You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

April 11, 2014

Making a Hotel Acquisition in Thailand: Protecting Your Future Assets

Bangkok Post, Corporate Counsellor Column

Thailand is a popular tourist destination and, to many of those with an entrepreneurial spirit, it is an attractive country in which to operate a hotel business. Phuket, for example, is a bustling tourist hotspot and sees some of the highest levels of foreign investment in the hotel industry.

Developing a new hotel from scratch, however, may not be an ideal choice for someone who lacks experience in the field. Hence, entrepreneurs with sufficient financial support often choose to acquire an existing hotel.

Acquiring an already established hotel business can ease the process of governmental approval procedures, and it can provide an instant source of income through its existing client base and facilities.

There are, however, numerous factors to be considered in hotel acquisition transactions. Legal due diligence is one such consideration that will greatly assist you in clarifying any defects in the hotel. Other issues include licences and permits and validation of the legal ownership of lands and buildings.

Real Property

The documents that prove the ownership of a plot of land on which a hotel is located are important, since land tends to be the most valuable asset in a hotel business. Also, just because a hotel has been in operation for a long time does not mean that the business is being run completely legally.

The history of land documents is also important. A title search at the local Land Office will ensure that the document has been issued legitimately and that there are no attachments, restrictions or encumbrances registered, and there are no risks that may lead to revocation of the land.

Some legal encumbrances, such as mortgages, leases and servitudes, are subject to registration at the Land Office, and will be shown on the back of the title deed, which can also be verified by conducting a title search at the office in the district where the land is located.

Only leases of three or more years, however, are required to be registered with the Land Office. Therefore, a title search will not show a lease with a period of less than three years, but the hotel’s owner should disclose an unregistered lease agreement during the due diligence process.

In Thailand, land use is regulated under the City Planning Act for residential, industrial, agricultural, environmental and cultural protection, or other purposes.

Additionally, the construction of a building must comply with the relevant rules, regulations and notifications issued under the laws governing building control and the environment as well as other relevant laws. The construction of a hotel building must also abide by these rules.

We have encountered cases in which the construction of a hotel has not complied with zoning regulations, and this can lead to major problems. For example, in the case of a hotel being constructed in a prohibited zone, it may be ordered demolished.

If the hotel was constructed in a prohibited zone before the relevant law was enacted, the hotel is prohibited from being renovated or altered in the future, and the owner cannot construct any new buildings.

Licenses and Permits

An owner needs many kinds of permits and licenses to operate a hotel. As with buildings used for other purposes, buildings used as a hotel require a construction permit.

Additionally, a hotel building requires a certificate of construction, as its use is controlled by the Building Control Act. A hotel building must be inspected by a qualified engineer annually, and on passing the inspection, the owner will be issued a certificate.

In terms of operating licenses, a hotel license is required, which will indicate the type and number of rooms. This is valid for five years and it can be renewed for another five years each time. The applicant is required to prepare an environmental impact assessment report (if the hotel will have 80 or more rooms) as well as other permits for buildings to be used as a hotel.

Operating a hotel without a hotel license or not complying with the provisions of the license are subject to penalties under the Hotel Act. Furthermore, in addition to the hotel license, other licenses may also be required, e.g., a license for public entertainment, the sale of food, the sale of alcohol and cigarettes, etc.

Finally, in addition to the due diligence that must be conducted on the property, due diligence on other matters (corporate structure, employment, finance, tax, etc) will also be conducted to ensure there are no hidden liabilities.

It is also important to check who owns the intellectual property rights in the hotel, such as the hotel’s name, internet domain name, or other businesses in the hotel, and to ensure that all rights and ownership to those rights can be transferred to the buyer.

Furthermore, the terms and conditions of an operational contract in which the hotel owner hires a third party to be responsible for different aspects of the hotel, such as maintenance and lease agreements, should be clarified. If those contracts are still effective after the business transfer, then the new owner will be bound to the obligations under those agreements, including costs and expenses.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

