You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

March 9, 2016

Legal Update: New Regulations in the ICT Sector in Vietnam

The final months of 2015 saw a flurry of new legislation in Vietnam’s Information Communication and Technology (ICT) sector. Some of the new regulations have recently taken effect, while others will become effective later in 2016. Below we provide an overview of some key legislation:

  • Information security. The new Law on Information Security is Vietnam’s first comprehensive statute in this area. Previously, data-security regulations were scattered across different pieces of legislation, such as the Law on Information Technology and the Law on Telecommunications. The new law includes, among other things, provisions on ensuring safety and security of information; protecting personal information in the network environment; and preventing spam, computer viruses, and harmful software. The Law on Information Security was passed on November 19, 2015, and will take effect on July 1, 2016.
  • Broadcasting services. Decree 06/2016/ND-CP on management, provision, and use of broadcasting services, which will come into force on March 15, 2016, regulates pay TV and the co-production of radio and TV programs. Replacing the current Decision 20 and Circular 19, Decree 06 has new, clearer regulations on Internet TV and offers some licensing exemptions for foreign channels which do not receive royalty payments. In addition, under the new decree, the number of foreign channels cannot exceed 30 percent of the total number of pay TV channels in Vietnam. The key content in Circular 19 on coproduction of radio and TV programs is retained in Decree 06, including the ban on coproduction of news and politics programs.
  • Internet resources. Circular 24/2015/TT-BTTTT on management and use of Internet resources provides additional grounds for dealing with “.vn” domain name disputes. For more information about Circular 24, please refer to our previous legal update.
  • Used IT products. The list of used IT products that are prohibited from importation has been updated in Circular 31/2015/TT-BTTTT (passed on October 29, 2015, and effective from December 15, 2015). This list notably still includes refurbished IT products, but upcoming legislation (see below) is expected to include some exceptions for refurbished goods.
  • Used machinery, equipment, and production lines. Circular 23/2015/TT-BTTT on importing used machinery, equipment, and production lines was passed on November 13, 2015, and will take effect on July 1, 2016, replacing Circular 20. Circular 23 will make it significantly easier for ICT companies to import used equipment by reducing restrictions and facilitating customs clearance.
  • Quality control of telecom services. Circular 35/2015/TT-BTTTT mainly updates the list of telecommunication services subject to quality control to keep up with the latest advances in technology. This circular came into effect on February 15, 2016.
  • Safety and security of information systems in banking operations. Circular 31/2015/TT-NHNN provides comprehensive security regulations in banking operations in areas including safety and security of information systems and management of online transaction services. Importantly, the circular clearly sets out that it applies not only to the State Bank of Vietnam and credit institutions, but also to foreign bank branches and providers of intermediary payment services—a new category not covered by the previous regulations. The new circular passed on December 28, 2015, and took effect on March 1, 2016.

In addition, a number of key regulations have been proposed which are currently still in draft form, including:

  • A circular on Over-The-Top services is currently on hold at the Ministry of Information and Communications (MIC).
  • A draft circular on cross-border service provision of public information was released for a public consultation period, which ended in June 2015. The circular is under consideration and is expected to be approved by the MIC in 2016.
  • There has been a long-pending draft of a decree on IT services, but it remains on hold.
  • A circular on the list of IT services has been drafted and released for public consultation. It is under consideration for approval. 
  • Procedures for registration of information content service provision on mobile telecommunication networks may be addressed under a new circular. A draft was released for public consultation from July 6 to September 6, 2015, and is under further regulatory review.
  • The existing Circular 12/2013 on telecom licensing may be amended. Draft amendments have been publicly released, but a timeline for the amendments is not yet available.
  • Finally, there may be a future decision of the Prime Minister to allow importation of refurbished IT products, components, and accessories, as long as they meet certain stipulated conditions.

To learn more about these regulations, please contact [email protected].

 

