You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

May 7, 2021

New Decrees Help Clarify Vietnam’s 2020 Enterprise and Investment Laws

On the first day of 2021, Vietnam’s new Law on Enterprises (2020 LOE) and Law on Investment (2020 LOI) took effect, replacing the previous versions of each law passed in 2014. These are the primary laws governing corporate and investment activities in Vietnam, for both domestic and foreign companies, and the new versions introduced some key changes for foreign investors.

To provide further guidance on the new laws, the government issued Decree No. 01/2021/ND-CP on enterprise registration under the 2020 LOE (Decree 1) and Decree No. 31/2021/ND-CP guiding the implementation of the 2020 LOI (Decree 31), which took effect on January 4 and March 26, 2021, respectively. Key highlights of these decrees are summarized below.

Decree 1: Great improvements in administrative procedures for enterprise registration

One enterprise – one ID number. Under Decree 1, an enterprise is granted only one ID number for all necessary governmental filings during the course of its existence. The enterprise code will now not only act as the tax code but also as the account number to participate in the compulsory social insurance system.

No hard copies required for enterprise registration. Under the previous 2014 LOE, procedures for enterprise registration could be conducted online via the National Business Registration Portal (NBRP), a publicly accessible centralized database of registered corporate details of all enterprises in Vietnam. However, this “e-filing” process still retained some burdens in terms of paperwork for both the enterprise management authorities and applicants. The 2020 LOE and Decree 1 have finally lifted the requirement for hard copies following a valid online filing, regardless of whether a certified electronic signature is utilized or not. The applicants only need to physically come to the local authority once, to directly obtain the results, or they can even request delivery. This development shows Vietnam’s legitimate efforts to build up and transform to a true e-government system.

More options for an enterprise’s legal status. In comparison with the preceding laws, Decree 1 provides clearer and more concise wording to report on a target enterprise’s operating status. Particularly, there are now seven options for an enterprise’s legal status as publicly shown in the NBRP: “business suspended,” “not operating at the registered address,” “enterprise registration certificate revoked due to enforcement of tax management,” “undergoing dissolution, acquisition, consolidation or merger,” “undergoing bankruptcy proceedings,” “dissolved, bankrupt or ceased to exist,” and “active/in operation.”

The Ministry of Planning and Investment recently issued Circular No. 01/2021/TT-BKHDT, which took effect on May 1, 2021, promulgating the standard forms to carry out the enterprise registration procedures in line with the 2020 LOE and Decree 1.

Decree 31: Brings clarity to certain key changes under the 2020 LOI

Definition of areas affecting national defense and security. The 2020 LOI newly introduced a regime of investment policies relating to national defense and security. However, in addition to setting out specific areas such as islands, border or coastal areas, the law contains a catch-all provision for “other areas affecting national defense and security.” Due to a lack of clear guidance on how to identity these areas, foreign investors faced difficulties in registering new investment projects or relocating existing projects after the 2020 LOI took effect. These “other areas” are now clearly defined in a closed list under Decree 31, which hopefully can help to resolve the recent issues.

List of business lines subject to market access restrictions for foreign investors. Decree 31 presents a combined list of business lines for which foreign investors are subject to market access restrictions. The list is divided into two sections: the first containing the business lines for which Vietnam has yet to open the market for foreign investment, the second containing those for which foreign investors have to satisfy conditions to enter the market. These conditions typically include restrictions on foreign ownership percentage, form of investment, scope of investment activities, and capacities of the foreign investor and local partners involved in an investment project. Specific conditions for each business line are further governed by and documented in relevant international treaties of which Vietnam is a member, and domestic specialized legal provisions.

Termination of a project as a result of a sham transaction. Following its introduction under the 2020 LOI, Decree 31 further clarifies that a project can be forced to be terminated in part or in whole as a result of a sham transaction in accordance with civil law, pursuant to a court judgment or arbitral award.

To promulgate standard forms for investment procedures in line with the 2020 LOI and Decree 31, the Ministry of Planning and Investment also issued Circular 03/2021/TT-BKHDT on April 9, 2021, which took effect on the same date.

Outlook

All the recent changes under the new legal framework demonstrate the government’s efforts to reduce administrative burden, create a more user-friendly e-government system, attract foreign investors, improve fairness and competitiveness in the market, and gradually ease discrimination between domestic and foreign-invested sectors to observe Vietnam’s commitments under international treaties. However, most of the new provisions are likely to come under close scrutiny, and conflicting interpretations and views can be expected in the immediate future.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

