You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

April 29, 2016

Impact of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank’s Operational Policies

Bangkok Post, Corporate Counsellor Column

Thailand’s current infrastructure needs are well known to policymakers. The development of urban and inter-city rail links, telecommunication networks, and renewable energy projects are some of the areas in need of investment, as identified by government agencies.

Much of the infrastructure development over the next decade will be capital-intensive, meaning that funding from the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) could assist in developing Thailand’s various projects.

The AIIB is a new multilateral development bank, initiated by China, with a stated purpose to “foster sustainable economic development, create wealth and improve infrastructure connectivity in Asia by investing in infrastructure and other productive sectors.” At its first meeting in January, the bank’s board of directors adopted a number of policies on financing, pricing, and procurement. These policies provide an outline of how the AIIB will select projects to invest in, and the form these investments will take.

The AIIB’s Articles of Agreement, signed by representatives of 57 member states, is the basic constitutional document from which the AIIB’s governing bodies, such as the board of governors, the board of directors, and the president, derive their operational authority. Article 11 permits the AIIB to carry out its investment activities by participating in direct loans, making equity investments and guarantees, and undertaking other forms of investment activities.

The Operational Policy on Financing, which was adopted by the board on January 17, outlines the bank’s financing policies. Among other things, it sets out the following conditions that must be satisfied for the AIIB to invest in a particular project:

  • The project must have clearly defined development objectives consistent with the bank’s stated purpose, and those objectives must permit appropriate evaluation of the project’s impact;
  • The project must provide for specific productive activities necessary to meet development objectives;
  • Alternative sources of finance, particularly private capital, must not be available for the project on terms and conditions that the AIIB considers reasonable; and
  • The project must comply with the other requirements of the operational policy and other AIIB policies.

Broadly, the AIIB’s financing activities can be broken down into sovereign-backed financing and financing which is not sovereign backed. Sovereign-backed financing means either a loan to a Member; a loan which has been guaranteed by a Member; or a guarantee that covers debt service defaults under a loan that are caused by government failure to meet a specific obligation in relation to the project or by a borrower’s failure to make a payment under the loan, and is accompanied by an indemnity by the Member to the AIIB. Nonsovereign-backed financing is any financing that does not fall within the definition of “sovereign-backed financing,” as outlined above.

In determining whether to grant sovereign-backed financing, the AIIB will assess whether the project’s impact on the member’s fiscal sustainability is acceptable. The bank will place significant weight on debt sustainability analyses conducted by the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. It will also assess whether the project contains acceptable oversight arrangements that provide reasonable assurances that the proceeds will only be used for the stated purposes of the financing.

The policy also outlines terms and conditions that must be included in the transaction documents for loans, including specific remedies, external debt reporting, and adherence to the general conditions as stipulated by the AIIB board from time to time. Significantly, the AIIB will not generally require specific security from a loan recipient that is a member, though it may require security if it is required by a co-financier. Loans to non-members may require security.

The policy provides the AIIB with significant leeway when granting non-sovereign-backed financing, although it explicitly states that market-based principles will be applied. Loans may be granted to project companies on a limited-recourse basis or directly to the project company’s sponsor (usually, the majority shareholders of the project company). The policy stipulates that loans will be based on standard template term sheets, loan agreements, and other relevant financing documentation.

Provided that the investment conditions are acceptable, the policy permits direct equity investments from the AIIB to either public- or private-sector companies. This form of investment may be particularly beneficial if the registered share capital of the project company must exceed a certain threshold.

Thailand has ambitious infrastructure goals that it aims to achieve in the next decade, and meeting these goals will require substantial capital investments. The AIIB is a potential source of funding for these projects, particularly when private capital is insufficient. In addition, since the AIIB will be investing in infrastructure throughout Asia, Thailand stands to gain from the knock-on effects of improved infrastructure in neighboring countries.

