who are considering Laos as an investment destination. Establishing an RO gives investors the ability to effectively gather, analyze, and assess business opportunities, which is unusually beneficial in Laos due to the scarcity of other reliable statistics and information outside of the country.

However, the 2016 Law on Investment Promotion, which permitted ROs, contained few procedural provisions on how they could actually be registered, leaving a problematic regulatory gap. Indeed, that law even expressly required further legislation to be implemented in future. In its absence, the relevant authorities have adopted informal policies and procedures for registration. This has left establishing and registering an RO in Laos an uncertain business.
Investors in Laos therefore welcomed the recent Decision No. 1825/MPI on the Establishment and Management of a Representative Office for Foreign Legal Entities Based in Laos (the Decision), which was published on August 6, 2018. Effective since August 13, the decision formalizes and clarifies the procedures for setting up an RO in Laos.

Types of RO and Operational Restrictions

The Decision provides distinct classifications for two types of RO: those that are established to carry out concession activities under the framework of a Memorandum of Understanding or agreement with local government; and those that are established outside of such a framework.

A third classification for multinational and transnational corporations was considered, but ultimately abandoned during the consultation period. During public and private sector consultations, concerns were raised about how such corporations would be defined, as there is no single, clear, pre-existing definition of them under Lao law. While such a class would certainly have had its benefits if properly executed, limiting the Decision to two classes is generally seen as the more beneficial option for the time being, as it will add to the assuredness and efficiency of the registration process.

It should be noted that ROs licensed under either category are restricted from carrying out business activities or generating income; advertising goods, services, or other products in any manner; allowing others to use their RO license; and issuing receipts or invoices for revenue or other types of income. In addition, no more than two foreign employees are allowed to work at any given RO, and Lao citizens must be given preference. Any and all foreign workers remain subject to work and residency permit requirements.

Conditions and Timeline for Registration

The Decision lays out a set of conditions that must be met in order to establish an RO in Laos, many of which are relatively standard requirements carried over from the preexisting legal regime (for example, entities must be registered in another jurisdiction and be able to produce their various corporate secretarial documents, etc.). In this way, the legislation formalizes many of the informal policies that have been used to register ROs so far under the 2016 Law on Investment Promotion.

Most notable among the conditions under the Decision is the retained requirement for ROs to have minimum registered capital of USD 50,000 in order to be registrable. During preliminary discussions (before the implementation of the Decision) individuals from the private and public sector alike expressed their concerns about this requirement, citing a previous move by the Lao government to abolish minimum registered capital for legal entities in order to facilitate the creation of companies in Laos. However, the government’s legislative agenda has been steadily moving away from that policy, and after discussions ended and all concerns had been considered, the Lao authorities moved forward with the minimum registered capital requirement of USD 50,000.

If all conditions are met, a legal entity can file a registration to establish an RO in Laos through the Ministry of Planning and Investment’s One Stop Service. The Decision states that registration should take 15 working days from the date of filing until approval is granted. However, in practice, this timeframe may slightly differ.

Conclusion

Although the 2016 Law on Investment Promotion permitted setting up ROs in Laos, it has taken a long time for the procedural regulations that support that set-up to come into being. Registration of an RO since then has been fraught with uncertainty, and the Decision, by fixing the regulatory framework, is therefore a great step toward a sturdy RO landscape in Laos. This is another example of recent efforts by local authorities to provide clearer and more thorough rules and regulations, superseding the more casual practices that have shaped the regulatory framework in Laos today.

The Decision has been openly welcomed by foreign entities that are contemplating potentially lucrative investment opportunities in Laos. Foreign investors are able to establish a local RO in Laos in order to test the waters and collect necessary data and information on business potential, before fully committing to a long-term investment in the country.

Ultimately, the Decision provides increased incentives for foreign investors to consider Laos as a market for expansion, and in turn is likely to propel the country’s growing economy.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

