You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

May 29, 2026

Indonesia Expands Rules on Drug Promotion and Advertising

Indonesia’s Food and Drug Authority (BPOM) has issued Regulation No. 7 of 2026 on Drug Promotion and Advertising, establishing an updated framework for promotional activities involving medicinal products in Indonesia. The regulation took effect on April 16, 2026, and supersedes BPOM Regulation No. 2 of 2021 on Drug Advertising Supervision.

The new regulation maintains general principles for advertising content, including requirements that advertisements be objective, complete, and not misleading, as further detailed in its annex. It also confirms that advertisements for nonprescription drugs directed to the public must obtain prior approval from BPOM before publication and must be in Bahasa Indonesia.

The regulation provides a more comprehensive framework governing how drug promotion is conducted, introducing several notable additions and changes, as described below.

Procedure and Requirements for Drug Advertisement Approval

To apply for a drug advertisement approval, applicants must create an online account through the dedicated portal SIAPIK. Advertisement approval is available only for registered drugs; unregistered drugs are not eligible for advertisement approval with BPOM.

The application must include the advertisement design, along with a translation if the design contains any wording in a foreign language. The submission format varies by media type, requiring, for example, copies in the form of print advertisements for visual media, scripts for audio media, and storyboards for audiovisual media. For online media—including social media—submissions should include any captions, descriptions, and hashtags that form an integral part of the advertising material.

The approval timeline takes approximately 3–4 months, as BPOM will generally request additional information or revisions during the verification and evaluation process. Applicants have 20 days to submit any such requested documents.

BPOM may also conduct a reevaluation of advertisements that have already received approval, based on monitoring results or new information regarding the safety and quality of the advertised drug. This could result in BPOM issuing a correction or revoking the initial approval.

Expanded Scope: From Advertising to Promotion

One of the key developments under the new regulation is its expanded scope. BPOM Regulation No. 2 of 2021 focused primarily on drug advertising. The new regulation covers drug promotion as a whole, with advertising treated as one form of promotional activity.

The regulation defines promotion as an activity in the field of marketing—including the provision of information or persuasion regarding drugs—carried out by pharmaceutical companies, pharmaceutical wholesalers, pharmaceutical service facilities, electronic pharmaceutical system providers, and/or other facilities authorized to dispense drugs, with the objective of increasing prescription, distribution, sales, or use of drugs. This broader scope means that activities beyond traditional advertisements may now fall within regulatory oversight, requiring companies to take a closer look at their overall promotional approach.

Expansion and Regulation of Parties Allowed to Promote Drugs

The regulation also broadens the range of entities allowed to conduct drug promotion. Promotion is no longer limited to pharmaceutical companies holding marketing authorization; it now includes pharmaceutical wholesalers (PBFs), pharmacy service facilities, electronic pharmaceutical system providers, and other relevant facilities.

is expressly recognized as a form of promotional activity. Pharmaceutical companies and pharmaceutical wholesalers are permitted to provide sponsorship to medical or healthcare professionals if it is carried out in accordance with applicable laws and regulations.

All promotional activities must be limited to products with valid marketing authorization and carried out in accordance with the guidelines provided in annexes to the regulation.

Individuals involved in drug promotion, including medical representatives and sales personnel, must have sufficient knowledge of the products being promoted, along with competency in communication, marketing, ethical aspects of promotion, pharmacovigilance, and applicable laws and regulations. They are also required to communicate information accurately, completely, and responsibly, and to report any safety-related information obtained from the public or healthcare professionals to the relevant entity.

Categorization of Drugs in Promotion Activities

The regulation introduces a clearer distinction between prescription drugs and nonprescription drugs. Promotion of prescription drugs—including potent, narcotic, and psychotropic drugs—is restricted to scientific media aimed at healthcare professionals, while nonprescription drugs (OTC and limited-OTC drugs) may be promoted to the public, subject to regulatory conditions.

Although prescription drugs cannot be advertised to the public, the regulation permits their limited display on official company websites of the relevant marketing authorization holders, restricted to basic product information such as product name, packaging, composition, and strength.

Inclusion of Electronic Pharmaceutical Systems

Electronic pharmaceutical system providers are expressly identified as entities that may carry out promotion and advertising of nonprescription drugs, provided such activities relate only to products with valid marketing authorization. Providers may also act as promotion organizers, either independently or on behalf of other stakeholders, such as pharmaceutical companies or distributors. This suggests that digital platforms are no longer considered merely intermediaries but may bear direct regulatory responsibility for promotional activities conducted through their systems.

