You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

February 14, 2018

Laos: Temporary Suspension of Business Licenses in Certain Industries

Tilleke & Gibbins

Laos has attracted substantial foreign investment in recent years, which has contributed to a surge in the establishment of legal entities, both local and foreign. However, the Lao government has noted that a number of legal entities have not actually been operating business activities in the country, nor have they fulfilled minimum requirements set out in relevant regulations. Moreover, the government found that several concessions that were granted are still not operational, or have been used as collateral or bargaining assets that were later sold to other investors for projects that were not originally part of the concessions granted.

As a result, the government issued a series of separate notifications, over the course of the past several months, that temporarily suspend the issuance of new business licenses for both domestic and foreign entities contemplating the establishment of a legal entity in several industry sectors in Laos.

Authorities are currently closely monitoring companies and concession projects in the country, and have issued a warning that noncomplying entities, regardless of their nationality, will face sanctions, ranging from warnings to revocation of existing business licenses. As such, the separate notifications issued by the government not only pertain to the issuance of new licenses but also pose implications for existing licensed business operations.

A number of key industries affected by the government’s notification are outlined below, and, unless otherwise noted, no date has been provided on when licensing will resume.

Insurance

The Prime Minister’s Office Notification No. 1199, dated August 17, 2016, which followed a previous notification on the same topic, was issued to request temporary suspension of the issuance of business or investment licenses for the establish of companies that conduct life and non-life insurance businesses.

Consultancy and Advisory Services

The Ministry of Industry and Commerce Notification No. 1964, dated August 28, 2017, which followed another notification issued by the Prime Minister’s Office, temporarily suspends the issuance of business licenses to operate consulting and advisory services in Laos.

Although the terms “consulting and advisory services” were not defined, legal advice and accounting and tax advice services are also included in the latest notification. Nonetheless, the notification allows for licenses to be granted if the Ministry of Industry and Commerce provides an exception for the applicant, based on the needs of the nation.

Financial Institution

The Financial Institution Management Department, Bank of Laos, Notification No. 95, dated November 18, 2017, temporarily suspends business licenses to operate financial institution activities in Laos until February 28, 2019. The notification’s scope includes commercial banks, microfinance institutions, all types of loan credit companies, pawnshops, leasing companies, money transfer services, currency exchange shops, insurance companies, stock companies, and asset management companies.

The Lao government’s rationale for this notification was the need to ensure that financial institutions operating in Laos are fulfilling minimum requirements, in order to enable authorities to effectively manage social impacts from their business activities. One notable example of a social impact arising from financial institutions is the rapid increase in the number of cars in the country due to the establishment of numerous financial leasing companies during the past few years.

Direct Sales

The Ministry of Industry and Commerce Notification No. 788/MOIC.DDT, dated April 11, 2017, temporarily suspends the issuance of direct sales business licenses in Laos. 

The ministry determined that the existing regulation framing direct sales (i.e., Decision No. 60. MOIC on Direct Sale, dated January 12, 2017) was not sufficiently detailed and may provide loopholes for possible fraud by business operators. Notification No. 788/MOI.DDT was therefore issued to provide authorities with the chance to revise existing regulations before business licensing can resume in this sector.

Small Hydropower Plants

The Prime Minister’s Office Notification No. 1815, dated November 10, 2017, temporarily suspends the issuance of business licenses for small-scale hydropower plants, which includes power plants with capacity of less than 15 MW each. This decision will enable the Ministry of Energy and Mines, which is the authority responsible for the issuance of licenses for hydropower plants, to ensure that current hydropower projects are operating effectively and meet required safety and environmental standards. 

It was reported by Lao media that over 270 small hydropower projects are being planned in Laos as of November 2017.  However, out of the numerous projects that have signed MOUs with the Lao government, only eight have actually commenced construction.

Mining

Mining is one sector that has experienced temporary suspension of business licensing for mining projects, including exploration and land survey for minerals, since June 2012. Although this suspension for the mining sector was lifted with the issuance of the Prime Minister’s Office Notification No. 1012, dated July 13, 2017, new applications for licenses will be thoroughly assessed, and will need to show extensive evidence of the management and financial capabilities of applicants in undertaking mining projects.