April 22, 2026
A new decree in Vietnam brings significant implementation clarity to the country’s existing extended producer responsibility (EPR) legal framework. An EPR mechanism was first codified in Vietnam in the 2020 Law on Environmental Protection amid ongoing challenges surrounding the collection and treatment of product and packaging waste. The mechanism was progressively detailed through Decree No. 08/2022/ND‑CP and its successive amendments, but the regulatory framework remained insufficiently developed, notably in terms of support mechanisms for waste collection, recycling, and treatment. The newly launched regulations in Decree No. 110/2026/ND-CP (Decree 110), issued on April 1, 2026, and taking effect on May 25, 2026, stipulate fully and clearly the responsibility of manufacturers and importers to recycle products and packaging and to treat waste. Some key provisions of Decree 110 for manufacturers, importers, and related stakeholders are presented below. Subjects of EPR The Law on Environmental Protection assigns responsibility to manufacturers and importers for product and packaging recycling (under Article 54) or waste collection and treatment (under Article 55), depending on the type of products and packaging they produce or import. Decree 110 elaborates on these EPR provisions by specifying the responsible entities and listing out the types of products and packaging subject to recycling and waste treatment responsibilities. Decree 110 clarifies the responsible entities in special cases, such as when products under the same brand are made by multiple manufacturers, when there is a contract manufacturing or entrusted import relationship, and when the manufacturer or importer is part of a corporate group. Notably, exemptions may be applied in some scenarios, such as for manufacturers and importers of products and packaging exclusively for export, temporary import and re-export, or research and testing purposes, as well as for entities with annual revenue from related products not exceeding VND 30 billion. Recycling Responsibilities Decree 110
April 15, 2026
On March 31, 2026, Vietnam’s government issued Decree 102/2026/ND-CP (Decree 102), which amends Decree 75/2019/ND-CP on administrative sanctions for competition law violations (Decree 75). Effective from May 20, 2026, the new decree introduces a number of significant changes aimed at strengthening enforcement, revising penalty structures, and broadening the range of remedial measures, primarily for violations related to economic concentration. Revised Penalties for Economic Concentration Violations Decree 102 significantly revises the penalties for violations related to economic concentration. Failure to notify an economic concentration; implementing an economic concentration before clearance Under the new framework, Articles 14 and 15 of Decree 75 have been amended to impose a range of monetary fines, rather than relying solely on percentage‑based penalties as under the previous regime, for violations involving the failure to notify an economic concentration or the implementation of an economic concentration prior to clearance. The fines range from VND 500 million to VND 1 billion for each enterprise participating in a concentration with combined assets, revenues, or purchase value below VND 3,000 billion in the preceding fiscal year, capped at 5% of the violating enterprise’s total turnover in the relevant market. For concentrations meeting or exceeding the VND 3,000 billion threshold across those same metrics, the fines increase to VND 1 billion to VND 2 billion per enterprise, also subject to the 5% cap. These differentiated thresholds allow penalties to better reflect the size of the transaction and its potential competitive impact. Non-compliance with conditional approvals Enterprises that do not implement or only partially implement the conditions specified in a conditional economic concentration approval decision face fines ranging from 1% to 3% of total turnover in the relevant market during the fiscal year preceding the violation. Decree 102 also adds a new remedial measure requiring enterprises to fully implement all conditions
March 31, 2026
Against the backdrop of Vietnam’s rapid economic and technological transformation and its ambition to build a knowledge-driven economy, the National Assembly of Vietnam adopted Law on Higher Education No. 125/2025/QH15 on December 10, 2025, The new law took effect on January 1, 2026, replacing Law on Higher Education No. 08/2012/QH13 of 2012 and its subsequent amendments after more than a decade of implementation. The new law reflects a significant policy shift toward enhancing the institutional autonomy of higher education institutions (“HEIs”)—universities and other university-level institutions. By granting broader autonomy, Vietnam aims to enable HEIs to operate more proactively, better respond to market needs, and improve the quality and efficiency of education and research activities. Comprehensive Institutional Autonomy in HEIs The new law marks a significant shift by granting HEIs comprehensive autonomy as a statutory right, within the bounds of the licensed scope of educational operation and the legal framework, rather than a conditional right as provided under the former law. Under the new law, HEIs are empowered to exercise autonomy over their academic expertise, training, scientific research, international cooperation, organizational structure, personnel, finance, and other higher education activities. The expansion of institutional autonomy is also accompanied by a correspondingly strengthened framework of institutional accountability. However, Vietnam maintains a certain degree of control and imposes restrictions on institutional autonomy in sensitive and strategically important areas. These controls and restrictions include limitations on training autonomy in the majors of teacher training, national defense, and security; and restrictions on financial and personnel management autonomy for HEIs under the administration of the Ministry of National Defense and the Ministry of Public Security. New Model for Curriculum Development The new law removes the concept of “opening a training major” and focuses regulation on how training programs are developed and delivered. Under the previous regime,
March 31, 2026
Thailand’s Department of Business Development (DBD) has issued a regulation imposing additional requirements for amending a company’s directors and signatory power to designate a foreign national as an authorized signatory of the company. This measure, effective April 1, 2026, has been introduced in response to the widespread use of Thai nationals as nominees to conduct business on behalf of foreigners, a practice considered to have an adverse impact on the country’s economic stability and security. The new measures are particularly concerned with changes to the authorized signatory structure of companies that originally had only Thai directors authorized to sign for and bind the company. Under the new rules, any amendment that results in a foreign national becoming an authorized signatory—whether solely or jointly—for such a company will be subject to additional verification. Directors signing an application to register such an amendment to the company’s authorized signatory structure are now also required to provide a statement confirming that all shareholders of the company have made genuine contributions and no Thai national has assisted with, supported, or participated in business activities in a nominee capacity. Implications Companies intending to appoint foreign directors as authorized signatories should be aware of the increased regulatory requirements and assessments. Additional documentation and confirmations may be required as part of the registration process.