You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

December 6, 2018

Growing Hemp in Thailand Is Now Permissible

Subscribe to Updates
Informed Counsel

From regulation and production to research and development, product development, and marketing, the hemp (Cannabis sativa) industry is set to outperform most expectations in the very near future. Hemp offers various economic benefits for retail products, including the durability of hemp fiber in the production of clothing and the nutritional benefits of hemp seeds and oil.   

Significant legalization and decriminalization efforts of cannabis products around the world and increased development of a cannabis sector have encouraged Thailand’s Ministry of Public Health to release a Ministerial Regulation Re: Licensing and Approval for the Production, Distribution or Possession of Narcotics Category V Hemp. This regulation, which came into effect on January 5, 2018, permits the growing of hemp once an appropriate license has been obtained. However, it does not address marijuana or any other forms of cannabis; thus, their status remains unchanged. Nonetheless, this regulation is an important step, signifying that the Thai government is ready to move toward accepting the potential scientific and commercial benefits of hemp.

Ministerial Regulation and Its Key Considerations   

The Ministerial Regulation allows persons to produce, dispose of, and possess hemp for industrial and medical purposes, if an appropriate license is obtained. Although Thailand is moving closer to accepting cannabis, the government is putting in great effort to make sure the industry is controlled with regulatory assurance, given that hemp contains low amounts of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)—the substance in marijuana (Cannabis indica) that induces intoxication, which is still not permitted in Thailand.

For the first three years after the promulgation of the regulation, only state agencies will be permitted to apply for a license to produce, distribute, or possess hemp. There is a possibility that this trial period, applicable only to state agencies, will be extended beyond the initial three years. Therefore, private entities should request collaboration arrangements with state agencies in order to conduct research and development on hemp products until the trial period has passed.    

When the application process eventually opens to the public, only competent, non-bankrupt, Thai nationals domiciled in Thailand, who have not had a license restricted under the Narcotics Act B.E. 2522 (1979) or the Psychotropic Substances Act B.E. 2559 (2016), will be allowed to apply for a license. The application must first be submitted to officials at the Narcotics Control Division of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Following approval by the FDA, the Secretary General of the FDA is required to obtain further approval from the Prime Minister, after which a license will be granted.   

The license comes with several restrictions, including: cultivated hemp must not exceed 1% THC on a dry-weight basis; hemp can only be grown in areas specified in the license; and hemp seeds must be sourced from seed producers who have a valid license to harvest hemp. A license will allow a license holder to use hemp containing not more than 1% THC on a dry-weight basis for the following purposes:

  1. For planting, harvesting, or converting hemp for household uses.
  2. For planting, harvesting, or converting hemp for commercial uses.
  3. For planting, harvesting, or converting hemp for research.
  4. To produce seeds for sale or distribution for the purposes of (1), (2), or (3).
  5. To distribute fresh stems or other parts, as permitted for use under the purposes of (1), (2), or (3), or for other benefits as prescribed by the Narcotics Control Committee.
  6. To use for other benefits, as accepted by the Narcotics Control Committee.

Further specifications that need to be followed by license holders with regard to the production, distribution, or possession of hemp are outlined in the Ministerial Regulation.

A New Market   

Moving forward, legal permission for the cultivation and production of hemp is a positive step—taken by a number of other countries—that opens the door to a viable and potentially profitable new market for investors in Thailand. The hemp industry could be the necessary boost the Thai economy needs to further propel the country. To ensure that there are positive developments in this nascent industry, the Thai government should be ready to give full regulatory support to the hemp industry and its licensed growers. Additionally, companies should begin to prepare applications for available licenses and should start developing successful business strategies in anticipation of further permissible regulatory options in the future.

Other Cannabis Developments   

In addition to this liberalization of hemp, a draft amendment to Bill for the Narcotics Act was submitted to the Thai National Legislative Assembly (NLA) on September 27, 2018. According to the draft’s preamble, the purpose of this amendment includes “allowing the research for the medical benefits of Cannabis and Kratom (Mitragyna speciosa) for applications in treatment under the supervision of healthcare professionals.”   

In response to  public queries as to whether the legislative process for “unlocking cannabis” may be accelerated, Deputy Prime Minister, Dr. Visanu Kruengam, publicly stated on October 19, 2018, that there are a number of legislative pathways by which cannabis may be liberalized including by Royal Emergency Decree and by Order of the National Council for Peace and Order based on Article 44 of the Constitution of Thailand B.E. 2560 (2017). Subsequently, (and quite quickly for the Thai legislative/regulatory process), on October 30, 2018, the NLA held a public conference, stating that the Bill is among the NLA’s current priorities, and the NLA will seek to complete the review process by December 2018.

