You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

October 15, 2025

Indonesia Strengthens Guidelines for Health Supplements Containing Probiotics

The Indonesian Food and Drug Administration (BPOM) has introduced more stringent oversight of health supplements containing probiotics with new guidelines that require clinical trials for certain products and expanded documentation standards. BPOM Regulation No. 17 of 2025 replaces the previous 2021 regulation and establishes a comprehensive framework for evaluating probiotic strains used in health supplements.

Assessment Requirements

The new regulation expands the scope of assessment to include not only categorization and documentation but also technical procedures, strain classification, and clinical trial requirements. Unlike the previous regulation, which provided general guidance, the updated framework creates a comprehensive system for evaluating both registered probiotic strains and new or combined strains.

Manufacturers must now submit supporting documentation covering strain identification and functional characterization, safety, efficacy, and product quality. The previous regulation required documentation only on safety, efficacy, and quality.

Clinical Trials

One of the most significant changes is the requirement for clinical trials conducted in Indonesia for applications that include benefit claims other than maintaining digestive health, or where there are modifications to benefit claims. The regulation specifies that phase 1 trials must demonstrate safety, while phase 2 trials must validate efficacy using statistically valid methods such as double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled studies). In addition, phase 3 and phase 4 trials may be required, and postmarket surveillance data must be submitted.

Technical Assessment Framework

Annex 4, a newly introduced section, establishes technical procedures for assessing health supplements containing probiotics in Indonesia. This comprehensive framework outlines criteria for evaluating new probiotic strains, including strain identification, functional characterization, safety, efficacy, and product quality.

The annex introduces a clear classification of claims for health supplement products containing probiotics:

  • General claims(e.g., maintaining digestive health).
  • Functional claims(e.g., normal biological function or activity in the body).
  • Risk reduction claims(e.g., lowering disease risk).

The regulation restricts use of the term “probiotic” to products containing live microorganisms with proven health benefits, using specific strains at specific doses. BPOM has included algorithms for evaluating the safety and efficacy of new strains and combinations to help standardize the review process and ensure consistency across applications.

Labeling Requirements

Health supplements containing probiotics must include the following information on their labels:

  • Genus, species, and strain identification clearly stated and presented according to proper nomenclature.
  • Quantity of live probiotic strains declared and demonstrated to remain stable until the end of the product’s shelf life, expressed in colony-forming units (CFUs).
  • Usage instructions based on clinical trial results.
  • Storage conditions if storage at a certain temperature is required.

Implications for Industry Stakeholders

Manufacturers and importers of health supplements containing probiotics should now:

  • Reassess their product portfolios against the new categorization and documentation standards.
  • Prepare for mandatory clinical trials in Indonesia for new strains or advanced claims.
  • Ensure compliance with updated labeling requirements, including strain identification and viable count declarations.

The heightened scientific and clinical standards under BPOM Regulation No. 17 of 2025 represent a fundamental shift in regulatory expectations. Given the complexity of the new requirements, early engagement with regulatory experts will be important for maintaining market access and avoiding potential delays in product approvals.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

July 20, 2018
Practical Law has published the 2018 edition of its Distribution and Marketing of Drugs Global Guide, a easily accessible Q&A overview of the key legal issues involved in bringing drugs to market in 29 jurisdictions worldwide. Members of the Tilleke & Gibbins life sciences team wrote the Vietnam chapter of this year’s guide.
July 20, 2018
Tilleke & Gibbins has contributed to the 2018 edition of the Distribution and Marketing of Drugs Global Guide, a Practical Law Company publication covering issues related to the distribution and marketing of drugs across 28 different jurisdictions.Providing their expertise in the guide’s Thailand chapter were Alan Adcock, partner and deputy director, Siraprapha Rungpry, consultant, and Dr. Atthachai Homhuan, regulatory affairs manager, from the Tilleke & Gibbins’ intellectual property group in Thailand. The chapter covers the following topics:
June 28, 2018
On June 19, 2018, Vietnam’s prime minister issued Directive No. 17/CT-TTg on strengthening the fight against smuggling, commercial fraud, and the production and trade of fake goods and low-quality goods for pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and functional foods (Directive 17). Directive 17 states that, while tens of thousands of cases have been discovered and handled, the situation still needs improvement, as infringers are using more complex methods and are located not only in urban areas, but also in many remote regions.
May 25, 2018
The Medical Facility Act B.E. 2541 (1998) (also known as the Sanatorium Act) was recently amended by the Medical Facility Act (No. 4) B.E. 2559 (2016) which introduced a number of changes to Thailand’s regulation of private medical facilities, e.g. private clinics and hospitals, including those performing plastic surgery. Some of the most notable changes lie in the amended Section 38, which concerns advertisements. Previously, an advertisement for a medical facility was regulated post-publication and did not require any prior approval.