You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

May 28, 2015

Myanmar Moves to Reform Labor Laws

Informed Counsel

Attention has been focused on Myanmar as it seeks to liberalize its economy after decades of isolation. Influenced in part by its regional ASEAN commitments, Myanmar has promoted significant change in its foreign investment laws and regulations, resulting in substantial increases in foreign investment. The increased investment has, in turn, created a demand for both low- and high-skilled labor and a need for effective laws to regulate the labor market. In response to these demands, the Thein Sein government has been working to both evaluate existing legislation and pass new labor laws which are representative of current global standards.

There is no single umbrella legislation applicable to all labor sectors. Rather, existing laws are a confluence of many different legal influences, with some laws dating back to the days of colonization. This is an overview of Myanmar’s recent labor law developments and the key issues facing employers.

Legislative Development

Myanmar’s labor laws span three defined eras. These include the pre-independence era, which dates back to the nineteenth century and is characterized by numerous substantive laws that are mostly still in use; the post-independence era, which is characterized by rigid military rule, a lack of robust development in labor law, and the passage of a few notable laws such as the Factories Act (1951), the Shops and Establishments Act (1951), and the Leave and Holidays Act (1951); and the most recent era of economic liberalization fostered by the current civilian government, which has set out to modernize Myanmar’s labor laws as part of the government’s objectives to promote investment and align the country with international labor standards. Policymakers understand that Myanmar’s labor laws are outdated and are dedicated to changing the system.

One step toward such change is the passage of the Employment and Skill Development Law (2013), a unique piece of legislation which places an obligation on employers to train and develop employees. Employers are expected to provide opportunities for training programs in accordance with guidelines set by a statutory skill development team which oversees these initiatives. Training can be provided on the job, outside the workplace, or through workshops conducted by an employer.

The law also sets out minimum requirements for employment contracts. The Department of Labor has recently hinted that it may become necessary to seek prior approval or to submit a copy of employment contracts for their review—an approach that has garnered much opposition. If the government does indeed issue a ministerial notification to implement such a requirement, it would place a regulatory burden on employers and hinder the fluidity of the labor market.

Other important laws include the Labor Organization Law, the Social Security Law, and the Settlement of Labor Dispute Law & Rules. The Ministry of Labor, Employment, and Social Security has been instrumental in the implementation of these laws. The Social Security Law allows employees to seek to obtain cash benefits for sickness, maternity, confinement, retirement, and for funerals. The social security fund is formed with contributions from both the employer and the employee—the employee contributes 2 percent of monthly wages and the employer is obligated to contribute an amount that equals 3 percent of an employee’s monthly wages to the fund. A unique feature of this legislation is that it includes an unemployment benefit insurance scheme which ensures that unemployed persons receive cash benefits.

Labor Law Updates

Recently, the Myanmar government has focused more attention on the effective resolution of labor disputes to avoid a repeat of the disruptive strikes that occurred in the Shwe Pyi Thar Industrial Zone in February and March 2015. This has included a focus on the use of The Settlement of Labor Dispute Law (2012), which mandates parties to consider using negotiation, conciliation, and arbitration as a first step before resorting to lock-outs and strikes.

Unfortunately, many employers and employees have ignored the rules and regulations that are in place to promote the peaceful resolution of disputes. In response to this, the government has recently set out to remedy the problem and promote dispute resolution. In a progressive move, the Ministry of Labor has established a Dispute Settlement Arbitration Council, a quasi-judicial body for resolving labor disputes, to save parties the time and expense of formal litigation in the courts. Participation, however, is not mandatory and parties must agree to amicably settle their disputes with the Council. The government has focused its efforts on communicating the benefits that come from use of the Council to stakeholders. 

With regard to the regulation of wages, the Law on Minimum Wages was passed in 2013, but the implementation of legislation establishing an official minimum wage rate remains pending in Parliament. While a government-designated committee is presently conducting extensive research into determining a suitable statutory minimum wage rate, no such rate has yet been established. There is an ongoing consultation meeting to arrive at minimum wage rates at the state and regional level. While statutory guidance is expected soon, employers may refer to these figures to calculate minimum wages. 

The Road Forward

As Myanmar focuses on modernizing its labor laws, the changes its government makes will influence the decisions foreign investors make in the future. Employers invest heavily in both the skilled and unskilled labor markets, and therefore, laws that are clear, fair, and in line with global standards are essential for most foreign investors.

