You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

May 27, 2021

Indonesia Updates Its Drug Advertising Guidelines

Subscribe to Updates

In February 2021, Indonesia’s National Agency for Drug and Food Control (Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan, or BPOM) issued updated guidelines for the advertising of pharmaceutical products. Regulation 2/2021 concerning the Supervision of Drug Advertising Guidelines, which came into effect on February 3, 2021, improves the process for the submission and consideration of advertisement approval requests, expands the categories of media and drugs that are not allowed to be advertised, defines supervisions and sanctions, and better clarifies drug labeling and advertisement to prevent pharmaceutical companies from mislabeling drugs and clamp down on drug advertisement violations online.

At the same time, BPOM revoked Regulation 8/2017 concerning the Supervision of Drug Advertising Guidelines. This old version from 2017 was updated by the new regulation in several important ways.

Online Application System for Advertisement Approval

BPOM now operates an online advertisement approval application system known as SIAPIK (from its full name, Sistem Aplikasi Persetujuan Iklan). The use of this online system, which is available at https://siapik.pom.go.id, is a step forward from the previous practice in which advertisement applications had to be filed in person.

BPOM Regulation 2/2021 regulates the submission of advertisement approval applications via the SIAPIK website. These applications must include a marketing authorization approval letter, the approved label or label design, and the advertising design. Advertising documents in English are accepted, but documentation in any other foreign (or local) language must be translated into Bahasa Indonesia. Applications should also include supporting documents containing certain information that is not related to the use of drugs, if required by the officer for verification.

After the documents are submitted, BPOM evaluates the advertisement approval using the appropriate process for the category into which the advertisement falls. Those in the “minor” category include advertisements with new concepts that do not have the potential to cause misinterpretation, as well as variations (such as small alterations to the information, and other insignificant changes) on advertisements that have already been approved. Those in the “major” category include advertisements with new concepts that have the potential to lead to wrong interpretations, and variations of advertisements (or meaningful changes) that have already been approved and have undergone no other notable change (e.g., in advertisement media, in reduction of claims, or through shortening of duration that could alter interpretations of the advertisement).

The evaluation period is 10 working days for minor category advertisements and 25 working days for major category advertisements—both significantly shorter than the 60 days for evaluation (regardless of category) specified in the previous regulation.

Evaluation results are then issued electronically—approved if the application has met all the requirements, or rejected if the application has failed to do so. An approval of an advertisement is valid for as long as the marketing authorization of the drug lasts and as long as the advertisement still meets the criteria and requirements.

The SIAPIK system also provides a “notification service,” which applicants can use to apply for renewal of unchanged advertisements or approval for variations to already-approved advertisements, if the changes are to:

  • design or layout, without changing the claims or information contained in the advertisement;
  • the cast appearing in the advertisement;
  • publication means, without any change in advertisement media as defined in article 7(2), 7(3), and 7(4) (see discussion of media categories below); or
  • reduction of claims or shortening of duration that does not result in a change to the interpretation or meaning of the advertisement.

Applications using the notification service are processed automatically via the SIAPIK system, with independent evaluation by the applicant (that is, self-assessment without BPOM evaluation) within one working day.

Media Category for Drug Advertisements

BPOM Regulation 2/2021 also expands the definitions of advertising publication media in which drugs can be advertised to three broad categories:

  1. visual media
  2. audio media (which includes audio accompanied by a static image online), and
  3. audiovisual media (such as an online video).

This is a significant change from the previous regulation’s media categories of only printed, electronic, and outdoor media.

Advertisements in the form of interactive communication (e.g., telephone, social media, chat rooms, and instant messaging), whereby information is transmitted between the advertiser and the public, are permitted as long as they meet all regulatory requirements, contain complete and truthful information,  and are in compliance with the approved advertisement.

Unlike BPOM Regulation 8/2017, the new regulation requires advertisements using visual media to provide a contact for customer service.

