You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

June 26, 2015

Licensing Reform on the Way in Thailand

Bangkok Post, Corporate Counsellor Column

In Franz Kafka’s novel The Castle, the protagonist tries in vain to get in touch with a mysterious group of administrators who run a small village from a castle. The character is challenged to learn the constantly changing ways and customs of the castle’s imposing bureaucracy.

Governments the world over employ vast armies of bureaucrats to administer official business, which includes everything from granting marriage licenses to approving multibillion-dollar investment projects. Thailand is no exception. But a new law called the Licensing Facilitation Act is aimed at making the bureaucracy easier to navigate and help Thailand’s business competitiveness.

As its name implies, the Act seeks to make it easier for businesses and individuals to obtain official licenses and approvals from government agencies. To that end, it promotes two overarching principles: greater transparency and less administrative discretion.

Indeed, as with the bureaucracies of other countries, the licensing process within Thai government agencies is often opaque. The time required to obtain a license is also uncertain, and officials can arbitrarily seem to change their minds about what paperwork is needed.

All of this makes doing business more difficult—and increases opportunities for corruption, as exasperated applicants will do whatever it takes to get their license.

The Licensing Facilitation Act, which goes into effect on July 21, takes aim at these problems. It requires licensing authorities to prepare a “licensing manual.” The manual must contain all the rules, procedures, and conditions to obtain a license as well as when the license must be issued.

If a license application is complete according to the manual, an official cannot ask for more documents. In other words, the manual should bring welcome predictability to the license application process.

What is more, license applications can be submitted electronically instead of by paper if allowed by the manual. This can save applicants significant time and expense.

If the application has a defect or does not fulfill the requirements stated in the manual, the official must ask the applicant to remedy the application immediately. If this is not possible, the official must make a record of the defect and the period of time needed to fix it.

Importantly, the official must make a decision on the license as per the timeline in the manual. If the deadline is not complied with, the official must explain the delay to the applicant and the Public Sector Development Commission, a government body under the Prime Minister’s Office, every seven days until a decision is made.

If the official fails to explain the delay, he or she can be liable for damages. The law does not state how damages would be calculated or to whom the official would be liable.

Another key feature of the Act is the creation of a One Stop Service Centre. The cabinet has the authority to establish such a center to receive all applications under the laws related to licensing. The One Stop Service Centre would be its own government agency, with branch offices under different ministries and different provinces.

The One Stop Service Centre would accept applications, inform applicants of licensing rules, send applications to the relevant agency, and give recommendations to the cabinet on improving licensing rules and application requirements. It can greatly ease the burden on applicants, as people would not be required to visit various agencies to obtain multiple licenses needed for an investment project.

The Licensing Facilitation Act also contains oversight mechanisms—for example, if a licensing official does not grant a license due to dishonesty or negligence, the relevant authority can bring disciplinary action against that official. Further, the Public Sector Development Commission can inspect whether the licensing officials’ work flow and period of time for granting the license stated in the manual are compliant with “good governance” rules. These rules are not specifically defined in the Act.

Additionally, licensing authorities must review the laws that empower them to grant licenses every five years. The authorities must submit reports of their review to the cabinet for consideration.

The Licensing Facilitation Act applies to almost all government licensing procedures, with a few notable exceptions. Courts are exempt, as are natural resource and environmentally related licensing. Military licenses are also generally exempt from the law.

The Act has the potential to make obtaining official licenses and approvals much easier. And reducing officials’ discretion in the licensing process will help to stop opportunities for corruption. Successful implementation would not only enhance Thailand’s investment environment but also improve overall governance. A more transparent and less Kafkaesque bureaucracy would be a boon for Thailand.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

