You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

October 20, 2023

Key Takeaways from Vietnam’s Decree 70 on Foreign Workers

On September 18, 2023, the Vietnamese government issued Decree No. 70/2023/ND-CP (“Decree 70”) amending and supplementing certain provisions of Decree No. 152/2020/ND-CP (“Decree 152”), which regulates foreign workers working in Vietnam and the recruitment and management of Vietnamese workers working for foreign entities in Vietnam. While Decree 70 relaxes some conditions relating to foreign workers, the general goal of protecting and prioritizing domestic labor over foreign labor remains. The major changes introduced in Decree 70 are summarized below.

1. Amended Definitions and Requirements for Worker Classifications

Decree 70 introduces several changes to the requirements for foreign workers to be classified as “experts” and “technical workers.” Under Decree 152, foreign workers needed to hold bachelor’s degrees or receive training directly related to their intended job positions in Vietnam. However, under Decree 70, experts are only required to have a university degree or higher and at least three years of relevant work experience suitable for their intended positions in Vietnam.

Similarly, it is no longer necessary for technical workers to have training in a specific technical field to be eligible to work in Vietnam. Instead, a technical worker is defined as someone who has undergone at least one year of training and possesses at least three years of working experience suitable for their intended job position.

Additionally, Decree 70 clarifies and expands the scope of the term “executive director”. Accordingly, an executive director can be (i) the head of a branch, representative office, or business location of an enterprise (which helps clarify the previous definition of “executive director” in Decree 152); or (ii) an individual who oversees at least one field within an agency, organization, or enterprise while being under the direct supervision of the head of that agency, organization, or enterprise.

2. Application for Work Permit

The general procedure for work permit application under Decree 70 remains the same as under Decree 152, consisting of two steps:

Step 1: Approval of demand to use foreign labor

Under this step, employers must submit a report and explanation on their need to use foreign workers to the Ministry of Labor, Invalids and Social Affairs (MOLISA) or the Department of Labor, War Invalids and Social Affairs (DOLISA) of the province or city where the foreign workers are expected to work. Decree 70 has shortened the timeline for submitting this application for approval of demand to use foreign labor to a minimum of 15 days in advance of the foreigner commencing work, compared to 30 days under Decree 152.

Decree 70 also includes specific cases related to changing the demand to use foreign labor, which may arise in the course of employing foreign workers. These cases involve changes in the positions, job titles, work arrangements, quantities, and locations for which foreign workers are required.

Additionally, from January 1, 2024, if employers would like to recruit foreign workers for a certain position, they must first post a recruitment announcement seeking Vietnamese workers for that position on the online portal of MOLISA or the provincial-level employment service center at least 15 days before the expected date of applying for approval of demand to use foreign labor. The MOLISA and DOLISA have not provided clear guidance on this issue, so it is uncertain exactly what this obligation will entail. However, Decree 70 states that the recruitment announcement must include the position, job description, number of employees to be hired, qualification requirements, experience, salary, time, and location of work.

If the employer can establish that it was unable to recruit Vietnamese workers for the posted positions, it may then submit the application for approval of demand to use foreign labor.

Step 2: Application for work permit

For the work permit application, instead of the general provisions stated in Decree 152 as “Documents providing proof that the individual is a manager or an executive director”, Decree 70 specifically outlines three types of qualifying documents: (i) the company’s charter or the operating regulations of agencies, organizations, or enterprises; (ii) the enterprise registration certificate or certificate of establishment or establishment decision or other document of equivalent legal validity; (iii) resolutions or decisions on the appointment of agencies, organizations, or enterprises.

According to Decree 70, in addition to diplomas, certificates, or training certifications, experts and technical workers can use previously granted work permits or work permit exemption certificates as substitutes for the experience confirmation document issued by foreign agencies, organizations, or enterprises.

For expats who are experts or technicians and will continue working in the same position and job title after renewing their work permit, it is not necessary to resubmit all the documents from the initial work permit application dossier. Instead, they only need to submit the following documents: (i) application for the issuance of a work permit; (ii) health certificate; (iii) two color photos; (iv) approval of demand to use foreign labor; (v) certified copy of passport or copy of passport with confirmation from the employer; and (vi) certified copy of the issued and valid (previous) work permit. This means that the process of obtaining a new work permit after previously having a renewed work permit has become more straightforward.

If foreign workers work for an employer at multiple locations, the application for a work permit must list all the workplaces in the application.

3. Reissuance of Work Permit

Decree 70 lists additional types of information changes that will require reissuance of a work permit, including changes to full name, nationality, passport number, working location, or enterprise name (without changing the enterprise code).

The approval of demand to use foreign labor is no longer required to be submitted in this case.