For a relatively young economy like that in Myanmar, the standardization of labor laws is important to continue to attract foreign investment, particularly in the labor-intensive manufacturing and retail sectors. Myanmar’s labor laws and regulatory framework must continue to evolve and balance the needs of both employers and employees in creating an environment for productive employment and economic advancement.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

October 12, 2023
Myanmar has made important amendments to its minimum wage framework by increasing the minimum compensation for workers in both the public and private sectors. Background In May 2018, the National Committee for Setting the Minimum Wage determined that all workers in Myanmar should receive a minimum wage of MMK 4,800 per day (approx. USD 2.29), equivalent to MMK 600 per hour for an eight-hour workday. This rule applied to all workers, without differentiation in location or job. Government Workers and Organizations In September 2023, the Ministry of Planning and Finance announced that daily workers in government departments and organizations are entitled to receive an additional benefit of MMK 1,000 on top of their existing daily wage, which was already MMK 4,800. Consequently, they could earn a total of MMK 5,800 per day for eight hours of work. Private-Sector Workers On October 9, 2023, the national committee announced an increase of minimum wages for employees in the private sector. According to Notification No. 2/2023, workers at private-sector employers with more than 10 employees are now entitled to minimum compensation of MMK 5,800 per day (approx. USD 2.77)—an additional MMK 1,000 per eight-hour workday over the previously established minimum wage. The changes took effect on October 1, 2023. For more details about these changes, or any aspect of employee compensation or employment law in Myanmar, please contact Tilleke & Gibbins at [email protected].
August 18, 2023
On August 16, 2023, Laos’ Prime Minister’s Office issued Notice No. 1502/PMO, which increases the minimum wage for all workers in Laos. This increase is a continuation of the stepped increases in the minimum wage that began in mid-2022. The recent notice increases the minimum monthly wage from LAK 1,300,000 (approx. USD 66) to LAK 1,600,000 (approx. USD 82), in accordance with an agreement reached in the government’s ordinary session in July 2023. The new minimum wage rate will take effect on October 1, 2023. This is the third minimum wage increase in Laos since June 2022. Two of the main factors responsible for this heightened frequency of minimum wage increases are the depreciation of the Lao kip against foreign currencies and inflation in the price of goods for daily consumption. These stepped increases also show the government’s proactive approach toward addressing the cost-of-living crisis in Laos and its effect on low-wage workers. For more details on the new minimum wage, or on any other labor and employment matters in Laos, please contact Dino Santaniello at [email protected] or +856 21 262 355.
July 7, 2023
Tilleke & Gibbins is pleased to announce the release of Employment Law Basics in Southeast Asia. This publication serves as an indispensable resource for businesses navigating the complex landscape of employment law in Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam. Authored by Tilleke & Gibbins’ regional team of employment law specialists, the guide provides a detailed overview of key employment law topics essential for businesses operating or planning to expand their operations in Southeast Asia. From employment contracts to termination procedures, each topic is examined in depth to ensure businesses are well-equipped to comply with local regulations and protect their interests. Key topics covered in the guide include: Employment contracts Probationary period Minimum wage Social security and statutory payments Working hours Leave and holidays Work rules Termination Foreign employees Data protection Remote work AI and automation Our guide offers multinational corporations establishing a presence in the region and local enterprises alike practical insights and actionable advice tailored to the unique regulatory environments in Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam. To access the full guide, please download the PDF below.
April 28, 2023
Instead of the typical dystopian scene of flames, wastelands of shattered buildings, and robotic overlords policing the remaining humans, our actual dystopian future may be a workplace filled only with men named Jared who once played lacrosse in high school. This may sound far-fetched, but one resume-screening tool was found to be using an algorithm that concluded two factors were most determinative of job performance: the name Jared and a history of playing lacrosse in high school. The frailties of artificial intelligence (AI) systems in recruitment and hiring could transform our workforces in unpredictable ways. If employers blindly follow AI outcomes without a deeper examination of how the algorithmic decision is reached, hiring outcomes may be not only ridiculous but also discriminatory. Risks of AI-Reliant Hiring Some employers have enthusiastically embraced AI as a way to reduce costs and replace human bias in the recruitment process. Human recruiters do not have a great track record; for example, in France, discrimination in recruitment has posed such a serious problem that the government submits false work biographies with ethnic names to identify and punish employers that unreasonably reject qualified ethnic applicants. Unfortunately, AI is modeled on human thinking, so it may amplify our own prejudices and errant conclusions while giving the appearance of providing a fair and clean process. AI typically learns inductively by training on examples and historical data. Factors such as exclusion of certain groups from educational or career opportunities has often shaped this data, so AI’s decisions may amplify this past prejudice. For instance, Amazon experimented with mechanized recruitment in 2014, but abandoned these efforts prior to implementation after the AI tool selected a predominantly male workforce. The AI learned by analyzing patterns in resumes submitted to the company over the last 10 years. Since over this period