You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

March 13, 2025

Funding Cuts and Mass Layoffs Due to Financial Stress in Cambodia

The recent freeze on US foreign aid has led to the suspension of billions of dollars in foreign assistance as well as widespread layoffs at contracting organizations around the world. Under this situation, USAID-funded offices in all jurisdictions, including Cambodia, may face the challenge of determining whether they need to lay off their employees.

Employers in Cambodia may take different steps in response to this and other instances of sudden financial stress in order to manage their workforce in accordance with Cambodian laws and regulations.

Suspension

Cambodia’s Labor Law allows employers to suspend employment contracts due to a major economic or material issue or any unexpected difficulty that results in the suspension of operations. To impose this employment contract suspension, the employer must initially submit a suspension request to the Ministry of Labor and Vocational Training (MLVT), detailing the reasons for the requested suspension.

If the reasons are deemed valid and the request is approved, the suspension period cannot exceed two months. During the suspension period, the employer must continue providing accommodation for employees if this benefit is already being provided. In some circumstances, the suspension period can be extended if necessary (as happened during the COVID-19 pandemic).

However, financial difficulties alone may not be a valid reason for extension. The decision is at the discretion of the MLVT labor inspectors on a case-by-case basis. Therefore, given the uncertain timeline of financial difficulties that may significantly impact the employer’s budget, suspending employment contracts might be ineffective.

Mass Layoffs

Under Cambodia’s Labor Law, mass layoffs due to a significant reduction in an establishment’s operation or an internal reorganization foreseen by the employer are permissible.

The layoff order must be based on professional qualifications, seniority period, and family burdens of the employees. The first employees to be laid off must be those with the least professional ability, followed by those with the least seniority. For seniority calculations, married employees must be given an additional year, as well as an additional year for each dependent child.

In addition, employers must inform the employees’ representatives in writing to solicit their suggestions, primarily on measures for announcing employee reductions in advance and minimizing the effects on affected workers.

The mass layoffs procedure is subject to the MLVT’s review and approval. Upon receipt of the request, an MLVT labor inspector may conduct a hearing to examine the impact of the proposed layoffs and measures to be taken to minimize their effects.

Termination

If an employment contract is not terminated by mutual agreement, due to serious misconduct by either party, or force majeure as defined under the Labor Law, the termination must have a valid reason.

Under the Labor Law, “valid reason” may refer to an employee’s aptitude or behavior, based on the requirements of the operation of the establishment. However, if employers face financial difficulties, they may consider declaring bankruptcy.

Declaring bankruptcy can be considered a valid reason and exempts employers from paying damages, as it does not impact an employee’s dignity or cause the public to question their behavior, abilities, or performance. However, declaring bankruptcy has legal implications, as it is governed by the Law on Insolvency and requires court proceedings.

The process involves filing an insolvency complaint with the court, which will review the complaint to determine if the employer is indeed insolvent. In addition, the employer must notify employees about the insolvency proceedings, their rights, and any potential layoffs. Employees can file claims for unpaid wages and other compensation, which are prioritized over other unsecured debts under both the Law on Insolvency and the Labor Law. Employers’ assets can be sold to pay off creditors, with employees being among the first to receive payment.

Damages and Statutory Payments

According to the Notification on Compensation for Terminating an Employment Contract, dated March 21, 2024, employers that terminate an employment contract without a valid reason must pay damages to the employees as follows:

  • For employees under a fixed-duration contract, the damages must be at least equal to the wages the employee would have received if they had completed the original term of the contract.
  • For employees under an unspecified-duration contract, the damages are equal to the seniority payment received during the employment contract.

These damages are in addition to required statutory payments that employees must receive after their contract is terminated, detailed in the table below.

The requirements regarding statutory payments and other compensation dues to employees upon termination of employment were significantly clarified by a notification in March 2024.

Compliance

Organizations forced to consider mass layoffs should consult with legal counsel to ensure compliance with the March 2024 notification and other relevant labor regulations before proceeding with any workforce reduction measures. Proactive communication with both the MLVT and employee representatives will be crucial throughout this process. Furthermore, employers should consider developing contingency plans that account for various timelines of financial recovery, as each approach—whether suspension, mass layoffs, or termination—carries distinct legal obligations and financial implications that extend beyond the immediate crisis period. Organizations that approach these difficult decisions with careful planning and legal diligence will be better positioned to maintain operational stability while fulfilling their obligations to employees during this period of economic uncertainty.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

