You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

May 28, 2024

Laos Issues Updated Law on Intellectual Property

On March 1, 2024, the Lao official gazette published the newly amended Law on Intellectual Property No. 50/NA, dated November 20, 2023 (the “2023 Law on IP”). The timing of this update is consistent with Laos’ history of providing regular revisions to the country’s IP legislation since the enactment of the first Law on Intellectual Property by the National Assembly in 2007 (the “2007 Law on IP”). These revisions include amendments in 2011, 2017, and now 2023.

Prior to 2007, intellectual property (IP) protection was granted through decrees issued by the prime minister’s office for selected types of IP: trademarks, patents, petty patents, and industrial designs. The 2007 Law on IP marked a significant shift by introducing comprehensive legislation to protect industrial property rights, new plant varieties, copyright, and related rights. It laid the foundations for IP legislation in Laos, with the primary objectives of promoting and protecting intellectual creativity and attracting foreign investment.

Since 2007, the enactment of new IP laws has not always entailed significant amendments to the existing IP framework; however, it frequently serves as an opportunity to introduce long-considered mechanisms. For example, the amended Law on Intellectual Property No. 38/NA, dated November 15, 2017 (“2017 Law on IP”) introduced, among other provisions, the possibility of opposition by a third party after the formal examination of a trademark application by the examiner.

The 2023 Law on IP brought additional changes and updates to the IP regulatory landscape in Laos. Some of the most notable of these are highlighted below.

Trademarks

While Laos already introduced a new mechanism for online trademark registration in November 2023—about a month before enacting the 2023 Law on IP—the new law did introduce some noteworthy changes.

Well-Known Marks

The 2023 Law on IP appears to ease the burden of proof for establishing that a mark is well known.

The 2017 Law on IP outlined several criteria for a trademark to be recognized as a well-known mark, thereby affording protection to these trademarks in Laos even in the absence of registration. One of the criteria was that the goods or services bearing the mark had to be widely circulated “within the territory.” However, the law did not define the phrase “within the territory,” leaving it open to interpretation. Consequently, this ambiguity may have restricted a trademark’s eligibility as a well-known trademark, potentially limiting its protection within Laos.

Another criterion was that consumers within the country had to widely recognize and acknowledge the reputation of the trademark. Once again, the term “within the country” was open to interpretation.

The 2023 Law on IP no longer includes the terms “territory” or “country,” eliminating doubts regarding potential interpretation that may have restricted the criteria to the Lao market only. Accordingly, evidence that a product is widely circulated, even worldwide, can now be used to demonstrate that a trademark is a well-known trademark. Additionally, the examiner may consider other criteria as well. However, the 2023 Law on IP does not state whether all criteria must be met or if only some are required.1

Trade Name Registration Requirement

Under the 2017 Law on IP, it was not necessary to register a trade name, such as the name of a legal entity registered with the Ministry of Industry and Commerce (MOIC). However, the 2023 amendment suggests that trade names must now be registered to be granted protection against third party infringement.

Industrial Property Rights

Cancellation of Trademarks, Industrial Designs, or Geographical Indications

The 2023 Law on IP outlines two distinct procedures for canceling these IP assets. Similar to under the 2017 Law on IP, third parties may file a request for cancellation with the MOIC within five years of the publication of registration in the official intellectual property gazette. In addition, a new amendment now explicitly provides the possibility of canceling trademark, industrial design, or geographical indication registrations that are deemed either “not correct” or made in bad faith. The MOIC assumes this power without defining these terms. As to bad faith, in practice, both before and after the 2023 Law on IP, examiners evaluate the good faith of applications prior to registration, despite the lack of specific authorizing provisions in legislation. The 2023 Law on IP has now expressly granted authorities the power to assess bad faith post-registration. This seems to be the prerogative of the Department of Intellectual Property to prevent Laos from becoming a refuge for bad-faith applicants, such as trademark squatters.

