You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

November 28, 2017

Indonesia Implementing Halal Assurance System

Informed Counsel

The private sector in Indonesia has been vocal about their concern for the government’s plan to make halal certification mandatory, believing that this requirement will add a greater burden to their business. Amid criticism, the government is moving forward with its halal assurance system, citing, among other reasons, the need for a government agency to be the new halal certification authority to create greater transparency in the existing certification process.

Halal Regulators

Halal certificates can currently be obtained from the Islamic Council (MUI), which is an autonomous organization not belonging to the government. With the introduction of the new Indonesian halal assurance system earlier this year, the Halal Product Assurance Organizing Agency (BPJPH) was inaugurated by the Ministry of Religious Affairs on October 11, 2017, to take over the MUI’s main halal certification duties and is expected to start operations by 2018.

The BPJPH has the authority to issue and revoke the halal certificate and halal label on products, carry out administration of halal certification of domestic and foreign products, supervise the guarantee of halal products, work with halal inspection agencies (LPH) on product inspection and/or testing, and conduct public relations campaigns to inform the public about halal products.

Once the BPJPH commences operations, the MUI will continue to play a role in the halal certification process by providing religious decrees to determine the halal status of a product. MUI decrees must be submitted to the BPJPH as the basis for the issuance of a halal certificate. Additionally, the MUI will work with the BPJPH in certification of halal auditors and accreditation of LPHs.

Transitional Period

Two draft halal regulations—one covering governmental fees and the other covering implementation and guidelines of the halal assurance system—have been prepared and are being reviewed by the Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Laws and Human Rights. Until the two laws enter into force, halal certificates will be issued by the MUI. After the laws take effect, halal certificates that have been issued by the MUI will remain valid until the date indicated on the certificate, with the next renewal of such certificates to be filed with the BPJPH.

Currently, each halal certificate that has been issued by the MUI is valid for two years. Later, upon the transfer to the BPJPH, the validity period of each certificate will be four years with the possibility of renewal.

The Indonesian government has imposed a deadline of October 17, 2019, for all required products to be halal-certified. However, there is a grace period of three years for food and beverage products, and a grace period of five years for cosmetics and drugs. It is important to note that life-saving medicines which have no substitutes are likely to be exempted from the halal-certificate obligation.

Products That Require Halal Certification

Although an exhaustive list is not yet available, the types of products that generally must be halal-certified include food, beverages, medicinal products, cosmetics, chemical products, biological products, and genetically engineered products.

To obtain halal status, both product materials and manufacturing processes will be inspected. Each company must have an in-house supervisor set up a halal assurance system and conduct periodic inspections to maintain the system. Products that contain non-halal substances or are non-halal because of their manufacturing process can still be sold in Indonesia but must be labeled “non-halal.”

Imported Products

Indonesia’s National Agency of Drug and Food Control (BPOM) currently requires products that will be imported, distributed, and traded in Indonesia to have an MUI halal certificate if the applicant wishes to include halal information/logo on their product label. In the future, this requirement will not be necessary if the product has been certified by the halal certification agency in its country of origin.

The BPJPH, the Ministry of Religious Affairs, and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs are collaborating on drafting an intergovernmental cooperation agreement for Indonesia and other nations. This bilateral agreement will enable certificates issued by a halal certification agency in one country to be recognized in Indonesia, and, once in effect, applicants will only be required to register their halal logo with the BPJPH with no additional certification actions needed.

Indonesia’s new halal assurance system may appear complicated. However, the government is expending considerable effort in simplifying procedures and requirements, and setting costs that are affordable for all. With the establishment of the BPJPH and the drafting of halal assurance laws, it is anticipated that the halal assurance system in Indonesia will soon be more efficient than ever before.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

