You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

June 3, 2016

Myanmar’s Condominium Law of 2016: A Foundation for Foreign Investment

Informed Counsel

In 2011, when Myanmar embarked on a series of political and economic reforms, there was a surge in demand for real estate. Demand quickly outpaced supply, resulting in an undersupply of quality office space and housing. By 2014, rental prices in Yangon’s prime areas had climbed to as high as USD 100 per square meter, rivaling those found in lower Manhattan and over three times those in prime areas of Bangkok. More recently, the combined effects of oversupply and Myanmar’s undeveloped real estate laws have led to a softening of the real estate market, causing rental prices in many high-end developments to fall.

Recognizing the need to encourage real estate investment and to support the development of a more robust legal structure focused on the industry, on January 22, 2016, the government passed the Condominium Law. In this article, we provide an overview of the law and highlight areas which may need further refinement.

Overview

The Condominium Law, for the first time, allows foreign nationals to legally purchase condominiums in Myanmar. Total foreign ownership in any one project, however, is limited to 40 percent of total project space. The Condominium Law stipulates criteria necessary for a project to qualify as a condominium suitable for foreign ownership. To qualify under the law, a building must meet the following main requirements:

  • The licensed developer must construct the building on a “collectively owned” land parcel. This is land owned by persons who have obtained an apartment ownership registration certificate. The land must be registered through local authorities as collectively owned land, even if the developers are the actual owners of the land.
  • Before the project is developed, the developer must obtain the approval of the Ministry of Construction to qualify the building as a condominium. After construction is complete and the building is inspected, a “residence permit” must be obtained.
  • The condominium must be constructed on a land mass of at least 0.5 acres or 20,000 feet.

These steps apply to projects that were not in place or under construction at the time the law was enacted. For projects that were commenced or that existed before the law was enacted, a Special Purpose Committee has the authority to review and approve projects as condominiums, provided they meet these main requirements. To date, the process and timelines that the Special Purpose Committee uses to evaluate preexisting projects have not been clearly outlined.

For the first time, the Condominium Law also provides a legal framework allowing the financing of condominiums. Prior to the Condominium Law, buyers of condominiums paid almost exclusively in cash, as financing options were largely unavailable. There is no limitation on financing for foreign buyers, who may seek financing from abroad. However, foreign investors must purchase a condominium through a transfer of funds from abroad, as there is no current allowance for in-country payment.

Challenges

The Condominium Law aims to establish a framework that promotes and facilitates foreign investment in Myanmar’s real estate market. Although this is an important step, there is still some way to go, as the law lacks clarity in certain key areas.

It is uncertain whether existing or developing projects can qualify as condominiums under the Condominium Law. For example, there is significant uncertainty over whether Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) projects, existing or currently under development in Myanmar, will qualify as condominiums under the law.

Many BOT projects are developed on land granted for use by the Myanmar government. The Condominium Law states that the land must be registered as collectively owned for the benefit of the owners, and cannot be the property of a department, organization, or person. The difficulty here is that many buildings that owners want qualified as condominiums are currently being built under BOT projects on land which is owned by Myanmar government entities.

There has been significant public debate over whether an exception should be granted to allow these projects to qualify as condominiums under the law. No such exception has been provided to date, although government officials have tried to assuage investor fears by saying that the ministries that own the land on which these projects are built would have the authority to give permission to register those lands as required by the law. This may provide a practical solution, but it does not directly address this issue.

Another issue that the Condominium Law does not address is whether there are any limitations on commercial use by foreign owners of units registered under the law, whether by the owner or lessee. Potential investors should consult relevant authorities before committing to long-term investment in a commercial enterprise that involves the Condominium Law.

In addition, while there are general provisions stating that there is a process through which a project can qualify as a condominium with the approval of a Management or Special Committee, the law is silent on what the process entails, leaving the details for development by the committees. Until this process is clarified, investors should take a cautious approach. This is particularly important as it relates to possible investment in developing or existing projects reviewed by the Special Purpose Committee.

Other concerns include the fate of projects which have halted or have been suspended because of discovered zoning infringements. Zoning infringements were overlooked for many years, but under the new democratically elected government, Myanmar’s zoning laws have been more heavily enforced. As a result, some high-profile projects have been suspended. While this is expected to benefit the industry in the long term, in the interim potential investors should conduct thorough due diligence on a project, the developer, and the chain of land titles and registrations.

