You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

April 11, 2014

Making a Hotel Acquisition in Thailand: Protecting Your Future Assets

Bangkok Post, Corporate Counsellor Column

Thailand is a popular tourist destination and, to many of those with an entrepreneurial spirit, it is an attractive country in which to operate a hotel business. Phuket, for example, is a bustling tourist hotspot and sees some of the highest levels of foreign investment in the hotel industry.

Developing a new hotel from scratch, however, may not be an ideal choice for someone who lacks experience in the field. Hence, entrepreneurs with sufficient financial support often choose to acquire an existing hotel.

Acquiring an already established hotel business can ease the process of governmental approval procedures, and it can provide an instant source of income through its existing client base and facilities.

There are, however, numerous factors to be considered in hotel acquisition transactions. Legal due diligence is one such consideration that will greatly assist you in clarifying any defects in the hotel. Other issues include licences and permits and validation of the legal ownership of lands and buildings.

Real Property

The documents that prove the ownership of a plot of land on which a hotel is located are important, since land tends to be the most valuable asset in a hotel business. Also, just because a hotel has been in operation for a long time does not mean that the business is being run completely legally.

The history of land documents is also important. A title search at the local Land Office will ensure that the document has been issued legitimately and that there are no attachments, restrictions or encumbrances registered, and there are no risks that may lead to revocation of the land.

Some legal encumbrances, such as mortgages, leases and servitudes, are subject to registration at the Land Office, and will be shown on the back of the title deed, which can also be verified by conducting a title search at the office in the district where the land is located.

Only leases of three or more years, however, are required to be registered with the Land Office. Therefore, a title search will not show a lease with a period of less than three years, but the hotel’s owner should disclose an unregistered lease agreement during the due diligence process.

In Thailand, land use is regulated under the City Planning Act for residential, industrial, agricultural, environmental and cultural protection, or other purposes.

Additionally, the construction of a building must comply with the relevant rules, regulations and notifications issued under the laws governing building control and the environment as well as other relevant laws. The construction of a hotel building must also abide by these rules.

We have encountered cases in which the construction of a hotel has not complied with zoning regulations, and this can lead to major problems. For example, in the case of a hotel being constructed in a prohibited zone, it may be ordered demolished.

If the hotel was constructed in a prohibited zone before the relevant law was enacted, the hotel is prohibited from being renovated or altered in the future, and the owner cannot construct any new buildings.

Licenses and Permits

An owner needs many kinds of permits and licenses to operate a hotel. As with buildings used for other purposes, buildings used as a hotel require a construction permit.

Additionally, a hotel building requires a certificate of construction, as its use is controlled by the Building Control Act. A hotel building must be inspected by a qualified engineer annually, and on passing the inspection, the owner will be issued a certificate.

In terms of operating licenses, a hotel license is required, which will indicate the type and number of rooms. This is valid for five years and it can be renewed for another five years each time. The applicant is required to prepare an environmental impact assessment report (if the hotel will have 80 or more rooms) as well as other permits for buildings to be used as a hotel.

Operating a hotel without a hotel license or not complying with the provisions of the license are subject to penalties under the Hotel Act. Furthermore, in addition to the hotel license, other licenses may also be required, e.g., a license for public entertainment, the sale of food, the sale of alcohol and cigarettes, etc.

Finally, in addition to the due diligence that must be conducted on the property, due diligence on other matters (corporate structure, employment, finance, tax, etc) will also be conducted to ensure there are no hidden liabilities.

It is also important to check who owns the intellectual property rights in the hotel, such as the hotel’s name, internet domain name, or other businesses in the hotel, and to ensure that all rights and ownership to those rights can be transferred to the buyer.

Furthermore, the terms and conditions of an operational contract in which the hotel owner hires a third party to be responsible for different aspects of the hotel, such as maintenance and lease agreements, should be clarified. If those contracts are still effective after the business transfer, then the new owner will be bound to the obligations under those agreements, including costs and expenses.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

