You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

December 30, 2014

New Law Puts Public-Private Partnerships on Solid Ground

Bangkok Post, Corporate Counsellor Column

There was much fanfare last year about the enactment of the Private Investment in State Undertaking Act of 2013. Many commentators forecasted an era of renewed vigor for public-private partnerships (PPPs) in Thailand.

In reality, the Act made only incremental changes relative to the older Public Participation in State Undertaking Act of 1992, at least in terms of approval procedures. However, it did set out a much stronger framework for comprehensive planning and quality of public-private ventures. This was evident in sections calling for a PPP Policy Committee, a PPP Fund, and a PPP Strategic Plan, as well as regulations on the use of experts and consultants.

The PPP Policy Committee in particular has broad authority, from preparing the PPP Strategic Plan for cabinet approval to approving projects, proposing measures to support PPPs, considering approval of no-bid selection processes, and issuing a variety of regulatory notifications.

The PPP Strategic Plan will be the main driver of PPP policy, identifying sectors appropriate for PPPs, setting priorities, identifying areas where investment is urgent, and setting targets and time frames. A new plan is to be produced every five years, with evaluations in the interim.

To ensure the plan reflects public needs, the PPP Policy Committee must hold hearings to obtain input from state agencies and members of the public. Prior to each hearing, the State Enterprise Policy Office (Sepo), as the secretariat, will prepare a framework setting out the draft strategic plan, goals, target audience, and other details for the approval of the committee. This will help it to produce an effective PPP Strategic Plan for submission to the cabinet.

The PPP Fund, meanwhile, is envisaged to be used for developing the strategic plan, hiring consultants, and helping state agencies to develop PPPs consistent with the plan. The money will come from state budget appropriations as well as fees charged to bidders. A PPP Fund Committee, separate from the policy panel, set out rules for the fund’s operation and expenditure earlier this year.

The new law also sets out clearer guidelines for the use of experts and consultants. By law, a state agency pursuing a PPP must appoint a selection committee to address tendering and a supervisory committee to handle oversight. Each is required to include some experts with knowledge, expertise, and experience that would be directly beneficial to consideration or oversight of a project. With the necessary regulations having been promulgated, Sepo has already begun compiling a list of approved experts.

As for consultants, the law envisages they will have various roles. At the very least, government agencies are required to hire consultants to produce reports about particular projects they wish to pursue. In addition, consultants can help to prepare tendering documents, analyze and propose solutions to manage risks, analyze and propose solutions to implementation problems, and/or advise on contract amendments.

Given the important role of consultants, the law requires the PPP Policy Committee to promulgate regulations on their qualifications. These regulations were promulgated early this year and address both individual consultants and firms. Among the requirements, a consultant must have at least three years’ experience and consulted on at least three projects, although these requirements can be reduced in the event of necessity with prescribed approvals.

Among the prohibited characteristics, the regulations exclude those who have specified conflicts of interest, abandoned work or been bankrupt, dismissed for malpractice, or sentenced to imprisonment, except for offenses committed through negligence or petty offenses.

A government agency pursuing a project must hire a consultant to prepare a project appraisal report, which must meet the requirements set out by the PPP Policy Committee. The regulations require the appraisal report to comprise a study and analysis addressing such matters as technical benefits, operating costs, estimated gains, a comparison of costs, and cost-effectiveness of different budget alternatives; alternative models for private sector investment; impacts of the project and means of mitigating negative impacts (environmental, national security, legal compliance, and others); results of the required hearings; identification of risks and their management; and the financial status and other relevant information on the agency pursuing the project.

Once the appraisal report is done, the government agency must submit it to the responsible minister for consideration and approval and then to Sepo, after which consideration will continue in accordance with the procedure specified in law.

With a solid legal foundation laid, the success of PPPs in Thailand will depend on both project champions within the government and private-sector operators that have the flexibility to meet the requirements of their public-sector counterparts. If both of these come together, PPPs can be an excellent solution for Thailand’s infrastructure needs.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

February 2, 2021
The application period for very small power producers (VSPPs) aiming to participate in the community power plant project is fast drawing to a close, with the deadline set for February 4, 2021. February 4 is also the closing date of the period for public comments on the two draft regulations outlining the pilot project to procure electricity from community power plants. These draft regulations are being finalized by the Energy Regulation Commission (ERC)  as part of an effort to boost the economy at a grassroots level. The community power plant project will procure 150 MW from VSPPs producing electricity from either biomass or biogas. 75 MW will be obtained from biomass VSPPs, with a limit of 6 MW to each biomass VSPP, while 75 MW of the electricity procurement will be obtained from biogas VSPPs with a limit of 3 MW each. VSPPs wishing to apply for the community power plant project must be 90%-owned by a private company, while 10% of ownership must be under a community enterprise or community enterprise network—consisting of at least 200 households—registered with the Department of Agricultural Extension. Furthermore, the fuel used by the VSPP must be either biogas or biomass obtained from the community enterprise or community enterprise network, and must not include fossil fuels. Once VSPPs have submitted their applications, they will be subject to a technical assessment to determine power production readiness, and will undergo a process of competitive bidding. VSPPs will be compared and selected based on a number of factors, including power production capacity, ability to operate for duration of the 20-year project, and the proposed fixed feed-in tariff (FiT). VSPPs that are chosen to participate in this pilot project will be subject to the following FiTs per unit of electricity, based on the type of fuel and
October 15, 2020
Practical Law has published the 2020 online version of Electricity Regulation in Thailand: Overview, a Q&A-style guide that provides detailed overviews of power issues and regulations for operators in the Thai electricity market. The Thailand overview is one of 22 such guides to jurisdictions worldwide, covering key practical issues related to the legal environment for agricultural operations.
October 13, 2020
On September 9, 2020, Vietnam’s Ministry of Industry and Trade (MOIT) issued Circular No. 21/2020/TT-BCT on the order and procedures for issuance of electricity operating licenses (Circular 21). Circular 21 will take effect on October 26, 2020, replacing Circular No. 36/2018/TT-BCT as amended by Circular No. 15/2019/TT-BCT (together, Circular 36).
October 1, 2020
Partner Vinh Quoc Nguyen and senior associate Tu Ngoc Trinh have contributed a chapter on electricity regulations in Vietnam, with a focus on the emerging renewable energy field, for the 2020 edition of the Practical Law Energy and Natural Resources Global Guide . The guide provides a comparative high-level overview, in a concise Q&A format, of energy laws and regulations in multiple jurisdictions around the world, and is split into three sections featuring regulations on (i) electricity, (ii) oil and gas, and (iii) mining. The Vietnam electricity chapter covers a range of topics, including the following: Recent trends in Vietnam’s electricity market and regulatory structure Companies involved in electricity generation, transmission, distribution and supply Import and export of electricity Electricity generation and renewable energy sources, including government policies and incentives Electricity transmission, distribution, and supply Proposals for reform, including privatization Practical Law Company is owned by Thomson Reuters and provides global guides covering legal know-how for corporate lawyers, including Global Guides to electricity regulation. Tilleke & Gibbins also contributes the Thailand chapter of this guide, as well as guides to numerous other practice areas. The full chapter can be viewed on the Practical Law website or downloaded using the button below.