You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

March 13, 2025

Funding Cuts and Mass Layoffs Due to Financial Stress in Cambodia

The recent freeze on US foreign aid has led to the suspension of billions of dollars in foreign assistance as well as widespread layoffs at contracting organizations around the world. Under this situation, USAID-funded offices in all jurisdictions, including Cambodia, may face the challenge of determining whether they need to lay off their employees.

Employers in Cambodia may take different steps in response to this and other instances of sudden financial stress in order to manage their workforce in accordance with Cambodian laws and regulations.

Suspension

Cambodia’s Labor Law allows employers to suspend employment contracts due to a major economic or material issue or any unexpected difficulty that results in the suspension of operations. To impose this employment contract suspension, the employer must initially submit a suspension request to the Ministry of Labor and Vocational Training (MLVT), detailing the reasons for the requested suspension.

If the reasons are deemed valid and the request is approved, the suspension period cannot exceed two months. During the suspension period, the employer must continue providing accommodation for employees if this benefit is already being provided. In some circumstances, the suspension period can be extended if necessary (as happened during the COVID-19 pandemic).

However, financial difficulties alone may not be a valid reason for extension. The decision is at the discretion of the MLVT labor inspectors on a case-by-case basis. Therefore, given the uncertain timeline of financial difficulties that may significantly impact the employer’s budget, suspending employment contracts might be ineffective.

Mass Layoffs

Under Cambodia’s Labor Law, mass layoffs due to a significant reduction in an establishment’s operation or an internal reorganization foreseen by the employer are permissible.

The layoff order must be based on professional qualifications, seniority period, and family burdens of the employees. The first employees to be laid off must be those with the least professional ability, followed by those with the least seniority. For seniority calculations, married employees must be given an additional year, as well as an additional year for each dependent child.

In addition, employers must inform the employees’ representatives in writing to solicit their suggestions, primarily on measures for announcing employee reductions in advance and minimizing the effects on affected workers.

The mass layoffs procedure is subject to the MLVT’s review and approval. Upon receipt of the request, an MLVT labor inspector may conduct a hearing to examine the impact of the proposed layoffs and measures to be taken to minimize their effects.

Termination

If an employment contract is not terminated by mutual agreement, due to serious misconduct by either party, or force majeure as defined under the Labor Law, the termination must have a valid reason.

Under the Labor Law, “valid reason” may refer to an employee’s aptitude or behavior, based on the requirements of the operation of the establishment. However, if employers face financial difficulties, they may consider declaring bankruptcy.

Declaring bankruptcy can be considered a valid reason and exempts employers from paying damages, as it does not impact an employee’s dignity or cause the public to question their behavior, abilities, or performance. However, declaring bankruptcy has legal implications, as it is governed by the Law on Insolvency and requires court proceedings.

The process involves filing an insolvency complaint with the court, which will review the complaint to determine if the employer is indeed insolvent. In addition, the employer must notify employees about the insolvency proceedings, their rights, and any potential layoffs. Employees can file claims for unpaid wages and other compensation, which are prioritized over other unsecured debts under both the Law on Insolvency and the Labor Law. Employers’ assets can be sold to pay off creditors, with employees being among the first to receive payment.

Damages and Statutory Payments

According to the Notification on Compensation for Terminating an Employment Contract, dated March 21, 2024, employers that terminate an employment contract without a valid reason must pay damages to the employees as follows:

  • For employees under a fixed-duration contract, the damages must be at least equal to the wages the employee would have received if they had completed the original term of the contract.
  • For employees under an unspecified-duration contract, the damages are equal to the seniority payment received during the employment contract.

These damages are in addition to required statutory payments that employees must receive after their contract is terminated, detailed in the table below.

The requirements regarding statutory payments and other compensation dues to employees upon termination of employment were significantly clarified by a notification in March 2024.

