You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

March 1, 2023

Khmer-Language and Other Requirements for Labeling of Household Chemical Products in Cambodia

In Cambodia, the Ministry of Commerce takes the lead on many consumer protection matters, issuing and enforcing regulations that contribute greatly to a fairer and more transparent legal framework. The regulations protect consumers while simultaneously creating a more a level playing field for businesses.

On September 2, 2022, the ministry issued a new regulation concerning household chemical products. The regulation, named Prakas No. 192 on the Requirements for the Labeling of Household Chemical Products, is another big leap forward in light of the consumer protection framework that the Cambodian government has been rapidly updating in recent years.

Interesting issues in the regulation include household chemical product classification, labeling and language requirements, product storage requirements, recall requirements, and obligations for companies engaging in business activities related to household chemicals. In addition, the regulation reminds household chemicals businesses operating online of the need to obtain additional e-commerce licensing.

Cambodia’s consumer protection authority, the Consumer Protection, Competition and Fraud Repression Directorate-General—commonly known as the CCF—has already started to enforce the new regulation, as the three-month transition period under the regulation has now passed.

Classifying and Defining Household Chemicals

The regulation classifies household chemicals into three groups based on the product’s purpose—namely detergents, pesticides, and substances for home and garden protection.

There is also a separate list of household chemicals identified as “chemicals not allowed for use in food.” This list is just a reminder, as existing legislation already prohibits the use of the identified chemicals in food.

The regulation defines household chemicals as finished chemical products, or chemical additives to products, that can be harmful to health and that have one of the three purposes mentioned above. The regulation further states that the products are for use in “normal life,” such as in homes, workshops, or gardens, or for other public use.

The regulation lists many examples of household chemicals—including wood preservatives, furniture polish, insecticides, herbicides, fungicides, oven cleaners, laundry detergents, toilet cleaners, dishwashing detergent, common cleaning agents, and many others—that are often part of daily life. We therefore believe that this regulation will have a substantial impact across a broad range of chemical products on the Cambodian market.

Labeling and Language Requirements

The regulation identifies the minimum labeling requirements and mandates the use of Khmer language for these, unless the regulation specifically indicates otherwise (for example, for active ingredients, which must be in English or French only). If the product does not have sufficient space for the labeling in Khmer, a description card, leaflet, sticker, or similar means to provide the information should be attached to the product.

Besides setting out various types of necessary informational and cautionary text, the regulation’s minimum labeling requirements also detail the use of pictograms complying with a subdecree from 2021 that applies the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals, which is an internationally recognized standard for classifying and labeling chemicals.

Obligations of Businesses

All household chemical businesses in Cambodia (i.e., those that import, manufacture, store, distribute, or sell household chemicals) must take responsibility for ensuring the quality and safety of their products. The products must meet the regulation’s requirements, including on labeling and language.

Under the regulation, businesses must safely store their products, specifically storing them away from food. Businesses must also keep documents on the source of the products, and must provide these to the CCF or other appropriate authorities upon request.

Businesses must also recall products that are of poor quality, unsafe, or noncompliant with the labeling standards or other technical regulations.

Analysis

The new regulation will contribute greatly to enhancing consumer protection, as it requires product labeling to provide the appropriate information to consumers in local language. Key labeling features with a positive impact on consumer protection include instructions on how to safely use a product, and instructions in case of emergencies.

Furthermore, the regulation clearly specifies that business owners must take responsibility for their products, ensuring they are safe for use. They are further obliged to recall any products deemed unsafe, which should generally lead to more reliable products on the market and removal of unsafe ones—either by businesses or the authorities (such as the CCF).

However, the regulation does not clarify product registration requirements, which would have been helpful to businesses operating in this sector. To date, it has been difficult to understand when and for exactly which products registrations are required—and even which regulator(s) are in charge in different scenarios. Unfortunately, the regulation does not make progress in clarifying these uncertainties.

Nevertheless, this regulation offers more guidance through its classification system, provides a clear definition of household chemicals (which had been ambiguous prior to the new regulation), and plainly lays out essential requirements for labeling content and language. Businesses can act decisively by updating their labels to comply with the new rules, and consumers can look forward to greater product safety and labeling clarity in the market for household chemicals in Cambodia.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

