You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

December 12, 2018

Myanmar Minimum Wage and Employment Contracts: Steps Towards HR Management Modernization

Bangkok Post

As Myanmar steadily develops after rejoining the global economic community, foreign investors are becoming more and more interested in doing business here, thanks, in part, to the low cost of labour and high potential for growth. Any investor interested in doing so however should be aware of the speed of legal change here, and be careful to keep up-to-date.

Myanmar’s employment law is based on a bedrock of old (sometimes colonial) legislation that is progressively being superseded by modern laws and regulations. It can also, at times, be heavily affected by the internal policies and practices of the Department of Labour of the Ministry of Labour, Immigration and Population (commonly referred to as the Ministry of Labour). Therefore, it is very important for companies to be aware not only of the latest legislation as it modernizes, but also of the workings of the Ministry of Labour. More importantly, it is vital to keep abreast of new legislation, or Ministry of Labour policy, in order to remain compliant in this rapidly developing environment.

This article provides two recent examples of legislative change—the first showing how rapidly the economy can affect legislation, and the second showing the sometimes idiosyncratic nature of rapidly developing law.

Myanmar’s Minimum Wage

A minimum wage was first introduced in Myanmar in September 2015, at a rate of MMK 450 (approximately USD 0.28) per hour and MMK 3,600 (approximately USD 2.25) per eight-hour workday. These rates were reassessed this year, after three years of rapid economic growth, in an attempt to catch up with and continue the fast-paced development of the country.

A proposal to increase the minimum wage was released in January 2018, leading to debates between employers, workers, and government representatives. Following those discussions, the National Committee for the Minimum Wage issued Notification 2/2018 on May 14, 2018, which entered into force on the same date.

The notification sets new minimum wage rates of MMK 600 (approximately USD 0.37) per hour and MMK 4,800 (approximately USD 3.00) per eight-hour workday. The definition of the minimum wage does not include overtime, bonuses, incentives, or any other allowances, which must therefore be considered separately. Additionally, under the definition of “minimum wage”, part-time workers qualify and must be paid on a prorated basis. Finally, a new minimum wage rate must be enacted every two years.

The notification—and therefore the minimum wage—applies to all businesses in Myanmar with 10 or more employees, irrespective of the location or type of work.

The notification provides a 33 percent increase from the previous minimum wage, and is the first revision of minimum wage since its introduction in Myanmar in 2015. Even with the considerable increase it remains one of the lowest minimum wages in the region, but is written in such a manner as to push further rapid reforms in future.  

Employment Contracts—Registration and Templates

Pursuant to Section 5(a) of the Employment and Skills Development Law (Law No. 29 of 2013), an enterprise must enter into written employment contracts with its employees within 30 days of employment. Unusually, the employment contract must then be submitted to the relevant Township Labour Office for registration, and any employment contracts that are not registered may be declared void. Companies are not required to register an employment contract during an employee’s probationary period (which must not exceed three months), but wages for work performed during the probationary period must be paid at a rate of at least 75 percent of the employee’s basic salary.  

Employment contracts must include the fundamental terms and conditions of the employment and specific contractual terms laid out in the employment law. Some of the necessary contractual terms include, among other things: type of employment, salary, employment location, working hours, overtime hours, days off, holidays, leave, medical treatment, resignation or termination, term (i.e. length) of employment, and the responsibilities of each party.

Further to these requirements, in August 2015, the Ministry of Labour issued a notification stating that all employees must use an employment contract template drafted by the government, to ensure that minimum employment standards are met. All companies with more than five employees, including private entities and foreign companies in Myanmar, are expected to oblige by this notification and adopt the contract template. Any addition or deviation from the template must be reflected in a separate annex which must be approved by the relevant Township Labour Office. Any employer that fails to sign an employment contract may be punished with imprisonment up to six months or, a fine, or both. Doubling down on this unusual requirement, a revised version of the Standard Employment Contract Template was announced on August 28, 2017.

Ministry of Labour policy requires these contracts to be in Myanmar language or bilingual (in both Myanmar language and English) when they are registered. In addition, at least three originals are to be executed: one for the employee, one for the employer, and one to be submitted to the Township Labour Office.

Moving forward

Over the past few years, Myanmar has experienced rapid political and economic changes, which have, in turn, strengthened and improved the country’s legal framework. These changes are a mark of strong development, but also mark a need for caution by investors. The law changes as quickly as the steadily improving economy, and sometimes with surprising results.

This story was originally published in the Bangkok Post and is reproduced here with permission and thanks. The original story can be viewed here on the Bangkok Post website.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

