You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

April 15, 2020

Laos Issues Guidelines for Freight Operators

On April 11, 2020, the Lao Ministry of Public Works and Transport (MPWT) issued Guidelines for the Domestic Transportation of Goods, and Entering and Exiting the Lao PDR, during the Protection, Control, and Eradication Period for COVID-19 No. 266/MPWT.

These guidelines provide welcome guidance on previous measures issued by the Lao Prime Minister (detailed here and here), which instructed transport business operators to abide by specific rules but did not provide clear guidelines from the MPWT on how to do so.

The guidelines provide the following details:

1.  Domestic Transportation of Goods

Drivers transporting goods through districts, provinces, or the capital, and drivers carrying out door-to-door deliveries, can transport goods and food to their destination, or to their customers, as usual. However, drivers must wear a mask at all times and have their body temperature checked by a government officer from the health sector at arrival, in accordance with the planned itinerary. If suspicious symptoms are detected, the measures prescribed by the health sector should be strictly followed. Otherwise, the driver can continue as normal.

2.  International Transportation and Transit of Goods

For the purposes of this article we have retained the language used in the announcement as closely as possible. However, from discussions with the relevant authorities, we understand that references to “foreign drivers” will also apply to citizens of Laos who transport goods across the border, to the extent practical. For example, the requirement for a health certificate issued in the previous country before crossing the border would still apply, but the requirement to leave the country as soon as possible would not. The provisions below should be read in that context.

General goods

Foreign drivers who enter Lao borders must comply with directions from the Ministry of Industry and Commerce and the Ministry of Health, including wearing a mask and providing a physical examination certification from health officers in the country of origin. Lao heath officers will then authorize their entry into Laos. The goods must be loaded or unloaded at a point determined by a Lao officer, after which the vehicle must return to the country of origin immediately.

Special goods

Foreign vehicles and their drivers which import goods for the purpose of a project (such as highways, the Lao-China railway, hydropower plants, etc.) or fuel, liquids, or other flammable objects which cannot simply be unloaded, are authorized to go to their destination, but they must observe the following measures:

  • The driver must have a certificate from the owner of the goods, the authorized distributor in Laos, or the project owner, expressly indicating the destination to which the goods will be transported.
  • The itinerary must be shown to inspection point officers along the way.
  • The driver can only travel in accordance with the itinerary indicated and for the reason specified.
  • If it is necessary for the driver to stay overnight, stay for more than one day, or stop on route, the transport company, its representative, the owner of the goods, or the project owner must arrange for the driver to stay and eat in the vehicle, a separate room, or in a dedicated zone for transport vehicles only. Ministry of Health rules must be observed.
  • In order to guarantee and evidence compliance with these rules, officers at the border will sign a certificate with the driver, the owner of the goods, or the project owner.

Transit of goods to a third country

When the goods enter the country, vehicles coming from abroad must come to the loading point, as indicated by the officers, and load the goods into a Lao vehicle.

When the goods exit the country, the Lao vehicle transporting the goods can transport them to the border to load them into the foreign vehicle of the third-country, or drive the Lao vehicle up to the destination, if the third-country allows it.

The guideline further provides that foreign drivers must undergo a medical check.

However, the guideline fails to expressly indicate whether foreign drivers are authorized or prohibited to drive through Laos up to the third-country, for cross border transportation of goods. Since this was prohibited in the previous order, issued on April 2, 2020, we recommend that transport businesses check with the authorities on this point.

3.  For Transport Business Operators

Transport business operators must:

  • Clean the company premises and disinfect the interior of the truck and container before each loading;
  • Record drivers’ condition, including a temperature check, every day;
  • Devise a plan, including replacement, for employees with an abnormally high temperature;
  • Ensure that all employees regularly wash their hands with soap, alcohol, gel, or disinfectant. Multiple handwashing stations must be put in place for customers, drivers, and employees in the operator’s offices;
  • Ensure that drivers hold a drivers’ license, ID card, and vehicle documents, at all times, to facilitate monitoring; and
  • Ensure that drivers wear masks when working or travelling.

4.  For Vehicle Drivers

Drivers must:

  • Hold a driver’s license, ID card, and vehicle documents at all times, in order to facilitate monitoring;
  • Wear a mask when working or travelling;
  • Avoid touching their mouth, eyes, and nose with their hands;
  • Wash hands with soap and water, or alcohol (75% or more); and,
  • Avoid entering crowded areas or touching others, and keep one meter away from others.

5.  Prohibitions and Sanctions for Violations

  • It is prohibited to transport goods using more than two drivers, or one driver and one other employee.
  • It is prohibited for government officers, or related staff, to collect payment from the transport drivers, at any checkpoints along the way.
  • All infringers will be sanctioned in accordance with Lao laws.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

