You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

December 22, 2017

New Guidance Released on Class B, C, and D Medical Devices in Vietnam

Vietnam’s Ministry of Health (MOH) has recently issued a very important notification and new regulations relating to the implementation of Decree No. 36/2017/ND-CP (Decree 36) on medical device management. The key notification was issued under Official Dispatch No. 7165/BYT-TB-CT dated December 14, 2017 (Dispatch 7165). The new implementing guidelines for Decree 36 were issued under Circular No. 46/2017/TT-BYT dated December 15, 2017 (Circular 46). These developments are crucial to the registration regime for medical devices in Vietnam.

Dispatch 7165

While not relating to Class A medical devices (which include, for example bandages, wheelchairs, reusable surgical instruments, medical gloves, etc.), Dispatch 7165 provides specific guidance on Class B, C, and D devices, as well as in vitro diagnostic (IVD) biologicals. Class B medical devices include items such as blood centrifuges, diagnostic ultrasound scanners, and infusion cannulas, while Class C medical devices include items such as diagnostic X-ray equipment, electrosurgical units, and urethral stents. Class D medical devices include items such as absorbable sutures, arterioscopes, implantable infusion pumps, dental implants, etc.

A marketing authorization (MA) license for Class B, C, and D medical devices will only be required from January 1, 2019 onwards. This means that the MA regime for Class B, C, and D medical devices will be delayed for one year from the original date set forth under Decree 36. This delay is likely spurred on due to the imminent delays in registering massive amounts of medical devices that have never been registered before, especially when infrastructure and proper resources need to be bolstered among the registration teams/office of the MOH to handle the huge workload. The early deadlines to register all devices were not practicable and were over-ambitious goals.

From now until January 1, 2019, some specific interim regulations set forth under the new Official Dispatch are as follows:

  • Class B, C, and D medical devices which were included in the enclosed annex of Circular 30/2015/TT-BYT dated October 12, 2015 on promulgating the importation of medical devices (Circular 30) will continue to be governed by the regulations of Circular 30. This means the MOH is allowing these devices to be imported and circulated in Vietnam, provided that these devices have import licenses as stipulated in Circular 30, and have been properly classified as Class B, C, or D medical devices by the authorized organizations.
  • For Class B, C, and D medical devices which are not included in the enclosed annex of Circular 30, the MOH will allow these devices to be imported and circulated in Vietnam, provided that they have been properly classified as Class B, C, or D medical devices by the authorized organizations. For smooth customs clearance, in practice, these devices may also need a letter from the Department of Medical Equipment and Construction (DMEC) under the MOH to confirm that the imported medical devices are not included in the enclosed annex of Circular 30.
  • The importation and circulation of IVD biologicals (e.g., microbiology reagents, histology reagents, etc.) require an MA license (as stipulated in Circular 44/2014/TT-BYT on drug registration) or an import license (as stipulated in Circular No. 47/2010/TT-BYT). IVD biologicals with MA licenses can be imported until the expiry date of their MA licenses. For IVD biologicals with import licenses that expire on December 31, 2017, their import licenses can be extended if the expiry date on their Letter of Authorization (LOA) remains valid after December 31, 2017 and the importer submits a written extension request for the import license to the DMEC, which will then review the request and approve the extension at its discretion.  

Circular 46

Circular 46, which was just released, provides long-awaited implementing guidelines to Decree 36 and will enter into effect on February 1, 2018.

The Circular specifically states that Class C and D medical devices that are put into the human body are exempt from the requirement to submit summaries of clinical testing data and clinical testing research results. These medical devices include (1) medical devices in Annex I of the Circular (e.g., peritoneal dialysis catheters, cannulae, introducers, etc.), and (2) medical devices which are freely sold and have obtained certificates of free sale from a competent body of any of the countries and organizations which are set forth in Annex II of the Circular.

Class C or D IVD medical devices (e.g., HIV blood donor screening equipment, HIV blood diagnostic equipment, plasma bags, etc.) are also exempt from the requirement to submit test results if such medical devices have been freely sold and have obtained certificates of free sale from a competent body of any of the countries and organizations which are included in Annex II of the Circular. Annex II countries include Japan, Canada, the United States, and various European countries.

The Circular also includes a list (i.e., Annex III) of Class B, C, and D medical devices which may be traded like other normal goods, and imposes no requirements on the establishments trading them to declare their eligibility to trade in medical devices.

Additionally, the MOH issued guidance on presenting technical summaries, and requirements and terminology for Vietnamese to English translations for the LOA. A sample LOA is also promulgated under the Circular.

Technical summaries and English LOAs which were signed before the effective date of the Circular (February 1, 2018) will continue to be used; companies are not required to re-prepare these documents.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