June 4, 2026
On May 19, 2026, the Cabinet of the Royal Thai Government approved, in principle, revisions to Thailand’s visa exemption scheme and visa on arrival (VOA) program, as proposed by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Tourism and Sports. The revisions represent a tightening of Thailand’s immigration framework and will affect a broad range of short-term visitors. Background On July 15, 2024, Thailand expanded its visa exemption scheme by increasing the permitted period of visa-exempt stay from 30 days to 60 days in order to promote tourism, support the country’s post-pandemic economic recovery, and facilitate international travel. Under this revised scheme, passport holders from 93 countries and territories (an increase from the previous 57 countries and territories) have been permitted to enter Thailand without a visa and remain in the country for up to 60 days per entry for purposes including tourism, business engagements, urgent work, and ad hoc assignments. In addition, eligible visitors may apply at the Thai Immigration Bureau for a further 30-day extension of stay. Key Changes The proposed revisions would revoke the current 60-day exemption and reinstate the previous stay period, thereby reducing the maximum permitted stay for eligible travelers to 30 days per entry. In addition, the number of countries and territories eligible under the 30-day visa-exemption scheme is expected to be reduced to 54. The scope of the VOA scheme would likewise be significantly narrowed, with the number of eligible countries reduced from 31 countries to just four (Azerbaijan, Belarus, Serbia, and India). Further, Thailand is expected to introduce a new 15-day visa exemption category for nationals of Seychelles, the Maldives, and Mauritius. The revised framework would also limit each country or territory to a single visa exemption privilege in order to simplify Thailand’s immigration framework and reduce overlapping immigration privileges.
April 29, 2026
Vietnam’s education sector is entering a new regulatory era. On December 10, 2025, the National Assembly adopted a series of new and amended laws in the field of education, including the 2025 Law on Vocational Education, the 2025 Law on Higher Education, and the amended Law on Education No. 123/2025/QH15 (Amended Law on Education). These laws together took effect on January 1, 2026, marking a significant reform of Vietnam’s legal framework governing the education sector. The legislative package introduces a new lawmaking approach under which foundational and principle-based provisions are codified in the Amended Law on Education, while the Law on Higher Education and the Law on Vocational Education serve as specialized statutes providing supplementary, sector-specific regulatory detail tailored to their respective subsectors. The Amended Law on Education fundamentally restructures how educational institutions are established, governed, and licensed, with direct implications for private investors, foreign-invested entities, and education service providers operating in Vietnam. Below are several highlights of the key changes under the amended law, especially in the private sector, that stakeholders should understand: Change in the National Education System In addition to primary education, lower secondary (junior high school) education is now compulsory in Vietnam. Accordingly, diplomas are no longer awarded upon completion of lower secondary school but only for upper education levels. The national education system is also expanded through the introduction of vocational high school as a new level of vocational education. Such reform creates additional learning pathways that not only enable learners to pursue both further education and participate in the labor market, but also better align education and training with socioeconomic development needs. New Hurdle for Joint Investors: Mandatory Corporate Entity Requirement Where two or more investors jointly establish an education institution, the investors are no longer permitted to directly establish such an institution.
March 31, 2026
Against the backdrop of Vietnam’s rapid economic and technological transformation and its ambition to build a knowledge-driven economy, the National Assembly of Vietnam adopted Law on Higher Education No. 125/2025/QH15 on December 10, 2025, The new law took effect on January 1, 2026, replacing Law on Higher Education No. 08/2012/QH13 of 2012 and its subsequent amendments after more than a decade of implementation. The new law reflects a significant policy shift toward enhancing the institutional autonomy of higher education institutions (“HEIs”)—universities and other university-level institutions. By granting broader autonomy, Vietnam aims to enable HEIs to operate more proactively, better respond to market needs, and improve the quality and efficiency of education and research activities. Comprehensive Institutional Autonomy in HEIs The new law marks a significant shift by granting HEIs comprehensive autonomy as a statutory right, within the bounds of the licensed scope of educational operation and the legal framework, rather than a conditional right as provided under the former law. Under the new law, HEIs are empowered to exercise autonomy over their academic expertise, training, scientific research, international cooperation, organizational structure, personnel, finance, and other higher education activities. The expansion of institutional autonomy is also accompanied by a correspondingly strengthened framework of institutional accountability. However, Vietnam maintains a certain degree of control and imposes restrictions on institutional autonomy in sensitive and strategically important areas. These controls and restrictions include limitations on training autonomy in the majors of teacher training, national defense, and security; and restrictions on financial and personnel management autonomy for HEIs under the administration of the Ministry of National Defense and the Ministry of Public Security. New Model for Curriculum Development The new law removes the concept of “opening a training major” and focuses regulation on how training programs are developed and delivered. Under the previous regime,
March 31, 2026
On December 10, 2025, the National Assembly of Vietnam adopted Law on Vocational Education No. 124/2025/QH15, which took effect on January 1, 2026, replacing Law on Vocational Education No. 74/2014/QH13 of 2014. The new law broadens the categories of institutions eligible to deliver vocational training, introduces vocational upper secondary schools, and shifts governance structures for private institutions from ownership-representative boards of management to stakeholder-based school councils. These reforms aim to diversify training providers, align programs with labor market needs, and create a more flexible, open vocational education ecosystem, offering expanded opportunities for foreign and domestic investors, universities, and enterprises. Some highlights of the new Law on Vocational Education are presented below. Expansion of Vocational Training Levels and Programs In addition to elementary, intermediate, and college—the three levels of vocational training program set out under the 2014 Law on Vocational Education—the new law expands the structure by introducing two new levels: Vocational high school training programs are placed between elementary and intermediate levels, and are aimed at combining upper secondary education with vocational training, expanding options for learners after graduating from the lower secondary level. Other vocational training programs are not specified in detail under the new law, but aim to equip learners with the capability to perform and handle one or several simple tasks of an occupation. Expansion of Vocational Education Providers The new law reclassifies and extends vocational education providers by classifying them into two distinct categories: Vocational education institutions, which include colleges, intermediate schools, and vocational high schools. Establishments participating in vocational education activities, which include vocational education centers, vocational-continuing education centers, continuing education centers, other centers with vocational education functions, enterprises, cooperatives, and higher education institutions. Vocational education providers may provide one vocational training level only, or several/all levels, depending on the type of provider. The