Land Concessions for Large Agricultural Projects

The Prime Minister’s Office Notification No. 1012, dated July 13, 2017, temporarily suspends business licenses and investment approval of land concessions for large-scale agricultural projects, in order to allow the government to thoroughly appraise whether concessions that were previously granted are effectively being operated in accordance with plans agreed upon between concessionaires and authorities. The suspension also provides authorities with the chance to determine the impacts of current projects on local communities and the environment. 

Land Concessions in Champasak, Salavan, and Sekong Provinces

The Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry Notification No. 1199, dated October 24, 2017, halts the granting of land concessions and renting in the following locations: (1) Paksong District, Champasak Province; (2) Lao Ngarm District, Salavan Province; and (3) Thateng District, Sekong Province. This suspension is intended to ensure that land is being used in accordance with the purpose of projects for which concessions or land leases have been granted by the government and local authorities.

The notification also provides the government with the opportunity to survey land granted for projects to ensure that they do not exceed the initial size granted by authorities. Studies conducted by different organizations over the past few years have revealed that many projects that were granted land concessions in Laos cover a larger land area than what was originally granted.

Regulatory Compliance

The series of notifications issued by the Lao government do not seem to be aimed at limiting domestic and foreign investment, but are rather part of widespread efforts to address concerns related to regulatory compliance, and social and environmental impacts in certain industries, as well as to improve the overall regulatory framework for conducting business in Laos.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