As the AIIB begins the process of approving investment plans for projects, it will be important to watch how the policy is implemented in practice.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

January 3, 2024
Thailand’s Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC) has issued the Notification on the Criteria for Regulating the Licensed Pool Manager B.E. 2566 (2023), which took effect on November 30, 2023. It followed an earlier notification, which took effect on October 13, 2023, that added the new license for the country’s pool gas manager. The new notification aims to regulate natural gas sale agreements and promote competition among players in the regulated natural gas market—that is, those who utilize natural gas for electricity generation under the Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand (EGAT) scheme, including industrial and NGV (natural gas for vehicles) consumers who rely on natural pool gas. The establishment of the pool gas scheme is aimed at encouraging new shippers to enter the market and providing new natural gas shippers with fair opportunities to compete with existing shippers, as all licensed shippers in the regulated market are subject to the same natural gas costs under this new scheme. Under this pool gas scheme, the pool manager plays a critical part in reselling natural gas in the country. Some of its responsibilities include the following: Purchasing natural gas or liquid natural gas (LNG) from licensed shippers in the regulated market at the rate at which the shippers procured the natural gas, including incidental expenses such as pipeline transportation and LNG station fees; Collecting data on the quantity and price of the gas purchased from the licensed shippers and calculating the pool gas price as specified in the ERC-approved manual, which is basically the average price of the natural gas procurement cost of all shippers in the pool; and Reselling natural gas or LNG to licensed shippers at the pool gas pricing rate in the quantity distributed to the pool by each shipper. Apart from its function in facilitating the primary procedures of
December 15, 2023
As part of its membership in Lex Mundi, Tilleke & Gibbins has published an updated edition of its Guide to Doing Business in Thailand for 2023. This guide outlines the key factors for starting and operating a business in the Thai market. Issues covered include: Investment incentives Financial facilities Exchange controls Import and export regulations Structures for doing business Requirements for the Establishment of a Business Operation of the Business Cessation or Termination of the Business Labor legislation, relations, and supply Tax Immigration requirements This publication is part of Lex Mundi’s Country Guides series prepared by member firms in more than 100 jurisdictions worldwide. The guides serve as a useful resource for planning international business strategy and researching new markets. The full Guide to Doing Business in Thailand is available through the button below.
July 25, 2023
Thailand’s Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC) is in the process of reviewing a draft regulation that updates the nationality qualifications for the ultimate shareholders and directors of applicants for an energy business license. The draft ERC Regulation Re: Qualifications, Documents and Application for Electricity Business—which is intended to replace the ERC Regulation Re: Application and Permission for Electricity Business B.E. 2551 and its amendments—is likely to be adopted soon and will affect licensed companies that are foreign majority owned when they apply for or renew their energy business licenses. The draft regulation requires partnerships, limited companies, and public limited companies to have the following qualifications unless there is an international agreement granting national treatment for a specific commitment (mode 3 or mode 4) or exemption by other laws: Juristic persons must be established under Thai law or registered in Thailand with the objective of carrying out electricity business; For private limited companies, foreign ultimate shareholders must not hold more than 49% of the total shares, and the number of the foreign shareholders must not exceed half of all shareholders; At least half of all directors must have Thai nationality; and Any authorized directors must have Thai nationality. When the draft regulation is adopted, it will not take retroactive effect on previously granted energy business licenses, which will continue to be valid until they expire if there is no material change to the license as defined by the draft regulation. Once the license is up for renewal (energy business licenses are normally issued for a specific period of time), it will be subject to the draft regulation. All license applications submitted prior to the effective date of the draft regulation and under consideration will be deemed applications for a license under the draft regulation. As noted above, the new qualification requirements
July 7, 2023
Cambodia has the potential to be one of the top countries in the world for generating renewable energy through solar, based on the average amount of sunlight hours available per day and the consistent sunshine throughout the year. The Cambodian government has recognized this potential and has made major updates to its energy policies in recent years. Solar power is now taking over a much larger portion of the total energy mix in Cambodia, especially as a number of utility-scale solar power plants have come online in recent years. The long-term Power Development Master Plan 2022–2040 sets out the long-term energy policy for Cambodia and requires a bigger role for renewables. The use of solar power will play a key role in this aim to increase the role of renewables, with the plan foreseeing almost 30% of all national power generated through solar technologies by 2040. Two of the latest legislative and regulatory steps by the government are the Ministry of Mines and Energy’s guidelines for rooftop solar systems, and most recently the long-awaited Environment and Natural Resources Code, which was enacted on June 29, 2023. Rooftop Solar Projects Many companies, from small startups to multinationals, are exploring the potential for rooftop solar in Cambodia. However, despite the favorable natural factors, the regulatory framework was not always clear or friendly to rooftop solar, hampering investment. This started slowly changing with the adoption of the first solar energy regulation in 2018, which provided the country’s first official guidance on both solar power plants and rooftop solar. It provided some much-needed clarity, but the 2018 solar energy regulation—and especially the subsequent electricity tariff schemes—often kept rooftop projects from being financially viable. Many players in the industry voiced their doubts about the regulations and tariffs, focusing especially on the capacity charge—a monthly