It is a common misconception that importers will never win classification assessments by the Thai Customs Department. However, this belief is far from the truth. Importers can indeed prevail in customs assessments, and one of the most effective tools at their disposal is the World Customs Organization’s (WCO) Explanatory Notes. The WCO’s Explanatory Notes are an indispensable resource for understanding the Harmonized System (HS) of tariff nomenclature. These notes provide detailed commentary on the scope of each heading, including lists of main products included and excluded, technical descriptions, and practical guidance for identifying goods. By leveraging these notes, importers can ensure accurate classification of their goods, which is crucial for fair customs assessments. Understanding the Explanatory Notes The Explanatory Notes serve as the official interpretation of the Harmonized System at the international level. They offer clarity on the classification of goods, which can significantly impact the duties and taxes imposed on imports. For instance, the notes provide insights into the properties, methods of production, and uses of various goods, helping importers to classify their products correctly and avoid misclassification disputes. Thailand’s Customs Tariff Decree holds that the classification interpretation must follow the General Rules for Interpretation together with the Explanatory Notes to the Harmonized System of the WCO. Most Thai Supreme Court decisions on classification also refer to the WCO’s Explanatory Notes and past rulings as the basis of their decisions. Successful Appeals There have been numerous instances of importers successfully appealing customs assessments by relying on the Explanatory Notes. For example, one importer of electronic components was initially assessed a higher duty due to misclassification. By presenting evidence from the Explanatory Notes that accurately described the components, the importer was able to demonstrate the correct classification and secure a favorable reassessment. Practical Steps for Importers To minimize the

On February 4, 2025, Thailand’s Board of Investment (BOI) issued Announcement No. Por. 3/2568, introducing updated qualifications, criteria, and conditions for long-term resident (LTR) visas. The updated requirements took effect immediately upon issuance of the announcement. The LTR program is intended to stimulate the economy and attract high-potential foreign nationals to Thailand, and these latest updates aim to expand access to a wider range of experts, investors, and executives to reinforce Thailand’s foreign talent pool and enhance its competitiveness. The recent updates primarily affect three categories under the LTR visa program: work-from-Thailand professionals, wealthy global citizens, and high-skilled professionals, as detailed below. Work-from-Thailand Professionals The updated LTR visa program includes some changes to the eligibility criteria for visa applicants in the work-from-Thailand professionals category: The revenue requirement for visa applicants’ employers is now USD 50 million over a three-year period, down from USD 150 million previously. Eligible foreign employers now include wholly owned subsidiaries of: companies listed on any stock exchange in any country; or private companies that have been in operation for at least three years and have generated a combined revenue of at least USD 50 million over the past three years. There are no longer work experience requirements. The other requirements remain the same. Wealthy Global Citizens For the wealthy global citizens category, the latest updates remove the requirement to have an annual personal income of USD 80,000, while the other criteria remain. Highly Skilled Professionals For the highly skilled professionals category, the latest updates expand eligibility to include lecturers in vocational or higher education, and remove work experience requirements. Other categories The updated LTR visa program does not introduce any changes for the wealthy pensioners category. However, the announcement does expand the scope of eligible dependents of LTR visa holders to cover parents and a

On January 6, 2025, the government of Vietnam issued Decree No. 05/2025/ND-CP amending and supplementing Decree No. 08/2022/ND-CP detailing the Law on Environmental Protection (“Decree 05”). Decree 05 came into effect immediately upon issuance and provides several changes to the regulations governing extended producer responsibility (“EPR”) for applicable manufacturers and importers, outlining their obligations concerning the recycling and treatment of discarded products and packages. (See our previous article on Vietnam’s EPR regulations here.) Outlined below are some critical amendments in Decree 05. Entities Subject to EPR Regulations Previously, Decree 08 limited the responsibility for recycling to manufacturers and importers of products and packaging specified in statutory lists. Decree 05 expands this scope by also including entities responsible for the quality and labeling of the regulated products and goods in Vietnam. Decree 05 inherits the regulations from Decree 08 that manufacturers and importers, if they produce and import products and packaging as stipulated by law, must fulfill their responsibility to recycle or support waste treatment activities. However, Decree 05 amends the lists of products/packaging that must be recycled or undergo waste treatment, and new products/packaging and recycling methods. Notably, rechargeable batteries (including those used in vehicles or for electrical and electronic devices) have been added to the list of regulated products and self-propelled vehicles and construction machinery have been removed from the list. Decree 05 also not only streamlines the recycling methods required for each type of product/packaging, but also removes the minimum requirement on the mass of products/packaging that must be recovered when recycling. Manufacturers and importers now have more flexibility in selecting recycling methods that are more suitable for actual recycling conditions in Vietnam. Decree 05 has revised the cases of exemption from recycling and waste treatment obligations, clarifying that both packaging manufacturers and importers with annual product

As Vietnam continues its government restructuring, including the merging of several key ministries, the country is signaling that mergers of provinces could be next. Conclusion 126-KL/TW of the Politburo and Secretariat, issued on February 14, 2025, sets out several tasks for continuing to streamline the political system in 2025, notably including, among others, the following: Elimination of intermediate administrative levels, and mergers of provincial units: The Government Party Committee is tasked with researching and planning for the elimination of intermediate administrative levels (district levels); reorganizing the commune level with structures, functions, duties, powers, and responsibilities aligned with the new organizational model; and proposing the merging of some provincial administrative units. A report to the Politburo is required by Q3 2025. Reorganization of police structure: The Central Public Security Party Committee is tasked with leading and coordinating the implementation of a three-tier police organization, eliminating the district-level police. Judicial system reforms: The Central Party Committees of the Supreme People’s Court and the Supreme People’s Procuracy are tasked with researching and advising on the organizational model for courts and procuracies, and proposing amendments and supplements to relevant party mechanisms and state laws, with the aim of eliminating the district level. A report to the Politburo is required by Q2 2025. Implications of Merging Provinces The merging of provinces could bring positive impacts as well as new challenges. The expected benefits include: Administrative efficiency and cost saving: Reducing the number of administrative units could lead to more efficient governance and decision-making processes, as well as lower administrative costs due to fewer government offices and personnel. Economic development: Larger administrative areas can benefit from better allocation of resources and infrastructure development. Larger provinces may also attract more investment due to increased economic potential and market size. Improved service delivery: Public services could improve