Download Full Article
Related Professionals

Industries

Life Sciences

Practices

Regulatory Affairs

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

September 7, 2026
Indonesia’s Constitutional Court (Mahkamah Konstitusi) has reinstated a key provision limiting pharmaceutical patent protection, signaling a renewed commitment to balancing patent rights with public access to medicines. In its ruling to Case No. 255/PUU-XXIII/2025, the court partially granted a petition for judicial review of Law No. 65 of 2024, which had amended the country’s Patent Law, and ordered the restoration of a provision that had excluded certain pharmaceutical inventions from patentability. The decision took effect immediately upon its pronouncement at the court’s plenary session on August 28, 2026. Background The petition challenged the removal of article 4(f) from Law No. 13 of 2016 concerning Patents (Patent Law), as amended by Law No. 65 of 2024. Article 4(f) had excluded from patentability certain inventions relating to new uses of known substances. The petitioners argued that removing this provision would open the door to patent protection for second medical use inventions and facilitate patent evergreening—practices that can extend exclusivity periods, delay generic market entry, and reduce public access to affordable medicines. The petitioners included several patient advocacy and public-interest organizations: the Indonesian Dialysis Patients Community Association, the Indonesian Association of Drug Abuse Victims (PKNI), the Indonesian Pulmonary Hypertension Foundation (YHPI), the Rekat Peduli Indonesia Foundation, and the Indonesian Positive Women’s Association (IPPI), along with the Indonesia for Global Justice Association and four individual petitioners. The petitioners also challenged the constitutionality of the phrase “interested party” in article 70(1) of the Patent Law, arguing that it should be construed expressly to clarify who has standing to appeal a decision to grant a patent before the Board of Patent Appeal, and to allow a broader range of parties—such as patent holders, licensees, consumer organizations, prosecutors, aggrieved third parties, and others who may suffer direct or indirect harm from the grant of a patent—to
Read More
September 4, 2026
Blind boxes and collectibles have become increasingly popular, driven by the excitement of not knowing which character or design will be revealed until the package is opened. While most visible in the art toy market, the same concept is also used in the food industry. Confectionery, snacks, and other food products are sometimes sold with toys, character figures, cards, or other collectibles. A package might, for example, contain one of ten possible characters, with consumers knowing that an item is included but not which one they will receive. Some collections may also feature rare or “secret” items. For food businesses, however, adding a randomized toy or collectible involves more than a marketing decision. The food, the nonfood item, and the randomized mechanism may each raise different regulatory considerations in Thailand. Thai FDA Requirements for Nonfood Objects Packaged with Food The main food regulatory consideration is Ministry of Public Health Notification No. 310 B.E. 2551 (2008), which regulates food packaged together with things or objects that are not food. Under Notification No. 310, certain nonfood objects may be packaged together with food where they fall within specified exceptions, including objects that serve the following purposes: Maintaining the quality or standard of the food, such as a desiccant or oxygen absorber; Serving as a seasoning or as part of food preparation, such as chili powder sachets or seasoning sachets contained in instant noodle packages; or Functioning as an eating or food-preparation utensil, such as a spoon or fork included with instant noodles. Other nonfood objects that do not fall within these categories generally should not be placed inside the food container together with the food. Where a toy, collectible, or other nonfood object is intended to be sold together with a food product, businesses should therefore carefully consider the nature of
Read More
August 20, 2026
As part of its membership in Lex Mundi, Tilleke & Gibbins has released the latest edition of its Guide to Doing Business in Thailand, providing an overview of the legal, regulatory, and commercial considerations for companies establishing or expanding operations in Thailand. The 2026 edition offers practical insight into the country’s business environment, investment framework, and operational requirements. The guide covers a wide range of topics relevant to foreign and domestic investors, including: Investment incentives and promotion schemes Financial facilities and banking regulations Exchange controls and money transfers Import and export regulations Business structures and incorporation options Requirements for establishing a business Operational and compliance considerations Business cessation and insolvency procedures Employment and labor laws Taxation Immigration and visa requirements Prepared by Tilleke & Gibbins lawyers across multiple practice areas, the publication outlines key aspects of doing business in Thailand, including foreign investment restrictions, regulatory compliance obligations, corporate structures, employment requirements, and recent legal and economic developments affecting investors. The publication forms part of Lex Mundi’s Country Guides series, a global collection of jurisdiction-specific reference materials prepared by member firms around the world. Together, these guides help companies evaluate opportunities, compare regulatory environments, and plan international business activities across multiple markets. The full Guide to Doing Business in Thailand 2026 is available through the button below.
Read More
August 10, 2026
On June 17, 2026, Indonesia’s National Agency of Drug and Food Control (BPOM) issued BPOM Regulation No. 10 of 2026 on Nutritional Information on Processed Food Labels. The new regulation, which revokes three previous nutrition labeling regulations, introduces several notable changes affecting food and beverage manufacturers, importers, and distributors. These changes range from updated nutrient reference values and serving-size requirements to the introduction of the Nutri-Level front-of-pack labeling system for certain beverage products. Businesses operating in Indonesia should carefully review these developments and assess their products’ compliance with the new requirements during the transition period. Implementation of the Nutri-Level Labeling System To implement the recently issued decree on Nutri-Level labeling, BPOM Regulation No. 10 of 2026 stipulates the requirements to implement the Nutri-Level labeling system on the front-of-pack. Under the new framework, ready-to-drink beverages, powdered beverages, and liquid or solid concentrates are required to display Nutri-Level labeling on the front label of their packaging. The Nutri-Level labeling system classifies products into color-coded levels A through D based on their sugar, sodium, and total fat content. The applicable Nutri-Level is determined based on the lowest level measured in the assessment of sugar, sodium, and total fat content. For products classified as level C or D, the Nutri-Level label must be accompanied by information on the relevant sugar, sodium, and total fat content per 100 ml of the ready-to-consume product. Products classified as level A or B may either display only the Nutri-Level designation or display the Nutri-Level together with the relevant nutritional information per 100 ml. Minimum Vitamin and Mineral Content Required for Declaration BPOM Regulation No. 10 of 2026 introduces a stricter threshold for the declaration of vitamins and minerals in the nutritional value information section (ING). Vitamins or minerals may only be declared if they are present at a
Read More