You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

October 4, 2013

Important Considerations for Employment Contracts under Thai Law

Bangkok Post, Corporate Counsellor Column

Under Thai law, there are no requirements that employment contracts be made in writing. For some employers, this may create the perception that they can simply reach a cursory agreement with an employee on a few basic issues, such as job role and salary, and work out any other issues as they arise. In reality, this could not be further from the truth.

It is strongly advised that employers and employees have written contracts to clearly specify the terms and conditions of employment. Later, if any dispute arises, the parties can refer to a written contract to help determine the actual agreed-upon provisions.

In Thailand, employment contracts can be broadly categorized into two main types: fixed-term and open-ended. Accordingly, it is important to be aware of the type of contract being offered or entered into, as the rights and legal ramifications associated with each differ immensely.

Fixed-Term Employment Contracts

With provisions that specify the start and end dates of employment, this type of contract will end when the agreed period of employment expires, without the need for advance notice of termination. The contract cannot be terminated prior to the expiration of the agreed period, unless there is termination with cause.

The Supreme Court has ruled that fixed-term contracts must not contain any provisions that purport to allow an employer or an employee to terminate it prior to the expiration of the agreed period, or to extend the term. If it contains such provisions, it will lose its status as a fixed-term contract.

By way of an example, if a contract contains the provision that “the employment shall be for a period of 12 months, but either party may terminate the employment contract by giving the other party two months’ advance notice,” then it would not be effective as a fixed-term contract.

Another important consideration is the parties’ performance. Even if a fixed-term contract is in place, if the employee continues working and the employer continues paying wages after the expiration of the agreed period of employment, then the fixed-term contract would effectively convert into an open-ended contract.

There is no requirement to give advance notice of termination for fixed-term contracts. In practice, however, it is still advisable for employers to inform their employees, preferably in writing, that in accordance with the contract, the employment will expire at the end of the agreed period. This will help to ensure that everyone is on the same page.

Open-Ended Employment Contracts

Such contracts will only specify the commencement date of employment but not the end. An employee may resign or an employer may terminate the contract at any time, subject to the contract, their rights and obligations under law, and the employer’s Work Rules and Regulations.

For open-ended contracts, advance notice of termination is required, unless there is termination with cause and/or unless the employer is not required to provide advance notice of termination by law.

Necessary Provisions in Employment Contracts

To adequately safeguard the basic rights of both the employer and employee, employment contracts should always contain the following provisions:

  • Date the contract was made;
  • Names of parties to the contract;
  • Commencement date of employment;
  • Expiry date (for fixed-term contracts);
  • Probationary period;
  • Duties and responsibilities of the employee;
  • Wages, benefits and welfare;
  • Security deposit/guarantee (if applicable);
  • Working days, hours and holidays;
  • Position and right to change position;
  • Workplace address/location;
  • Non-competition and non-solicitation;
  • Confidentiality/non-disclosure;
  • Intellectual property;
  • Reference to Work Rules and Regulations; and
  • Termination of employment.

Language Requirements for Written Contracts

One of the most frequent questions clients ask is whether it is mandatory for contracts to be written in the Thai language. It is not.

However, if an employee is Thai and cannot understand English well enough to fully comprehend the terms of the contract, then it is strongly advisable to have the contract written in Thai or to have bilingual provisions. This way, both parties can understand the terms, and it guards against employees raising the issue that they misunderstood the terms in English.

Fair Contract Terms

Although an employer and employee are generally free to negotiate and agree to the terms and conditions of a contract, such terms and conditions must be fair.

If any terms or conditions result in the employer having excessive advantage over an employee, the court would be empowered to modify them as it deems fair and appropriate. Therefore, employers need to take great care in crafting their contracts to ensure legal compliance.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