4. Work Permit Exemptions

In addition to the list of cases for which foreign workers are exempted from applying for a work permit specified in Decree 152, Decree 70 amends and supplements the following circumstances: (i) foreigner sent to Vietnam by a competent foreign agency or organization to teach, or to act as a manager or executive director at an educational institution proposed to be established by foreign diplomatic missions or intergovernmental organizations in Vietnam; and (ii) foreigner confirmed by the Ministry of Education and Training to enter Vietnam to work as a manager, executive director, or principal at an educational institution proposed to be established by foreign diplomatic missions or intergovernmental organizations in Vietnam. Foreigners married to Vietnamese citizens are also now eligible for a work permit exemption certificate. Previously, many foreigners were on a dependent visa sponsored by their spouse, so would need to leave Vietnam every six months, which was very inconvenient.

5. Reporting Regime

If an expat works in many localities for the same employer, it is worth noting that the employers are obligated to file an online report to the MOLISA and the DOLISA within three working days from the start date of the expat’s working term.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

January 14, 2026
Employers operating in Thailand can enforce post-employment noncompete covenants, but success depends on precise drafting and strong evidentiary support. Thai courts will uphold restraints that protect legitimate employer interests and are fair and reasonable in duration, geographic reach, and substantive scope. Overbroad covenants, however, draw judicial skepticism and may fail unless they are drafted in severable, defensible components tied to the employee’s actual role. This article synthesizes recent trends in Thai case practice, explains how Thai courts assess reasonableness in employment restraints, and provides a practical litigation-focused framework for drafting enforceable covenants, preparing evidence, and pursuing relief through the Labor Court. The Legal Framework and Its Practical Implications Thai courts evaluate noncompete covenants under general principles of contract enforceability and public policy, with particular focus on whether a restraint is necessary to protect a legitimate employer interest and proportionate to that objective. In employment matters, this analysis is shaped by the employee-protective tenor of Thai labor law and by the Labor Court’s equitable discretion in determining appropriate remedies. The practical takeaway is that standardized or broadly drafted covenants rarely survive scrutiny. Courts look for a demonstrable nexus between the employee’s actual exposure to confidential information, trade secrets, or customer relationships and the scope of the restraint. Where that nexus is weak or the restraint operates as a blanket prohibition, courts are inclined to decline enforcement or limit relief to a narrowly tailored prohibition. The employer interests most commonly recognized as legitimate in Thai practice include the protection of trade secrets, confidential business information, and goodwill tied to identifiable customer segments or territories. Courts are more likely to enforce restraints where employers can clearly document what information is at risk, why particular customer relationships matter, and how the employee was involved with those assets. Judges also look closely at the
December 19, 2025
On December 12, 2025, Thailand’s Ministry of Labor published a ministerial regulation prescribing the minimum and maximum wages used as a base for calculating social security contributions. The regulation, which takes effect on January 1, 2026, sets a flat minimum base wage of THB 1,650 per month and a phased increase of the maximum base wage over the following six years, as outlined in the table below. Impact on Social Security Benefits Not only will monthly contributions increase as a result of the adjustment to the maximum wages used as a base for calculating social security contributions, but the maximum benefits available to insured persons will also be enhanced, as shown in the next table. Employer Obligations From January 1, 2026, employers must correctly withhold wages and remit social security contributions for both the employer’s and employees’ portions in compliance with the revised thresholds. Failure to comply may expose employers to penalties under the Social Security Act B.E. 2533 (1990). Employers should ensure that payroll systems are updated as necessary to reflect these changes to the wage ceiling used for social security contribution calculations.
December 8, 2025
As Thailand transitions into an aged society, retirement policy and workplace protections for older workers have come into sharper focus. With public sentiment increasingly open to working beyond the traditional retirement age, questions about employee rights and employer obligations are more relevant than ever. In October 2025, Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul proposed increasing the statutory retirement age to 65 for government officers, citing Thailand’s aged-society status and the potential social and economic benefits of longer working lives. While academics and stakeholders have raised concerns about systemic impacts, public opinion remains divided, with many workers signaling a willingness to continue working beyond the current norm. Against this backdrop, it’s worth revisiting what the Labor Protection Act B.E. 2541 (1998) (LPA) requires in regard to retirement and severance pay. This article explains the current legal landscape under the LPA, with a focus on retirement and severance pay for employees over 60, recent judicial developments, and practical options for structuring postretirement engagements. Retirement as Termination Under the LPA Under the LPA, retirement—whether set by agreement between employer and employee or unilaterally stipulated by the employer—is deemed a termination of employment. As a result, employees who retire under such terms are entitled to severance pay. The law also adds a default rule: if there is no agreed or prescribed retirement age, or if the prescribed retirement age exceeds 60, an employee aged 60 or older may declare an intention to retire. The declaration takes effect 30 days after notice, and the employer must pay severance accordingly. In short, retirement triggered by agreement, the employer’s work rules, or an employee’s valid notice is treated as a termination, and statutory severance pay is owed. Hiring or Rehiring Employees Over 60 Practical issues arise when an employer’s work rules set a retirement age that does not
December 2, 2025
Investing in Mainland Southeast Asia is Tilleke & Gibbins’ essential guide for investors looking to do business in this vibrant region, whether it’s starting operations as a newly established entity or expanding into new territories or business models.