April 22, 2026
A new decree in Vietnam brings significant implementation clarity to the country’s existing extended producer responsibility (EPR) legal framework. An EPR mechanism was first codified in Vietnam in the 2020 Law on Environmental Protection amid ongoing challenges surrounding the collection and treatment of product and packaging waste. The mechanism was progressively detailed through Decree No. 08/2022/ND‑CP and its successive amendments, but the regulatory framework remained insufficiently developed, notably in terms of support mechanisms for waste collection, recycling, and treatment. The newly launched regulations in Decree No. 110/2026/ND-CP (Decree 110), issued on April 1, 2026, and taking effect on May 25, 2026, stipulate fully and clearly the responsibility of manufacturers and importers to recycle products and packaging and to treat waste. Some key provisions of Decree 110 for manufacturers, importers, and related stakeholders are presented below. Subjects of EPR The Law on Environmental Protection assigns responsibility to manufacturers and importers for product and packaging recycling (under Article 54) or waste collection and treatment (under Article 55), depending on the type of products and packaging they produce or import. Decree 110 elaborates on these EPR provisions by specifying the responsible entities and listing out the types of products and packaging subject to recycling and waste treatment responsibilities. Decree 110 clarifies the responsible entities in special cases, such as when products under the same brand are made by multiple manufacturers, when there is a contract manufacturing or entrusted import relationship, and when the manufacturer or importer is part of a corporate group. Notably, exemptions may be applied in some scenarios, such as for manufacturers and importers of products and packaging exclusively for export, temporary import and re-export, or research and testing purposes, as well as for entities with annual revenue from related products not exceeding VND 30 billion. Recycling Responsibilities Decree 110
March 30, 2026
In response to an emerging crisis on food safety, the government of Vietnam promulgated Decree No. 46/2026/ND-CP (Decree 46) on January 26, 2026, and Resolution No. 66.13/2026/NQ-CP (Resolution 66.13) on January 27, 2026, setting out a number of substantive changes to the procedure and strict requirements for the declaration, registration, and importation of food products. Both instruments took effect upon issuance. However, shortly after they entered into force, food businesses encountered significant implementation challenges, particularly with respect to state inspection procedures at the customs clearance stage for imported products. In response, the government issued Resolution No. 09/2026/NQ-CP (Resolution 09) on February 4, 2026, temporarily suspending Decree 46 and Resolution 66.13 until a new effective date of April 16, 2026. Continued Suspension of Implementation of Decree 46 and Resolution 66.13 After considering feedback gathered by the Ministry of Health from food businesses and other stakeholders during the suspension period, the Vietnam Government Office issued a notice on March 20, 2026, agreeing to extend the suspension until the issuance of an amended Law on Food Safety and its guiding decree. Following this notice, on March 22, 2026, the Ministry of Health prepared a draft resolution to implement the notice and replace Resolution 09. Under the draft resolution, the effectiveness of Decree 46 and Resolution No. 66.13 would continue to be suspended until the amended Law on Food Safety takes effect, except for the provisions under Resolution 66.13 allowing flexibility in documents evidencing product efficacy, which would take effect on April 16, 2026, and remain effective until the Law on Food Safety is replaced (but not later than February 28, 2027). Accordingly, for products subject to the registration declaration procedure, such as health supplements, efficacy may be substantiated by either (i) scientific evidence supporting the declared function and effects of the product
February 26, 2026
Laos’ Food and Drug Department (FDD) has been using a new online registration system for drugs since the beginning of the year. The system, which was implemented following the November 2025 issuance of Notice No. 5960/FDD, became the official pathway for submissions on January 1, 2026. Since that date, paper-based registrations have no longer been accepted. This marks a significant advancement in the digitalization of regulatory processes in Laos. As the online system is now the exclusive platform for registration, renewal, and amendments, companies that have not yet aligned their processes to the new system should act promptly to ensure a smooth transition. To assist with this, the FDD will conduct periodic training sessions on the use of the online registration system, which will be delivered either in person or remotely, depending on operator demand. To start using the system, drug and medical device manufacturers, as well as import-export companies, that have not yet registered must submit a formal request identifying the authorized personnel who will access the platform, after which they will be issued user accounts and access codes. Each request must be accompanied by the company’s enterprise registration certificate (incorporation certificate), a copy of the identity card or passport of each designated user, and a scanned copy of their signature. There is no restriction on the number of users per company, allowing flexibility to meet operational needs. Companies that already hold accounts and access codes from the trial phase may continue using them and may apply for additional accounts if needed. Additional Requirements The new system also introduces a standardized format for drug registration numbers. For example, an import drug registration number such as 06 I 4040/15 will be changed to 06-IM-04040-15, and a domestic drug registration number such as 06 L 4040/15 will be changed to
January 21, 2026
Spurred by global geopolitics and Canada’s Indo-Pacific Strategy, which aims to forge deeper ties with ASEAN, Canadian companies have been showing growing interest in Thailand and Southeast Asia in recent years. To understand the opportunities offered by the region, we sat down with Andrew Stoutley, a Toronto native and the chief operating officer of Tilleke & Gibbins, a leading Southeast Asian regional law firm with over 130 years of history in Thailand. Q: Why are Canadian companies looking at Thailand and Southeast Asia right now? A: Two reasons stand out. First, diversification has moved up the agenda. Many Canadian companies want options outside North America due to tariff volatility and policy uncertainty in the United States, as well as questions around the next Canada–United States–Mexico Agreement mandatory joint review. At the same time, the shift of global production from China to Southeast Asia is accelerating, driven by rising costs, geopolitics, and the need to avoid overreliance on a single market. As a result, Canadian companies are looking for a second production base or a regional hub, and Thailand and its neighbors are natural choices given their manufacturing depth, location, and established supply chains. Second, Canada’s own efforts in the region are gaining traction. The Indo-Pacific Strategy has led to more on-the-ground support, including larger trade missions, upgraded diplomatic posts, and new financing options. Export Development Canada (EDC) now has a presence in Bangkok, giving Canadian companies a direct line to financing and insurance in Thailand. There’s also steady progress on trade frameworks like the recently signed Canada–Indonesia Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (which will come into effect pending domestic procedures), ongoing negotiations of a Canada–ASEAN FTA, and the exciting announcement about the launch of negotiations of a Canada–Thailand FTA. Together, these developments have the potential to make it much easier