You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

September 4, 2024

Indonesia Imposes Stringent Requirements on Electronic Cigarettes

Subscribe to Updates

Government Regulation No. 28 of 2024 (“GR No. 28”) was issued on July 26, 2024, to implement Law No. 17 of 2023 on Health (the “Omnibus Health Law”). GR No. 28 contains extensive provisions on tobacco products and electronic cigarettes in an effort to reduce the health risks associated with addictive substances, decrease the prevalence of smokers, and prevent the initiation of smoking among beginners in Indonesia.

The Indonesian FDA (known as “BPOM”) is working to implement the relevant provisions in GR No. 28 and has subsequently issued a draft regulation on the control and distribution of tobacco products and electronic cigarettes. This draft regulation is set to replace current BPOM Regulation No. 41 of 2013, which only covered tobacco products. The new draft regulation, however, also incorporates rules on electronic cigarettes.

This article outlines some of the measures on electronic cigarettes contained in GR No. 28 and the draft implementing regulation, focusing particularly on testing and reporting requirements, sale and pack size requirements, and labeling and advertising requirements.

Testing and Reporting

The draft regulation requires that each variant of electronic cigarettes produced or imported be tested for nicotine content. These tests must be conducted in an accredited laboratory, and the results must be reported to BPOM.

The use of additive materials is prohibited unless they have been proven safe for public health. To enforce this, electronic cigarettes must be tested for the presence of prohibited additives before they are distributed. Additionally, a verification of the content of prohibited additives must be conducted during the distribution period, with the testing and verification being carried out in different laboratories. The results of both tests (i.e., the pre-distribution test and the subsequent verification) must be reported to BPOM.

Sale and Pack Size

GR No. 28 prohibits the sale of electronic cigarettes:

  • Via self-service machines;
  • To individuals under the age of 21 (an increase over the previous minimum age of 18 years old) or to pregnant women;
  • In locations near entrance and exit doors or in high-traffic areas;
  • Within 200 meters of children’s educational facilities or playgrounds; and
  • Through web services, commercial electronic applications, or social media platforms without age verification.

GR No. 28 also establishes pack size requirements for electronic cigarettes. For closed-system or single-use cartridge electronic cigarettes, the liquid nicotine content must not exceed 2 mL per cartridge, and each package cannot contain more than two cartridges. For open-system or refillable electronic cigarettes, liquid nicotine must be sold in 10-milliliter or 20-milliliter containers. For solid electronic cigarettes, there must be 20 sticks per pack.

Labeling

Electronic cigarette labels are required to display health warnings in both text and image format, providing educational information about the risks of smoking. These health warnings must be printed on the package surface as an integral part of the packaging. There are five different required warnings for each variant of electronic cigarette. Each of the five warnings must be equally displayed on all of the electronic cigarette packs for each variant.

The health warning text and images must be displayed on all sizes of electronic cigarette packages. Each package must show one type of health warning, which cannot be obscured by anything else. The warning must meet the following criteria:

  • The warning must be displayed on the top portion of the package (horizontal orientation), on both the front and back, covering 50% of the surface area;
  • The packaging must include the word “warning” in yellow text that stands out clearly on a black background;
  • The image must be printed in color; and
  • The font must be Arial Bold, proportional to the package size, with yellow text on a black background.

The draft regulation also requires electronic cigarette labels to include the following information:

  • A statement that the product contains nicotine;
  • A statement that the product is prohibited from being sold or provided to individuals under the age of 21 or to pregnant women; and
  • The production code; date, month, and year of production; and the name and address of the manufacturer.

The label must not contain any misleading information or sign or any promotional wording.

Advertising

GR No. 28 stipulates extensive advertising requirements for electronic cigarettes. Advertising on digital-based social media platforms is prohibited. GR No. 28 also specifies requirements for advertisements placed on websites and commercial electronic applications. requirements for advertisements at point-of-sale locations and via outdoor media, print media, and broadcasting media.

Advertisements on websites or commercial electronic applications:

  • Must include a health warning and a statement prohibiting the sale or provision of electronic cigarettes to individuals under the age of 21 and to pregnant women;
  • Must not illustrate or suggest that using electronic cigarettes offers health benefits;
  • Must not use misleading words or phrases or encourage the consumption of electronic cigarettes,
  • Must not depict the use or display of electronic cigarettes or any references that could be associated with the brand;
  • Must not feature children, teenagers, or pregnant women in any pictures or text;
  • Must not target children, teenagers, or pregnant women;
  • Must not use cartoons or animation as advertising characters;
  • Must not contradict public norms;
  • Must implement age verification to limit access to those 21 years old and above.

Conclusion

Businesses operating in the electronic cigarette industry in Indonesia need to stay vigilant and proactive in response to these new regulatory requirements. Compliance will not only require adjustments in production, packaging, and marketing strategies but also proactive due diligence to avoid potential legal repercussions. Companies should consider conducting comprehensive audits of their current practices and seek legal counsel to ensure full compliance with the evolving regulatory landscape. By doing so, they can better navigate the complexities of these stringent regulations and mitigate risks that could impact their market presence and operational continuity.

