You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

June 9, 2022

Legislation Amendments for Public Limited Companies in Thailand

Subscribe to Updates

On May 23, 2022, the Public Limited Companies Act (No. 4) B.E. 2565 (2022) was approved and published in the Government Gazette. The updated law amends the previous version of the Public Limited Companies Act by formally allowing board of directors (BOD) and shareholders’ meetings to be held electronically, and amending corporate approval processes for public limited companies.

The new act came into effect the day after its publication, but full implementation of certain amendments will only become practical after the issuance of various related subrules and subregulations. The key elements of the new act are described below.

Electronic Dissemination of Company Notices and Advertisements

Under the previous version of the Public Limited Companies Act, required company notices, statements, and advertisements had to be published in a local newspaper where the company is located, for at least three consecutive days.

However, the amended act allows such notices, statements, and advertisements to be sent via electronic means, though the process must comply with subregulations to be issued by the Department of Business Development (DBD).

Electronic Delivery Options for Documents

The amended act allows public limited company notices or documents to be sent to company directors, shareholders, or creditors electronically instead of by registered mail, as long as the recipients have consented to receive such documents via electronic means. Electronic delivery of documents must comply with subregulations to be issued by the DBD.

Additional Individuals Authorized to Call BOD Meetings

In keeping with the previous version of the law, the amended act grants the chairperson of the BOD the authority to call a board meeting, and allows any two directors to jointly request that the chairperson call a meeting, in which case the chairperson must call the meeting within 14 days. The amended act further stipulates that if the chairperson does not call the meeting in accordance with the request, at the lapse of the 14-day window, the requesting directors can then directly call a BOD meeting in the following 14 days. The new act also allows the vice-chairperson to call a BOD meeting if there is no chairperson; this authority passes to any two directors if there is no vice-chairperson.

Electronic BOD Meetings

The amended Public Limited Companies Act allows BOD meetings to be convened by electronic means, unless this is prohibited by the company’s articles of association. Such meetings, which are deemed to be held at the company’s head office, must be held in compliance with the laws governing electronic meetings.

A public limited company’s BOD should meet at least once every three months. The previous version of the Public Limited Companies Act stipulated that the notice calling for a meeting be given to the directors in person or sent to them at least seven days in advance, but the amended act reduces the notice period to three days. In the case of an urgent matter and when needed to protect the rights and benefits of the company, the notice period can be shortened further and the notice can be sent electronically.

Electronic Shareholders’ Meetings
Similar to electronic BOD meetings, shareholders’ meetings can also be convened electronically if this is not restricted by the company’s articles of association and is in compliance with the laws governing electronic meetings. Likewise, the company’s head office is deemed the location of the meeting.

If a shareholders’ meeting is requested by the holders of at least 10% of the total issued shares, and the BOD fails to call the meeting within 45 days of receiving the shareholders’ request, the requesting shareholders can then call for a shareholders’ meeting in the subsequent 45 days. The meeting notice issued by the requesting shareholders can be sent electronically, provided the shareholders have consented to receive the documents via electronic means. This delivery of documents must comply with subregulations to be issued by the DBD.

Appointment of a Proxy Holder via Electronic Means

The amended act permits shareholders to appoint a proxy holder via electronic means, provided the method is safe, credible, and in accordance with the rules prescribed by the DBD. This is a change from the previous version of the act, under which the appointment of a proxy holder for a shareholders’ meeting had to be made in writing and signed by the grantor, with a hard copy submitted to the chairperson or a designee.

Tilleke & Gibbins will continue to monitor the new act’s implementation—particularly the development of regulations related to electronic processes—and provide updates as appropriate. For more information on these new laws, or any aspect of how public limited companies can comply with Thailand’s laws, please contact Chaiwat Keratisuthisathorn at [email protected] or +66 2056 5507, Onunya Chanpen at [email protected] or +66 2056 5603, or Suphitsara Jaturaphitjaroen at [email protected] or +66 2056 5645.

Related Professionals

Practices

Corporate/M&A

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

September 30, 2021
Thailand’s Board of Investment has consolidated its definition of promoted business activities in the digital space, replacing promotions for e-commerce, digital services, and software, with a single category for “Development of software, platform for digital services, or digital content.”
Read More
September 9, 2021
Multilaw has published its new Global Business Entities Guide, which collects expert advice from Multilaw’s member firms in more than 65 jurisdictions around the world. The guide provides answers to the key issues concerning international business operations, investments, and joint ventures. Each country section lists the main types of business vehicle that exist in the jurisdiction, and gives a detailed review of each business type through a standardized template that covers the following topics: General principles Incorporation, formation, or organization Registers Governance Ownership interests Costs and taxes Jurisdiction-specific matters Multilaw is a global network of carefully selected, independent law firms consisting of over 10,000 commercial lawyers in more than 100 countries, able to provide expert legal advice in complex environments around the globe. The full guide is available for free on the Multilaw website.
Read More
September 7, 2021
COVID-19 and the resulting lockdown measures to limit outbreaks in Thailand have caused significant financial difficulties for many business operators, large and small. Whether a business is a creditor or debtor, there is a high likelihood they have faced or will face a default caused by the pandemic. This article identifies three legal options available when a party defaults—civil cases, bankruptcy actions, and business rehabilitation actions—and compares key elements associated with each option. For context, those three options are defined as follows: Civil case. A legal proceeding in which a creditor files a civil lawsuit (or arbitration claim) against a debtor for debt collection. If a debtor fails to settle a debt in accordance with a judgment, the creditor can ask the court to enforce the judgment by seizure and sale of the debtor’s assets through public auction. Bankruptcy action. A legal proceeding under the Bankruptcy Act in which a government authority can collect a debtor’s assets, sell the assets by public auction, and distribute the net proceeds among creditors. In bankruptcy proceedings, the creditors will receive repayment in proportion to the size of the outstanding debts. Business rehabilitation action. A legal proceeding under the Bankruptcy Act aimed at helping a debtor recover from insolvency and continue its business. Debtors are given debt relief and a “new start” through business rehabilitation, while creditors are able to collect a higher percentage of outstanding debt under rehabilitation than they would under a bankruptcy action. In short, a civil case is a claim in court for repayment of a specific debt, a bankruptcy action results in distribution of the debtor’s assets among the creditors, and a business rehabilitation action aims to enable the debtor to stay in business while repaying their debts to some degree. A civil case may be appropriate when
Read More
September 3, 2021
Attorneys from Tilleke & Gibbins have prepared the Thailand section of the Foreign Investment Restrictions Guide, published by Lex Mundi. The guide provides answers to key questions related to the regulatory regime for foreign investments in the jurisdictions of Lex Mundi member firms in 57 jurisdictions around the world. Each country-specific section contains in-depth information on the jurisdiction’s legal framework governing employment relationships, addressing the following questions and topics: General overview of the country’s foreign investment restrictions Sectors subject to investment restrictions Relevant thresholds, notification obligations, and approval requirements Grounds to block a foreign investment Information specific to COVID-19 and other relevant potential developments The guide draws on the expertise of Lex Mundi member firms from around the world. Its innovative format allows users to compare current information from multiple jurisdictions in a side-by-side customizable report. To browse the contributions, generate country-specific reports, and compare regulatory guidance on cross-border investment and transactional activity across multiple jurisdictions, please visit the Lex Mundi website.
Read More