You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

November 27, 2013

New Decree on Foreign Workers in Vietnam

Informed Counsel

Following adoption of the new Labor Code (in force since May 1, 2013), the government of Vietnam recently issued Decree 102/2013/ND-CP (Decree 102) elaborating the Labor Code’s provisions on foreign nationals working in the country. Under Decree 102, which took effect on November 1, 2013, employers using foreign workers will be required to submit an annual “foreign labor demand report” to the local authorities. While the Decree adds some clarity with regard to issuance and reissuance of work permits and eligibility for work permit exemption, some uncertainties remain as to its application and interpretation.

Work Permit Eligibility

To qualify for a work permit in Vietnam, a foreign worker must, among other conditions: (1) be capable of civil acts; (2) undergo a health check (in his/her home country or in Vietnam); and (3) have a clean criminal record. Under the previous decree on foreign workers, those who qualified as managers, executive officers, or experts were eligible for work permits. Decree 102 retains those categories but adds the new category of technicians, defined as those who have undergone technical training for at least one year and have worked in their field for at least three years.

The Decree defines foreign “experts” as: (1) workers who are recognized by a foreign country as experts, or (2) workers having at least an engineering degree, bachelor’s degree, or the equivalent, and at least five years of working experience in the field in which they were trained. But the Decree does not clarify how a foreign worker is to be recognized as an “expert” in a foreign country or what kind of proof is required, nor does it define “managers” or “executive officers.”

New “Foreign Labor Demand Report” Requirement

While it is indeed a positive development that Decree 102 expands the list of foreign workers eligible for a work permit, the procedure for obtaining one has become more complicated with the requirement of an annual “foreign labor demand report.”

Decree 102 confirms the Labor Code’s provisions that employers (with some exceptions) are to report their demand for foreign workers in respect of positions for which qualified Vietnamese workers cannot be found. These reports must be sent annually by the employer to the Chairman of the provincial People’s Committee, which is to issue written approval to the employer for employing foreign workers for each position. This written approval must be submitted along with the work permit application for each foreign worker. If the employer’s need for foreign workers changes, it must notify the Chairman of the provincial People’s Committee of such changes.

Additional Categories for Work Permit Exemption

The Labor Code already exempts certain categories of foreign workers from the work permit requirement, such as capital-contributing members or owners of limited liability companies, members of the board of management of shareholding companies, and lawyers licensed by the relevant Vietnamese authority. Decree 102 adds to this list a number of new categories, including: (1) those whose have been licensed by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to act as journalists; (2) teachers at international schools under the management of diplomatic missions or international organizations; (3) volunteers; and (4) persons with master’s degrees or higher who come to Vietnam for a maximum of 30 days to provide consultancy services, to teach, or to conduct research at universities.

Foreign nationals entering Vietnam to work for a period of less than three months, however, are no longer exempted from the work permit requirement, as was the case under the previous law. As a result, foreign nationals coming to Vietnam must, in accordance with Decree 102, have a work permit or business visa regardless of how long they intend to work in Vietnam (unless otherwise exempted).

Decree 102 also introduces some changes as to the procedure for obtaining a work permit exemption. The foreign national’s employer must request the relevant labor authority to certify in writing that the foreign national satisfies the conditions for exemption. Previously, the employer had only to report to the labor authorities that the foreign worker was eligible for an exemption. In order to obtain a work permit exemption certificate, however, the applicant is no longer required to legalize the foreign documents in the application file—only translation into Vietnamese and a relatively simple authentication process in Vietnam of such documents is required. Moreover, fewer documents are required in order to obtain a confirmation of a work permit exemption. Previously, the same set of documents required for a work permit was required for a work permit exemption. It is not entirely clear, however, which documents must be provided, but interestingly, the Decree appears not to require that a copy of the approved “foreign labor demand report” be submitted.

Replacing an Expired Work Permit

The new Labor Code abolished the possibility of applying for extension of expired work permits; the maximum term of a work permit is now two years. However, under Decree 102, a foreign worker whose work permit will expire may apply for reissuance of the work permit. The duration of a reissued work permit is, again, a maximum of two years. A work permit that has expired shall be reissued within three business days from the date the relevant authorities receive a complete application for reissuance.

Another positive change introduced by Decree 102 is that the employer, in the case of expired work permits, will not have to submit a training contract for a Vietnamese national to replace the foreign employee in order to obtain a reissued work permit.