Introduction of Risk Management in Promotion

The regulation also requires incorporation of risk management considerations into promotional activities. Pharmaceutical companies and pharmaceutical wholesalers, as part of their quality systems under Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) and Good Distribution Practices (GDP) standards, are required to account for risks arising from promotional activities in order to prevent drug misuse or irregularities in drug distribution. This must be reflected in stock management, demand and disease prevalence estimation, shelf life, supply chain integrity, and return or purchasing policies.

Expanded Restrictions on Promotional Practices

The regulation introduces a detailed list of prohibited promotional activities, including:

  • Collusion in prescribing practices to increase sales,
  • Use of multilevel marketing schemes,
  • Promotional incentives such as rewards or quizzes,
  • Disguised promotion through research or studies,
  • Distribution of free samples to the public, and
  • Excessive discounting that may create unfair competition.

Only companies—not individuals—are allowed to initiate promotional activities and advertisements, including publications. An exception is made for individuals acting as advertising talent who have been formally appointed by pharmaceutical companies, ensuring that promotional activities remain under the control and responsibility of authorized entities. Furthermore, promotional activities must not use the concept of endorsements or recommendations from medical professionals, healthcare personnel, celebrities, or other professions that encourage the public to use the drugs.

Advertising Media

The regulation broadens and clarifies the range of media permitted for drug advertising. Drugs may now be advertised through visual, audio, and audiovisual media, explicitly including social media platforms. The regulation permits two-way communication features—such as comments and chats—between advertisers and the public on social media, provided the information remains objective, complete, not misleading, and consistent with approved advertisement content. However, such interactive features may not be used to facilitate sales transactions.

Practical Considerations

While BPOM Regulation No. 7 of 2026 introduces clearer guidance and broader coverage, its application may depend on specific factual circumstances, particularly regarding the categorization of promotional activities, digital communication strategies, and the involvement of multiple parties in distribution and promotion. These aspects may require careful interpretation on a case-by-case basis, depending on how the activities are structured.

Given the scope of the changes introduced, companies will likely need to review their existing promotional practices and assess potential compliance considerations.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

