You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

September 9, 2026

Indonesia’s Updated Regulation on Food Packaging

Subscribe to Updates

On June 30, 2026, Indonesia’s National Agency of Drug and Food Control (BPOM) issued BPOM Regulation No. 11 of 2026 on Food Packaging, which expands the list of approved food-contact substances and recognizes a broader range of permissible functions for those substances. The new regulation, which revokes BPOM Regulation No. 20 of 2019, reflects developments in packaging technology and materials science.

Although the new regulation provides more advantages to business actors by adding more food contact substances to the approved list for use in food packaging, there are more stringent rules and restrictions for testing. One of the most significant changes is a comprehensive migration-testing framework that sets out requirements for packaging materials, testing conditions, food simulants, and specific migration limits.

Overall and Specific Migration

Under BPOM Regulation No. 20 of 2019, migration requirements were primarily set out within the lists of approved food-contact substances and packaging materials. BPOM Regulation No. 11 of 2026 instead expressly requires packaging materials that come into direct contact with food to meet both overall and specific migration limits. These are defined as follows:

  • Overall migration: The total quantity of all substances that migrate from the packaging, regardless of whether the substances are hazardous or nonhazardous to health.
  • Specific migration: The quantity of a particular identified substance known to be hazardous to health that migrates from the packaging.

Stricter Limits on Heavy Metals

The overall migration limit for plastic packaging remains unchanged under both regulations at 60 mg/kg or 10 mg/dm². However, the new regulation introduces significant changes to the regulation of heavy metals. Under the 2019 regulation, four heavy metals—lead, cadmium, chromium VI, and mercury—were subject to a single combined limit of 1 mg/kg. The 2026 regulation, however, requires each heavy metal to meet its own individual specific migration limit, adds arsenic as a newly regulated substance, and broadens the scope of chromium testing from chromium VI (Cr(VI)) to total chromium (Cr). The specific migration limits under the 2026 Regulation are set out below:

  • Arsenic (As): Not detected (LOD 0.01 mg/kg)
  • Cadmium (Cd): Not detected (LOD 0.002 mg/kg)
  • Total Chromium (Cr): Not detected (LOD 0.01 mg/kg)
  • Lead (Pb): 0.05 mg/kg
  • Mercury (Hg): Not detected (LOD 0.01 mg/kg)

Updated Rules on Food Simulants

A food simulant is a medium used to mimic the characteristics of a particular food to simulate the migration of components from the food packaging into the food. The 2026 regulation identifies five types of food simulants for use in overall migration testing, as follows:

  • Simulant A: Ethanol 10% (v/v)
  • Simulant B: Acetic acid 3% (w/v)
  • Simulant C: Ethanol 20% (v/v)
  • Simulant D1: Ethanol 50% (v/v)
  • Simulant D2: Vegetable oil containing less than 1% unsaponifiable matter; if food simulant D2 cannot be used, 95% alcohol or isooctane may be used as an alternative food simulant
  • Simulant E: Poly (2,6-diphenyl-p-phenylene oxide), particle size 60–80 mesh, pore size 200 nm

Under the 2019 regulation, simulant D2 was defined as vegetable oil, with no specific compositional requirements. The 2026 regulation narrows this definition and provides an alternative for situations where simulant D2 cannot be used.

New Requirements for Food Product Composition

The 2026 regulation introduces new disclosure requirements for the composition of food products that may come into contact with their packaging material. The name, percentage, and function of each component must be declared, and the sum of all declared percentages must equal 100%.

New Testing Requirements for Reusable Plastic Packaging

The 2026 regulation introduces additional requirements for reusable food packaging. Reusable plastic packaging must meet both the overall and specific migration limits through the testing protocol prescribed in Annex V.

For overall migration, compliance may be demonstrated in a single test. If the first result meets the applicable limit, no further testing is required. If it does not, up to two additional tests are permitted, provided that the results show a decreasing trend, with the second result lower than the first, and the third lower than the second.

Specific migration, by contrast, requires three tests in order to simulate the repeated contact that occurs over the packaging’s service life. Each result must meet the applicable specific migration limit, and the levels must not increase across the cycles; the second result may not exceed the first, and the third may not exceed the second. Compliance depends on these results, as well as on the stability of the packaging material throughout the three testing cycles. A material is considered unstable if detectable migration increases from the first test to the third, even when the migration values remain below the applicable regulatory limit.

Because contact under single-use conditions represents the worst-case scenario for migration, test data generated under those conditions is generally understood to support compliance for repeated-use applications as well.

Transition Period

BPOM Regulation No. 11 of 2026 provides a 12-month transition period from its promulgation date to allow food packaging products already circulating in the market to comply with the new requirements. Food packaging that was already in circulation before the regulation entered into force must be brought into compliance with the new regulation by June 30, 2027.

Business Impact

BPOM Regulation No. 11 of 2026 updates Indonesia’s food packing rules to better respond to developments in food packaging technology and materials science. Food packaging manufacturers, importers, and brand owners in Indonesia should review existing compliance practices and test reports to confirm that packaging intended for direct food contact meets the new overall and specific migration requirements.