March 4, 2021
E-commerce platforms have become some of the most significant marketplaces in Thailand, with millions of daily business transactions and huge numbers of online users. The increasing number of online shops operating on e-commerce platforms requires new techniques to be employed in online IP rights infringement cases. Both the private sector and the government have developed tools to enhance online IP enforcement, including ones using the latest legal technologies and artificial intelligence (AI). Many legal technologies and AI operations are still nascent and typically do not yet offer the best approach for online IP rights enforcement. For example, AI and other technologies available today are still unable to consistently differentiate between original and counterfeit products from the images and information displayed on the e-commerce platforms and the internet. Therefore, some of the most effective measures for online IP enforcement still involve manual online searches by experienced local investigators with deep understanding of the behaviors of local users (both sellers and buyers) and the ability to link relevant information across online platforms. Thailand’s Department of Intellectual Property (DIP), as the governmental office responsible for IP-related matters in Thailand, has initiated its new Memorandum of Understanding on the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights on the Internet. This memorandum of understanding (MOU) does not create additional rights for IP owners, but acts as a mechanism to gather all the relevant stakeholders to address issues related to online IP infringement in a unified, mutually agreeable manner. The signatories of the MOU fall into four categories: Governmental authorities: DIP, Department of Business Development, and Department of International Trade Promotion; E-commerce platform operators: Lazada, Shopee, and JD Central (the most popular e-commerce platforms in Thailand); IP rights holders: Particularly including trademark owners facing ongoing counterfeiting problems in Thailand; and Law firms. Although the MOU is not
March 4, 2021
Vietnam has become a big player in the global fashion industry. Garments made in Vietnam now appear all over the world, especially in the U.S. and the EU. In this value chain, however, Vietnamese companies usually play the role of garment processors, fulfilling the orders of big brands for immediate export purposes. While the goods bearing the registered marks are made in Vietnam by local companies, the brand owners are often overseas or global corporations. As a brand owner can lose protection of its mark in Vietnam due to non-use, this situation leads to the question of what constitutes “use” of a mark when the mark-bearing goods are processed for export only, and not sold in the Vietnam market. Article 124.5 of Vietnam’s IP Law provides that: Use of a mark means the performance of the following acts: Affixing the protected mark on goods, packaging, business facilities, means of service provision, or transaction documents in business activities; Circulating, offering, advertising, or stocking for sale goods bearing the protected mark; Importing goods or services bearing the protected mark. At first glance, the above provision seems quite clear. While importing goods appears on the list, exporting goods is conspicuously absent, and therefore it is not an act of use. However, it is also clear that for the purpose of exporting, a product should go through a manufacturing or processing stage in which the mark will be physically affixed to the product or its packaging. For fashion goods, this could be in the form of a removable tag or package, a tag sewn onto the item, or a fundamental part of the garment’s design (such as a T-shirt emblazoned with a brand name, or a shoe featuring a distinctive logo). Then, the question becomes whether this act of affixing the mark on
March 4, 2021
Myanmar, which is now more than halfway through the scheduled soft opening of its Intellectual Property Department (IPD) under the country’s New Trademark Law, is well on its way to the full realization of its plans for a modernized IP system operating on par with international standards. As the first of four IP-related laws passed in 2019, the ongoing implementation of the Trademark Law affects definitions of trademarks and types of trademark applications. Section 2 of the law defines a “mark” as “either a visible sign or a combination of signs, including one’s own names, alphabet letters, numbers, graphical representations, or compositions of color and tints to distinguish the goods or services of an enterprise from those of another enterprise. Within this scope, trademark, service mark, collective mark and certification mark are also included. The ‘series mark’ consists of a number of these marks, which resemble each other on the material particulars, but may differ in some aspect—for instance, a mark with different color variations. However, there is no specific definition of what makes up a series mark in the Trademark Law itself, and there has also not yet been any clear guidance on the issue. The Trademark Rules, which set the guidelines for the trademark application and registration procedures, are still in the process of being finalized, are expected to include information on the possibility of filing series marks under the soft opening period. On December 29 2020, the IPD held a workshop to clarify various issues, and informed attendees that applications containing more than one trademark in a single application are prohibited under the new system. However, this seemed to contradict the Ministry of Commerce’s Order No. 63/2020, which had declared that the refiling of old marks under the soft opening period of the new Trademark Law
February 23, 2021
As many are already aware, following the change of government in Myanmar on February 1, 2021, a draft Cyber Security Law was proposed which attracted widespread criticism. However, less attention has been paid to significant amendments to two existing laws, some of which have a similar effect to parts of the draft Cyber Security Law. In other words, while the draft Cyber Security Law has not progressed further and is under public scrutiny, significant elements of it have found their way into law in Myanmar by other routes. Because these amendments are already law, it is very important that individuals and businesses in Myanmar understand their implications. Amendments to the Law Protecting the Privacy and Security of Citizens The Law Protecting the Privacy and Security of Citizens (2017), or the “Privacy Law,” was amended on February 13, 2021, less than two weeks after the military government came into power. These amendments chiefly address the power of the government to conduct searches, seizures, and arrests; to extend detention without judicial oversight; and to carry out broad surveillance and investigation activities that could intrude on individual privacy. The amendments accomplish this by suspending various sections of the Privacy Law for as long as the State Administration Council (the military body now governing Myanmar) is in power. The suspended sections include the following: Section 5: Search, seizure, and arrest without civilian observation The relevant part of Section 5 of the Privacy Law states, “The responsible authorities shall … when acting in accordance with existing law, not enter into a person’s residence or a room used as a residence, or a building, compound or building in a compound, for the purpose of search, seizure, or arrest, unless accompanied by minimum of two witnesses who should comprise Ward or Village Tract Administrators…”. The suspension