You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

September 4, 2018

MIP Quotes Several Tilleke & Gibbins Practitioners on Plain Packaging Across Southeast Asia

Managing Intellectual Property

Practitioners from Tilleke & Gibbins’ offices in Indonesia, Thailand, and Vietnam have been quoted extensively in an article by Managing Intellectual Property (MIP) , discussing a recent ruling by the World Trade Organization (WTO) on plain packaging in Australia and its potential effect on packaging regulations for Asian jurisdictions.

Alan Adcock, partner and deputy director of Tilleke & Gibbins’ intellectual property department, notes that “[the WTO’s] unfortunate decision will likely further embolden overzealous health regulators here in Asia to further encroach upon the intellectual property rights of manufacturers across several industries,” while questioning the WTO’s reasoning in its reaching its decision that plain packaging does not unjustifiably encumber trademarks.

The potential for this decision to affect regulations is echoed by Linh Thi Mai Nguyen, head of trademark in Tilleke & Gibbins’ Vietnam offices, who notes that existing tobacco legislation in Vietnam is implemented in such a way as to “take into account, inter alia, conditions and trends in printing health warnings on tobacco packages of other countries in the region and around the world.” She adds that this clear statement of the persuasiveness of non-binding international judgments shows that “the WTO ruling on the Australian law may have a negative impact on tobacco and other industries in Vietnam.”

Indonesia, as a challenger to the WTO’s plain packaging measures, takes the position that “[t]he WTO panel has overlooked the trademark owner’s rights and, as a result, consumers’ abilities to make informed decisions are diminished,” explains Somboon Earterasarun, a partner in Tilleke & Gibbins’ intellectual property department, discussing the Indonesian challenge. Wongrat Ratanaprayul, director of Tilleke & Gibbins’ Indonesia operations still advises caution however, noting that “Indonesia’s brand owners will need to be more vigilant in monitoring potential regulatory encroachments that could lead to other products of public health concern, which may also be subjected to discriminative plain packaging in the future, although no such regulation is currently in the pipeline.”

To read the full article, please visit the MIP  Website (subscription required).

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

May 6, 2016
The key drivers of healthcare product investment are the effective protection of intellectual property rights and compliance with the law. Protection of IP rights and obtaining market authorization are challenges faced by every company operating in the healthcare industry. To discuss these issues and more, Dr. Atthachai Homhuan, regulatory affairs manager at Tilleke & Gibbins, will present on “Intellectual Property and Regulatory Perspectives of Thailand’s Healthcare Business” at an IP Lunch Talk held by Tilleke & Gibbins and the National Innovation Agency.
April 28, 2016
The nominees of Asian Legal Business’s Southeast Asia Law Awards 2016 have been announced, and Tilleke & Gibbins has secured nominations in three categories, as follows:Intellectual Property Firm of the YearThailand Law Firm of the YearVietnam Law Firm of the YearTo determine the winners, a team of researchers at ALB are considering factors such as firms’ breadth and complexity of work, innovation, third-party awards, and market feedback, among other criteria.
March 29, 2016
Who’s Who Life Sciences 2016 has recognized Alan Adcock, partner and deputy director of Tilleke & Gibbins’ intellectual property and regulatory affairs group, as a leading life sciences expert in sectors including patent litigation and regulatory. This is the eighth edition of the guide, and it aims to single out the world’s leading individuals and firms in the field of life sciences law.The nominees were selected based upon comprehensive, independent survey work with both general counsel and private practice lawyers across the world.