April 9, 2026
Thailand’s Office of the Insurance Commission (OIC) has published two parallel sets of draft regulatory amendments for public hearing—one governing non-life insurance and the other governing life insurance. The proposed amendments would significantly revise the rules for issuing, offering, and selling insurance policies, as well as the conduct of agents, brokers, and banks. Stakeholders may submit comments until April 25, 2026. The key proposed changes are summarized below. Electronic Policy Delivery by Default Under both draft amendments, electronic delivery would become the default method for delivering insurance policies. A printed copy would be required only if the policyholder expressly opts out, and any such printed copy would be treated as a substitute for the electronic original. For life insurance, this requirement would also extend to coverage summaries and to exclusion documents. The OIC would also retain authority to approve alternative delivery methods for specific types of policies. Misuse of Licenses Both amendments would introduce an explicit prohibition against sales representatives using another person’s name or license, or allowing another person to use their name or license, in connection with the offering of insurance or in sales documentation and policies. Premium Collection Reforms Both amendments would introduce the premium collection reforms outlined below. Premium receipt accounts Insurers must ensure that sales representatives inform customers of the available payment channels, which are limited to channels that remit premiums into the insurer’s account. If a customer pays an insurance premium to an insurer’s employee, an insurance broker, or any other person, and the company acknowledges the payment by issuing an insurance policy or other documentary evidence of insurance coverage, the insurer would be deemed to have received the insurance premium. Written premium collection and refund guidelines Insurers would be required to prepare written internal guidelines covering premium collection and refund policies, risk
April 2, 2026
Thailand’s Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA) enforcement has entered a new phase, and the insurance industry is squarely in the regulatory spotlight. The Personal Data Protection Committee (PDPC) considers insurers “large-scale” processors of sensitive data—including health records, financial information, and biometric data—making the sector a focal point for enforcement action. In August 2025 alone, the PDPC issued administrative fines totaling THB 21.5 million, and fines for individual violations have ranged from THB 50,000 to THB 2 million. The PDPC has also deployed its “Eagle Eye Crawler,” an AI-driven surveillance tool that monitors websites around the clock for data leaks and noncompliant privacy notices. This article highlights the key regulatory developments directly affecting insurers and outlines practical steps toward compliance. What Has Changed: OIC and PDPC Alignment The Office of Insurance Commission (OIC) has synchronized its sector-specific rules with the PDPA through the Notification on Customer Personal Data Protection (No. 2) B.E. 2568 (2025). The combined effect of the PDPC’s general enforcement push and the OIC’s sectoral guidance creates four critical compliance areas for insurers. Consent unbundling. Consent for marketing must be strictly separated from the core insurance contract; bundling marketing consent into the policy application is no longer permissible. Agent and intermediary oversight. Insurance intermediaries are generally classified as data processors, meaning that insurers—as data controllers—must provide specific written instructions and security protocols to all agents and brokers. A 2026 enforcement trend shows controllers being held liable for the “weak security” of their vendors and downstream processors. Enhanced privacy notices. Insurers must provide a summary privacy notice alongside the full policy, plainly stating categories of data, purposes, lawful bases, disclosure recipients, cross-border transfers, retention periods, data subject rights, and easy marketing opt-out channels. DPO registration and ROPA. All organizations involved in “regular or systematic monitoring of data subjects on
March 17, 2026
Thailand’s Office of Insurance Commission (OIC) has introduced comprehensive group-wide supervision requirements for insurers operating within corporate groups. Published on February 26, 2026, in two separate notifications in the Government Gazette, the new rules establish parallel frameworks for life and non-life insurance companies. Both notifications take effect on July 1, 2026, and impose significant new requirements on insurance business groups. Affected insurers should begin reviewing their group structures, governance frameworks, and risk management systems now to ensure timely compliance. The notifications aim to ensure that group-level operations are orderly, stable, and reliable, and prevent the accumulation of systemic risk that could undermine public confidence in the insurance sector. Both notifications share a substantially parallel structure and require insurers to assess and manage the financial position, risk exposure, reliability, and corporate governance of their entire insurance business group on a comprehensive and ongoing basis. The regulations introduce definitions for several key terms. An “insurance business group” encompasses the insurer together with its ultimate parent company, parent companies, subsidiaries, and related companies. The “head of the insurance business group” is the entity responsible for overseeing group-wide supervision, operations, and governance. An “ultimate parent company” is one that exercises control without itself being controlled by another entity. Key Requirements The notifications establish the following core obligations for insurers: Group structure and shareholding reporting: Insurers must report the organizational chart and shareholding structure of their insurance business group—covering the ultimate parent company, parent companies, subsidiaries, and related entities—to the OIC registrar by June of each year, and whenever material changes occur. The regulations prescribe specific thresholds for determining when shareholding proportions constitute control. Corporate governance standards: Board members, executives, and authorized persons of the ultimate parent company or parent company must not be disqualified (e.g., bankrupt individuals, persons convicted of property-related fraud, or
February 10, 2026
Data center and cloud investments are forming a major focus of private-sector investment in Thailand, with tech giants like Amazon, Google, Microsoft, and TikTok, as well as numerous telecom and data center companies, committing significant outlays to data center and cloud development. The country’s Board of Investment (BOI) approved projects worth THB 1.87 trillion in 2025, and THB 746 billion of this was from planned data center investments—by far the largest amount from any single industry. Thailand’s swift rise as a regional data center hub is fueled by surging demand for cloud, AI, and digital services, as well as large-scale investments from global tech firms. The country’s strategic location, competitive power costs, robust fiber infrastructure, expanding IT talent, and supportive government policies—including BOI incentives and streamlined approvals—have made it an attractive destination for scalable and sustainable digital infrastructure investments. The BOI’s proactive approach in updating promoted categories and providing both tax and non-tax incentives further ensures Thailand’s continued growth in this sector. 2025 BOI Changes for Data Centers In the middle of 2025, the BOI responded to the remarkable trend by updating investment‑promotion categories across various sectors (e.g., machinery and electrical equipment, public utilities, digital and innovative industries) to accommodate growing investment in data‑center projects. Before the change, which was detailed in a notification that has applied to investment promotion applications submitted from July 1, 2025, onward, data‑center projects under BOI promotion were granted a single A1 incentive (an eight‑year corporate income‑tax exemption) and subject to one uniform set of conditions. The July 2025 notification restructured promotion for data centers into two categories based on power‑usage efficiency: high‑efficiency data centers and other data centers. Under these rules, qualified high‑efficiency data centers are eligible for an eight‑year corporate income tax (CIT) exemption, while for other data centers this exemption is