Outlook

The passage of the new Condominium Law represents another important effort to encourage foreign investment and economic development in Myanmar. While it is uncertain whether some pre-existing projects can qualify for condominium classification and whether certain commercial ventures will be permitted, the Condominium Law nonetheless opens an additional market for foreign investment in Myanmar.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

July 3, 2026
Thailand will keep its reduced government fees for property sale and mortgage registration in place for another year. Two Ministry of Interior notifications, issued following a cabinet resolution on June 30, 2026, and published in the Government Gazette on July 1, 2026, extend the previously reduced fee levels through June 30, 2027. The reduced registration fees apply to the sale and mortgage of the same property types covered in prior versions of the scheme: detached houses, semidetached houses, row houses, commercial buildings, land transferred together with such buildings, and condominium units. To be eligible for the reduced fees, the purchase price, the officially assessed value, and the mortgage amount must each not exceed THB 7 million, and the buyer must be a Thai individual. The reduced registration fees for eligible sales and mortgages are calculated as follows: Sale: 0.01% of the official assessed value (reduced from standard rate of 2%) Mortgage: 0.01% of the mortgage amount (reduced from standard rate of 1%) The reduced mortgage registration fee applies only if the mortgage is registered at the same time as the sale of the property.
April 30, 2026
Thailand’s Long-Term Resident (LTR) Visa regime offers an attractive immigration pathway for qualifying foreign nationals, providing a 10-year renewable permission to stay in Thailand. Following amendments under Board of Investment (BOI) Announcement No. Por. 3/2568 dated February 4, 2025, the regime now more explicitly accommodates property investment as a qualifying vehicle—a development of particular relevance to foreign nationals already considering real estate acquisitions in Thailand. The LTR Visa is available to several categories of applicants, including wealthy global citizens with global assets of at least USD 1 million, and wealthy pensioners aged 50 or older with an annual pension or fixed income of at least USD 40,000. Property as a Qualifying Investment For both categories, property investment is recognized as one of three eligible investment types alongside Thai government bonds (with at least five years remaining to maturity) and direct investments in Thai companies or approved venture capital or private equity vehicles. The minimum qualifying property investment is USD 500,000 for wealthy global citizens and USD 250,000 for wealthy pensioners. Eligible property types include freehold condominiums, buildings, or villas, as well as leasehold properties with a remaining lease term of at least 10 years. Health Coverage Requirement Beyond the investment threshold, applicants must demonstrate adequate health coverage. This requirement can be satisfied through a health insurance policy covering at least USD 50,000 in Thai medical expenses with at least 10 months of remaining coverage, evidence of social security benefits covering Thai medical costs, or a bank deposit of at least USD 100,000 retained for 12 months. Practical Considerations For foreign nationals already considering property acquisitions in prime residential markets—where investment values commonly meet or exceed the USD 500,000 threshold—the visa pathway effectively transforms a real estate purchase into a dual-purpose investment, combining asset ownership with long-term residence rights that
April 7, 2026
Real estate law specialists from Tilleke & Gibbins provided the chapter on Vietnam for Practical Law’s Commercial Real Estate Global Guide 2026, a comparative jurisdictional guide in Q&A format giving a high-level overview of real estate investment structures, restrictions on foreign ownership, and other important issues of real estate law. The main topics include the following: Real estate investment Title to real estate Sale of real estate Real estate tax Real estate finance Real estate leases Planning and development controls To read the Vietnam chapter, please visit the Practical Law website and enroll in the free Practical Law trial to gain full access.
February 25, 2026
In December 2025, the National Assembly of Vietnam enacted a new Law on Construction, replacing the 2014 Law on Construction as amended in 2020. The 2025 Law on Construction will, in principle, take effect on July 1, 2026, subject to certain exceptions. Among its notable reforms, one development has attracted particular attention from both legal practitioners and market participants: the introduction of a statutory framework governing predetermined damages, commonly referred to as “liquidated damages.” This marks the first time liquidated damages have been expressly recognized at the level of primary legislation in Vietnam. While liquidated damages clauses have long been a common feature of construction contracts in practice, their legal enforceability has historically been subject to uncertainty. Although the new provision appears to represent a positive step toward greater legal clarity, it remains an open question whether it is sufficient, on its own, to provide a solid legal basis for the enforceability of liquidated damages clauses in construction disputes in Vietnam. What’s New? Article 86.2 of the 2025 Law on Construction provides (emphasis added): “Compensation for damages shall be determined on the basis of actual damages [or] predetermined damages corresponding to obligations under the construction contracts that are breached [and] the extent of such breaches.” This provision is significant in that it expressly recognizes predetermined damages, or liquidated damages, as a lawful basis for determining compensation for damage. However, the new law does not define “predetermined damages.” The absence of a statutory definition creates potential ambiguity as to the scope and nature of this concept and may give rise to disputes over how—and whether—a particular contractual clause qualifies as predetermined damages for the purposes of Article 86.2. Further, Article 86.2 qualifies the application of predetermined damages by requiring that such damages correspond to the obligations not fulfilled and the