Advertising Controls and Prohibitions for Specific Drugs

The list of specific drugs that require additional information in their advertisements remains the same, but in the new regulation this has been moved into the body (instead of an appendix). These drugs include the following:

  • Cough medicine or flu medicine
  • Asthma medication
  • Indigestion medicine
  • Anthelmintic
  • Topical drugs for fungal infections
  • Eye drops
  • Mouthwash
  • Sore throat medication
  • Bruise medicine
  • Anemia medicine
  • Laxatives
  • Motion sickness medication
  • Malaria drugs
  • Diarrhea medicine

Advertisements for prescription drugs, narcotics, and psychotropic drugs are exempted from having to include specific information if the advertisements are addressed to healthcare workers.

One change reflected in the new regulation is an expansion of the types of drugs prohibited from being advertised to the public. In Regulation 8/2017, “G-list drugs,” or prescription drugs, are prohibited from being advertised to the public. In Regulation 2/2021, this prohibition on public advertisements covers prescription drugs, narcotics, and psychotropic drugs.

Supervision of Advertisements

Officers continue to have the authority to monitor airing advertisements and re-evaluate approved advertisements. However, Regulation 2/2021 allows the public to participate in advertisement supervision as well by providing information or reports on suspected advertisement violations. The report should be submitted to the head of BPOM electronically to the official BPOM email address for public complaints ([email protected]) or by telephone (1500533). The information can also be submitted in writing to the director of safety, quality and import export control of drugs, narcotics, psychotropics, precursors, and addictive substances.

Sanctions

BPOM Regulation 2/2021 stipulates a number of administrative sanctions, depending on the severity of a violation. At the lower end of the scale are warnings (from a written notice to a more serious warning), followed by orders to correct, stop, or withdraw published advertisements. Offenders may also be punished by a temporary suspension of advertising activities, or a freezing or revocation of a marketing authorization permit.

Conclusion

While Regulation 2/2021 does not represent a fundamental change to drug advertising in Indonesia, there are several significant updates that pharmaceutical companies need to be aware of before planning an advertising campaign in Indonesia or submitting a drug advertisement application. The regulations for using the SIAPIK online system, amended categories and prohibitions, and public involvement in supervising advertisements are important updates that both have the potential to affect companies’ advertising plans and help maintain the relevance and effectiveness of Indonesia’s drug advertising regulatory environment.

