You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

June 9, 2020

Government of Vietnam Issues Resolution to Boost Post-Pandemic Economy

Subscribe to Updates

On May 29, 2020, the government of Vietnam issued Resolution No. 84/NQ-CP, which mandates a number of economic relief and recovery measures in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. These measures include, among others, the reduction of certain government fees and charges and the easing of some regulations on foreign employees, trade, and construction. Some highlights of Resolution 84 are discussed below.

Reduction of Government Fees

To alleviate the hardship faced by companies affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, the government will temporarily reduce or suspend some fees and charges, including the following:

  • Land rent: 15% reduction of the 2020 rent for land plots leased directly from the state, applicable to renters making annual rent payments who were forced to suspend their operations due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • Auto industry: 50% reduction of vehicle registration fees until the end of 2020 for cars manufactured or assembled in Vietnam, in order to encourage domestic consumption.
  • Water resources: Exemption from the fee for granting the right to exploit water resources in 2020 for companies exploiting water resources for manufacturing and business activities.
  • SME loans: 2% reduction of interest rates on loans disbursed to eligible SMEs from the Small and Medium Enterprise Development Fund.
  • Tax: Contributions to COVID-19-fighting activities can be deductible expenses when calculating corporate income tax. The government also plans to seek approval for a 30% reduction of corporate income tax for 2020 for small and extra-small enterprises.

Foreign Employees

Foreign experts, company managers, investors, and high-tech workers working in investment and business projects in Vietnam will be allowed to enter Vietnam to maintain the operations of their companies while ensuring compliance with preventative measures against the epidemic. Foreigners entering on this basis are still subject to mandatory quarantine (currently, 14 days) and subsequent monitoring by the local health authority.

Work permits will be renewed for foreign experts, company managers, and technical workers currently working for companies in Vietnam, and new work permits will be issued to foreign experts, company managers, and technical workers who replace those who are unable to enter or will not return to Vietnam.

Manufacturing and Trade

The Ministry of Industry and Trade is tasked with implementing measures to overcome any disruption of the supply of raw materials for manufacturing facilities and businesses; to diversify export markets, facilitate trade promotions, and seek new markets for goods whose delivery has been canceled or delayed due to the pandemic; and to fully utilize the benefits brought about by free trade agreements, especially the EVFTA and CPTPP.

Certificates of origin (C/O) with electronic signatures or electronic seals, or scanned C/Os, will be accepted for submission to the customs authority for customs clearance to reduce difficulties for import/export companies. Furthermore, the HS codes for import and export goods are to be unified with those of other countries, especially the EU.

Personal Protective Equipment

The Ministry of Health is responsible for coordinating with relevant authorities to facilitate production of medical masks, sanitizing products, and other medical supplies to meet the demand for domestic consumption and export; as well as to simplify the evaluation and approval procedures for manufacturing, importing, and exporting personal protection equipment and medical devices.

Construction

The government will propose that the National Assembly allow certain provisions of the amended Law on Construction (currently available for public comments) to be applied as soon as the amended law is passed, including an exemption from construction permits for construction projects that meet certain conditions (e.g., those for which the construction design has been approved), and the transfer of authority to grant construction permits for special-classification projects from the Ministry of Construction to the provincial People’s Committees.

Outlook

In order to implement the measures stated in Resolution 84, the government as well as relevant ministries and local authorities will need to formulate and issue implementing decrees, circulars and official guidance. Thus, it will take some time for all the measures to take effect in practice.

If you have any questions or concerns, please reach out to us at [email protected] for our further assistance.