May 8, 2026
The global trade environment for Thai exporters in 2026 has shifted significantly. Recent enforcement developments in both the United States and the European Union show a clear shift in trade policy: regulators are no longer focused solely on tariff levels, but also on whether products genuinely originate where exporters claim they do. Adding to this complexity, the US Supreme Court’s February 2026 decision striking down the use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose tariffs has upended the legal basis for a major pillar of US tariff policy, creating significant legal and commercial uncertainty for exporters worldwide, including in Thailand. For Thai companies integrated into regional supply chains, this change carries material implications. Although the IEEPA-based US reciprocal tariffs have been struck down, intensified circumvention enforcement continues under separate legal authorities, and the administration has signaled its intent to reimpose tariffs under alternative statutory frameworks, while EU authorities are using anti-circumvention investigations where trade patterns shift. In both jurisdictions, the decisive issue is whether manufacturing in Thailand constitutes substantial transformation under applicable rules of origin. Such origin determinations increasingly drive duty exposure, audit risk and commercial disputes. In 2026, the ability to defend a product’s Thai origin is not merely a procedural step, it is central to preserving market access in the US and EU. Impact Of US Circumvention Enforcement and an Uncertain Tariff Landscape Following the 2025 Framework for an Agreement on Reciprocal Trade, Thailand saw a shift in its tariff relationship with the US. A substantial range of Thai-origin goods were subject to a 19% reciprocal tariff under the IEEPA. However, the Supreme Court’s ruling invalidating the use of IEEPA for tariffs has removed the legal basis for that rate. The Administration has indicated it intends to pursue replacement tariffs under other statutory authorities,
April 29, 2026
Vietnam’s education sector is entering a new regulatory era. On December 10, 2025, the National Assembly adopted a series of new and amended laws in the field of education, including the 2025 Law on Vocational Education, the 2025 Law on Higher Education, and the amended Law on Education No. 123/2025/QH15 (Amended Law on Education). These laws together took effect on January 1, 2026, marking a significant reform of Vietnam’s legal framework governing the education sector. The legislative package introduces a new lawmaking approach under which foundational and principle-based provisions are codified in the Amended Law on Education, while the Law on Higher Education and the Law on Vocational Education serve as specialized statutes providing supplementary, sector-specific regulatory detail tailored to their respective subsectors. The Amended Law on Education fundamentally restructures how educational institutions are established, governed, and licensed, with direct implications for private investors, foreign-invested entities, and education service providers operating in Vietnam. Below are several highlights of the key changes under the amended law, especially in the private sector, that stakeholders should understand: Change in the National Education System In addition to primary education, lower secondary (junior high school) education is now compulsory in Vietnam. Accordingly, diplomas are no longer awarded upon completion of lower secondary school but only for upper education levels. The national education system is also expanded through the introduction of vocational high school as a new level of vocational education. Such reform creates additional learning pathways that not only enable learners to pursue both further education and participate in the labor market, but also better align education and training with socioeconomic development needs. New Hurdle for Joint Investors: Mandatory Corporate Entity Requirement Where two or more investors jointly establish an education institution, the investors are no longer permitted to directly establish such an institution.
April 22, 2026
A new decree in Vietnam brings significant implementation clarity to the country’s existing extended producer responsibility (EPR) legal framework. An EPR mechanism was first codified in Vietnam in the 2020 Law on Environmental Protection amid ongoing challenges surrounding the collection and treatment of product and packaging waste. The mechanism was progressively detailed through Decree No. 08/2022/ND‑CP and its successive amendments, but the regulatory framework remained insufficiently developed, notably in terms of support mechanisms for waste collection, recycling, and treatment. The newly launched regulations in Decree No. 110/2026/ND-CP (Decree 110), issued on April 1, 2026, and taking effect on May 25, 2026, stipulate fully and clearly the responsibility of manufacturers and importers to recycle products and packaging and to treat waste. Some key provisions of Decree 110 for manufacturers, importers, and related stakeholders are presented below. Subjects of EPR The Law on Environmental Protection assigns responsibility to manufacturers and importers for product and packaging recycling (under Article 54) or waste collection and treatment (under Article 55), depending on the type of products and packaging they produce or import. Decree 110 elaborates on these EPR provisions by specifying the responsible entities and listing out the types of products and packaging subject to recycling and waste treatment responsibilities. Decree 110 clarifies the responsible entities in special cases, such as when products under the same brand are made by multiple manufacturers, when there is a contract manufacturing or entrusted import relationship, and when the manufacturer or importer is part of a corporate group. Notably, exemptions may be applied in some scenarios, such as for manufacturers and importers of products and packaging exclusively for export, temporary import and re-export, or research and testing purposes, as well as for entities with annual revenue from related products not exceeding VND 30 billion. Recycling Responsibilities Decree 110
April 15, 2026
On March 31, 2026, Vietnam’s government issued Decree 102/2026/ND-CP (Decree 102), which amends Decree 75/2019/ND-CP on administrative sanctions for competition law violations (Decree 75). Effective from May 20, 2026, the new decree introduces a number of significant changes aimed at strengthening enforcement, revising penalty structures, and broadening the range of remedial measures, primarily for violations related to economic concentration. Revised Penalties for Economic Concentration Violations Decree 102 significantly revises the penalties for violations related to economic concentration. Failure to notify an economic concentration; implementing an economic concentration before clearance Under the new framework, Articles 14 and 15 of Decree 75 have been amended to impose a range of monetary fines, rather than relying solely on percentage‑based penalties as under the previous regime, for violations involving the failure to notify an economic concentration or the implementation of an economic concentration prior to clearance. The fines range from VND 500 million to VND 1 billion for each enterprise participating in a concentration with combined assets, revenues, or purchase value below VND 3,000 billion in the preceding fiscal year, capped at 5% of the violating enterprise’s total turnover in the relevant market. For concentrations meeting or exceeding the VND 3,000 billion threshold across those same metrics, the fines increase to VND 1 billion to VND 2 billion per enterprise, also subject to the 5% cap. These differentiated thresholds allow penalties to better reflect the size of the transaction and its potential competitive impact. Non-compliance with conditional approvals Enterprises that do not implement or only partially implement the conditions specified in a conditional economic concentration approval decision face fines ranging from 1% to 3% of total turnover in the relevant market during the fiscal year preceding the violation. Decree 102 also adds a new remedial measure requiring enterprises to fully implement all conditions