You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

December 12, 2018

Myanmar Minimum Wage and Employment Contracts: Steps Towards HR Management Modernization

Bangkok Post

As Myanmar steadily develops after rejoining the global economic community, foreign investors are becoming more and more interested in doing business here, thanks, in part, to the low cost of labour and high potential for growth. Any investor interested in doing so however should be aware of the speed of legal change here, and be careful to keep up-to-date.

Myanmar’s employment law is based on a bedrock of old (sometimes colonial) legislation that is progressively being superseded by modern laws and regulations. It can also, at times, be heavily affected by the internal policies and practices of the Department of Labour of the Ministry of Labour, Immigration and Population (commonly referred to as the Ministry of Labour). Therefore, it is very important for companies to be aware not only of the latest legislation as it modernizes, but also of the workings of the Ministry of Labour. More importantly, it is vital to keep abreast of new legislation, or Ministry of Labour policy, in order to remain compliant in this rapidly developing environment.

This article provides two recent examples of legislative change—the first showing how rapidly the economy can affect legislation, and the second showing the sometimes idiosyncratic nature of rapidly developing law.

Myanmar’s Minimum Wage

A minimum wage was first introduced in Myanmar in September 2015, at a rate of MMK 450 (approximately USD 0.28) per hour and MMK 3,600 (approximately USD 2.25) per eight-hour workday. These rates were reassessed this year, after three years of rapid economic growth, in an attempt to catch up with and continue the fast-paced development of the country.

A proposal to increase the minimum wage was released in January 2018, leading to debates between employers, workers, and government representatives. Following those discussions, the National Committee for the Minimum Wage issued Notification 2/2018 on May 14, 2018, which entered into force on the same date.

The notification sets new minimum wage rates of MMK 600 (approximately USD 0.37) per hour and MMK 4,800 (approximately USD 3.00) per eight-hour workday. The definition of the minimum wage does not include overtime, bonuses, incentives, or any other allowances, which must therefore be considered separately. Additionally, under the definition of “minimum wage”, part-time workers qualify and must be paid on a prorated basis. Finally, a new minimum wage rate must be enacted every two years.

The notification—and therefore the minimum wage—applies to all businesses in Myanmar with 10 or more employees, irrespective of the location or type of work.

The notification provides a 33 percent increase from the previous minimum wage, and is the first revision of minimum wage since its introduction in Myanmar in 2015. Even with the considerable increase it remains one of the lowest minimum wages in the region, but is written in such a manner as to push further rapid reforms in future.  

Employment Contracts—Registration and Templates

Pursuant to Section 5(a) of the Employment and Skills Development Law (Law No. 29 of 2013), an enterprise must enter into written employment contracts with its employees within 30 days of employment. Unusually, the employment contract must then be submitted to the relevant Township Labour Office for registration, and any employment contracts that are not registered may be declared void. Companies are not required to register an employment contract during an employee’s probationary period (which must not exceed three months), but wages for work performed during the probationary period must be paid at a rate of at least 75 percent of the employee’s basic salary.  

Employment contracts must include the fundamental terms and conditions of the employment and specific contractual terms laid out in the employment law. Some of the necessary contractual terms include, among other things: type of employment, salary, employment location, working hours, overtime hours, days off, holidays, leave, medical treatment, resignation or termination, term (i.e. length) of employment, and the responsibilities of each party.

Further to these requirements, in August 2015, the Ministry of Labour issued a notification stating that all employees must use an employment contract template drafted by the government, to ensure that minimum employment standards are met. All companies with more than five employees, including private entities and foreign companies in Myanmar, are expected to oblige by this notification and adopt the contract template. Any addition or deviation from the template must be reflected in a separate annex which must be approved by the relevant Township Labour Office. Any employer that fails to sign an employment contract may be punished with imprisonment up to six months or, a fine, or both. Doubling down on this unusual requirement, a revised version of the Standard Employment Contract Template was announced on August 28, 2017.

