You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

April 11, 2014

Making a Hotel Acquisition in Thailand: Protecting Your Future Assets

Bangkok Post, Corporate Counsellor Column

Thailand is a popular tourist destination and, to many of those with an entrepreneurial spirit, it is an attractive country in which to operate a hotel business. Phuket, for example, is a bustling tourist hotspot and sees some of the highest levels of foreign investment in the hotel industry.

Developing a new hotel from scratch, however, may not be an ideal choice for someone who lacks experience in the field. Hence, entrepreneurs with sufficient financial support often choose to acquire an existing hotel.

Acquiring an already established hotel business can ease the process of governmental approval procedures, and it can provide an instant source of income through its existing client base and facilities.

There are, however, numerous factors to be considered in hotel acquisition transactions. Legal due diligence is one such consideration that will greatly assist you in clarifying any defects in the hotel. Other issues include licences and permits and validation of the legal ownership of lands and buildings.

Real Property

The documents that prove the ownership of a plot of land on which a hotel is located are important, since land tends to be the most valuable asset in a hotel business. Also, just because a hotel has been in operation for a long time does not mean that the business is being run completely legally.

The history of land documents is also important. A title search at the local Land Office will ensure that the document has been issued legitimately and that there are no attachments, restrictions or encumbrances registered, and there are no risks that may lead to revocation of the land.

Some legal encumbrances, such as mortgages, leases and servitudes, are subject to registration at the Land Office, and will be shown on the back of the title deed, which can also be verified by conducting a title search at the office in the district where the land is located.

Only leases of three or more years, however, are required to be registered with the Land Office. Therefore, a title search will not show a lease with a period of less than three years, but the hotel’s owner should disclose an unregistered lease agreement during the due diligence process.

In Thailand, land use is regulated under the City Planning Act for residential, industrial, agricultural, environmental and cultural protection, or other purposes.

Additionally, the construction of a building must comply with the relevant rules, regulations and notifications issued under the laws governing building control and the environment as well as other relevant laws. The construction of a hotel building must also abide by these rules.

We have encountered cases in which the construction of a hotel has not complied with zoning regulations, and this can lead to major problems. For example, in the case of a hotel being constructed in a prohibited zone, it may be ordered demolished.

If the hotel was constructed in a prohibited zone before the relevant law was enacted, the hotel is prohibited from being renovated or altered in the future, and the owner cannot construct any new buildings.

Licenses and Permits

An owner needs many kinds of permits and licenses to operate a hotel. As with buildings used for other purposes, buildings used as a hotel require a construction permit.

Additionally, a hotel building requires a certificate of construction, as its use is controlled by the Building Control Act. A hotel building must be inspected by a qualified engineer annually, and on passing the inspection, the owner will be issued a certificate.

In terms of operating licenses, a hotel license is required, which will indicate the type and number of rooms. This is valid for five years and it can be renewed for another five years each time. The applicant is required to prepare an environmental impact assessment report (if the hotel will have 80 or more rooms) as well as other permits for buildings to be used as a hotel.

Operating a hotel without a hotel license or not complying with the provisions of the license are subject to penalties under the Hotel Act. Furthermore, in addition to the hotel license, other licenses may also be required, e.g., a license for public entertainment, the sale of food, the sale of alcohol and cigarettes, etc.

Finally, in addition to the due diligence that must be conducted on the property, due diligence on other matters (corporate structure, employment, finance, tax, etc) will also be conducted to ensure there are no hidden liabilities.

It is also important to check who owns the intellectual property rights in the hotel, such as the hotel’s name, internet domain name, or other businesses in the hotel, and to ensure that all rights and ownership to those rights can be transferred to the buyer.

Furthermore, the terms and conditions of an operational contract in which the hotel owner hires a third party to be responsible for different aspects of the hotel, such as maintenance and lease agreements, should be clarified. If those contracts are still effective after the business transfer, then the new owner will be bound to the obligations under those agreements, including costs and expenses.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

