You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

February 21, 2013

Major Changes in Vietnam IT Regulations on the Horizon

Informed Counsel

According to the 2012 White Book on Information and Communication Technology released by the Ministry of Information and Communications (MIC), the total revenue of Vietnam’s information and communication technology sector in 2011 was USD 20 billion, 22 times more than in 2000. This included sales in the electronic hardware industry of USD 11.3 billion, an increase of 101% over 2010, and sales in the software industry of USD 1.17 billion, which grew by 10%.

Despite this rapid growth, there remains a major lack of professionalism in the management of information technology services. Currently, the main legislation governing IT services is found in three documents: the Law on Information Technology, Decree No. 71/2007/ND-CP guiding the implementation of the Law on Information Technology, and Decree 63/2007/ND-CP providing administrative sanctions in the IT sector. This legislation, however, is very general and has not caught up with the rapid developments in IT services.

In order to more closely manage the sector and create a fair environment for the industry going forward, the MIC is putting the finishing touches on a new Draft Decree on IT Services.

Clearer Definition of IT Services

The picture of IT services seems to be clearer under the Draft Decree. Instead of the current legislation’s classification, in which IT services include only the three basic groups of hardware services, software services, and digital content services, the Draft Decree outlines a more comprehensive list with nine distinct groups of IT services. These groups cover services related to IT consulting; hardware and electronics; software; digital content; IT training; leasing and sharing IT resources; information safety; release and distribution of IT products; and other IT services. The Draft Decree shows further progress by its removal from the list of IT-enabled services, such as online training services or remote health diagnosis and treatment services; these services are already under the management of other government bodies.

Cloud Computing Services, License Required?

Cloud computing services, under the “leasing and sharing of IT resources” group, are included for the first time as IT services under the Draft Decree. The provision of cloud computing services, as well as large-scale data center services and industrial-scale refurbishing, recycling, and renewing of hardware and electronic products, would require a license from the MIC under the Draft Decree. This may be considered a restriction on cross-border suppliers of this service since one of the conditions for granting such license is that the service provider be established and operating in accordance with Vietnamese laws. The point of cloud computing services is to shorten (long) distances and cut costs; the requirement that service providers have a license and a Vietnamese subsidiary would reduce both of these benefits. Also, under the current law, foreign service providers are permitted to provide cross-border IT services without limitation or restriction. It is unclear if this requirement will be applicable to cross-border service providers.

Many IT Services to Register

While there is no requirement of service provision registration under the current legislation, many IT services are required to be registered under the Draft Decree. The registration will be applicable to some digital content services; distribution of software, digital content, and information security products; web search portal services; app and digital content stores; renting and selling space for online advertising; and other services.

Though the registration procedures do not seem overly complicated and do not require the approval of the authority, the registration requirement will add to the work and time commitments faced by IT service providers.

Content Providers to Benefit from the Draft Decree

Content providers in Vietnam have been complaining for years that they have been “bullied and pinched” by the telecommunications industry because the profit-sharing ratio always leans toward the latter—commonly at the rate of 70-30 or 60-40 in favor of the telecom service providers. In addition to the profit-sharing issues, the telecom service providers often unilaterally dictate such issues as the way of doing business and the time that digital content is launched.

There is currently no specific legislation governing the profit-sharing ratio between content providers and telecom service providers. The Draft Decree is the first legal document creating a framework for this issue. Under the Draft Decree, telecom service providers are not permitted to impose their subscriber development expenses, or other expenses not directly related to content services, on corporate/individual content service providers, and must disclose the structure of revenue sharing and telecommunications charges to the content providers. The sharing of revenue and profits between digital content service providers and telecom service providers must be “determined transparently, reasonably, and equally.”

Outlook

The Draft Decree has been presented at several seminars to seek opinions from concerned parties, and is currently still under consideration by the MIC. Many organizations who have reviewed the Draft Decree, including current IT service providers,  have expressed their dissatisfaction with its license, permit, and registration requirements, while applauding other changes.

Based on the responses of MIC representatives at these seminars, it appears the authority is inclined to keep such requirements for management purposes. If so, there would be big changes in the legal framework for IT services, which would have a significant impact on IT service providers in Vietnam. Cross-border suppliers of IT services would be most affected—international giants would no longer be able to provide services via the Internet without first obtaining permits from the MIC. An international online store selling mobile applications, for example, would need to complete registration procedures or obtain a permit to sell products to Vietnamese users.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