Related Professionals

Industries

Life Sciences

Practices

Regulatory Affairs

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

July 20, 2022
What does “digital health” include within each jurisdiction? Thailand: For the most part, the idea of “digital health” or “telemedicine” has generally fallen within the area of medical device regulation in Thailand. The normal sort of digital health components you would think of—like software and device accessories for diagnosis, monitoring, prevention, or treatment of illnesses—would fall into medical device classification, so long as they do not achieve their intended function by immunological, metabolic, or pharmacological means. The “digital health” devices you commonly think of, like mobile medical apps, wearable technologies and software, fall mainly within this definition. After the last update to the Medical Device Act in 2008, Thailand next looked at digital health in 2019, with the Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA)—which is largely aligned with GDPR principles—and the Cybersecurity Act. These deal with important issues arising from “digital health” and “telemedicine” like personal data protection, consent to use and consent to transfer data, and privacy. Vietnam: Similarly, in Vietnam, while there’s not a clear definition of “digital health” in the law, it is understood to include various types of medical devices, software, and online services used for healthcare purposes—including diagnosis and treatment as well as medical records and telemedicine. There’s no law on digital health, per se, but many of these areas are covered by separate circulars issued by the Ministry of Health. There’s a circular (referred to as “Circular 49”) from late 2017 on telemedicine, for example, that actually uses the term “telemedicine” to identify the industry and sets out licensing and technical requirements. Indicators such as this show that Vietnam is definitely embracing the concept. Indonesia: In Indonesia, there is also no precise definition of “digital health.” Digital health is regulated under several laws and regulations, such as provisions concerning medical devices under the health
Read More
July 6, 2022
Patent is an essential piece of the amended Law on Intellectual Property (“Amended IP Law”), which was passed by the National Assembly of Vietnam on June 16, 2022, and will take effect on January 1, 2023 (except for the regulation on protection of experimental data for agrochemical products, which will take delayed effect on January 14, 2024). Among the amended and supplemented contents of the Amended IP Law, there are notable patent-related amendments to Article 60 on assessing the novelty of inventions and Article 96 on grounds for invalidating patent protection titles. We discuss these changes below. Secret Prior Art Under Article 60.1 A significant amendment to Clause 1, Article 60 of the Amended IP Law on the novelty of inventions is to broaden the scope under which an invention can be considered to have lost its novelty. For the first time in Vietnam, “secret prior art” –a patent application with an earlier filing date or priority date but published on or after the filing date or priority date of an examined patent application – is introduced as a prior art document. In the diagram above, at the time of filing of the A2 application, secret prior art A1 has been filed but not yet published, making it inaccessible to the public. At this point, only the A1 applicant and the IP Office are aware of the A1 application. Under the current provisions of the 2005 IP Law, as amended in 2009 and 2019, the A1 patent application is not eligible to be a prior art document when assessing the novelty of A2. However, based on the “first-to-file principle” and the principle of priority, the IP Office has still had other approaches to bar the patentability of an A2 patent application if there is such an A1 application. By
Read More
June 13, 2022
Thailand’s cannabis cultivation licensing scheme for the country’s transition toward legalization of the plant has now come to an end. The Ministry of Public Health (MOPH) announced in the Government Gazette that from June 9, 2022, “only cannabis extract with tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) of more than 0.2% by weight will be considered a narcotic.” This means that now anyone can grow, sell, or purchase cannabis seeds, plants, and inflorescence freely in Thailand, and licenses for the cultivation, possession, and distribution of cannabis are no longer required. Neither the number of cannabis plants nor the place of cultivation is restricted. It is thus the beginning of a new chapter for cannabis cultivation in Thailand, with many opining that now is a good time to enter this exciting and growing industry. The journey to this point began in 2019, when Thailand amended its laws on cannabis to allow for treatment for medical purposes, with one of the prerequisite conditions being that the cannabis must be grown in Thailand. The law was further amended to promote commercialization of the cannabis industry, allowing for cannabis to be added to food and beverages, cosmetics, and herbal products. In addition, three traditional cannabis-based formulas were listed in the universal healthcare coverage scheme, which means that almost all Thais have access to traditional cannabis recipes without cost. The successful launch of medical cannabis and its applications, and its viability as an economic industry, have become a national agenda and priority policy of the MOPH. In order to achieve the above outcomes, several legal frameworks and guidelines throughout the product’s lifecycle have been developed. For example, the Thai Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has so far granted licenses to cultivate cannabis (also known as a license to manufacture a narcotic) on more than 1,977 acres (around 800 hectares).
Read More
April 19, 2022
New technologies and production processes in the food industry have led to novel foods becoming increasingly important to both food manufacturers and the consuming public worldwide. This is very much the case across a number of jurisdictions in Southeast Asia. “Novel foods” refer to new food production processes, foods, and ingredients that have not yet been commonly used for human consumption, so these innovative foods require safety assessments before companies can produce and market them. While rules for these safety assessments are already part of novel food regulations in several other jurisdictions—such as the novel food regulations in the United Kingdom and European Union adopted in 2003, and the major reform of food safety laws in the United States passed in 2011 under the Food Modernization Act—similar rules governing the assessment of novel foods are relatively new or yet to be introduced in many parts of Asia. Nevertheless, it is important to understand the laws and practices that apply to safety assessments and the process of bringing novel foods to market in jurisdictions in the region. This article provides some clarity in this regard by summarizing important practical information on novel foods and the relevant required safety assessments in Indonesia, Thailand, and Vietnam.   Indonesia Regulator National Agency for Drug and Food Control (NADFC); frequently referred to as BPOM (Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan). Relevant Measures BPOM Regulation No. 27 Year 2018 concerning Public Service Standards in BPOM; Decision of the Director of Processed Food Standardization No. HK.02.02.51.511.06.21.21 Year 2021 concerning Public Service Standard Directorate Processed Food Standardization Definitions General “food ingredients” are basic fresh or processed ingredients that can be used to produce food; novel food is any food ingredient not listed in BPOM’s positive list of ingredients. Official Fees None   Process and Timeline Before submitting an
Read More