Exhaustion of Rights

The 2023 Law on IP introduces the concept of exhaustion of rights, which may be the most notable addition to the IP legislative landscape in Laos. The operative language in the law suggests that the rights of trademark owners are exhausted as soon as a product bearing their trademark is sold, thereby preventing the trademark owner from restricting the use or resale of the product.

This aspect may provide further insight into the stance of local authorities on parallel imports. Historically, Laos has maintained a tolerant approach toward parallel imports, though its legality may be questionable. With exceptions for specific products necessitating a specific license from a licensor to a designated licensee with the right to sell the products domestically (e.g., drugs, medicine, cars), the legality of parallel imports remained uncertain.

However, the 2023 Law on IP has not amended provisions that could be cited to argue against the legality of parallel imports. The law still allows trademark or geographical indication owners to prevent third parties from using, selling, importing, or exporting goods bearing a trademark identical or similar to a registered trademark. This appears to present a potential conflict with the provisions on exhaustion of rights mentioned above, and it may require further clarification in the future.

Industrial Designs

Under the 2017 Law on IP, one of the requirements for protecting an industrial design was to provide evidence that the design was new and not formerly disclosed.

The 2023 Law on IP provides greater clarity on the methods of disclosure. While it remains essential for an industrial design to be novel, the revised law specifies that the industrial design must not have been disclosed to the public through “print media, electronic mediums, practical use, exhibitions, or any other means in Laos” prior to the priority date or the actual filing for registration. Accordingly, the law now explicitly recognizes the use of electronic media, such as websites and social media, as forms of disclosure.

Patents and Petty Patents

Means of Disclosure to the Public

The 2023 Law on IP provides similar updates regarding disclosure of patents and petty patents. It explicitly recognizes electronic media as a means of disclosure that may undermine the requirement of novelty. Previously, the law merely stated that the patent or petty patent should not have been known by the public, without providing further details. The 2023 Law on IP now stipulates that patents and petty patents must be inventions that have not been disseminated via publication in writing (e.g., newspapers), online media, actual use, or any other forms in Laos during the year before the application. The amendment provides good clarifications, as we can now say with certainty that an invention disseminated on the internet through a domain that is accessible in Laos is not eligible.

Required Information for Patent and Petty Patent Applications

As part of the application, the applicant previously had to include a thorough description of the invention or utility innovation that clearly explains its benefits and how to use it. The 2023 Law on IP now provides that for inventions derived directly or substantially from genetic resources or traditional know-how, the origin, name of the community, or ethnic group must also be disclosed.

Geographical Indications

The protection of a geographical indication now starts from the filing date of the application instead of from the date of registration.

Copyright

Protection Extended to Other Works of Art and Electronic Works

The 2017 Law on IP provided a list of works eligible for copyright protection. The list included:

  • Drawings, paintings, carvings, lithography, tapestries, embroidery, and other works of fine art;
  • Sculptures, engravings, and other works of sculpture;
  • Designs of buildings or construction, internal or external decorations, designs, and other architectural works;
  • Photographs produced using technical methods and works expressed by an analogous process;
  • Illustrations, maps, plans, sketches and three-dimensional works related to geography, topography, architecture, or science;
  • Dramatic-musical works, pantomimes or dramas, choreographic works, and other works created for performance purposes;
  • Musical compositions, with or without lyrics, including edited notes or tunes;
  • Phonograms;
  • Works of applied art; and
  • Films or other cinematographic works, or works expressed by an analogous process, including audiovisual works consisting of a sequence of images that can be continuously projected as a moving picture and can be recorded with other materials so as to be continuously projected as a moving picture, including their soundtracks.

To this list, the 2023 Law on IP adds “other works of art,” expanding the scope of protection to encompass a broader range of artistic creations. In addition, the law specifies that creations can be tangible or electronic in nature.

Protection Term

Previously, the term of protection for applied art and pictures was 25 years from the date of creation. This term has now been extended to 30 years.

