You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

August 30, 2013

New Guiding Decree on Labor Outsourcing Services in Vietnam

Informed Counsel

In the February issue of Informed Counsel, we discussed labor outsourcing, a new form of labor supply for Vietnam, introduced by the new Labor Code. While labor outsourcing did exist in practice in Vietnam before the new Labor Code came into force on May 1, 2013, it had been technically illegal until legislation relating to it was introduced.

On May 22, 2013, the Vietnamese Government issued Decree No. 55/2013/ND-CP detailing the new Labor Code’s provisions on labor outsourcing. The key points of Decree 55, which took effect on July 15, 2013, are discussed below.

Labor Outsourcing – For Limited Types of Work Only

The most notable aspect of Decree 55 is that it restricts labor outsourcing services to only 17 job categories, including:

  1. Interpreters, translators, and stenographers
  2. Administrative assistants
  3. Receptionists
  4. Tour guides
  5. Sales support staff
  6. Project support staff
  7. Programmers of production machine systems
  8. Manufacturers/installers of broadcasting and telecommunications equipment
  9. Staff that operate, inspect, and/or repair construction machinery or electrical systems in manufacturing
  10. Cleaning and sanitation staff for buildings and factories
  11. Document editors
  12. Bodyguards and security guards
  13. Staff for marketing and customer care via telephone
  14. Financial and tax consultants
  15. Automotive mechanics
  16. Industrial scanners/drafters and interior decorators
  17. Drivers

In addition, the duration of the labor outsourcing may not exceed 12 months and may not be extended. This limitation on duration is placed upon the outsourced employee and not the enterprise providing the outsourced employee; thus, it would not be possible to switch enterprises to circumvent the 12-month limitation. The law, however, does not appear to limit replacing the outsourced laborer with another after the 12 months have elapsed.

Financial Commitments

The “sublessor,” defined as “an enterprise licensed to conduct labor outsourcing” and being the enterprise providing employees, must pay a deposit or “escrow” of VND 2 billion (approximately USD 95,000) into a blocked bank account prior to the commencement of labor outsourcing. The escrow serves as a security for the outsourced employee and may be used toward payment of unpaid salaries, statutory insurance contributions, and/or compensation for damages should the sublessor breach any of its obligations pursuant to the labor contract.

The sublessor is further required to have a legal capital (i.e. statutory capital) of VND 2 billion. It is unclear, however, whether the legal capital must be contributed in addition to the aforementioned escrow. Furthermore, additional requirements apply with respect to sublessors that are joint venture companies with a foreign partner. The foreign partner must: (1) be an entity specializing in labor subleasing services with share capital and assets amounting to at least VND 10 billion (approximately USD 476,000); (2) have at least five years of experience in labor outsourcing services; and (3) have a certificate of good standing issued by the company’s country of origin.

Additional Requirements and Limitations

The office of the employee sublessor must be “stable,” though Decree 55 fails to define what constitutes this “stable” condition. The likely intention of the law drafters is that the office address of an employee sublessor should not be frequently changed. Along these lines, Decree 55 further requires that if it is a leased office, then the lease term must be at least two years.

In order to provide labor outsourcing services, the sublessor must obtain a license from the Ministry of Labor, War Invalids, and Social Affairs. The timeline for the issuance of such license is 30 business days from the date the Ministry receives a valid application. A license is issued for a maximum of 36 months, but may be renewed. However, each renewal may not last for more than 24 months, and the maximum number of renewals is two.

A sublessor must pay salary to an outsourced employee at least equal to the salary that the subleasing employer pays its employees who have the same professional qualifications and are doing the same job or a job of the same value. A sublessor is also prohibited from:

  • Collecting fees from an outsourced employee;
  • Subletting an employee without his/her consent;
  • Subletting an employee for a job not included in the list of permitted jobs set out above; and
  • Subletting an employee to a parent company or subsidiary of the sublessor, or a company which belongs to a group in which the sublessor is also a member.

Companies using outsourced employees (i.e., subleasing employees) are prohibited from:

  • Collecting fees from the outsourced employee;
  • Subletting the outsourced employee to another company; and
  • Using an outsourced employee for a job not included on the list of permitted jobs set out above.

Further Clarity Is Needed

It is unclear whether manufacturing companies (both domestic and foreign-invested companies) operating in industrial or processing zones, which have a high labor demand for a short period of time, may use outsourced employees in order to meet business demands. Arguably, the vaguely worded jobs of “sales support” and “project support” mentioned in points (5) and (6) above could apply in such circumstances, in the absence of further clarification from the government.