July 7, 2025
On June 20, 2025, Cambodia’s Ministry of Economy and Finance issued Instruction No. 19116 to clarify when board members and company directors must receive salaries and pay payroll taxes. Board members and company directors who are not considered employees are subject to a withholding tax. This category consists of people who complete services for a nonresident individual and people who perform independent work for a company in Cambodia. Board members and company directors who are considered employees, including those appointed by a foreign head office to temporarily manage a company in Cambodia, must pay payroll taxes on any salary they receive, regardless of whether they are paid by a local or foreign branch of the company. The above obligations apply regardless of whether the person has a work permit. Board members and company directors are exempt from paying payroll tax if they: Are not present and not performing a regular management role at the company despite being registered on the company’s statutes or patent tax card; Participate only in board meetings and occasional shareholder meetings; and Do not receive a salary from a company in Cambodia. Overall, this instruction provides an important clarification regarding the tax obligations of board members and company directors. Companies should pay attention to the classification of their board members and directors and be mindful of the exemption.   This article was written with the assistance of Tilleke & Gibbins interns Amelia Gemma Erickson and Amrin Keat.
July 7, 2025
On June 27, 2025, Thailand issued the new Ministerial Regulation Prescribing the Criteria and Rates for Receiving Unemployment Benefits (No. 2) B.E. 2568 (2025), which amended a similarly named ministerial regulation by boosting the rate of social security benefits to alleviate hardships for employees who are terminated. The new ministerial regulation took effect the following day. Under this new ministerial regulation, eligible terminated employees are entitled to receive unemployment benefits under the Social Security Fund (SSF) for a maximum of 180 days per year, at the rate of 60% of the employee’s monthly wages at the time of termination, up from 50% previously. However, the maximum wage used as the basis for calculating the benefit remains capped at THB 15,000 per month. Therefore, the maximum unemployment benefit that an employee can receive from the SSF is now THB 9,000 (up from THB 7,500) per month for a period of up to six months. To qualify for the unemployment benefits from the SSF, employees must be registered with the Social Security Office and must have contributed to the SSF for at least six months within the 15 months prior to the start date of the relevant unemployment period. This new ministerial regulation was enacted to increase the amount of financial support provided to insured persons in the case of termination, as part of the government’s objective of alleviating economic hardship under current economic and social conditions in Thailand. For more details on unemployment benefits in Thailand, or on any aspect of employment law in the country, please contact Pimvimol (June) Vipamaneerut at [email protected], Dusita Khanijou at [email protected], Ketnut Pukahuta at [email protected], or Chomanut Arif at [email protected].
July 4, 2025
On July 1, 2025, new minimum daily wage rates for Bangkok and certain business types nationwide were published in the Government Gazette, taking effect on the same day. The daily minimum wage rate for Bangkok has been increased to THB 400 per day, while the minimum wage rates for other provinces remain unchanged from the rates that took effect on January 1, 2025. However, daily minimum wage rates have also been increased to THB 400 nationwide for type 2, type 3, and type 4 hotels under the Hotel Act and for entertainment establishments under the Entertainment Place Act. This THB 400 rate applies to all businesses that meet the criteria, even if the province’s general rate is lower. The new minimum wage rates supersede any lower wages agreed upon in existing employment contracts or conditions of employment that were in force before this announcement came into effect. As a result, these employees must be paid their wages at the newly prescribed rate for work performed from July 1, 2025, onward.
June 30, 2025
On March 4, 2025, Cambodia’s Ministry of Labor and Vocational Training (MLVT) issued Prakas No. 073/25 on Procedures for Resolving Individual Labor Disputes, replacing Prakas No. 318 on the same topic from 2001 and introducing significant changes to how individual labor disputes are filed, processed, and escalated. In addition, Prakas No. 073 outlines the roles and responsibilities of labor inspectors, the process for filing and handling complaints, and the steps for conciliation and further legal recourse, as described below. Filing a Complaint Any party to an individual labor dispute can file a complaint with the Labor Dispute Department of the MLVT or the Department of Labor at the capital or provincial level. Upon receiving a complaint, a labor inspector will review the case and may initiate either conciliation or a labor inspection. Invitation letters will be issued to the disputing parties to provide relevant information and documents. Conciliation Process Prakas No. 073 places strong emphasis on the conciliation process, introducing strict procedural rules and deadlines with clear consequences for noncompliance: If the claimant fails to provide required information within the specified deadline (or within three working days thereafter without reasonable excuse), the complaint is deemed void. If the respondent fails to attend the conciliation meeting within the deadline (or within three working days thereafter without reasonable excuse), the conciliation is considered unsuccessful, and the respondent is deemed guilty as claimed. Once all necessary information is gathered, a labor inspector will invite both parties to a joint conciliation meeting, which must be held within three weeks of the complaint being received. If the claimant fails to attend the meeting or sign the minutes without a reasonable excuse, the complaint is void. If the respondent fails to attend the meeting without a reasonable excuse, the conciliation is unsuccessful, and the respondent