Thailand’s draft Emergency Decree on Technology Crimes Suppression, which we covered in a client alert in January 2025 primarily addressed to telecom operators and financial institutions, is expected to have significant implications for a wide range of business operators.  The draft emergency decree has already been approved by the cabinet but may undergo further developments as it continues in the legislative process. In this article, we will highlight the material impacts of the draft emergency decree on overseas and local fintech operators. Expanded Definition of “Technology Crimes” The definition of “technology crimes” now includes the following acts of forgery or alteration: Forging or altering the identity of individuals and biometric characteristics by utilizing computer or communication systems or other electronic means to commit offenses. Forging or altering symbols, trademarks, or seals of groups (e.g., foundations, community enterprises) or juristic persons, including acts by juristic persons using individuals or juristic persons as nominal directors or shareholders, regardless of whether such individuals or legal juristic persons reside in Thailand. Forging or altering digital or online platforms, regardless of the platform’s location or legal status. Individuals who conspire, utilize, assist, or support the commission of these offenses will face the same penalties as the principal offender. Business Operator Definition The scope of “business operators” is now expanded to cover various fintech and digital asset operators beyond those under the Payment Systems Act (PSA). The draft emergency decree now includes the following operators, whether they are legally authorized or not: Business operators under the PSA and business operators who operate “as if” they are payment system operators Business operators under the Royal Decree on Digital Asset Businesses or business operators who operate “as if” they are digital asset business operators. Foreign exchange business operators. Disclosure and Exchange of Information Business operators must disclose

On January 24, 2025, the prime minister of Vietnam issued Decision No. 232/QD-TTg, approving the proposal for establishment and development of a carbon market in Vietnam. The decision establishes a compliance mechanism for greenhouse gas (GHG) emitters and creates opportunities for investors interested in carbon trading in Vietnam. Market Development Roadmap Decision 232 establishes a phased approach to developing Vietnam’s carbon market, with the following ambitious milestones: Before June 2025 (preparation period): The legal framework for trading of emissions quotas and carbon credits and a carbon-credit offset exchange mechanism will be developed, along with the necessary infrastructure for organization and operation of the carbon-credit market. From June 2025 to the end of December 2028 (pilot period): A pilot domestic carbon exchange will be launched, with continued legal refinements. From 2029 (official launch period): The carbon market will be fully operational. Carbon Market Structure and Trading Mechanisms Vietnam’s carbon market will function as a centralized, government-regulated exchange, trading two main assets: GHG emissions quotas (allowances) allocated to regulated emitters, which can be traded or auctioned; and Carbon credits generated from domestic and international projects that are certified for trading. The carbon credits generated from international projects include those originating from international exchange or offset-crediting mechanisms such as the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), the Joint Credit Mechanism (JCM), and Article 6 of the Paris Agreement. The National Registration System for GHG emissions quotas and carbon credits will be primarily developed and operated by the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment. Transactions of GHG emissions quotas and carbon credits will occur on the domestic carbon exchange, managed by the Hanoi Stock Exchange, and will follow a centralized process where verified quotas and credits receive unique domestic codes for trading and participants must have depository accounts. The Vietnam Securities Depository and Clearing Corporation

Vietnam’s political system is currently undergoing a significant reorganization to streamline government operations and improve efficiency. In this regard, Plan 141/KH-BCDTKNQ18, issued on December 6, 2024, provided guidelines on the restructuring of existing ministries, ministerial-level agencies, and government-affiliated agencies. Accordingly, the number of ministries is being reduced from 18 to 14 through mergers and consolidations and the establishment of a new Ministry of Ethnic and Religious Affairs. The number of ministerial-level agencies is being reduced to three, and government-affiliated agencies to five. Similar streamlining is happening at provincial levels. The newly consolidated state agencies will assume all functions, rights, and responsibilities of the merged entities, and will continue handling all ongoing matters previously handled by the former agencies. Some examples of these changes include the following: The Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) will oversee telecommunications, IT applications, cybersecurity, e-transactions, and national digital transformation, which had previously been managed by the Ministry of Information and Communications (MIC). MOST will also be responsible for issuing licenses related to these areas, such as licenses for G1 online game services and telecommunication services. The Ministry of Culture, Sports, and Tourism will assume the responsibility of press management, previously under the MIC. The Ministry of Finance will assume state management functions related to investment, previously handled by the Ministry of Planning and Investment. Provincial Departments of Finance will issue Investment Registration Certificates and Enterprise Registration Certificates, a responsibility previously held by the Departments of Planning and Investment. The Ministry of Home Affairs will oversee labor and employment matters. Provincial Departments of Home Affairs will be authorized to issue work permits and will be the designated authorities for companies to register their internal labor regulations. Advantages for Businesses The restructuring aims to simplify regulations and expedite licensing processes. By reducing the number of agencies

Exchangeable bonds (EBs) are uncommon financial instruments in the Thai market and differ from convertible bonds, which allow conversion into newly issued shares. EBs, on the other hand, are an alternative way of raising funds but are not defined under Thai rules and are typically not offered in Thailand. Instead, a major shareholder of a Thai-listed company uses an offshore vehicle company to issue EBs backed by its trading shares in a Thai-listed company. The exchange price usually includes a premium over the reference price. This method enables the major shareholder to monetize holdings efficiently while maintaining flexibility in financial management through funds raised without relying on traditional loans. Share Price Impact In one recent case involving the issuance of EBs backed by Thai listed shares, the share price of the underlying company got hit significantly. Some critics may view EB issuance as harmful to minority investors while providing advantages to the EB issuer because the potential conversion can lead to an increase in the supply of the company’s shares in the market, since the bondholders converting EBs often sell those shares in the market. This may exert downward pressure on the share price due to the higher supply of shares available for trading. Meanwhile, the advantages of issuing EBs seem to be fundraising at a lower cost for the major shareholders to the detriment of minority investors in a listed company. The anticipation regarding impending conversions can also affect investor sentiment, leading to increased volatility in the share price. Some may view the issuance of EBs as having a positive side since this typically offers a higher conversion price compared to the current trading price, but whether it will undergo future growth would still largely depend on the market’s confidence in the stock price, and disclosures play a