Related Professionals

Industries

Life Sciences

Practices

Regulatory Affairs

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

February 22, 2021
Following the recent imposition of sanctions on Myanmar individuals and companies by the US, the UK and Canada have now imposed new sanctions. As with the US sanctions, these new measures impact UK and Canadian citizens and companies, and non-UK and non-Canadian companies and citizens with interests in those jurisdictions. The EU has indicated that it is planning to issue similar sanctions in the near future. New UK Sanctions In addition to the 16 individuals already sanctioned by the UK government, on February 18, 2021, the UK government announced that three individuals have been sanctioned for serious human rights violations and are now subject to asset freezes and travel bans. The full list of Myanmar individuals and companies sanctioned by the UK is available on the website of the Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation. Breaches of UK financial sanctions are criminal offences punishable in the UK by up to 7 years imprisonment and heavy fines. New Canadian Sanctions Also on February 18, timed to coincide with the UK sanctions, new Canadian sanctions were imposed on nine individuals. As with the UK, Canada already had a number of individuals in the Myanmar military on its sanctions list, and the new additions bring the total number of individuals sanctioned by Canada to 54. All assets of these individuals in Canada are now frozen, and they are banned from travelling to Canada. Canadian businesses or entities may not do business with any of the 54 individuals. Full details of the impact of the sanctions are available on the Government of Canada’s website, as is a database of the Myanmar individuals and companies subject to them. Breach of Canadian sanctions carries with it up to 5 years’ imprisonment in Canada and/or a large fine. Other Countries The EU is reportedly drawing up sanctions
Read More
February 18, 2021
As you will no doubt know, on February 1, 2021, the Myanmar military declared a state of emergency in Myanmar for a period of one year. State Counsellor Daw Aung Sang Su Kyi was detained, as were the president and various significant political and civil leaders. Min Aung Hlaing, commander-in-chief of the Tatmadaw (Myanmar armed forces) has installed himself as chairman of the State Administration Council, the current administration. New sanctions The reaction of the Biden administration has been swift. On February 10, 2021, President Biden issued Executive Order 14014, which provides bases to impose sanctions on individuals and companies deemed by the US to, among other things: operate in the defense sector of Myanmar; be responsible for policies that undermine democratic processes in Myanmar; have taken actions to undermine democratic processes or institutions, or prohibit, limit, or penalize the exercise of free speech, in Myanmar; or be a spouse or child of the foregoing. On the next day, February 11, the US Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), imposed sanctions under the new executive order on ten individuals—including General Min Aung Hlaing—and three companies, including Cancri Gems & Jewelry Co, Myanmar Imperial Jade Co, and Myanmar Ruby Enterprise.  All such individuals and companies have now been designated on the US list of specially designated nationals (SDNs). Effect of sanctions As a result of such sanctions, the property of these individuals or companies that is located in the US or is under the possession or control of US companies and citizens is frozen, and US companies and citizens are generally prohibited from dealing deal with any such property.  Reportedly, roughly USD 1 billion of funds belonging to the individuals and companies blocked on February 11 are located in the US and thus now frozen. The SDN list As many
Read More
February 1, 2021
The latest edition of Practical Law’s Life Sciences Global Guide features contributions from Tilleke & Gibbins attorneys in the firm’s Yangon office. One of the sections they have provided for the Myanmar chapter of this Q&A-style guide to life sciences regulatory frameworks worldwide is “Medicinal Product Regulation and Product Liability in Myanmar.” The section includes discussion of a range of regulatory issues related to the marketing and selling of pharmaceutical products, including the following topics: Regulatory overview: Authorities, scope, and general procedures for pharmaceuticals, biologicals, and medical devices and health care IT Pricing, government funding, and reimbursement: National health care system, price regulation, and reimbursement Clinical trials Manufacturing and distribution Marketing: Authorization for marketing medicinal products, parallel imports and cross-border trade in medicines Restrictions on dealings with health care professionals Selling restrictions Advertising and promotion Data privacy Packaging, labeling, and tracking Product safety, quality, and liability Local establishment, representation, and residency requirements Reform The full “Medicinal Product Regulation and Product Liability in Myanmar” section can be accessed on the Practical Law website. Practical Law, produced by Thomson Reuters, is the world’s leading legal know-how resource for business lawyers, publishing a huge range of guides covering hundreds of jurisdictions and practice areas. Tilleke & Gibbins also supplied “Pharmaceutical IP and Competition Law in Myanmar,” which was published in the Life Sciences Global Guide  at the same time.
Read More
February 1, 2021
Attorneys from Tilleke & Gibbins in Myanmar have contributed to the latest edition of Practical Law’s online Life Sciences Global Guide. The guide is a Q&A-style overview of the regulatory frameworks for the life sciences industry across multiple jurisdictions worldwide, and this year the Myanmar chapter includes two sections, one of which is “Pharmaceutical IP and Competition Law in Myanmar.” This section runs through the country’s legal and regulatory environment for patents and trademarks—particularly as they relate to pharmaceutical business in the jurisdiction. The section then turns to IP and competition law issues, with questions and answers focusing on how the country’s competition laws and regulations affect the pharmaceutical sector. Readers are also given information on how to properly comply with Myanmar law on competition, including when it comes to licensing of medicines and pharmaceutical technology. The full Pharmaceutical Intellectual Property and Competition Law in Myanmar guide can be accessed on the Practical Law website. Practical Law, produced by Thomson Reuters, is the world’s leading legal know-how resource for business lawyers, publishing a huge range of guides covering hundreds of jurisdictions and practice areas. Tilleke & Gibbins also supplied the “Medicinal Product Regulation and Product Liability in Myanmar,” which Practical Law published in its Life Sciences Global Guide  at the same time.
Read More