Related Professionals

Practices

Regulatory Affairs

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

July 24, 2026
For businesses in Thailand’s regulated industries, the problem of “too many licenses” is one of the most familiar hurdles to getting a product to market. Take a simple example: importing the materials necessary to sell teriyaki chicken skewers. To legally do this, a business may need approvals from several different agencies—separate permits for the chicken (Department of Livestock Development), the dipping sauce (Thai FDA), the wooden skewers (Department of Forestry), and other ingredients, each under a different authority. This kind of overlap is often cited to argue for a “regulatory guillotine”—a systematic review to cut outdated or duplicative rules that slow investment and business activity. The Facilitation of Licensing and Public Service Consideration Act B.E. 2569 (2026) (Licensing Facilitation Act 2026) is Thailand’s most significant response yet to that concern. This article looks at the Facilitation Act 2026 through a life sciences and regulatory affairs lens—what it may mean for the manufacturers, importers, and distributors of food, drugs, medical devices, cosmetics, and similar products who routinely deal with several regulators to bring a single product to market. The Super License: One Approval Standing in for Many The reform with the clearest potential for regulated-product businesses is the law’s “super license” mechanism, referred to as a “main license” in the statute. Once a business obtains the main license for a regulated activity, it is automatically deemed to hold all related sublicenses issued by other agencies for that same activity, provided the activity has been designated as eligible in the Government Gazette. The Licensing Facilitation Act 2026 also creates a central application center, allowing applicants to submit a single application and pay all relevant fees at one point of contact, with the center routing the application to each agency through a shared information system. The potential benefits of this for businesses
Read More
July 13, 2026
Indonesia’s Halal Product Assurance Agency (BPJPH) has issued new regulations establishing clearer procedures for imposing administrative sanctions on businesses that violate halal product assurance requirements. BPJPH Regulation No. 2 of 2026 on the Imposition of Administrative Sanctions for Violations of Halal Product Assurance Implementation, issued on June 5, 2026, strengthens Indonesia’s halal compliance framework, as mandated under Law No. 33 of 2014 on Halal Product Assurance and Government Regulation No. 42 of 2024 on the Implementation of Halal Product Assurance. BPJPH Regulation No. 2/2026 also supports the upcoming mandatory halal compliance deadline of October 17, 2026, which will apply to a broad range of products and services, including imported food and beverages, slaughtering products and services, natural and quasi-drugs, health supplements, cosmetics, chemical and genetically engineered products, clothing and accessories, household goods, prayer equipment, stationery, and class A medical devices. Scope BPJPH is authorized to impose administrative sanctions for violations of halal product assurance requirements committed by businesses, halal inspection agencies (LPH), halal auditors, halal product process companion institutions (lembaga pendamping PPH), and halal product process companions (pendamping PPH). The head of BPJPH has authority to determine, cancel, or amend the imposition of administrative sanctions, including upon receipt of objections. This authority covers revocation of Halal Certificates (including foreign halal certificate registration numbers), withdrawal of goods from circulation, freezing of LPH operations, freezing of halal product process companion institutions, revocation of PPH companion institution registration numbers, revocation of halal auditor registration numbers, and revocation of LPH accreditation status. Administrative Sanctions Businesses may be subject to any of the following administrative sanctions: Written warning; Administrative fine; Revocation of the halal certificate, including revocation of foreign halal certificate registration numbers; and Withdrawal of goods from circulation. The regulation sets out the types of violations that may trigger these sanctions, with each
Read More
July 1, 2026
Obtaining marketing authorization is a fundamental requirement for bringing pharmaceutical products to the Thai market. Companies must navigate the Thai Food and Drug Administration’s registration procedures while also complying with post-approval pharmacovigilance obligations, licensing requirements for manufacturing and importation, data protection rules, and other regulatory requirements. This guide provides an overview of Thailand’s regulatory framework for pharmaceutical marketing authorization, including available registration pathways, review timelines, application fees, postmarketing surveillance obligations, licensing requirements, exemptions, data exclusivity, freedom of information, and parallel import considerations. It is intended as a practical reference for pharmaceutical companies, regulatory affairs professionals, and others involved in bringing medicinal products to the Thai market. Download the guide below for a concise overview of the current requirements and procedures governing pharmaceutical marketing authorization in Thailand.
Read More
June 19, 2026
For the first time, Thailand’s Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has published a consolidated list identifying all substances that have successfully passed its novel food safety evaluation process. The list is a step forward in regulatory transparency, but it also highlights a feature of the Thai regime that food companies often overlook: each approval is tied exclusively to the company that applied for it. A substance’s appearance on the list does not give other companies the green light to use it. This article examines the structure of Thailand’s novel food approval framework, the implications of applicant exclusivity, and the strategic choices it requires of food companies looking to bring novel ingredients to the Thai market. Thai FDA Food Safety Evaluation Framework Notification No. 376 of the Ministry of Public Health requires novel food substances to undergo a food safety assessment, with an exemption only for novel foods manufactured exclusively for export. The framework also encompasses “foods that do not qualify as novel foods” but which present characteristics warranting a safety evaluation, such as differing quality standards, increased serving sizes, or applications in specific food categories, where such changes affect consumption levels, nutritional value, or consumer safety. The recently published list of foods that passed the safety evaluation by the Thai FDA is structured by substance category and identifies the approved company (domestic manufacturer or importer), country of origin, substance name and trade name, approved purpose of use, and date of the Thai FDA’s approval notification certificate. A notable feature of Thailand’s novel food regime is that the approval result is tied exclusively to the company that submitted the application. Publication of the consolidated list does not constitute a general authorization to use the approved substances. The Thai FDA’s approval certificate specifies the approved conditions of use and the requirements
Read More