Related Professionals

Practices

Corporate/M&A

Dispute Resolution and Litigation

Real Estate

Tax

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

February 9, 2026
When unauthorized credit card transactions occur, who bears responsibility—the cardholder or the issuing bank? In Thailand, a landmark 2025 ruling by the country’s Supreme Court has clarified this question, establishing a stricter standard for banks in fraud disputes and significantly strengthening consumer protections. The case centered on disputed charges where a customer claimed their credit card had been used without authorization. The bank sued to recover the amount, and both the court of first instance and the Court of Appeal ruled in favor of the bank. However, the Supreme Court overruled their judgments and decided that the customer did not need to pay for the unauthorized transactions, placing liability squarely on the bank. This ruling was based on three key findings, which are outlined below. Finding 1: Insufficient Expert Testimony In this case, the bank bore the burden of proving matters related to the credit card system’s manufacture, design, security, and operation, as required under the Consumer Case Procedure Act B.E. 2551 (2008). To meet this requirement, the bank presented testimony from two employees in its credit card department regarding ’security measures and issuance procedures. However, the Supreme Court found these witnesses unqualified as experts, as they did not present technical or academic evidence and did not possess specialized expertise in credit card technology. As a result, their testimony failed to establish that the bank’s credit card technology was sufficiently secure against fraudulent misuse. Finding 2: Contradictory Terms and Conditions The bank’s own credit card terms and conditions included a provision acknowledging that despite the card’s EMV security standards, cardholders must still exercise caution to prevent unauthorized access. The Supreme Court interpreted this clause as an explicit admission that credit card systems remain vulnerable to hacking and fraud, even with high-level security measures in place. This acknowledgment undermined the
Read More
February 3, 2026
Thailand’s alternative dispute resolution (ADR) landscape has evolved significantly over the past decade. Legislative reforms such as the Dispute Mediation Act and expanded court‑annexed mediation have strengthened non‑litigious options, while institutional choices have broadened. Parties can now choose between the Thai Arbitration Institute (TAI), the Thailand Arbitration Center (THAC), and a growing number of sector‑specific dispute forums. For businesses, these choices matter. Each forum has different rules, administration, costs, speed, and enforcement mechanisms. These factors can directly impact commercial leverage, recovery outcomes, and business continuity. Choosing the right forum and drafting an effective dispute resolution clause can materially influence how a dispute is resolved. This article outlines the practical differences between Thailand’s leading alternative dispute resolution forums, explains when each is likely to deliver the most value, and offers drafting and strategy tips to embed those advantages into your dispute resolution clauses. Why ADR Is Gaining Traction in Thailand Thai policy increasingly supports the resolution of civil and commercial disputes through ADR. Recent amendments to the Civil Procedure Code now provide for court-supervised pre-action and in-case mediation. This type of mediation has its advantages: it suspends limitation periods, involves no court fees, and can conclude with a consent judgment that is immediately enforceable and subject to only limited grounds of appeal. In parallel, the Mediation Act supports out‑of‑court mediation for qualifying disputes within defined subject‑matter and monetary thresholds. Valid settlement agreements reached under this law may be enforced through a streamlined court process. Thailand’s arbitration framework has also matured into a reliable, pro‑enforcement framework under the Arbitration Act, which closely follows the UNCITRAL Model Law and applies to both domestic and international cases, so cross‑border users see familiar rules. As Thailand is a signatory to the New York Convention, Thai courts generally recognize and enforce foreign awards subject only
Read More
January 29, 2026
Following the recent enactment of a comprehensive legal framework addressing sexual harassment, Thailand has launched a fast-track judicial process enabling victims of online sexual harassment to obtain court orders suspending and removing obscene content from the internet. On January 26, 2026, the Office of the Judiciary introduced the “Take It Down” procedure through the Court Integral Online Service (CIOS) platform, providing victims with their first direct, expedited pathway to halt the spread of online content that violates the new legal provisions against sexual harassment. This new remedy stems from section 284/4 of the Penal Code, introduced through the Act Amending the Penal Code (No. 30) B.E. 2568, which took effect on December 30, 2025. Under section 284/4, an injured person or a competent official may petition the court to suspend dissemination of violating data and remove the data from computer systems within a court-specified period. The court may also direct system controllers, service providers, or competent authorities to carry out the order and report back within 15 days. Filing through the CIOS Platform The CIOS platform serves as the primary electronic channel for these petitions. Key features include: Individuals can file online without appearing in person and may submit petitions at any time the system is available. Users must complete digital identity verification via the ThaID application to access the CIOS. Petitions under section 284/4 are limited to requests to suspend or remove violating content. Claims for monetary damages must be pursued separately, including via separate proceedings or prefiling mediation. Streamlined Review Process The submission workflow is end-to-end electronic, and the system provides step-by-step guidance. After submission, court staff review the petition before presenting it to a judge for consideration. The court may conduct an online inquiry to obtain additional information, and in-person attendance is required only if deemed
Read More
January 26, 2026
Tilleke & Gibbins has contributed an updated Vietnam chapter to Foreign Investment Review 2026, a recently published global guide to the legal and regulatory environment for foreign investment in 25 jurisdictions worldwide. Published and distributed by Lexology Panoramic, the guide discusses law and policy on oversight of foreign investment, regulatory frameworks, procedural requirements, and other important stipulations for foreign investors. The Vietnam chapter was prepared by Kien Trung Trinh, a partner in the Tilleke & Gibbins’ Hanoi office, Dung Thi Phuong Le, an associate in the firm’s office in Ho Chi Minh City, Nguyen Thi Huong Nguyen, associate in Hanoi, and Ngan Thuc Nguyen, paralegal in Ho Chi Minh City. The Vietnam chapter covers the following topics: Law and Policy: Government policies and practices, main laws and their scope of application (including details on investment promotional measures), definitions, rules for state-owned enterprises and sovereign wealth funds, relevant authorities and oversight, and national interest provisions. Procedure: Jurisdictional thresholds, national interest clearance, securing approval, the review process for competition clearance and associated penalties, involvement of authorities, facilitation of clearance, and post-closing regulatory powers. Substantive assessment: Substantive tests for clearance, authorities’ consultation with other countries and other relevant parties, transactional prohibitions and objections, mitigating arrangements and challenges to a decision, and protection of confidential information. Recent cases, updates, and trends: Relevant recent case law, key recent and ongoing developments. A PDF of the Vietnam chapter can be accessed through the button below. Tilleke & Gibbins also contributed the Cambodia, Laos, and Myanmar chapters to Foreign Investment Review 2026. Readers can also gain 30 days of complementary access to the full Foreign Investment Review 2026 guide and the rest of Lexology Panoramic’s varied offerings through this link.
Read More