September 9, 2026
On August 5, 2026, the Consumer Case Division of Thailand’s Civil Court rendered a judgment in a case involving a beauty clinic that advertised acne scar treatments using claims that the clinic was operated by a specialist physician and that the treatment, allegedly involving stem cell technology, could permanently remove acne scars. The plaintiff brought a claim against both the physician-owner and the clinic company, alleging that the advertisements were false and induced her to purchase the treatment. The court found that the clinic was liable for the false representations and that the physician-owner, as both the authorized director of the company and the medical practitioner who provided treatment, was jointly responsible. Although the plaintiff could not fully prove all damages claimed, the court awarded compensation of THB 20,000, together with interest. While the judgment arose from a consumer protection dispute, it serves as a valuable reminder that medical facility advertisements in Thailand are regulated and may expose clinics and healthcare providers not only to regulatory enforcement but also to civil liability from patients who rely on misleading promotional claims. Regulatory Framework Governing Medical Facility Advertisements Medical facility advertising in Thailand is governed by the Medical Facility Act B.E. 2541 (1998), as amended by the Medical Facility Act (No. 4) B.E. 2559 (2016). The principal secondary legislation is the Department of Health Service Support (DoHSS) Notification Re: Rules, Procedures, Conditions, and Fees for an Advertisement or Publication Concerning a Medical Facility, which came into force on November 25, 2019. Under this notification, “advertising” includes any act, by any means, that causes members of the public to see, hear, or otherwise become aware of a message, sound, or image for the commercial benefit of a medical facility. This broad definition covers not only traditional media but also clinic websites, social
September 9, 2026
On June 30, 2026, Indonesia’s National Agency of Drug and Food Control (BPOM) issued BPOM Regulation No. 11 of 2026 on Food Packaging, which expands the list of approved food-contact substances and recognizes a broader range of permissible functions for those substances. The new regulation, which revokes BPOM Regulation No. 20 of 2019, reflects developments in packaging technology and materials science. Although the new regulation provides more advantages to business actors by adding more food contact substances to the approved list for use in food packaging, there are more stringent rules and restrictions for testing. One of the most significant changes is a comprehensive migration-testing framework that sets out requirements for packaging materials, testing conditions, food simulants, and specific migration limits. Overall and Specific Migration Under BPOM Regulation No. 20 of 2019, migration requirements were primarily set out within the lists of approved food-contact substances and packaging materials. BPOM Regulation No. 11 of 2026 instead expressly requires packaging materials that come into direct contact with food to meet both overall and specific migration limits. These are defined as follows: Overall migration: The total quantity of all substances that migrate from the packaging, regardless of whether the substances are hazardous or nonhazardous to health. Specific migration: The quantity of a particular identified substance known to be hazardous to health that migrates from the packaging. Stricter Limits on Heavy Metals The overall migration limit for plastic packaging remains unchanged under both regulations at 60 mg/kg or 10 mg/dm². However, the new regulation introduces significant changes to the regulation of heavy metals. Under the 2019 regulation, four heavy metals—lead, cadmium, chromium VI, and mercury—were subject to a single combined limit of 1 mg/kg. The 2026 regulation, however, requires each heavy metal to meet its own individual specific migration limit, adds arsenic as
September 7, 2026
Indonesia’s Constitutional Court (Mahkamah Konstitusi) has reinstated a key provision limiting pharmaceutical patent protection, signaling a renewed commitment to balancing patent rights with public access to medicines. In its ruling to Case No. 255/PUU-XXIII/2025, the court partially granted a petition for judicial review of Law No. 65 of 2024, which had amended the country’s Patent Law, and ordered the restoration of a provision that had excluded certain pharmaceutical inventions from patentability. The decision took effect immediately upon its pronouncement at the court’s plenary session on August 28, 2026. Background The petition challenged the removal of article 4(f) from Law No. 13 of 2016 concerning Patents (Patent Law), as amended by Law No. 65 of 2024. Article 4(f) had excluded from patentability certain inventions relating to new uses of known substances. The petitioners argued that removing this provision would open the door to patent protection for second medical use inventions and facilitate patent evergreening—practices that can extend exclusivity periods, delay generic market entry, and reduce public access to affordable medicines. The petitioners included several patient advocacy and public-interest organizations: the Indonesian Dialysis Patients Community Association, the Indonesian Association of Drug Abuse Victims (PKNI), the Indonesian Pulmonary Hypertension Foundation (YHPI), the Rekat Peduli Indonesia Foundation, and the Indonesian Positive Women’s Association (IPPI), along with the Indonesia for Global Justice Association and four individual petitioners. The petitioners also challenged the constitutionality of the phrase “interested party” in article 70(1) of the Patent Law, arguing that it should be construed expressly to clarify who has standing to appeal a decision to grant a patent before the Board of Patent Appeal, and to allow a broader range of parties—such as patent holders, licensees, consumer organizations, prosecutors, aggrieved third parties, and others who may suffer direct or indirect harm from the grant of a patent—to
September 4, 2026
Blind boxes and collectibles have become increasingly popular, driven by the excitement of not knowing which character or design will be revealed until the package is opened. While most visible in the art toy market, the same concept is also used in the food industry. Confectionery, snacks, and other food products are sometimes sold with toys, character figures, cards, or other collectibles. A package might, for example, contain one of ten possible characters, with consumers knowing that an item is included but not which one they will receive. Some collections may also feature rare or “secret” items. For food businesses, however, adding a randomized toy or collectible involves more than a marketing decision. The food, the nonfood item, and the randomized mechanism may each raise different regulatory considerations in Thailand. Thai FDA Requirements for Nonfood Objects Packaged with Food The main food regulatory consideration is Ministry of Public Health Notification No. 310 B.E. 2551 (2008), which regulates food packaged together with things or objects that are not food. Under Notification No. 310, certain nonfood objects may be packaged together with food where they fall within specified exceptions, including objects that serve the following purposes: Maintaining the quality or standard of the food, such as a desiccant or oxygen absorber; Serving as a seasoning or as part of food preparation, such as chili powder sachets or seasoning sachets contained in instant noodle packages; or Functioning as an eating or food-preparation utensil, such as a spoon or fork included with instant noodles. Other nonfood objects that do not fall within these categories generally should not be placed inside the food container together with the food. Where a toy, collectible, or other nonfood object is intended to be sold together with a food product, businesses should therefore carefully consider the nature of