You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

March 7, 2025

Laos’ New Regulation on Biopharmaceuticals, Gene Therapy, and Stem Cells

Subscribe to Updates

On November 22, 2024, the Ministry of Health (MOH) in Laos issued Decision No. 3730/MOH, which regulates the management, processing, production, and use of biopharmaceutical products, genes, and stem cells. This decision came into force on January 18, 2025, 45 days after its publication in the Lao Official Gazette on December 4, 2024. This decision signifies Laos’ recognition and acceptance of biopharmaceutical products, genes, and stem cells for use in medical treatments and the beauty industry, and it aligns with the ongoing development of biomedical sciences in the country.

Definitions

The MOH’s decision defines biopharmaceuticals, gene therapy, and stem cells as follows:

  • “Biopharmaceutical products” refers to a type of biological or drug product that is produced or synthesized from natural substances, objects, or chemicals. This group of products includes blood, blood components, allergens, cells or cellular components, gene therapies, tissues, protein-based medicines, drugs derived from living cells, and biologics, which can be produced from sugars, proteins, amino acids, or substances with complex characteristics derived from organic sources such as human, animal, and plant parts; yeast; and microorganisms. These products exclude vaccines and biosimilar products, which will be specified under separate regulations.
  • “Gene therapy” refers to a treatment approach that applies the principle of arranging amino acids (which could involve DNA or RNA sent to the patient’s cells in the form of a drug with the purpose of treating a certain disease).
  • “Stem cells” are defined in the decision as cells or immature cells that can be sourced from various organs in the They are characterized by being undifferentiated, having the potential for differentiation, and being self-renewing.

Stem Cell Production

The decision outlines comprehensive provisions for managing and using raw materials in stem cell production. Key points include:

  • Production location standards: Ensuring facilities meet specific standards of the MOH.
  • Personnel nationality restrictions: Limiting certain roles to Lao nationals—for instance, product managers, quality control managers, and quality assurance managers.
  • Raw material requirements: Complying with ethics committee guidelines, including prohibitions on using embryos and fetuses.
  • Product consent agreement: Before using certain types of stem cell products on a patient, consent must be obtained from a fully conscious patient and witnessed by a relative. If a patient is unconscious, consent for treatment or services must be obtained from a relative in accordance with ethical guidelines.
  • Compensation for damages resulting from use: The consent form for treatment must specify the conditions for compensation for damages resulting from the use of the product in accordance with the treatment conditions set out in the consent form.

Importation and Exportation

For importing biopharmaceutical products, genetic material, and stem cells, applicants must submit complete documentation, including an enterprise registration certificate, production license, and product quality certificate. Strict quality inspections and compliance with the Law on Drugs and Medical Products are mandatory. Additionally, the importation of raw materials from embryos and fetuses is prohibited.

Exporters must also provide comprehensive documentation, including an exportation approval certificate, product registration certificate, and quality inspection report. They must ensure product quality through rigorous inspections and comply with both local and destination country regulations.

Clinical Trial Management

This decision defines a clinical trial as “a scientific process that designs and conducts experiments on the human body. The interpretation of the research results aims to provide an understanding of the principles and guidelines for the use of drugs, devices, instruments, and procedures in treating patients.” Clinical trials must be authorized by the MOH’s Food and Drug Department (FDD) through the approval of an ethics committee. All procedures, processes, and actions related to the clinical trial must be approved by the FDD, which will approve the conduct of a clinical trial if it is assessed to be beneficial for the development of disease prevention and treatment in Laos.

Business Operating Requirements

To operate a business involving stem cells, operators must:

  • Obtain licenses from relevant sectors, including planning and investment, natural resources and environment, and health.
  • Be Lao nationals with relevant qualifications.
  • Undergo regular inspections and evaluations by the MOH.
  • Employ specialists with appropriate qualifications and experience.

Businesses operating in the biopharmaceutical, gene therapy, and stem cell sectors in Laos must navigate a complex regulatory landscape under Decision No. 3730/MOH. The decision establishes clear compliance requirements, from facility standards and personnel restrictions to ethical sourcing and quality control. Companies seeking to enter or expand in this market should closely monitor further regulatory developments and ensure strict adherence to MOH guidelines. As Laos continues to develop its biomedical sector, businesses that align with these regulations and invest in compliance infrastructure will be well-positioned for long-term growth and market stability.

