You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

December 22, 2017

New Guidance Released on Class B, C, and D Medical Devices in Vietnam

Vietnam’s Ministry of Health (MOH) has recently issued a very important notification and new regulations relating to the implementation of Decree No. 36/2017/ND-CP (Decree 36) on medical device management. The key notification was issued under Official Dispatch No. 7165/BYT-TB-CT dated December 14, 2017 (Dispatch 7165). The new implementing guidelines for Decree 36 were issued under Circular No. 46/2017/TT-BYT dated December 15, 2017 (Circular 46). These developments are crucial to the registration regime for medical devices in Vietnam.

Dispatch 7165

While not relating to Class A medical devices (which include, for example bandages, wheelchairs, reusable surgical instruments, medical gloves, etc.), Dispatch 7165 provides specific guidance on Class B, C, and D devices, as well as in vitro diagnostic (IVD) biologicals. Class B medical devices include items such as blood centrifuges, diagnostic ultrasound scanners, and infusion cannulas, while Class C medical devices include items such as diagnostic X-ray equipment, electrosurgical units, and urethral stents. Class D medical devices include items such as absorbable sutures, arterioscopes, implantable infusion pumps, dental implants, etc.

A marketing authorization (MA) license for Class B, C, and D medical devices will only be required from January 1, 2019 onwards. This means that the MA regime for Class B, C, and D medical devices will be delayed for one year from the original date set forth under Decree 36. This delay is likely spurred on due to the imminent delays in registering massive amounts of medical devices that have never been registered before, especially when infrastructure and proper resources need to be bolstered among the registration teams/office of the MOH to handle the huge workload. The early deadlines to register all devices were not practicable and were over-ambitious goals.

From now until January 1, 2019, some specific interim regulations set forth under the new Official Dispatch are as follows:

  • Class B, C, and D medical devices which were included in the enclosed annex of Circular 30/2015/TT-BYT dated October 12, 2015 on promulgating the importation of medical devices (Circular 30) will continue to be governed by the regulations of Circular 30. This means the MOH is allowing these devices to be imported and circulated in Vietnam, provided that these devices have import licenses as stipulated in Circular 30, and have been properly classified as Class B, C, or D medical devices by the authorized organizations.
  • For Class B, C, and D medical devices which are not included in the enclosed annex of Circular 30, the MOH will allow these devices to be imported and circulated in Vietnam, provided that they have been properly classified as Class B, C, or D medical devices by the authorized organizations. For smooth customs clearance, in practice, these devices may also need a letter from the Department of Medical Equipment and Construction (DMEC) under the MOH to confirm that the imported medical devices are not included in the enclosed annex of Circular 30.
  • The importation and circulation of IVD biologicals (e.g., microbiology reagents, histology reagents, etc.) require an MA license (as stipulated in Circular 44/2014/TT-BYT on drug registration) or an import license (as stipulated in Circular No. 47/2010/TT-BYT). IVD biologicals with MA licenses can be imported until the expiry date of their MA licenses. For IVD biologicals with import licenses that expire on December 31, 2017, their import licenses can be extended if the expiry date on their Letter of Authorization (LOA) remains valid after December 31, 2017 and the importer submits a written extension request for the import license to the DMEC, which will then review the request and approve the extension at its discretion.  

Circular 46

Circular 46, which was just released, provides long-awaited implementing guidelines to Decree 36 and will enter into effect on February 1, 2018.

The Circular specifically states that Class C and D medical devices that are put into the human body are exempt from the requirement to submit summaries of clinical testing data and clinical testing research results. These medical devices include (1) medical devices in Annex I of the Circular (e.g., peritoneal dialysis catheters, cannulae, introducers, etc.), and (2) medical devices which are freely sold and have obtained certificates of free sale from a competent body of any of the countries and organizations which are set forth in Annex II of the Circular.

Class C or D IVD medical devices (e.g., HIV blood donor screening equipment, HIV blood diagnostic equipment, plasma bags, etc.) are also exempt from the requirement to submit test results if such medical devices have been freely sold and have obtained certificates of free sale from a competent body of any of the countries and organizations which are included in Annex II of the Circular. Annex II countries include Japan, Canada, the United States, and various European countries.

The Circular also includes a list (i.e., Annex III) of Class B, C, and D medical devices which may be traded like other normal goods, and imposes no requirements on the establishments trading them to declare their eligibility to trade in medical devices.

Additionally, the MOH issued guidance on presenting technical summaries, and requirements and terminology for Vietnamese to English translations for the LOA. A sample LOA is also promulgated under the Circular.