Ministry of Labour policy requires these contracts to be in Myanmar language or bilingual (in both Myanmar language and English) when they are registered. In addition, at least three originals are to be executed: one for the employee, one for the employer, and one to be submitted to the Township Labour Office.

Moving forward

Over the past few years, Myanmar has experienced rapid political and economic changes, which have, in turn, strengthened and improved the country’s legal framework. These changes are a mark of strong development, but also mark a need for caution by investors. The law changes as quickly as the steadily improving economy, and sometimes with surprising results.

This story was originally published in the Bangkok Post and is reproduced here with permission and thanks. The original story can be viewed here on the Bangkok Post website.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

October 25, 2021
Michael Ramirez, a counsel in Tilleke & Gibbins’ dispute resolution group in Bangkok, has updated the firm’s contribution to the Global Attorney-Client Privilege Guide, published by Lex Mundi. The newly expanded guide provides information on what constitutes attorney-client privilege in over 70 countries around the world. The Thailand section of the guide contains in-depth information on the function and applications of attorney-client privilege in Thailand (or, as explained in the guide, an equivalent concept enshrined in Thai law), including coverage of the following topics: Privilege in corporations Common interest doctrine Litigation funding Crime-fraud exception Work product doctrine/litigation privilege Other privileges including mediation, accountant-client and settlement negotiation The interactive guide features expert contributions by Lex Mundi member firms from jurisdictions worldwide. Readers can browse the contributions, generate country-specific reports, and compare attorney-client privilege in multiple jurisdictions. For more information, please visit the Lex Mundi website.
October 14, 2021
As part of its membership in Lex Mundi, Tilleke & Gibbins has published an updated edition of its Guide to Doing Business in Thailand for 2021. This guide outlines all of the key factors for starting and operating a business in the Thai market. Issues covered include: Investment incentives Financial facilities Exchange controls Import and export regulations Structures for doing business Requirements for the Establishment of a Business Operation of the Business Cessation or Termination of the Business Labor legislation, relations, and supply Tax Immigration requirements This publication is part of Lex Mundi’s Guides to Doing Business series prepared by member firms in more than 100 jurisdictions worldwide. The guides serve as a useful resource when planning an international business strategy or researching a new market.
September 13, 2021
Businesses in Vietnam recognize the need to vaccinate their workers in order to keep their factories and workplaces open. In this article, we explore whether employers may require their employees to be vaccinated, as well as associated disclosure and privacy issues under Vietnamese law.
September 13, 2021
With COVID-19 cases continuing to pose a significant threat throughout Thailand, many employers have ordered their employees to work exclusively from home in order to minimize their chances of contracting the virus. However, this luxury is not afforded to all employees—some are unable to work from home due to the nature of their work, and consequently they are placed in the precarious position of being exposed to possible infection. Thailand’s Social Security Office (SSO) understood these risks early in the pandemic and, in March 2020, issued guidelines through the Workmen’s Compensation Fund Office on employees’ entitlement to claim benefits from the workers’ compensation fund (WCF) if they contract the virus as a result of their work. The WCF provides medical-related assistance and compensation to employees who directly suffer from a work-related injury or sickness (subject to certain conditions). Falling ill with COVID-19 during the performance of work duties may constitute suffering work-related sickness, thereby allowing employees to claim compensation from the WCF by submitting the Kor Thor 16 form, a medical certificate, treatment records, records of the employee’s working hours, and other relevant documentation. Upon receiving a claim, the SSO will investigate by collecting facts and evidence from the employer, the infected employee and his or her colleagues, and any witnesses. The official will examine the employee’s duties and working conditions in detail, taking into consideration any relevant information, such as evidence regarding the employee’s travel or movements prior to falling sick. Once all the facts and evidence are gathered, the matter will be submitted to a medical subcommittee responsible for determining whether the employee’s onset of COVID-19 is due to his or her work. If the subcommittee finds that the employee’s contraction of the virus did indeed result from the performance of his or her work duties, the