Related Professionals

Industries

Life Sciences

Practices

Regulatory Affairs

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

September 9, 2026
On August 5, 2026, the Consumer Case Division of Thailand’s Civil Court rendered a judgment in a case involving a beauty clinic that advertised acne scar treatments using claims that the clinic was operated by a specialist physician and that the treatment, allegedly involving stem cell technology, could permanently remove acne scars. The plaintiff brought a claim against both the physician-owner and the clinic company, alleging that the advertisements were false and induced her to purchase the treatment. The court found that the clinic was liable for the false representations and that the physician-owner, as both the authorized director of the company and the medical practitioner who provided treatment, was jointly responsible. Although the plaintiff could not fully prove all damages claimed, the court awarded compensation of THB 20,000, together with interest. While the judgment arose from a consumer protection dispute, it serves as a valuable reminder that medical facility advertisements in Thailand are regulated and may expose clinics and healthcare providers not only to regulatory enforcement but also to civil liability from patients who rely on misleading promotional claims. Regulatory Framework Governing Medical Facility Advertisements Medical facility advertising in Thailand is governed by the Medical Facility Act B.E. 2541 (1998), as amended by the Medical Facility Act (No. 4) B.E. 2559 (2016). The principal secondary legislation is the Department of Health Service Support (DoHSS) Notification Re: Rules, Procedures, Conditions, and Fees for an Advertisement or Publication Concerning a Medical Facility, which came into force on November 25, 2019. Under this notification, “advertising” includes any act, by any means, that causes members of the public to see, hear, or otherwise become aware of a message, sound, or image for the commercial benefit of a medical facility. This broad definition covers not only traditional media but also clinic websites, social
Read More
September 9, 2026
On June 30, 2026, Indonesia’s National Agency of Drug and Food Control (BPOM) issued BPOM Regulation No. 11 of 2026 on Food Packaging, which expands the list of approved food-contact substances and recognizes a broader range of permissible functions for those substances. The new regulation, which revokes BPOM Regulation No. 20 of 2019, reflects developments in packaging technology and materials science. Although the new regulation provides more advantages to business actors by adding more food contact substances to the approved list for use in food packaging, there are more stringent rules and restrictions for testing. One of the most significant changes is a comprehensive migration-testing framework that sets out requirements for packaging materials, testing conditions, food simulants, and specific migration limits. Overall and Specific Migration Under BPOM Regulation No. 20 of 2019, migration requirements were primarily set out within the lists of approved food-contact substances and packaging materials. BPOM Regulation No. 11 of 2026 instead expressly requires packaging materials that come into direct contact with food to meet both overall and specific migration limits. These are defined as follows: Overall migration: The total quantity of all substances that migrate from the packaging, regardless of whether the substances are hazardous or nonhazardous to health. Specific migration: The quantity of a particular identified substance known to be hazardous to health that migrates from the packaging. Stricter Limits on Heavy Metals The overall migration limit for plastic packaging remains unchanged under both regulations at 60 mg/kg or 10 mg/dm². However, the new regulation introduces significant changes to the regulation of heavy metals. Under the 2019 regulation, four heavy metals—lead, cadmium, chromium VI, and mercury—were subject to a single combined limit of 1 mg/kg. The 2026 regulation, however, requires each heavy metal to meet its own individual specific migration limit, adds arsenic as
Read More
September 7, 2026
Indonesia’s Constitutional Court (Mahkamah Konstitusi) has reinstated a key provision limiting pharmaceutical patent protection, signaling a renewed commitment to balancing patent rights with public access to medicines. In its ruling to Case No. 255/PUU-XXIII/2025, the court partially granted a petition for judicial review of Law No. 65 of 2024, which had amended the country’s Patent Law, and ordered the restoration of a provision that had excluded certain pharmaceutical inventions from patentability. The decision took effect immediately upon its pronouncement at the court’s plenary session on August 28, 2026. Background The petition challenged the removal of article 4(f) from Law No. 13 of 2016 concerning Patents (Patent Law), as amended by Law No. 65 of 2024. Article 4(f) had excluded from patentability certain inventions relating to new uses of known substances. The petitioners argued that removing this provision would open the door to patent protection for second medical use inventions and facilitate patent evergreening—practices that can extend exclusivity periods, delay generic market entry, and reduce public access to affordable medicines. The petitioners included several patient advocacy and public-interest organizations: the Indonesian Dialysis Patients Community Association, the Indonesian Association of Drug Abuse Victims (PKNI), the Indonesian Pulmonary Hypertension Foundation (YHPI), the Rekat Peduli Indonesia Foundation, and the Indonesian Positive Women’s Association (IPPI), along with the Indonesia for Global Justice Association and four individual petitioners. The petitioners also challenged the constitutionality of the phrase “interested party” in article 70(1) of the Patent Law, arguing that it should be construed expressly to clarify who has standing to appeal a decision to grant a patent before the Board of Patent Appeal, and to allow a broader range of parties—such as patent holders, licensees, consumer organizations, prosecutors, aggrieved third parties, and others who may suffer direct or indirect harm from the grant of a patent—to
Read More
September 4, 2026
Blind boxes and collectibles have become increasingly popular, driven by the excitement of not knowing which character or design will be revealed until the package is opened. While most visible in the art toy market, the same concept is also used in the food industry. Confectionery, snacks, and other food products are sometimes sold with toys, character figures, cards, or other collectibles. A package might, for example, contain one of ten possible characters, with consumers knowing that an item is included but not which one they will receive. Some collections may also feature rare or “secret” items. For food businesses, however, adding a randomized toy or collectible involves more than a marketing decision. The food, the nonfood item, and the randomized mechanism may each raise different regulatory considerations in Thailand. Thai FDA Requirements for Nonfood Objects Packaged with Food The main food regulatory consideration is Ministry of Public Health Notification No. 310 B.E. 2551 (2008), which regulates food packaged together with things or objects that are not food. Under Notification No. 310, certain nonfood objects may be packaged together with food where they fall within specified exceptions, including objects that serve the following purposes: Maintaining the quality or standard of the food, such as a desiccant or oxygen absorber; Serving as a seasoning or as part of food preparation, such as chili powder sachets or seasoning sachets contained in instant noodle packages; or Functioning as an eating or food-preparation utensil, such as a spoon or fork included with instant noodles. Other nonfood objects that do not fall within these categories generally should not be placed inside the food container together with the food. Where a toy, collectible, or other nonfood object is intended to be sold together with a food product, businesses should therefore carefully consider the nature of
Read More