August 22, 2025
On August 12, 2025, Vietnam’s Ministry of Agriculture and Environment submitted a draft law amending several provisions of the Land Law 2024 (“Draft Amended Land Law” or “Draft”) for government consultation and public comment. The Draft primarily aims to address three controversial issues in Vietnam’s land regime concerning (i) land pricing, (ii) land clearance, and (iii) the allocation of land outside auctions, following policy set out by Resolution 18-NQ/TW and the newly adopted Resolution 69-NQ/TW on land governance modernization. Land pricing is potentially one of the most important areas among the proposed reforms. The Draft, however, has notably not addressed a major concern recently raised by the public: When a project has been allocated or leased land, but the relevant authority has not yet issued the land-price decision, a “supplemental charge” continues to accrue for the entire waiting period. Under current rules, this charge is calculated at 5.4% per year on the ultimately determined land-use fee or land rent, materially shifting project economics and pricing risks to developers or end-buyers. Core Reforms on Land Pricing The Draft Amended Land Law sets out a number of reforms on land pricing, including the following: Land price tables: The Draft maintains provincial land price tables but clarifies the scope of application: They are used to determine land-related financial obligations of land users and compensation when the state recovers land; the government will detail the adjustment coefficient regime, ratios for land-use fee calculation by land type/user/form, and deductible infrastructure costs. Provincial people’s committees will continue to issue land price tables every five years, effective from January 1 of the first year in the cycle, with authority to supplement within the cycle as necessary. In provinces with cadastral maps and digital land price databases, the tables may be established down to the land-parcel level,
August 19, 2025
On August 6, 2025, Myanmar’s National Defence and Security Council (NDSC) issued Order No. 20/2025, announcing a change in the composition of the country’s Foreign Exchange Supervisory Committee (FESC). The prime minister has been appointed committee chair of the FESC, and five other individuals were appointed to the committee. The order took immediate effect. Originally established in April 2022, the FESC is responsible for approving foreign currency conversion, granting exemptions to foreign exchange restrictions, and permitting overseas transfers of foreign currency. The FESC supervises the flow of foreign currencies for domestic and foreign investment, manufacturing, exports and imports, and service businesses (including education- and health-related initiatives). The FESC is specifically responsible for considering and approving the use of foreign currency for the following: Importing machinery, vehicles, equipment, and raw materials essential for foreign investment and manufacturing projects; Importing fuel, medicine, cooking oil, fertilizer, insecticide, and construction materials not readily available on the domestic market; Covering Myanmar citizens’ needs abroad, such as medical treatment, education, or religious activities; Facilitating imports of general goods, loan repayments, interest payments to foreign lenders, service payments, and profit repatriation from investments; and Importing luxury products, including brand-name goods, jewelry, sports cars, and watches. The FESC is empowered to carry out further duties related to foreign exchange management as assigned by the NDSC Importers, exporters, investors, and business owners are encouraged to consult the most current FESC guidelines and approval lists before conducting transactions in Myanmar. For more details on these FESC composition developments, or on any aspect of financial regulations in Myanmar, please contact Tilleke & Gibbins at [email protected].
August 1, 2025
Tilleke & Gibbins has contributed the Vietnam chapter to Corporate Governance 2025, part of the International Comparative Legal Guides (ICLG) series published by Global Legal Group. This respected guide offers comprehensive, jurisdiction-specific overviews of corporate governance laws and practices around the world. Each jurisdictional chapter follows a clear Q&A format, providing practical insights into critical issues such as: Sources of corporate governance regulation Shareholders’ rights, powers, and responsibilities Structure and duties of management bodies Stakeholder involvement in governance Transparency and reporting requirements ESG and sustainability-related obligations Cybersecurity and technology-related disclosures The Vietnam chapter was authored by Tram Ngoc Bich Nguyen, Truc Thi Thanh Tran, Dung Thi Phuong Le, and Quang Minh Vu, members of Tilleke & Gibbins’ corporate and commercial team in Ho Chi Minh City. The authors provide detailed analysis of Vietnam’s corporate governance framework, including recent developments such as the 2025 amendments to the Law on Enterprises requiring disclosure of ultimate beneficial ownership and the increasing emphasis on sustainable business practices and responsible corporate conduct. The chapter also discusses practical considerations for foreign investors in Vietnam, such as overlapping signing authorities between key company officers, enforcement of shareholders’ agreements, and disclosure obligations related to ownership and management roles. The complete Vietnam chapter is available as a PDF below. The Vietnam chapter—and the full Corporate Governance 2025 guide—are also freely available on the ICLG website.
July 25, 2025
On June 17, 2025, the National Assembly of Vietnam adopted Law No. 76/2025/QH15 (Amended LOE) amending and supplementing the 2020 Law on Enterprises, which aims to reshape the legal framework to enhance transparency and alignment with international standards. The Amended LOE took effect from July 1, 2025. Below are key notes on the Amended LOE. Recognition of Beneficial Owners The beneficial owner (BO) concept was previously addressed under Vietnam’s anti-money laundering framework. However, the formal recognition of a BO in the Amended LOE marks a pivotal advancement in embedding ownership transparency into corporate governance, in line with the G7 Financial Action Task Force’s standards on anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing. Under the Amended LOE and Decree No. 168/2025/ND-CP of the government dated June 30, 2025, on enterprise registration (Decree 168), a BO is identified through either equity ownership or control rights. Equity ownership: Individuals holding 25% or more of a company’s charter capital or voting shares, either directly or indirectly, qualify as BOs. Indirect ownership is further defined as ownership of at least 25% of charter capital or voting shares through an intermediary organization. Control rights: Individuals with the authority to make or influence major decisions are considered BOs. The actual control over a company includes the power (i) to appoint or remove most or all members of the board of directors or the members’ council or the general director of a company; (ii) to amend the charter; or (iii) to decide other key matters specified in the company’s charter. Notably, individuals representing state ownership in state-owned enterprises are excluded from the scope of the BO concept. Companies are responsible for collecting, updating, and retaining information about BOs and cooperating with authorities when requested to identify BOs, among other obligations. Additionally, any companies registered before July 1, 2025, must