October 1, 2025
In September 2025, Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) accused a company listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET), including its current and former directors, of concealing material information in connection with its filing registration and draft prospectus. This recent enforcement action demonstrates the serious consequences of making false statements or appearing to conceal material information in IPO filings and ongoing disclosures. In addition to being subject to criminal penalties, such actions can impact the eligibility of directors and executives to serve and may cause lasting reputational damage. Key Legal Risks The Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (as amended) imposes strict liability for making false statements or concealing material information in IPO registration statements and draft prospectuses. In such cases, investors can claim for damages, and there are also criminal penalties, including imprisonment for up to five years and substantial fines, may apply to the company, its directors, and responsible officers. However, misstatements or omissions in IPO filings do not, by themselves, disqualify directors or executives from holding office, whether arising from an SEC accusation or even a final court judgment. In contrast, for ongoing disclosures after listing, such as financial statements, annual reports, and meeting notices, false or misleading statements or concealment of material information can result in not only criminal liability but also immediate disqualification of directors and executives. If the SEC accuses a listed company or its directors or executives of such misstatements or omissions, those directors or executives are immediately disqualified from their positions, even before a final court judgment. Director and Executive Qualifications Directors and executives must meet the SEC’s specified standards of trustworthiness, as set out in the relevant rules. The SEC clearly defines characteristics that are considered to demonstrate a lack of trustworthiness. For ongoing disclosures, being involved in
September 30, 2025
Vietnam’s higher education system is at a pivotal stage of reform, with the government taking decisive steps to strengthen its policy and regulatory framework. In response to obstacles encountered during the implementation of the Law on Higher Education, issued in 2012 and amended in 2018, the third draft of the amended Law on Higher Education (Draft Law) is scheduled for submission to the National Assembly in October 2025. The Draft Law reflects the state’s commitment to aligning the education sector with international standards while addressing persistent structural challenges. The Draft Law emphasizes clarifying institutional mandates, enhancing accountability, and modernizing governance models to enable higher education institutions to operate with greater autonomy and efficiency. Against this backdrop, we outline below several notable provisions of the third draft and their potential implications for higher education institutions (HEIs) in Vietnam. Applicable Entities In addition to HEIs as defined and covered under existing legislation, the Draft Law extends its scope of applicable entities. The current Law on Higher Education does not regulate training institutions under state agencies, the armed forces, or political and social organizations, nor does it provide specific provisions for institutions offering only postgraduate education. To address this, the Draft Law introduces the term “institutions with higher education activities,” expanding its scope to include: (a) academies and research institutes established by the prime minister, mandated to provide doctoral-level training; (b) educational institutions affiliated with state agencies, political organizations, socio-political organizations, and the people’s armed forces, authorized to offer higher education programs in their specialized fields; and (c) institutions established pursuant to international treaties or by decision of the prime minister, with authorization to deliver certain levels of higher education. The inclusion of “institutions with higher education activities” represents a significant development both legally and institutionally. In an increasingly diversified higher education
September 29, 2025
In September 2019, the government of Vietnam issued Decree No. 75/2019/ND-CP on Administrative Sanctions in the Field of Competition (Decree 75) to address the urgent need for clear sanctioning mechanisms following the implementation of the new Law on Competition in July 2019. However, after five years of enforcement, various gaps and inconsistencies have been exposed that hinder its application. These shortcomings have reduced the deterrent effect of the sanctioning regime, and created legal uncertainty for market participants. A recent case involving Duc Giang – Lao Cai Chemicals’ acquisition of another chemical company—one of the first cases of economic concentration violation to be sanctioned by the National Competition Commission (NCC) since the Law on Competition took effect—highlights the practical difficulties under Vietnam’s competition law enforcement regime. In this case, although the transaction exceeded the statutory notification thresholds of economic concentration set out in the law, the parties failed to submit the required notification. This violation resulted in the NCC imposing aggregate fines of VND 1,423,982,880 (approximately USD 54,770) on the companies in September 2024. On appeal, Duc Giang – Lao Cai Chemicals argued that the chairman of the NCC was legally entitled to issue a warning as the key punishment instead of a monetary penalty. However, the chairman rejected the appeal, citing Article 14 of Decree 75, under which the specific penalty and level for “failure to notify economic concentration” is a fine, not a warning. While the chairman of the NCC is generally empowered to impose penalties, a warning cannot be applied if the specific regulation for a particular violation does not provide for it as a sanction. This example shows the inadequacy and inconsistency of the regulations on penalties for violations of competition law, and underscores the need for an amendment of Decree 75 to resolve such conflicts
September 26, 2025
As Vietnam accelerates its digital transformation, data centers have emerged as critical infrastructure supporting the shift toward a digital government, digital economy, and digital society. For businesses targeting Vietnam’s rapidly growing data center market, a clear understanding of the evolving regulatory landscape, compliance obligations, and government incentives is key to successful market entry and operation. This article provides a strategic overview of investment opportunities and key compliance requirements in Vietnam’s dynamic data center sector. Investment Incentives to Boost Data Center Growth Since July 1, 2024, organizations and individuals across all economic sectors have been encouraged to invest in and contribute to the development of data centers. By law, there are no restrictions on shareholding ratios, capital contributions, or foreign investor participation in data center and cloud computing services under business cooperation contracts. Currently, investment in AI data centers is classified as a specially incentivized industry, qualifying for preferential treatments and incentives in terms of investment, taxation, land use, and other related areas. Large-scale data centers, together with AI and cloud computing, are currently considered as strategic technologies and products for which Vietnam offers significant fiscal, tax, and land incentives to promote investment. Additionally, these large-scale projects may receive direct financial support from local development budgets for facility construction, technical infrastructure, and equipment procurement, subject to state budget provisions and applicable laws. AI data center construction projects also enjoy preferential treatment under customs regulations. Regulatory Approvals for Providing Data Center Services The 2023 Telecom Law and its guiding documents marked a significant milestone by classifying data center services as value-added telecom services. Under the law, a data center service is defined as a telecom service that enables users to process, store, and retrieve information via a telecom network through the leasing of part or all of a data center. A