March 31, 2026
Against the backdrop of Vietnam’s rapid economic and technological transformation and its ambition to build a knowledge-driven economy, the National Assembly of Vietnam adopted Law on Higher Education No. 125/2025/QH15 on December 10, 2025, The new law took effect on January 1, 2026, replacing Law on Higher Education No. 08/2012/QH13 of 2012 and its subsequent amendments after more than a decade of implementation. The new law reflects a significant policy shift toward enhancing the institutional autonomy of higher education institutions (“HEIs”)—universities and other university-level institutions. By granting broader autonomy, Vietnam aims to enable HEIs to operate more proactively, better respond to market needs, and improve the quality and efficiency of education and research activities. Comprehensive Institutional Autonomy in HEIs The new law marks a significant shift by granting HEIs comprehensive autonomy as a statutory right, within the bounds of the licensed scope of educational operation and the legal framework, rather than a conditional right as provided under the former law. Under the new law, HEIs are empowered to exercise autonomy over their academic expertise, training, scientific research, international cooperation, organizational structure, personnel, finance, and other higher education activities. The expansion of institutional autonomy is also accompanied by a correspondingly strengthened framework of institutional accountability. However, Vietnam maintains a certain degree of control and imposes restrictions on institutional autonomy in sensitive and strategically important areas. These controls and restrictions include limitations on training autonomy in the majors of teacher training, national defense, and security; and restrictions on financial and personnel management autonomy for HEIs under the administration of the Ministry of National Defense and the Ministry of Public Security. New Model for Curriculum Development The new law removes the concept of “opening a training major” and focuses regulation on how training programs are developed and delivered. Under the previous regime,
March 31, 2026
On December 10, 2025, the National Assembly of Vietnam adopted Law on Vocational Education No. 124/2025/QH15, which took effect on January 1, 2026, replacing Law on Vocational Education No. 74/2014/QH13 of 2014. The new law broadens the categories of institutions eligible to deliver vocational training, introduces vocational upper secondary schools, and shifts governance structures for private institutions from ownership-representative boards of management to stakeholder-based school councils. These reforms aim to diversify training providers, align programs with labor market needs, and create a more flexible, open vocational education ecosystem, offering expanded opportunities for foreign and domestic investors, universities, and enterprises. Some highlights of the new Law on Vocational Education are presented below. Expansion of Vocational Training Levels and Programs In addition to elementary, intermediate, and college—the three levels of vocational training program set out under the 2014 Law on Vocational Education—the new law expands the structure by introducing two new levels: Vocational high school training programs are placed between elementary and intermediate levels, and are aimed at combining upper secondary education with vocational training, expanding options for learners after graduating from the lower secondary level. Other vocational training programs are not specified in detail under the new law, but aim to equip learners with the capability to perform and handle one or several simple tasks of an occupation. Expansion of Vocational Education Providers The new law reclassifies and extends vocational education providers by classifying them into two distinct categories: Vocational education institutions, which include colleges, intermediate schools, and vocational high schools. Establishments participating in vocational education activities, which include vocational education centers, vocational-continuing education centers, continuing education centers, other centers with vocational education functions, enterprises, cooperatives, and higher education institutions. Vocational education providers may provide one vocational training level only, or several/all levels, depending on the type of provider. The
January 16, 2026
Employment law specialists from Tilleke & Gibbins in Vietnam have contributed the Vietnam chapter to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce from International Employment Lawyer. This comprehensive global guide, covering 50 jurisdictions worldwide, addresses the complex issue of workplace restructurings, with a particular focus on the needs of multinational companies. The Vietnam chapter was authored by partner Kien Trung Trinh, counsel Sarah Galeski, and associates Dung Thi Phuong Le and Nguyen Thi Huong Nguyen. The Q&A-style chapter provides in-depth analysis of key areas related to workplace restructuring, including: Reduction in workforce; Restructuring or reorganization of the business; Changing terms and conditions; and Areas to watch. A PDF of the Vietnam chapter can be downloaded through the button below. Tilleke & Gibbins also contributed the Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, and Thailand chapters to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce 2026. To browse the full guide for all 45 jurisdictions, please visit the International Employment Lawyer website.
January 16, 2026
Employment law specialists from Tilleke & Gibbins’ office in Bangkok have contributed the Thailand chapter to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce from International Employment Lawyer. This comprehensive global guide, covering 50 jurisdictions worldwide, addresses the complex issue of workplace restructurings, with a particular focus on the needs of multinational companies. The Thailand chapter was authored by Pimvimol (June) Vipamaneerut, Chusert Supasitthumrong, Dusita Khanijou, and Chomanut Arif. The Q&A-style chapter provides in-depth analysis of key areas related to workplace restructuring, including: Reduction in workforce; Restructuring or reorganization of the business; Changing terms and conditions; and Areas to watch. A PDF of the Thailand chapter can be downloaded through the button below. Tilleke & Gibbins also contributed the Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, and Vietnam chapters to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce 2026. To browse the full guide for all 45 jurisdictions, please visit the International Employment Lawyer website.