October 15, 2025
The Indonesian Food and Drug Administration (BPOM) has introduced more stringent oversight of health supplements containing probiotics with new guidelines that require clinical trials for certain products and expanded documentation standards. BPOM Regulation No. 17 of 2025 replaces the previous 2021 regulation and establishes a comprehensive framework for evaluating probiotic strains used in health supplements. Assessment Requirements The new regulation expands the scope of assessment to include not only categorization and documentation but also technical procedures, strain classification, and clinical trial requirements. Unlike the previous regulation, which provided general guidance, the updated framework creates a comprehensive system for evaluating both registered probiotic strains and new or combined strains. Manufacturers must now submit supporting documentation covering strain identification and functional characterization, safety, efficacy, and product quality. The previous regulation required documentation only on safety, efficacy, and quality. Clinical Trials One of the most significant changes is the requirement for clinical trials conducted in Indonesia for applications that include benefit claims other than maintaining digestive health, or where there are modifications to benefit claims. The regulation specifies that phase 1 trials must demonstrate safety, while phase 2 trials must validate efficacy using statistically valid methods such as double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled studies). In addition, phase 3 and phase 4 trials may be required, and postmarket surveillance data must be submitted. Technical Assessment Framework Annex 4, a newly introduced section, establishes technical procedures for assessing health supplements containing probiotics in Indonesia. This comprehensive framework outlines criteria for evaluating new probiotic strains, including strain identification, functional characterization, safety, efficacy, and product quality. The annex introduces a clear classification of claims for health supplement products containing probiotics: General claims(e.g., maintaining digestive health). Functional claims(e.g., normal biological function or activity in the body). Risk reduction claims(e.g., lowering disease risk). The regulation restricts use of the term
October 3, 2025
On September 26, 2025, the Contract Committee under Thailand’s Consumer Protection Board issued a regulation that aims to standardize contracts and enhance consumer protection within the beauty and wellness industry. The Notification on Prescribing the Beauty Service Business as a Contract-Controlled Business B.E. 2568 (2025), which takes effect on January 24, 2026, requires business operators to use a prescribed standard contract in Thai and adhere to strict mandatory provisions and prohibitions. These regulations apply to operators across all in-person and online service channels, including via digital platforms. “Beauty services business” is defined as the provision of services under an agreement allowing consumers to receive a series of treatments, either over a set number of sessions or within a set period. This includes massage, spa, other methods for cleanliness, beauty, or care of facial or body skin, and weight control and body shaping—including services offered electronically. The law excludes surgery, liposuction, and medical treatments performed by licensed practitioners. The notification establishes the following key requirements: Mandatory contract and formatting. All contracts with consumers must use the standard contract form, in Thai, with clear, readable text (minimum font size of 2 millimeters, no more than 11 characters per inch), and include all essential terms from the annexed form. Contract execution. Contracts must be made in duplicate, with one copy given to the consumer at signing. For agreements concluded through electronic channels, the process must comply with the Electronic Transactions Act and use the same required terms. Digital platforms. Business operators who provide services facilitated through a digital platform as an intermediary are ultimately responsible for ensuring the consumer receives a compliant contract. Prohibited clauses. The law prohibits clauses that limit or exclude liability for damages to life, body, health, mind, or property resulting from breach of contract or a wrongful act;
September 16, 2025
Since Thailand formally removed Mitragyna speciosa (kratom) from the list of narcotic drugs, the country has progressed from outright prohibition to a structured, license-based regime. While the Ministry of Public Health oversees cannabis plant regulation, the Ministry of Justice (MOJ) is the regulatory authority overseeing kratom plants. For the avoidance of doubt, separate Ministry of Public Health notifications prohibit the use of kratom as a food ingredient unless a food safety evaluation has been conducted; however, this restriction does not affect trade in unprocessed leaves per se. For businesses in Thailand dealing exclusively in kratom leaves, the most consequential development is the Ministerial Regulation on the Application for Permits and Notifications for the Importation and Exportation of Kratom Leaves B.E. 2568 (2025), a bylaw of the Kratom Plant Act 2022. The ministerial regulation establishes the following notable definitions: “Kratom leaves”: Fresh or dried leaves in their natural, unprocessed state (no extracts, concentrates, or infused products). “Import/Export”: Any act of bringing kratom leaves into or out of Thailand, whether for commercial sale, industrial processing abroad, or research. Import/Export Licensing Under the Kratom Plant Act, a license is mandatory for importing or exporting kratom leaves. Individuals, juristic persons, community enterprises, and state agencies in Thailand are eligible to obtain a license to import (or a license to export) kratom leaves. Licenses are available to qualified individuals and juristic persons. Individuals must satisfy the following qualifications to be eligible for a license: Thai nationality, ≥ 20 years old, resident in Thailand. Not incompetent, quasi-incompetent, or under legal guardianship. No license suspension currently in force under the Kratom Act or Narcotics Code. No license revocation in the previous two years. No conviction under the Kratom Act or Narcotics Code within the previous two years (unless fully released from punishment). Juristic persons must satisfy
September 4, 2025
With advancements in health technology, telemedicine has taken on a wider online presence in Thailand. Under the Medical Facility Act, licensed clinics and hospitals may now diagnose, prescribe, and issue electronic prescriptions during a video call, provided they maintain patient confidentiality and proper recordkeeping. As a complementary concept, a telepharmacy allows a pharmacist to verify prescriptions, counsel patients, and dispense medication from a remote site. Hospitals, clinic chains, and some retail pharmacy groups have adopted “drive-thru” or “locker” pick-up points where drugs are bagged only after a real-time video consultation with a registered pharmacist. The clear benefits of telehealth include shorter waiting times and broader access to specialists, which is in the public interest. Drug Distribution and Advertising in Thailand The online pharmacy ecosystem creates a legal bridge in that once a teleconsulting doctor issues an e-prescription, a licensed pharmacy can lawfully dispense and deliver the medicine prescribed to the patient’s door. Nonetheless, the critical compliance component remains the advertising of medicinal drugs. It is still not allowed to advertise prescription/pharmacy-dispensed drugs to the public in Thailand. Although Thailand’s Drug Act of 1967 was written more than half a century ago, it still governs the trading of every medicinal drug that makes its way to consumers in Thailand—whether bought at a pharmacy or delivered with a few taps on a smartphone. First and foremost, the pharmacy must hold a license to sell medicinal drugs as a retailer. It is also mandatory that arrangements be made for a pharmacist to be on duty during opening hours. Drugs are classified into three main categories: prescription drugs, pharmacy-dispensed drugs, and over-the-counter (OTC) drugs. The listing of OTC drugs with their prices via an online platform is allowed, as only OTC drugs may be advertised directly to the public. However, naming or showing