You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

June 28, 2013

Land Ownership Through Adverse Possession

Bangkok Post, Corporate Counsellor Column

In Thailand, individuals or entities that are eligible to hold ownership of land under the Land Code can acquire it by means of purchase, hire-purchase, gift, or inheritance. But there is one more way to obtain ownership of landed property, which does not require consent from the previous owner: adverse possession, colloquially known as “squatters’ rights.”

The difference between ownership and mere possession is that in the latter case, a person is exercising intentional control over a property, without necessarily being the legal owner. An example of possession would be if you borrowed your friend’s car for a weekend trip; you are in possession of the car during that trip, but your friend still remains the owner of the car.

Adverse possession occurs when a third party acquires the title to a legal owner’s real property without the legal owner receiving any compensation or engaging in any contract. The third party acquires ownership rights by holding the property for a specific period of time, in a manner that conflicts with the original owner’s rights. This common-law concept of obtaining ownership through possession, known in ancient Roman law as “usucapio,” has found its way into the laws of many civil-law countries, including Thailand’s Civil and Commercial Code (CCC).

Section 1382 of the CCC provides a basis for the concept of adverse possession. It states that a person acquires ownership of immovable property if the person has, for an uninterrupted period of ten years, peacefully and openly possessed the property belonging to another with the intention of being its owner.

There are four key requirements to obtain land ownership by adverse possession.

First, the property must belong to another person. Therefore, if the property in question is a plot of land, for another person to obtain ownership through adverse possession, the previous owner must have been registered as the owner of the land in the land title deed (called a “chanote” in Thailand).

In circumstances where the adverse possessor was in possession of the land before the owner was registered in the land title deed, the Thai Supreme Court has ruled that this period prior to registration is not taken into account and the ten-year period only starts from the date the title deed was issued.

Second, the possessor must have possessed the land in an open and peaceful manner. This requires actual possession, through acts such as erecting a fence around the land, constructing buildings, and cultivating or improving the land in any manner that is open and obvious in a way that would be noticeable to the registered owner on occasional visits.

A person who uses intimidation or force to obtain or retain possession of the land is not eligible for ownership under CCC section 1382, since such possession is not peaceful.

Third, the possession must continue uninterrupted for at least ten years. However, according to section 1384, if the possessor loses holding of the property involuntarily, the possession shall not be deemed interrupted so long as possession is recovered or an action is instituted within one year from the date of the loss.

Finally, the possessor must have taken possession of the property with the intention to be its owner. This requirement precludes rightful possessors from acquiring ownership of the land through adverse possession. This would include lessees of the land or employees who may have been hired by the land owner to cultivate the land.

An interesting aspect of this law is that while an adverse possessor must intend to become the owner of the land, there is no requirement of good faith and he does not need to believe he has any right to possess and own the land.

As long as he has the intention to own the land while being in factual possession of it for ten years, he can obtain ownership through adverse possession under this law without having to compensate the previous owner. This is true even if he encroaches on the land in bad faith and knows that the land is already owned by another person; the previous registered owner would still lose ownership of the land.

According to section 1383, this would even be the case if ownership of the property was acquired based on a criminal offense; after expiration of the prescription period for the offense, or after expiration of the ten-year period, whichever is longer, the offender or a transferee in bad faith would obtain legal ownership of the land.

The most effective way for registered land property owners to prevent loss of ownership to an adverse possessor is to put up a fence around the property. In case land owners notice any unauthorized dwellers on their land, they should immediately report this to the police or file a complaint for eviction with the appropriate court.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