August 14, 2026
Thailand’s Office of the Insurance Commission (OIC) has issued guidelines clarifying the boundaries between permissible and prohibited activities for unlicensed individuals—including influencers, bloggers, and content creators—when communicating about insurance products on social media. The Good Practice Guidelines for Persons Not Licensed as Insurance Agents or Brokers Regarding the Dissemination of Insurance Content Through Digital Media B.E. 2569 (2026) took effect on July 24, 2026. Activities Requiring a License The guidelines reserve the following activities for licensed agents and brokers: Soliciting or facilitating insurance contracts. Providing personalized advice on product suitability. Recommending policy cancellation to purchase promoted products. Creating links that facilitate contract formation. Receiving performance-based compensation tied to policies or premiums generated. Importantly, boilerplate disclaimers such as “this is not a recommendation to buy insurance” will not shield individuals from liability if the OIC views the content as personalized advice or solicitation. Permitted Activities Unlicensed persons may present general educational content about insurance—such as explaining terminology, sharing industry statistics, reporting news, or sharing personal experiences—provided the content does not target specific individuals to purchase from specific companies. The guidelines also set out best practices for communication, including presenting information in a fair and balanced manner that covers both benefits and limitations, encouraging consumers to read policy terms and consult licensed professionals, verifying information from credible sources before dissemination, and exercising special care when the audience may include vulnerable groups such as persons aged 60 and older. Prohibited Practices Prohibited practices include fear-based marketing, creating artificial urgency, omitting material limitations, making exaggerated claims, falsely claiming professional credentials, using fake engagement mechanisms, and sharing false or misleading content. The guidelines also reinforce the prohibitions under section 83 of the Life Insurance Act B.E. 2535 and section 78 of the Non-Life Insurance Act B.E. 2535 against soliciting insurance contracts with foreign operators
August 11, 2026
On July 27, 2026, the State Bank of Vietnam (SBV) released a draft decree proposing amendments to Decree No. 52/2024/ND-CP dated May 15, 2024, on non-cash payments (Decree 52). The draft decree would amend 17 of Decree 52’s 38 articles, with several key changes directly affecting providers of intermediary payment service (IPS). The key proposed changes affecting IPS providers are outlined below. Streamlining IPS Licensing Procedures A central objective of the draft decree is to simplify regulatory procedures for IPS providers. Notably, it would significantly reduce IPS licensing documentation requirements by removing the need to submit enterprise registration certificates, investment registration certificates, and documents evidencing the qualifications of the legal representative and general director. Instead, the SBV would retrieve this information directly from national business registration and other specialized databases, requesting additional documents only where the relevant information cannot be verified electronically or is incomplete. The draft decree also removes the current limit of two rounds for dossier supplementation and shortens processing timelines for several IPS licensing procedures such as issuance, amendment, and reissuance of IPS licenses. The processing time for new IPS license applications would be thereby reduced from 90 to 60 working days. In addition, several continuing IPS business conditions would be removed. For example, IPS providers would no longer be required to maintain certain representations relating to corporate restructuring or the legality of contributed capital. Likewise, the IPS project plan (đề án) would become a one-time application document rather than an ongoing licensing condition. If retained in the final decree, this change could provide IPS providers with significantly greater flexibility to implement post-licensing technology upgrades, system integrations, and corporate restructuring transactions without needing to revisit the originally approved project plan. The draft decree also removes the requirement for the SBV to consult the Ministry of Public
August 10, 2026
Thailand has finalized its social media KYC (“know your customer”) rules under Notification of the Electronic Transactions Commission on Measures to Prevent Technological Crimes for Social Media Service Providers (No. 2), which was published in the Government Gazette on May 5, 2026, and will take effect on November 1, 2026. While an early draft of the notification proposed requiring social media platforms to arrange identification of every user account, the final notification is significantly more targeted, focusing on paid online advertising and advertiser identity verification. Though the regulatory initiative primarily aims to combat online fraud and technology-related crimes, it also has important consequences for intellectual property enforcement, because the verified platform records that will be generated under the new requirements can help IP rights holders to identify anonymous online infringers. Key Regulatory Mandates The notification requires social media service providers to verify the identity of advertisers before their paid advertisements are published and disseminated in Thailand through social media, regardless of whether the advertising fees come from the advertisers or third parties. Verification of an advertiser is valid for one year, after which verification would have to be performed again before the platform could publish additional paid advertisements from the advertiser. Permitted verification methods are specified under the notification. A platform may verify an advertiser by checking identity evidence and confirming the connection between the advertiser and that identity evidence, with the notification giving facial comparison against certain government-issued identity documents as an example. Alternatively, platforms may verify advertisers through a digital identity verification and authentication system with an identity-proofing assurance level not lower than the level prescribed by Thailand’s Electronic Transactions Commission. The notification further requires platforms to retain only the advertiser’s information necessary to identify the advertiser, beginning from the start of the advertising activity and for
August 10, 2026
On July 31, 2026, Thailand’s Big Data Institute (BDI) launched a public consultation on the principles of a proposed new data-sharing law, with comments accepted until August 31, 2026. If enacted, the law would establish Thailand’s first comprehensive framework for government and private-sector data sharing, creating a systematic, secure, and transparent regime to support analytics, policymaking, research, and innovation. Central Data-Sharing Platform The draft law establishes a central system for data sharing, managed by the BDI. Government agencies would be required to connect to the BDI’s Data Integration and Intelligence Platform (also referred to as D2), in accordance with the BDI’s rules and procedures. Five Dimensions of Data Sharing The draft law covers five key types of data sharing between government (G), businesses (B), and consumers (C): G2B: Private organizations may request government data specifically for research and development purposes. The BDI will assess the applicant’s data governance, security, and privacy capabilities whether such measures meet prescribed standards before forwarding the request to the relevant government agency within 90 days. Any dispute may be escalated to a newly established Data-Sharing Promotion Committee for final determination. G2G: Government agencies may request data from other agencies through the central system. The data-holding agency must respond within 90 days, taking legality, necessity, proportionality, public interest, and personal data protection into account. Disputes may be referred to the Data-Sharing Promotion Committee for adjudication. B2G: In emergency situations involving public safety, economic security, or disaster response, the Minister of Digital Economy and Society may require private entities to provide data through the central data-sharing system. Government agencies must specify the data requested, demonstrate its necessity and expected benefits, and request only data reasonably available to the data holder. Requests for personal data must be limited to the minimum amount necessary. B2C: Royal decrees may