Compliance

Organizations forced to consider mass layoffs should consult with legal counsel to ensure compliance with the March 2024 notification and other relevant labor regulations before proceeding with any workforce reduction measures. Proactive communication with both the MLVT and employee representatives will be crucial throughout this process. Furthermore, employers should consider developing contingency plans that account for various timelines of financial recovery, as each approach—whether suspension, mass layoffs, or termination—carries distinct legal obligations and financial implications that extend beyond the immediate crisis period. Organizations that approach these difficult decisions with careful planning and legal diligence will be better positioned to maintain operational stability while fulfilling their obligations to employees during this period of economic uncertainty.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

March 31, 2026
On December 10, 2025, the National Assembly of Vietnam adopted Law on Vocational Education No. 124/2025/QH15, which took effect on January 1, 2026, replacing Law on Vocational Education No. 74/2014/QH13 of 2014. The new law broadens the categories of institutions eligible to deliver vocational training, introduces vocational upper secondary schools, and shifts governance structures for private institutions from ownership-representative boards of management to stakeholder-based school councils. These reforms aim to diversify training providers, align programs with labor market needs, and create a more flexible, open vocational education ecosystem, offering expanded opportunities for foreign and domestic investors, universities, and enterprises. Some highlights of the new Law on Vocational Education are presented below. Expansion of Vocational Training Levels and Programs In addition to elementary, intermediate, and college—the three levels of vocational training program set out under the 2014 Law on Vocational Education—the new law expands the structure by introducing two new levels: Vocational high school training programs are placed between elementary and intermediate levels, and are aimed at combining upper secondary education with vocational training, expanding options for learners after graduating from the lower secondary level. Other vocational training programs are not specified in detail under the new law, but aim to equip learners with the capability to perform and handle one or several simple tasks of an occupation. Expansion of Vocational Education Providers The new law reclassifies and extends vocational education providers by classifying them into two distinct categories: Vocational education institutions, which include colleges, intermediate schools, and vocational high schools. Establishments participating in vocational education activities, which include vocational education centers, vocational-continuing education centers, continuing education centers, other centers with vocational education functions, enterprises, cooperatives, and higher education institutions. Vocational education providers may provide one vocational training level only, or several/all levels, depending on the type of provider. The
January 16, 2026
Employment law specialists from Tilleke & Gibbins in Vietnam have contributed the Vietnam chapter to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce from International Employment Lawyer. This comprehensive global guide, covering 50 jurisdictions worldwide, addresses the complex issue of workplace restructurings, with a particular focus on the needs of multinational companies. The Vietnam chapter was authored by partner Kien Trung Trinh, counsel Sarah Galeski, and associates Dung Thi Phuong Le and Nguyen Thi Huong Nguyen. The Q&A-style chapter provides in-depth analysis of key areas related to workplace restructuring, including: Reduction in workforce; Restructuring or reorganization of the business; Changing terms and conditions; and Areas to watch. A PDF of the Vietnam chapter can be downloaded through the button below. Tilleke & Gibbins also contributed the Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, and Thailand chapters to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce 2026. To browse the full guide for all 45 jurisdictions, please visit the International Employment Lawyer website.
January 16, 2026
Employment law specialists from Tilleke & Gibbins’ office in Bangkok have contributed the Thailand chapter to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce from International Employment Lawyer. This comprehensive global guide, covering 50 jurisdictions worldwide, addresses the complex issue of workplace restructurings, with a particular focus on the needs of multinational companies. The Thailand chapter was authored by Pimvimol (June) Vipamaneerut, Chusert Supasitthumrong, Dusita Khanijou, and Chomanut Arif. The Q&A-style chapter provides in-depth analysis of key areas related to workplace restructuring, including: Reduction in workforce; Restructuring or reorganization of the business; Changing terms and conditions; and Areas to watch. A PDF of the Thailand chapter can be downloaded through the button below. Tilleke & Gibbins also contributed the Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, and Vietnam chapters to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce 2026. To browse the full guide for all 45 jurisdictions, please visit the International Employment Lawyer website.
January 16, 2026
Tilleke & Gibbins’ office in Yangon has contributed the Myanmar chapter to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce from International Employment Lawyer. This comprehensive global guide, covering 50 jurisdictions worldwide, addresses the complex issue of workplace restructurings, with a particular focus on the needs of multinational companies. The Myanmar chapter was prepared by Kyaw Min Tun, an associate in the firm’s Myanmar office. The Q&A-style chapter provides in-depth analysis of key areas related to workplace restructuring, including: Reduction in workforce; Restructuring or reorganization of the business; Changing terms and conditions; and Areas to watch. A PDF of the Myanmar chapter can be downloaded through the button below. Tilleke & Gibbins also contributed the Cambodia, Laos, Thailand, and Vietnam chapters to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce 2026. To browse the full guide for all 45 jurisdictions, please visit the International Employment Lawyer website.