Conclusion

While Decree 102 contains some positive developments, such as expanding the categories of workers eligible for a work permit, and workers exempted from the same, the process of obtaining a work permit or a work permit exemption appears to have tightened up under the new Decree. Moreover, the Decree lacks clarity as to the interpretation of certain terms, as well as the documents required for work permit applications or exemptions.  A circular on foreign workers, expected to be issued later this year, may provide some clarity and guidance in this regard.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

April 3, 2023
Most employers know that terminating employees for poor job performance is not easy. But it is actually legally possible—if employers have the right approach and take specific precautionary measures. However, failing to take these precautions can mean that an employer is either stuck with an incompetent employee or on the losing end of a lawsuit for unfair termination. This article will lay out some essential considerations for employers in Thailand regarding termination of employment for poor performance. First, understand that “poor work performance” is a lack of performance or ability, or an inability to work with other employees. It does not constitute a violation of work rules or regulations. In some cases, however, an employee’s failure to act in accordance with lawful instructions or commands of the employer, resulting in poor work performance, could also be considered a violation of work rules or regulations. This may be the case if the work rules or regulations clearly state that an employee must strictly comply with the employer’s instructions or commands. Second, an employer can, in fact, terminate an employee due to poor work performance. For example, this may be possible in the following scenarios: Records show that an employee’s work performance has fallen below the employer’s required standards, and the employee has not tried to improve his or her work performance for three consecutive years. In addition, it does not appear that the employer was biased when giving ratings or scores for the employee’s work performance. The job description of the employee includes coordination with employees in other departments, but the employee has not been able to do so. Therefore, the employee was reassigned to a new job function, but the employee still did not improve. This suggests that the employee has a lack of interpersonal skills and is not
March 23, 2023
On March 19, 2023, Thailand’s new work-from-home (WFH) legislation amending the Labour Protection Act (No. 8) B.E. 2566 (2023) was published in the Government Gazette. It will come into effect on April 18, 2023. The amendment aims to enhance employee protections to accord with current global standards, provide alternative working arrangements for employers and employees, increase workforce efficiency, and strengthen employees’ job security and a better quality of life. As we detailed previously, the new WFH legislation allows employers and employees to reach agreements that permit employees to work remotely. Since there are no accompanying criminal punishments relating to this new provision, and the legislation incorporates the term “may agree,” it appears that this WFH provision is not mandatory but is primarily intended to facilitate and encourage remote working agreements between employers and employees. For more details on the WFH legislation, or on any aspect of employment law in Thailand, please contact Tilleke & Gibbins at [email protected].
February 24, 2023
Many companies have moved to Southeast Asia to benefit from the advantages of this vibrant and diverse market. The region is already a manufacturing hub for a multitude of industries—computer and automotive products in Thailand, textiles in Cambodia, and footwear and electrical goods in Vietnam, to name a few—and an increasing number of companies worldwide are reconfiguring their supply chains to include regional suppliers. A key challenge is keeping up to date with employment law trends in these jurisdictions to ensure compliance with local regulations—and avoid costly, time-consuming business interruption. Here we outline trends and recent regulatory developments in Cambodia, Thailand, and Vietnam, and consider what they mean for employers. Cambodia The Ministry of Labour and Vocational Training (MLVT) is likely to pursue a more proactive enforcement strategy in 2023. Last May, the MLVT announced companies would be required to submit a twice yearly self-declaration on labour compliance through a new online system. The self-declaration form requires companies to confirm and upload evidence of compliance, and the MLVT online system—through which the ministry can easily determine if a company is compliant –generates a report that lists all fines. Companies should comply with the self-declaration requirement and carefully review the form to understand what fines will apply for non-compliance. On 1 October 2022, regulations relating to the National Social Security Fund (NSSF) pension system came into effect, and employers and employees began making NSSF pension contributions. Over the next five years, total compulsory pension contributions will amount to 4% of an employee’s wage, half of which is paid by the employer and half deducted from the employee’s salary. The contribution wage is capped at KHR 1.2m (USD 300). Employers are currently required to pay a relatively small amount (KHR 24,000, or around USD 6). This will increase to 10.75% over
January 19, 2023
The Thai parliament has passed the so-called Work from Home Bill—formally known as Labour Protection Act (No. 8) B.E. 2566 (2023)—which amends the country’s Labour Protection Act (LPA) to reflect current circumstances. The accompanying legislative remark states that the proposed amendments to the LPA will provide additional options for work arrangements between employers and employees, upgrade the level of labor protection, increase work stability, and improve quality of life for employees in Thailand. The legislation adds a single section to the LPA providing that an employer and an employee “may agree in the employment contract” that the employee is allowed “to bring work . . . to perform at home or at the residence of the employee or anywhere that the employee can work remotely through information technology, if the nature of the work permits.” The provision further provides that employers are responsible for ensuring that remote work agreements are in writing, either physically or electronically, and may include the following details: Period of the agreement; Normal working hours, rest periods, and overtime work; Criteria for overtime work, holiday work, and various types of leave; Scope of work and control or supervision by the employer; and Responsibility for arranging supplies and equipment, including necessary costs relating to the work. The amended LPA gives employees who work from home the right to refuse contact from the employer or the supervisor beyond working hours. In addition, employers must treat remote employees equally to on-premise employees. The most notable question surrounding this legislation is whether employers must allow employees to work remotely. The phrase “may agree” suggests that employers do not have to agree to allow an employee to work remotely. Another important aspect of the amendment is that there is no criminal punishment attached to it, which suggests that the legislation