You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

March 19, 2014

Lex Mundi Global Practice Guide: Restrictions and Incentives on Ownership of Farmland

Lex Mundi and Tilleke & Gibbins

Agricultural expansion through farmland has been a key driver of growth in several parts of the world to cope with the increasing needs for food. In many jurisdictions, the ownership and possession of farmland by foreigners has been subject to restrictions and incentives. This Global Practice Guide: Restrictions and Incentives on Ownership of Farmland, prepared members of the Lex Mundi Agribusiness practice group, provides insights for agribusiness companies and investors regarding potential opportunities and restrictions in this burgeoning area. The overview for Thailand is provided below, while the full guide can be found on the Lex Mundi website.

1. How is farmland typically defined? Please include details of any usage and size requirements if applicable.

Under the Agriculture Land Reform Act B.E. 2518 (1975), “farmland” can be typically defined as land used predominantly for agriculture. Additionally, “agriculture” covers paddy cultivation, plantations, orchards, animal rearing, fisheries, and aquatic animal breeding.

The Agriculture Land Reform Office (ALRO) is a government authority that obtains land by taking it from the public domain or purchasing and expropriating it from landowners. ALRO reforms the land into agricultural areas to provide for people who are deemed appropriate.

Section 30 of the Agriculture Land Reform Act regulates all land or immovable property which has been obtained by ALRO. ALRO has the power to allocate this land to agricultural workers (i.e. farmers) or agricultural institutions according to the rules, methods, and conditions prescribed by the responsible committee. The following qualifications shall be met:

  1. Not to exceed 50 rai* for an agricultural worker and persons in the same family engaging in other fields of agricultural work, except as in (2);
  2. Not to exceed 100 rai for an agricultural worker and persons in the same family engaging in animal husbandry classified as large animals according to the notification of the Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives; 
  3. The land area must be used as the committee deems appropriate for an agricultural institution considering their category and procedures. 

Other than ALRO’s allocation of land to agricultural workers and the agricultural institutions as mentioned above, any person or legal entity who wishes to lease, hire-purchase, buy, or use agricultural land or immovable property to engage in business supporting or relating to agriculture must obtain approval from ALRO according to the regulations and conditions approved by the committee. However, the size of the land shall not exceed 50 rai.

2. Is government approval required in order to take an interest in farmland (by means of acquisition, lease or otherwise)?

As mentioned above, the right to use farmland under the Agriculture Land Reform Act shall be approved by ALRO.

3. If government approval is required, are there procedural requirements, licences and/or permits to be obtained or waiting periods which may affect the transfer of the interest in farmland?

A person who wishes to take interest in agricultural land from ALRO must submit the application to either the Central ALRO or the Provincial ALRO in which the land is located.

It generally takes about 1.5-2 years to obtain approval and/or the Sor Por Gor 4-01 certificate.

4. Is local presence required in order to take an interest in farmland?

The applicant must be Thai (either a juristic person or an individual) to take interest in farmland but does not require a local presence in Thailand.

5. Which governmental authorities are involved in the determination of the regulations of ownership of farmland?

Regulations on ownership of farmland are determined by ALRO of the Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives.

6. Does the government offer any incentives or encourage the acquisition of farmland? For example, the government may offer tax exemptions on the purchase of farmland.

The registration fee of the rights over land related to agricultural land reform under the Agriculture Land Reform Act is eligible for exemptions.

7. What kind of encumbrances typically affect farmland?

A person or legal entity who is granted rights under the Agriculture Land Reform Act shall not have the right to subdivide or transfer rights to such land to others except by way of inheritance or transference to an agricultural institution or ALRO.

8. What is the process for finding out about the existence of encumbrances affecting farmland?

The existence of encumbrances can be checked at the Department of Land and the Provincial ALRO where the land is located.

9. What kind of permits and/or licenses are you required to hold if you have an interest in farmland?

“Sor Por Gor 4-01” is a certificate to enter and use certain reformed land, which will be issued to the agricultural worker or agricultural institution who received the land allocated by ALRO, while other persons approved by ALRO to lease, hire-purchase, or buy land will receive title deed and an agreement entered into between ALRO and the applicant.

10. Is any reform expected to the laws affecting the ownership of farmland?

No reform is currently expected.