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

July 28, 2026
Data protection officers (DPOs) have become a fixture of Thailand’s privacy compliance landscape since the Personal Data Protection Act B.E. 2562 (2019) (PDPA) took full effect and the Office of the Personal Data Protection Committee (PDPC) began requiring certain organizations to appoint them. On July 7, 2026, the Office of the PDPC presented draft guidance on DPOs as part of a public consultation on a series of draft personal data protection manuals and recommendations. The draft offers the clearest indication yet of how the regulator expects the DPO role to work in practice, addressing recurring implementation issues under the PDPA—including when an organization must appoint a DPO, how the DPO should operate independently, how to manage conflicts of interest, and how data subjects and regulators should be able to contact the DPO. Because it remains in draft, organizations have an opportunity to weigh the practical implications now before the guidance is finalized. When a DPO Must Be Appointed The draft guidance clarifies the triggers for mandatory DPO appointment, including: Regular and systematic monitoring of personal data or systems on a large scale, such as tracking, analyzing, or predicting behavior, attitudes, or individual characteristics. Core activities involving large-scale processing of sensitive personal data, such as health data, biometric data, or criminal records. Certain foreign-organization representative arrangements. Public-sector coverage under relevant notifications identifying government entities that must appoint a DPO. Processing involving 100,000 or more data subjects may be considered large-scale. The guidance also contemplates voluntary DPO appointment for organizations that wish to raise their privacy governance standards, and such organizations should still comply with the standards applicable to DPOs under the law. Independence and Reporting Lines The draft guidance identifies lack of DPO independence as a core risk because an ineffective or constrained DPO may be unable to raise deficiencies
July 27, 2026
Vietnam’s new E-Commerce Law, which took effect on 1 July 2026 along with its implementing Decree No. 248/2026/ND-CP (Decree 248), marks a significant development in the country’s approach to online intellectual property (IP) enforcement, reflecting a clear shift from a reactive model of intermediary liability to one that expects platforms to play a more active role in preventing infringement. From notice-and-takedown to platform responsibility The most significant change introduced by the E-Commerce Law is the transformation of the legal role of e-commerce platforms. The existing safe harbor provisions under the IP Law and the copyright notice-and-takedown regime established by Decree 17/2023/ND-CP (Decree 17) largely required intermediaries to act only after receiving notice of infringement. Once infringing content had been removed, the platform’s legal obligation was generally considered fulfilled. The new legislation adopts a fundamentally different approach. Article 17 of the E-Commerce Law requires intermediary platforms to screen information relating to goods and services before publication in order to prevent listings involving counterfeit or IP-infringing goods, and goods of unknown origin. Rather than relying exclusively on complaints from rights holders, platforms are now expected to implement preventive measures before infringing listings become publicly available. Decree 248 further requires platforms to update keyword filters based on recommendations issued by competent authorities. These filtering mechanisms are intended to prevent prohibited listings from appearing on the platform and represent a further move away from a purely complaint-driven enforcement model. The legislation also introduces Vietnam’s first statutory stay-down obligation. Under the E-Commerce Law and Decree 248, major digital platforms must maintain automated systems capable of reviewing, warning against, and removing unlawful listings while also implementing measures to prevent repeat violations, defined under Decree 248 as conduct that has previously been identified and handled by the platform, but continues to recur. This obligation addresses one
July 27, 2026
A new decree on penalties for violations related to the crypto asset market creates compliance risks for offshore crypto asset exchanges in Vietnam that do not hold, and practically cannot obtain, a Vietnamese license, and for Vietnamese users who continue to transact on those platforms. Decree No. 284/2026/ND-CP (Decree 284), issued by the government of Vietnam on July 16, 2026, formally establishes an administrative penalty framework for violations related to crypto assets and the crypto asset market. The decree takes effect on September 1, 2026, and will remain in force for the duration of the five-year pilot program under Resolution No. 05/2025/NQ-CP, which is scheduled to end in September 2030. Direct Penalties on Vietnamese Users The most immediate commercial risk to offshore platforms is that their Vietnamese users now face direct personal liability for using their exchanges. Vietnamese users who trade crypto assets outside of a Ministry of Finance-licensed service provider face fines of up to VND 50 million (approximately USD 1,900). Vietnamese users trading in crypto assets that are offered or issued to foreign users face higher penalties of up to VND 100 million (approximately USD 3,800). It is expected that Vietnamese users will be more willing to migrate away from offshore platforms now that there is a risk of real enforcement against them. Penalties on Unlicensed Service Providers Violations of providing crypto asset services or advertising crypto-related services without a license face fines of up to VND 200 million (approximately USD 7,700). Operating a crypto asset trading market without proper authorization falls within the same highest penalty bands. Organizations that violate issuance, provision, or disclosure rules may face fines of up to VND 200 million. Although the maximum administrative fine per violation is capped at VND 200 million for organizations and VND 100 million for individuals, these
July 21, 2026
Thailand’s Ministry of Digital Economy and Society (MDES) published a notification establishing an expedited court-ordered takedown mechanism for online content in cases of “urgent necessity.” The notification, which was issued on July 17, 2026, under the Computer Crime Act B.E. 2550 (2007), as amended, took effect the following day. It significantly expands the categories of content subject to rapid government-initiated removal. Content Categories Subject to Takedown The notification defines “urgent necessity” (section 20, paragraph 5, of the Computer Crime Act) as circumstances where any delay in suppressing computer data may impact national security, religion, the monarchy, good morals, social culture, or public order. In this regard, it establishes four broad categories of content: Computer Crime Act offenses. National security offenses. IP and other criminal offenses, where it is contrary to public order or good morals and a competent officer has requested its suppression. Content contrary to public order or good morals, a broad residual category encompassing 14 subcategories approved by the Computer Data Screening Committee. The fourth category is the most expansive. Its 14 subcategories include: Content defaming, mocking, satirizing, or devaluing the monarchy. Online gambling advertising or facilitation. Offering illegal firearms for sale. Offering baraku (hookah) products or e-cigarettes for sale. Offering cannabis inflorescences or processed cannabis products for sale. Advertising or soliciting prostitution. Content inciting violence, hatred, or social division. Unauthorized overseas employment advertising. Offering boiled kratom juice for sale. Online sale or advertising of alcoholic beverages. Content satirizing or degrading Buddhism. Money lending at interest rates exceeding legally prescribed limits. Advertising or disseminating information about surrogacy services. Forgery of documents, cards, or official documents. Enforcement Procedure In cases of urgent necessity, a competent official assigned by the MDES permanent secretary must file a petition with supporting evidence to the court with jurisdiction, requesting an order to