January 26, 2026
Myanmar’s Private Security Services Law, enacted on February 18, 2025, together with its implementing Directive on Applications for a Private Security Services License or Permit issued on June 18, 2025, establishes the country’s first comprehensive regulatory framework for both commercial private security service providers and companies that employ in-house security personnel. The framework applies to both Myanmar and foreign entities. For foreign investors and multinational operators, the new regime introduces strict licensing requirements, local content rules, and various approvals that must be carefully considered as part of business planning and compliance processes. Regulatory Authority and Structure The governing authority under the Private Security Services Law is the Private Security Services Central Supervisory Committee, formed with the minister of the Ministry of Home Affairs (MOHA) as chairperson, the chief of the Myanmar Police Force as vice-chairperson, and members from other high-ranking officials from relevant ministries, such as Transport and Communications, Defense, Planning and Finance, Investment and Foreign Economic Relations, Legal Affairs, Immigration and Population, Labor, and Commerce. This Central Committee is the highest regulatory authority and has the power to adopt policies, approve or reject applications for licenses and permits, and decide appeals against administrative actions taken by Supervisory Committees, which operate under the Central Committee at the state and regional level. They are responsible for processing applications, verifying compliance with statutory requirements, submitting applications to the Central Committee with remarks, and issuing licenses and permits once approved. Supervisory Committees also monitor compliance by license or permit holders and impose administrative penalties for noncompliance, while the Central Committee exercises final decision-making authority. License Requirements for Security Service Providers To apply for a private security services license, companies must be registered under the Myanmar Companies Law. Foreign companies may also operate a private security services business in Myanmar, subject to compliance
January 21, 2026
Spurred by global geopolitics and Canada’s Indo-Pacific Strategy, which aims to forge deeper ties with ASEAN, Canadian companies have been showing growing interest in Thailand and Southeast Asia in recent years. To understand the opportunities offered by the region, we sat down with Andrew Stoutley, a Toronto native and the chief operating officer of Tilleke & Gibbins, a leading Southeast Asian regional law firm with over 130 years of history in Thailand. Q: Why are Canadian companies looking at Thailand and Southeast Asia right now? A: Two reasons stand out. First, diversification has moved up the agenda. Many Canadian companies want options outside North America due to tariff volatility and policy uncertainty in the United States, as well as questions around the next Canada–United States–Mexico Agreement mandatory joint review. At the same time, the shift of global production from China to Southeast Asia is accelerating, driven by rising costs, geopolitics, and the need to avoid overreliance on a single market. As a result, Canadian companies are looking for a second production base or a regional hub, and Thailand and its neighbors are natural choices given their manufacturing depth, location, and established supply chains. Second, Canada’s own efforts in the region are gaining traction. The Indo-Pacific Strategy has led to more on-the-ground support, including larger trade missions, upgraded diplomatic posts, and new financing options. Export Development Canada (EDC) now has a presence in Bangkok, giving Canadian companies a direct line to financing and insurance in Thailand. There’s also steady progress on trade frameworks like the recently signed Canada–Indonesia Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (which will come into effect pending domestic procedures), ongoing negotiations of a Canada–ASEAN FTA, and the exciting announcement about the launch of negotiations of a Canada–Thailand FTA. Together, these developments have the potential to make it much easier
January 20, 2026
Thailand’s Board of Investment (BOI) has imposed new restrictions on foreign-majority shareholding and land ownership for companies in certain promoted activities. The changes took effect on September 1, 2025, but were not published in the Government Gazette until December 30, 2025, under Notification of the Board of Investment No. Sor. 7/2568 on the Amendment to List of Activities Eligible for Investment Promotion under Notification of the Board of Investment No. 9/2565, dated July 22, 2025. Foreign Land Ownership Restrictions Generally, foreign land ownership is one of the privileges granted to BOI-promoted companies, allowing them to own land to engage in the promoted activities. However, with these new restrictions, the BOI will no longer grant land-ownership privileges to foreign-majority-owned companies that conduct business activities in the following categories: Rolling, drawing, casting, or forging of nonferrous metals (category 5.4.9) Manufacturing of ferrous metal products or ferrous metal parts (category 5.4.11.2) Manufacturing of nonferrous metal products and/or nonferrous metal parts for industrial use (category 5.4.11.4) Manufacturing of other metal products, including other metal parts for industrial use (category 5.4.11.5) Manufacture of chemical products for industry (category 6.2) Manufacture of plastic products for industrial goods and parts (category 6.4.1) These restrictions do not apply to existing BOI-promoted companies that have at least three projects granted promotion under the same juristic person during the past 15 years (2011–2025) with total investment of at least THB 5 billion, excluding the cost of land and working capital. Foreign Shareholding Restrictions For companies to be eligible for BOI promotion in three other categories of business activities, at least 51% of the company’s registered capital must be held by Thai individual shareholders, unless the BOI-promoted activity is located within a special border economic zone as designated by the BOI. These three categories are: Manufacture of bags made of
January 6, 2026
Thailand is developing new legislation on responsible business conduct that would impose statutory obligations on large enterprises to manage human rights and environmental risks throughout their operations and supply chains. The Draft Act on the Promotion of Responsible Business Conduct, commonly referred to as the Human Rights and Environmental Due Diligence (HRDD) Bill, has been developed through extensive consultation involving a wide range of stakeholders, with the Ministry of Justice playing a leading role. If enacted, the HRDD bill would reshape how certain large businesses operate and manage their supply chains, reflecting a recognition of international standards and global concerns regarding human rights and environmental protection. By introducing legally binding due diligence obligations, the draft aims to ensure that businesses operating in Thailand are held accountable for adverse impacts throughout their operations and supply chains, in line with emerging global legal frameworks. Who Will Have to Comply? The HRDD bill primarily targets large enterprises based on their annual revenue thresholds: Manufacturing businesses with annual revenue exceeding THB 500 million Wholesale, retail, or service businesses with annual revenue exceeding THB 300 million The draft would also cover state-owned enterprises and foreign businesses operating in Thailand if their operations meet the applicable revenue thresholds. What Does Human Rights and Environmental Due Diligence Involve? Under the HRDD bill, due diligence is not a one-time checklist but an ongoing process with several key requirements: Adopt and publicly disclose a sustainability policy. Businesses must commit publicly to respecting human rights and protecting the environment, and must integrate this policy into corporate governance and risk management systems. Identify and assess risks. Companies must identify and assess risks of human rights violations and environmental harm across their operations and value chains. Prevent or reduce risks. Businesses must implement effective and proportionate measures to prevent or mitigate