Technical summaries and English LOAs which were signed before the effective date of the Circular (February 1, 2018) will continue to be used; companies are not required to re-prepare these documents.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

July 13, 2026
Indonesia’s Halal Product Assurance Agency (BPJPH) has issued new regulations establishing clearer procedures for imposing administrative sanctions on businesses that violate halal product assurance requirements. BPJPH Regulation No. 2 of 2026 on the Imposition of Administrative Sanctions for Violations of Halal Product Assurance Implementation, issued on June 5, 2026, strengthens Indonesia’s halal compliance framework, as mandated under Law No. 33 of 2014 on Halal Product Assurance and Government Regulation No. 42 of 2024 on the Implementation of Halal Product Assurance. BPJPH Regulation No. 2/2026 also supports the upcoming mandatory halal compliance deadline of October 17, 2026, which will apply to a broad range of products and services, including imported food and beverages, slaughtering products and services, natural and quasi-drugs, health supplements, cosmetics, chemical and genetically engineered products, clothing and accessories, household goods, prayer equipment, stationery, and class A medical devices. Scope BPJPH is authorized to impose administrative sanctions for violations of halal product assurance requirements committed by businesses, halal inspection agencies (LPH), halal auditors, halal product process companion institutions (lembaga pendamping PPH), and halal product process companions (pendamping PPH). The head of BPJPH has authority to determine, cancel, or amend the imposition of administrative sanctions, including upon receipt of objections. This authority covers revocation of Halal Certificates (including foreign halal certificate registration numbers), withdrawal of goods from circulation, freezing of LPH operations, freezing of halal product process companion institutions, revocation of PPH companion institution registration numbers, revocation of halal auditor registration numbers, and revocation of LPH accreditation status. Administrative Sanctions Businesses may be subject to any of the following administrative sanctions: Written warning; Administrative fine; Revocation of the halal certificate, including revocation of foreign halal certificate registration numbers; and Withdrawal of goods from circulation. The regulation sets out the types of violations that may trigger these sanctions, with each
July 1, 2026
Obtaining marketing authorization is a fundamental requirement for bringing pharmaceutical products to the Thai market. Companies must navigate the Thai Food and Drug Administration’s registration procedures while also complying with post-approval pharmacovigilance obligations, licensing requirements for manufacturing and importation, data protection rules, and other regulatory requirements. This guide provides an overview of Thailand’s regulatory framework for pharmaceutical marketing authorization, including available registration pathways, review timelines, application fees, postmarketing surveillance obligations, licensing requirements, exemptions, data exclusivity, freedom of information, and parallel import considerations. It is intended as a practical reference for pharmaceutical companies, regulatory affairs professionals, and others involved in bringing medicinal products to the Thai market. Download the guide below for a concise overview of the current requirements and procedures governing pharmaceutical marketing authorization in Thailand.
June 24, 2026
Patent enablement requirements are provided under Article 102 of Vietnam’s Law on Intellectual Property (IP Law). In particular, a patent specification must “fully and clearly disclose the nature of the invention to such an extent that, based on the specification, a person having ordinary skill in the relevant art can implement the invention.” In pharmaceutical and biotechnology patents, this requirement is more complicated and subject to more rigorous assessment. The Patent Examination Guidelines (Guidelines) of the Intellectual Property Office of Vietnam (IP Office) were amended in March 2026 to introduce Annexes III and IV for the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors, in which Annex III provides detailed guidelines on the assessment of specification requirements. These amendments were made under a project for strengthening capacity in industrial property examination between the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) and the IP Office. Annex III provides detailed instructions on how examiners assess enablement in a pharmaceutical or biotechnology application, and offers examples of acceptable and unacceptable descriptions with regard to the enablement aspect. Enablement Requirements in Pharma and Biotech Patents Article 12.7 of Circular 10/2026/TT-BKHCN (Circular 10) adds to the requirements of Article 102 of the IP Law that the description must demonstrate the novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability of the technical solution. For pharmaceutical composition subject matters, Article 12.9 of Circular 10 sets out that the description must present the results of clinical trials and/or the pharmacological effects of the claimed pharmaceutical composition, and must include at least the following information: Substance/mixture used. Testing method (system) employed. Information on the test results. Correlation between the pharmacological effects obtained from the tests and the application of the pharmaceutical product in the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases. The Guidelines note that pharmacological study results should be presented in a quantified manner, and pharmacological
June 19, 2026
For the first time, Thailand’s Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has published a consolidated list identifying all substances that have successfully passed its novel food safety evaluation process. The list is a step forward in regulatory transparency, but it also highlights a feature of the Thai regime that food companies often overlook: each approval is tied exclusively to the company that applied for it. A substance’s appearance on the list does not give other companies the green light to use it. This article examines the structure of Thailand’s novel food approval framework, the implications of applicant exclusivity, and the strategic choices it requires of food companies looking to bring novel ingredients to the Thai market. Thai FDA Food Safety Evaluation Framework Notification No. 376 of the Ministry of Public Health requires novel food substances to undergo a food safety assessment, with an exemption only for novel foods manufactured exclusively for export. The framework also encompasses “foods that do not qualify as novel foods” but which present characteristics warranting a safety evaluation, such as differing quality standards, increased serving sizes, or applications in specific food categories, where such changes affect consumption levels, nutritional value, or consumer safety. The recently published list of foods that passed the safety evaluation by the Thai FDA is structured by substance category and identifies the approved company (domestic manufacturer or importer), country of origin, substance name and trade name, approved purpose of use, and date of the Thai FDA’s approval notification certificate. A notable feature of Thailand’s novel food regime is that the approval result is tied exclusively to the company that submitted the application. Publication of the consolidated list does not constitute a general authorization to use the approved substances. The Thai FDA’s approval certificate specifies the approved conditions of use and the requirements