March 31, 2026
Against the backdrop of Vietnam’s rapid economic and technological transformation and its ambition to build a knowledge-driven economy, the National Assembly of Vietnam adopted Law on Higher Education No. 125/2025/QH15 on December 10, 2025, The new law took effect on January 1, 2026, replacing Law on Higher Education No. 08/2012/QH13 of 2012 and its subsequent amendments after more than a decade of implementation. The new law reflects a significant policy shift toward enhancing the institutional autonomy of higher education institutions (“HEIs”)—universities and other university-level institutions. By granting broader autonomy, Vietnam aims to enable HEIs to operate more proactively, better respond to market needs, and improve the quality and efficiency of education and research activities. Comprehensive Institutional Autonomy in HEIs The new law marks a significant shift by granting HEIs comprehensive autonomy as a statutory right, within the bounds of the licensed scope of educational operation and the legal framework, rather than a conditional right as provided under the former law. Under the new law, HEIs are empowered to exercise autonomy over their academic expertise, training, scientific research, international cooperation, organizational structure, personnel, finance, and other higher education activities. The expansion of institutional autonomy is also accompanied by a correspondingly strengthened framework of institutional accountability. However, Vietnam maintains a certain degree of control and imposes restrictions on institutional autonomy in sensitive and strategically important areas. These controls and restrictions include limitations on training autonomy in the majors of teacher training, national defense, and security; and restrictions on financial and personnel management autonomy for HEIs under the administration of the Ministry of National Defense and the Ministry of Public Security. New Model for Curriculum Development The new law removes the concept of “opening a training major” and focuses regulation on how training programs are developed and delivered. Under the previous regime,
March 31, 2026
Thailand’s Department of Business Development (DBD) has issued a regulation imposing additional requirements for amending a company’s directors and signatory power to designate a foreign national as an authorized signatory of the company. This measure, effective April 1, 2026, has been introduced in response to the widespread use of Thai nationals as nominees to conduct business on behalf of foreigners, a practice considered to have an adverse impact on the country’s economic stability and security. The new measures are particularly concerned with changes to the authorized signatory structure of companies that originally had only Thai directors authorized to sign for and bind the company. Under the new rules, any amendment that results in a foreign national becoming an authorized signatory—whether solely or jointly—for such a company will be subject to additional verification. Directors signing an application to register such an amendment to the company’s authorized signatory structure are now also required to provide a statement confirming that all shareholders of the company have made genuine contributions and no Thai national has assisted with, supported, or participated in business activities in a nominee capacity. Implications Companies intending to appoint foreign directors as authorized signatories should be aware of the increased regulatory requirements and assessments. Additional documentation and confirmations may be required as part of the registration process.
March 31, 2026
On December 10, 2025, the National Assembly of Vietnam adopted Law on Vocational Education No. 124/2025/QH15, which took effect on January 1, 2026, replacing Law on Vocational Education No. 74/2014/QH13 of 2014. The new law broadens the categories of institutions eligible to deliver vocational training, introduces vocational upper secondary schools, and shifts governance structures for private institutions from ownership-representative boards of management to stakeholder-based school councils. These reforms aim to diversify training providers, align programs with labor market needs, and create a more flexible, open vocational education ecosystem, offering expanded opportunities for foreign and domestic investors, universities, and enterprises. Some highlights of the new Law on Vocational Education are presented below. Expansion of Vocational Training Levels and Programs In addition to elementary, intermediate, and college—the three levels of vocational training program set out under the 2014 Law on Vocational Education—the new law expands the structure by introducing two new levels: Vocational high school training programs are placed between elementary and intermediate levels, and are aimed at combining upper secondary education with vocational training, expanding options for learners after graduating from the lower secondary level. Other vocational training programs are not specified in detail under the new law, but aim to equip learners with the capability to perform and handle one or several simple tasks of an occupation. Expansion of Vocational Education Providers The new law reclassifies and extends vocational education providers by classifying them into two distinct categories: Vocational education institutions, which include colleges, intermediate schools, and vocational high schools. Establishments participating in vocational education activities, which include vocational education centers, vocational-continuing education centers, continuing education centers, other centers with vocational education functions, enterprises, cooperatives, and higher education institutions. Vocational education providers may provide one vocational training level only, or several/all levels, depending on the type of provider. The
March 31, 2026
Thailand’s Office of the Consumer Protection Board has opened a public hearing period on draft regulations governing the transfer of direct sales and direct marketing businesses. The draft Notification of the Direct Sales and Direct Marketing Committee: Criteria and Procedures for Business Transfer and Amendment of Registration for Direct Sales or Direct Marketing Businesses establishes a compliance-focused process with strict documentation requirements and timelines for transferring direct sales and direct marketing businesses. The proposed framework also defines the roles of transferors and transferees and establishes application procedures with the Office of the Consumer Protection Board. Applications may be submitted in person or electronically and will be examined to confirm they are complete, authentic, and compliant with legal requirements. This includes verification that: The transferee meets all required qualifications; No disqualifying factors apply; and The applicant is not subject to legal restrictions. The public hearing period is open until April 29, 2026. Direct sales and direct marketing business operators should prepare for these proposed requirements to ensure compliant implementation once the regulations are finalized.