July 3, 2026
Thailand will keep its reduced government fees for property sale and mortgage registration in place for another year. Two Ministry of Interior notifications, issued following a cabinet resolution on June 30, 2026, and published in the Government Gazette on July 1, 2026, extend the previously reduced fee levels through June 30, 2027. The reduced registration fees apply to the sale and mortgage of the same property types covered in prior versions of the scheme: detached houses, semidetached houses, row houses, commercial buildings, land transferred together with such buildings, and condominium units. To be eligible for the reduced fees, the purchase price, the officially assessed value, and the mortgage amount must each not exceed THB 7 million, and the buyer must be a Thai individual. The reduced registration fees for eligible sales and mortgages are calculated as follows: Sale: 0.01% of the official assessed value (reduced from standard rate of 2%) Mortgage: 0.01% of the mortgage amount (reduced from standard rate of 1%) The reduced mortgage registration fee applies only if the mortgage is registered at the same time as the sale of the property.
April 30, 2026
Thailand’s Long-Term Resident (LTR) Visa regime offers an attractive immigration pathway for qualifying foreign nationals, providing a 10-year renewable permission to stay in Thailand. Following amendments under Board of Investment (BOI) Announcement No. Por. 3/2568 dated February 4, 2025, the regime now more explicitly accommodates property investment as a qualifying vehicle—a development of particular relevance to foreign nationals already considering real estate acquisitions in Thailand. The LTR Visa is available to several categories of applicants, including wealthy global citizens with global assets of at least USD 1 million, and wealthy pensioners aged 50 or older with an annual pension or fixed income of at least USD 40,000. Property as a Qualifying Investment For both categories, property investment is recognized as one of three eligible investment types alongside Thai government bonds (with at least five years remaining to maturity) and direct investments in Thai companies or approved venture capital or private equity vehicles. The minimum qualifying property investment is USD 500,000 for wealthy global citizens and USD 250,000 for wealthy pensioners. Eligible property types include freehold condominiums, buildings, or villas, as well as leasehold properties with a remaining lease term of at least 10 years. Health Coverage Requirement Beyond the investment threshold, applicants must demonstrate adequate health coverage. This requirement can be satisfied through a health insurance policy covering at least USD 50,000 in Thai medical expenses with at least 10 months of remaining coverage, evidence of social security benefits covering Thai medical costs, or a bank deposit of at least USD 100,000 retained for 12 months. Practical Considerations For foreign nationals already considering property acquisitions in prime residential markets—where investment values commonly meet or exceed the USD 500,000 threshold—the visa pathway effectively transforms a real estate purchase into a dual-purpose investment, combining asset ownership with long-term residence rights that
April 7, 2026
Real estate law specialists from Tilleke & Gibbins provided the chapter on Vietnam for Practical Law’s Commercial Real Estate Global Guide 2026, a comparative jurisdictional guide in Q&A format giving a high-level overview of real estate investment structures, restrictions on foreign ownership, and other important issues of real estate law. The main topics include the following: Real estate investment Title to real estate Sale of real estate Real estate tax Real estate finance Real estate leases Planning and development controls To read the Vietnam chapter, please visit the Practical Law website and enroll in the free Practical Law trial to gain full access.
February 25, 2026
In December 2025, the National Assembly of Vietnam enacted a new Law on Construction, replacing the 2014 Law on Construction as amended in 2020. The 2025 Law on Construction will, in principle, take effect on July 1, 2026, subject to certain exceptions. Among its notable reforms, one development has attracted particular attention from both legal practitioners and market participants: the introduction of a statutory framework governing predetermined damages, commonly referred to as “liquidated damages.” This marks the first time liquidated damages have been expressly recognized at the level of primary legislation in Vietnam. While liquidated damages clauses have long been a common feature of construction contracts in practice, their legal enforceability has historically been subject to uncertainty. Although the new provision appears to represent a positive step toward greater legal clarity, it remains an open question whether it is sufficient, on its own, to provide a solid legal basis for the enforceability of liquidated damages clauses in construction disputes in Vietnam. What’s New? Article 86.2 of the 2025 Law on Construction provides (emphasis added): “Compensation for damages shall be determined on the basis of actual damages [or] predetermined damages corresponding to obligations under the construction contracts that are breached [and] the extent of such breaches.” This provision is significant in that it expressly recognizes predetermined damages, or liquidated damages, as a lawful basis for determining compensation for damage. However, the new law does not define “predetermined damages.” The absence of a statutory definition creates potential ambiguity as to the scope and nature of this concept and may give rise to disputes over how—and whether—a particular contractual clause qualifies as predetermined damages for the purposes of Article 86.2. Further, Article 86.2 qualifies the application of predetermined damages by requiring that such damages correspond to the obligations not fulfilled and the