Decree 55 provides important clarifications regarding labor outsourcing activities in Vietnam, including the list of jobs for which labor outsourcing is permitted, statutory guarantee amounts, legal capital, and the requirements for obtaining a labor outsourcing license. However, more guidelines are needed from the labor authorities, as vague provisions remain in the Labor Code of Vietnam.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

April 3, 2023
Most employers know that terminating employees for poor job performance is not easy. But it is actually legally possible—if employers have the right approach and take specific precautionary measures. However, failing to take these precautions can mean that an employer is either stuck with an incompetent employee or on the losing end of a lawsuit for unfair termination. This article will lay out some essential considerations for employers in Thailand regarding termination of employment for poor performance. First, understand that “poor work performance” is a lack of performance or ability, or an inability to work with other employees. It does not constitute a violation of work rules or regulations. In some cases, however, an employee’s failure to act in accordance with lawful instructions or commands of the employer, resulting in poor work performance, could also be considered a violation of work rules or regulations. This may be the case if the work rules or regulations clearly state that an employee must strictly comply with the employer’s instructions or commands. Second, an employer can, in fact, terminate an employee due to poor work performance. For example, this may be possible in the following scenarios: Records show that an employee’s work performance has fallen below the employer’s required standards, and the employee has not tried to improve his or her work performance for three consecutive years. In addition, it does not appear that the employer was biased when giving ratings or scores for the employee’s work performance. The job description of the employee includes coordination with employees in other departments, but the employee has not been able to do so. Therefore, the employee was reassigned to a new job function, but the employee still did not improve. This suggests that the employee has a lack of interpersonal skills and is not
March 23, 2023
On March 19, 2023, Thailand’s new work-from-home (WFH) legislation amending the Labour Protection Act (No. 8) B.E. 2566 (2023) was published in the Government Gazette. It will come into effect on April 18, 2023. The amendment aims to enhance employee protections to accord with current global standards, provide alternative working arrangements for employers and employees, increase workforce efficiency, and strengthen employees’ job security and a better quality of life. As we detailed previously, the new WFH legislation allows employers and employees to reach agreements that permit employees to work remotely. Since there are no accompanying criminal punishments relating to this new provision, and the legislation incorporates the term “may agree,” it appears that this WFH provision is not mandatory but is primarily intended to facilitate and encourage remote working agreements between employers and employees. For more details on the WFH legislation, or on any aspect of employment law in Thailand, please contact Tilleke & Gibbins at [email protected].
February 24, 2023
Many companies have moved to Southeast Asia to benefit from the advantages of this vibrant and diverse market. The region is already a manufacturing hub for a multitude of industries—computer and automotive products in Thailand, textiles in Cambodia, and footwear and electrical goods in Vietnam, to name a few—and an increasing number of companies worldwide are reconfiguring their supply chains to include regional suppliers. A key challenge is keeping up to date with employment law trends in these jurisdictions to ensure compliance with local regulations—and avoid costly, time-consuming business interruption. Here we outline trends and recent regulatory developments in Cambodia, Thailand, and Vietnam, and consider what they mean for employers. Cambodia The Ministry of Labour and Vocational Training (MLVT) is likely to pursue a more proactive enforcement strategy in 2023. Last May, the MLVT announced companies would be required to submit a twice yearly self-declaration on labour compliance through a new online system. The self-declaration form requires companies to confirm and upload evidence of compliance, and the MLVT online system—through which the ministry can easily determine if a company is compliant –generates a report that lists all fines. Companies should comply with the self-declaration requirement and carefully review the form to understand what fines will apply for non-compliance. On 1 October 2022, regulations relating to the National Social Security Fund (NSSF) pension system came into effect, and employers and employees began making NSSF pension contributions. Over the next five years, total compulsory pension contributions will amount to 4% of an employee’s wage, half of which is paid by the employer and half deducted from the employee’s salary. The contribution wage is capped at KHR 1.2m (USD 300). Employers are currently required to pay a relatively small amount (KHR 24,000, or around USD 6). This will increase to 10.75% over
January 19, 2023
The Thai parliament has passed the so-called Work from Home Bill—formally known as Labour Protection Act (No. 8) B.E. 2566 (2023)—which amends the country’s Labour Protection Act (LPA) to reflect current circumstances. The accompanying legislative remark states that the proposed amendments to the LPA will provide additional options for work arrangements between employers and employees, upgrade the level of labor protection, increase work stability, and improve quality of life for employees in Thailand. The legislation adds a single section to the LPA providing that an employer and an employee “may agree in the employment contract” that the employee is allowed “to bring work . . . to perform at home or at the residence of the employee or anywhere that the employee can work remotely through information technology, if the nature of the work permits.” The provision further provides that employers are responsible for ensuring that remote work agreements are in writing, either physically or electronically, and may include the following details: Period of the agreement; Normal working hours, rest periods, and overtime work; Criteria for overtime work, holiday work, and various types of leave; Scope of work and control or supervision by the employer; and Responsibility for arranging supplies and equipment, including necessary costs relating to the work. The amended LPA gives employees who work from home the right to refuse contact from the employer or the supervisor beyond working hours. In addition, employers must treat remote employees equally to on-premise employees. The most notable question surrounding this legislation is whether employers must allow employees to work remotely. The phrase “may agree” suggests that employers do not have to agree to allow an employee to work remotely. Another important aspect of the amendment is that there is no criminal punishment attached to it, which suggests that the legislation