* 1 rai = 400 square wah (1600 sq. meters) = 0.4 acres = 0.16 hectares
1 ngan = 100 square wah
1 square wah = 4 sq. meters

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

December 4, 2025
Thailand has expanded the circumstances under which state agencies may bypass competitive bidding procedures to address urgent security challenges. On November 28, 2025, Thailand’s Ministry of Finance published the Ministerial Regulation Determining Cases of Procurement by Specific Method (No. 6) B.E. 2568 in the Royal Gazette, introducing a new pathway for procuring supplies and services needed to address cyber and military threats that may affect the stability of government agencies or the nation. For technology vendors, cybersecurity firms, and defense contractors, this regulatory change creates immediate opportunities to engage directly with government buyers facing urgent security challenges. New Fast-Track Category for Security Threats The regulation amends Thailand’s Public Procurement and Supplies Management Act B.E. 2560 (2017) to add a new category of procurement that qualifies for the “specific method”—a noncompetitive, direct selection process. Previously, agencies could use this expedited method only in limited circumstances, such as emergencies, cases with proprietary technology requirements, or national security operations. The new provision explicitly covers procurement of supplies related to preventing or resolving cyber or military threats that could impact the stability of a state agency or the country. This addition recognizes the urgent nature of modern security challenges, where competitive bidding timelines may leave agencies vulnerable during critical threat windows. State agencies dealing with active cyberattacks, preparing defensive measures against anticipated threats, or responding to military security concerns can now move directly to negotiate with qualified vendors rather than conducting lengthy public tender processes. Vendor Considerations Vendors offering cybersecurity solutions now have a regulatory avenue to work directly with government clients when stability concerns are present. These solutions include threat detection systems, anti-ransomware tools, incident response services, firewalls, and security consulting. Similarly, defense contractors providing military equipment or specialized security supplies can pursue direct engagement channels where traditional procurement methods would create
December 4, 2025
Thailand’s Department of Business Development (DBD), through its Office of Central Company and Partnership Registration, has released multiple draft orders for public consultation until December 12, 2025. These draft orders aim to strengthen the business registration process, with a focus on the requirements for establishing and amending the principal office address of a partnership or limited company, verification of authorized signatories, and measures to identify and prevent registrations involving persons linked to suspicious or high-risk activities. The draft orders’ proposed requirements are outlined below. Principal Office Verification The principal office address of a partnership or limited company, including house registration code, house number, full address details, and building name, must be fully aligned with the civil registry. The registrar will strictly verify this before accepting any registration or amendment. If the address used for registration is already registered for at least five other companies, the company must submit a consent letter from the person authorized to allow use of the principal office, along with supporting documents proving the right to use the address. Signatory Certification Compliance Duties Persons certifying directors’ signatures on registration forms are responsible for verifying their identities, maintaining up-to-date information, and complying with the requirements of the DBD’s Biz Regist digital registration system. Certain supporting documents proving the qualifications of certifying persons are also required, with some exceptions for specific professional roles. Identity and qualification verification must be renewed upon the completion of one year from the date of registration as a certifying person, or if the certification credentials expire before the one-year period ends, in accordance with the verification requirements. Verification of Suspicious Parties Any partner, shareholder, or director linked to a predicate offense will be required to meet with the registrar in person for further verification steps. For all parties related to a company
December 2, 2025
Investing in Mainland Southeast Asia is Tilleke & Gibbins’ essential guide for investors looking to do business in this vibrant region, whether it’s starting operations as a newly established entity or expanding into new territories or business models.
November 28, 2025
On November 26, 2025, the government of Vietnam issued Resolution No. 8/2025/NQ-CP to extend and expand the pilot program allowing Vietnamese citizens who meet certain conditions to gamble at three integrated casino resorts in Vietnam: Corona Resorts & Casino Phu Quoc (An Giang Province) – Effective immediately, and continuing an ongoing pilot program that started in 2019. The Grand Casino Ho Tram (Ho Chi Minh City) – New pilot program for five years starting November 26, 2025. Van Don Integrated Casino & Tourism Complex (Quang Ninh Province) – New pilot program for five years from the date the casino receives its license. The pilot program was originally established under Decree No. 03/2017/ND-CP on casino business, which also sets out the specific eligibility conditions for Vietnamese citizens. After the pilot period, these projects must stop allowing Vietnamese players until the government issues further decisions. This expansion of the pilot program comes after Vietnam’s Ministry of Finance (MOF) released a draft decree earlier this year proposing significant changes to the regulatory framework governing casino operations. These revisions, which focus on increasing fiscal contributions from local players and strengthening compliance obligations for casino operators nationwide, are detailed below. Proposed Increase in Casino Entry Fees for Vietnamese Players The draft decree increases the entry fees applicable to Vietnamese citizens permitted to play at casinos. Under the current regulations, Vietnamese players are required to pay an entry fee of VND 1 million (approx. USD 38) for 24 consecutive hours or VND 25 million (approx. USD 950) per month. The draft decree proposes increasing these fees to VND 2.5 million (approx. USD 95) for 24 consecutive hours and VND 50 million (approx. USD 1,900) per month, effectively doubling the existing amounts and marking the first major fee revision since the pilot program allowing Vietnamese players