General Prohibition

As a general prohibition, the 2023 Law on IP now expressly prohibits counterfeiting, modifying, or using intellectual property rights of another person for commercial gain without authorization from the rightful IP owner. Accordingly, the use of counterfeit goods for personal use only, without any intent of engaging in a commercial activity, may now be accepted in Laos.

Conclusion

The 2023 Law on Intellectual Property introduces significant updates and enhancements to Laos’ IP regulatory framework, marking a pivotal step in the country’s ongoing commitment to robust intellectual property protection. Noteworthy changes include streamlined criteria for well-known trademarks, mandatory registration of trade names, and clarified disclosure requirements for industrial designs and patents. The law also introduces the concept of exhaustion of rights, potentially influencing parallel import practices. By expanding the scope of copyright protection to include electronic works and extending the protection term for applied art, the new law reflects Laos’ dedication to fostering innovation and safeguarding intellectual creativity. These amendments aim to attract foreign investment and align Laos’ IP laws with international standards, ensuring comprehensive protection for creators and innovators.

1 The criteria are as follows: (1) the relevant sector of the public recognizes the trademark through trade, use of the trademark on or in connection with goods or services, or in advertising; (2) the products, goods, or services bearing the trademark are widely circulated; (3) sufficient volume of goods sold or services provided; (4) regular and continuous use of the trademark; (5) goodwill associated with use of the trademark with the goods or services, based on factors such as good quality, service, or popularity; (6) consumers widely recognize the reputation of the trademark; and (7) high value of investment in the trademark, such as investing in the advertisement and distribution of the main trademark.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