October 31, 2025
On September 29, 2025, Thailand’s Office of the Personal Data Protection Committee (PDPC Office) published its Regulations on the Review and Certification of Binding Corporate Rules B.E. 2568 (2025) (the Regulations). The Regulations provide clarity on the PDPC Office’s approach to reviewing and certifying binding corporate rules (BCRs) under Section 29 of the Personal Data Protection Act B.E. 2562 (2019) (PDPA), and aim to facilitate international data transfers within a group of undertakings or enterprises (a “corporate group”). In conjunction with this development, the PDPC Office also approved BCRs for two companies operating in Thailand on September 30, 2025. This milestone represents the first concrete progress since the PDPC’s Notification on Criteria for the Protection of Personal Data Sent or Transferred to a Foreign Country pursuant to Section 29 of the PDPA B.E. 2566 (2023) came into effect in March 2024. Some key features of the Regulations are set out below. Categorization of BCRs BCRs are classified into two types: (1) BCRs for Controllers (BCR-C) and (2) BCRs for Processors (BCR-P). The category must be clearly specified when submitting the BCRs to the PDPC Office. Documentation Requirement The applicant must prepare and submit the application (a standard template may be provided by the PDPC Office in the future) along with supporting documents for review and certification in the Thai language. If the supporting documents are in a foreign language, a certified Thai translation should be provided. The translation must be notarized by a notary public or qualified person. Supporting documents may include, among others, a binding instrument such as an intra-group agreement, or a list of entities subject to the BCRs. Expedited Process Requirement Organizations with existing BCR approvals under the EU or UK GDPR, or from countries announced by the PDPC under Section 28, may apply through an
October 30, 2025
Recent events at a Thai listed company, where a proposal to remove the director was not successful, amid claims that a competitor was attempting to gain control of the company, illustrate how disputes over corporate control can unfold differently at the board level and shareholder level. At the board level, removing directors of a listed company mid-term to gain corporate control is not an easy task under Thai law, as it requires a higher threshold than appointing a new director, which typically only requires a simple majority vote in a listed company. At the shareholder level, Thailand’s tender offer and competition regimes add complexity where different shareholder groups act in concert to remove opposing board representatives or otherwise influence control. In this article, we will explore why the attempted removal of a director may fail, and how the tender offer regime may apply. Key Issues at a Glance Shareholder groups may seek to convene meetings to propose changes to board composition or company authority. Such proposals can be delayed or complicated by regulatory requirements and the need for additional disclosures. Regulatory authorities and minority shareholders may raise concerns when major shareholders coordinate to influence board control, especially if such actions could trigger tender offer or merger control obligations. Companies often respond by seeking further information on shareholder relationships and potential conflicts before proceeding. Why the Director Removal Failed Under Section 76 of the Public Limited Companies Act B.E. 2535 (as amended), the early removal of a director requires two conditions to be satisfied at the same meeting of shareholders: Headcount test: At least 75% of shareholders attending and entitled to vote must vote in favor. If multiple shareholders appoint the same person as proxy, each proxy is counted as a separate head for the purpose of the headcount test,
October 24, 2025
On October 22, 2025, the Thai government posted a directive not to grant gambling licenses for gambling involving poker nationwide to crack down on illegal gambling activities. The directive was issued by Thailand’s Ministry of Interior to align with government policies to prevent the legalization of all types of gambling businesses, including poker as a sporting activity. This will result in the revocation of poker activities as sport and institute a strict ban on such activities nationwide. Businesses should note the new government’s strict approach toward gambling activities as the legal situation regarding gambling in the country continues to draw close attention.
October 1, 2025
In September 2025, Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) accused a company listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET), including its current and former directors, of concealing material information in connection with its filing registration and draft prospectus. This recent enforcement action demonstrates the serious consequences of making false statements or appearing to conceal material information in IPO filings and ongoing disclosures. In addition to being subject to criminal penalties, such actions can impact the eligibility of directors and executives to serve and may cause lasting reputational damage. Key Legal Risks The Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (as amended) imposes strict liability for making false statements or concealing material information in IPO registration statements and draft prospectuses. In such cases, investors can claim for damages, and there are also criminal penalties, including imprisonment for up to five years and substantial fines, may apply to the company, its directors, and responsible officers. However, misstatements or omissions in IPO filings do not, by themselves, disqualify directors or executives from holding office, whether arising from an SEC accusation or even a final court judgment. In contrast, for ongoing disclosures after listing, such as financial statements, annual reports, and meeting notices, false or misleading statements or concealment of material information can result in not only criminal liability but also immediate disqualification of directors and executives. If the SEC accuses a listed company or its directors or executives of such misstatements or omissions, those directors or executives are immediately disqualified from their positions, even before a final court judgment. Director and Executive Qualifications Directors and executives must meet the SEC’s specified standards of trustworthiness, as set out in the relevant rules. The SEC clearly defines characteristics that are considered to demonstrate a lack of trustworthiness. For ongoing disclosures, being involved in