September 2, 2026
Thailand and China have a longstanding and significant trade relationship, which increasingly extends to e-commerce and digitally enabled supply chains. While these channels create new opportunities for businesses to reach consumers across borders, their growth also brings greater exposure to intellectual property (IP) infringement across jurisdictions and online platforms. Effective cooperation between the two countries’ enforcement authorities has therefore become increasingly important. To strengthen cooperation in this area, Thailand and China signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) on IP enforcement in Beijing on July 20, 2026, during the Thai prime minister’s official visit to China. Officially titled “Memorandum of Understanding Between the State Administration for Market Regulation of the People’s Republic of China and the Ministry of Commerce of the Kingdom of Thailand on Cooperation in the Field of Intellectual Property Enforcement,” the MOU forms part of a broader bilateral agenda covering industrial and supply chains, participation by micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs), cooperation associated with the ASEAN–China Free Trade Area 3.0, and progress on the registration of Thai geographical indications in China. The MOU establishes a bilateral framework for cooperation and coordination in five broad areas: Strengthening dialogue in IP enforcement; Enhancing information sharing; Facilitating the enforcement of IP rights in cases arising in the parties’ domestic markets and on online platforms, in accordance with their respective domestic laws; Promoting cooperation in IP enforcement training and human resource development; and Undertaking other cooperation activities agreed upon by both sides. The Department of Intellectual Property (DIP) will serve as the principal coordinating agency for Thailand, while the Bureau of Law Enforcement and Inspection in China’s State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) will serve in that role for China. The framework is particularly relevant to the growth of e-commerce, as it covers infringement in the domestic markets and on
August 28, 2026
When considering a franchise, many people first think of a restaurant, retail chain, or service outlet. From a legal perspective, however, the foundation of every franchise lies in the right to use a brand, which is typically granted through a trademark license. Trademarks are often the most valuable assets in a franchise system. Through a trademark license, a franchisor authorizes a franchisee to use its trademarks, logos, and branding while maintaining control over how the brand is presented to customers. The Role of Trademarks in Franchise Businesses Under the Trademark Law 2019, a mark is defined as a sign that is capable of distinguishing the goods or services of one undertaking from those of others in the course of trade. This distinguishing function is particularly important in a franchise arrangement, where the franchisee’s use of the franchisor’s trademark allows consumers to recognize the source, quality, and reputation of the business. In this way, trademarks help preserve brand identity, strengthen market recognition, and protect the commercial value of the franchise system. Legal Foundation for Franchise Brand Protection Myanmar presently does not have a specific statutory framework governing franchise arrangements. As a result, franchise agreements are generally regulated under the broader applicable legal framework, including the Contract Act 1872, the Trademark Law 2019, the Competition Law 2015, the Consumer Protection Law 2019, and the relevant implementing rules and regulations. The licensing of trademarks within a franchise arrangement is particularly governed by the Trademark Law 2019. Franchisors should ensure that the trademarks intended to be licensed to franchisees in Myanmar are registered under the Trademark Law 2019 and that the relevant trademark license is properly recorded with the Intellectual Property Department (IPD). Trademark License Recordal Under the Trademark Law 2019, the owner of a registered trademark may grant a license to another
August 27, 2026
It is generally understood that patents are granted for new designs that have not been widely known or used in Thailand and not been disclosed anywhere prior to the date of the patent application. It is trite law that design law protects the distinctive appearance or products. Under Section 3 of the Thai Patent Act B.E. 2522, as amended by the Patent Act (No. 2) B.E. 2535 and the Patent Act (No. 3) B.E. 2542, a design is defined as “any form or composition of lines or colors that gives a product a special appearance and can serve as a pattern for an industrial or handicraft product.” This raises an important question. Can a patent be issued for a product design that contains text, numerals, trademarks, or symbols that do not fall under the definition of a design? This issue commonly arises when attempting to register packaging, labels, and graphical user interfaces (GUIs). Until a few years ago, applicants could file design applications with the Thai Patent Office for designs that contained such elements, provided that an appropriate disclaimer was included. This practice was generally accepted by Thai design examiners at that time, but the Patent Office has since implemented a change in its practice that could have a significant impact on applicants for design patents. Where design representations are submitted as line drawings or computer-aided design (CAD) drawings, the examiner may now issue an office action requiring their removal. This practice, however, appears to be applied inconsistently, as some examiners still exercise their own discretion in determining whether drawings containing these elements are acceptable. Below are examples of a GUI design, a CAD drawing design, and a photographic design representation that illustrates issues relating to the presence of nonallowable elements. GUI design For this GUI design, the submitted
August 27, 2026
Franchising in Thailand has matured into a sizeable commercial sector, but the rules governing franchisor–franchisee relationships remain scattered across general legislation rather than consolidated in a dedicated franchise statute. In this environment, the decisions of the Trade Competition Commission of Thailand (TCCT) have emerged as valuable practical guidance. Thailand follows a civil-law system in which judicial and administrative decisions do not create binding precedent; however, past rulings are nonetheless influential. This article examines the most instructive recent TCCT decisions and distills the practical compliance considerations for franchisors and franchisees operating in Thailand. Postcontract Changes: Justified or Unfair? A recurring issue is whether a franchisor may alter the terms of engagement after contract execution. The TCCT has established that midterm modifications are not inherently unfair; the determinative factors are whether there was a reasonable business justification, adequate advance notice, and a transparent process. In a 2023 coffee franchise matter, for instance, the TCCT declined to find a violation where a franchisor increased raw material prices, noting the increase had been communicated in advance and supported by demonstrable cost pressures. A bubble tea franchise matter reinforces this principle. The TCCT found that postcontract mandatory purchases of branded syrup and flavorings were justified, as the agreement reserved the franchisor’s right to modify product requirements, the materials were sold at or below market prices, and the branded ingredients possessed distinctive qualities deemed essential to franchise quality. The complaint was dismissed, with the additional requirements characterized as a legitimate measure to preserve brand consistency. Considered together, these decisions indicate that post‑contract modifications will be evaluated against three criteria: (1) whether there is a legitimate business rationale, (2) whether adequate advance notice was provided, and (3) whether franchisees were treated equitably throughout the transition. Discriminatory Treatment: Are Renewals and Information Equal? A 2024 automotive dealership