You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

June 9, 2020

Government of Vietnam Issues Resolution to Boost Post-Pandemic Economy

Subscribe to Updates

On May 29, 2020, the government of Vietnam issued Resolution No. 84/NQ-CP, which mandates a number of economic relief and recovery measures in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. These measures include, among others, the reduction of certain government fees and charges and the easing of some regulations on foreign employees, trade, and construction. Some highlights of Resolution 84 are discussed below.

Reduction of Government Fees

To alleviate the hardship faced by companies affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, the government will temporarily reduce or suspend some fees and charges, including the following:

  • Land rent: 15% reduction of the 2020 rent for land plots leased directly from the state, applicable to renters making annual rent payments who were forced to suspend their operations due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • Auto industry: 50% reduction of vehicle registration fees until the end of 2020 for cars manufactured or assembled in Vietnam, in order to encourage domestic consumption.
  • Water resources: Exemption from the fee for granting the right to exploit water resources in 2020 for companies exploiting water resources for manufacturing and business activities.
  • SME loans: 2% reduction of interest rates on loans disbursed to eligible SMEs from the Small and Medium Enterprise Development Fund.
  • Tax: Contributions to COVID-19-fighting activities can be deductible expenses when calculating corporate income tax. The government also plans to seek approval for a 30% reduction of corporate income tax for 2020 for small and extra-small enterprises.

Foreign Employees

Foreign experts, company managers, investors, and high-tech workers working in investment and business projects in Vietnam will be allowed to enter Vietnam to maintain the operations of their companies while ensuring compliance with preventative measures against the epidemic. Foreigners entering on this basis are still subject to mandatory quarantine (currently, 14 days) and subsequent monitoring by the local health authority.

Work permits will be renewed for foreign experts, company managers, and technical workers currently working for companies in Vietnam, and new work permits will be issued to foreign experts, company managers, and technical workers who replace those who are unable to enter or will not return to Vietnam.

Manufacturing and Trade

The Ministry of Industry and Trade is tasked with implementing measures to overcome any disruption of the supply of raw materials for manufacturing facilities and businesses; to diversify export markets, facilitate trade promotions, and seek new markets for goods whose delivery has been canceled or delayed due to the pandemic; and to fully utilize the benefits brought about by free trade agreements, especially the EVFTA and CPTPP.

Certificates of origin (C/O) with electronic signatures or electronic seals, or scanned C/Os, will be accepted for submission to the customs authority for customs clearance to reduce difficulties for import/export companies. Furthermore, the HS codes for import and export goods are to be unified with those of other countries, especially the EU.

Personal Protective Equipment

The Ministry of Health is responsible for coordinating with relevant authorities to facilitate production of medical masks, sanitizing products, and other medical supplies to meet the demand for domestic consumption and export; as well as to simplify the evaluation and approval procedures for manufacturing, importing, and exporting personal protection equipment and medical devices.

Construction

The government will propose that the National Assembly allow certain provisions of the amended Law on Construction (currently available for public comments) to be applied as soon as the amended law is passed, including an exemption from construction permits for construction projects that meet certain conditions (e.g., those for which the construction design has been approved), and the transfer of authority to grant construction permits for special-classification projects from the Ministry of Construction to the provincial People’s Committees.

Outlook

In order to implement the measures stated in Resolution 84, the government as well as relevant ministries and local authorities will need to formulate and issue implementing decrees, circulars and official guidance. Thus, it will take some time for all the measures to take effect in practice.

If you have any questions or concerns, please reach out to us at [email protected] for our further assistance.

Related Professionals

Practices

Corporate/M&A

Dispute Resolution and Litigation

Real Estate

Tax

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

January 21, 2026
Spurred by global geopolitics and Canada’s Indo-Pacific Strategy, which aims to forge deeper ties with ASEAN, Canadian companies have been showing growing interest in Thailand and Southeast Asia in recent years. To understand the opportunities offered by the region, we sat down with Andrew Stoutley, a Toronto native and the chief operating officer of Tilleke & Gibbins, a leading Southeast Asian regional law firm with over 130 years of history in Thailand. Q: Why are Canadian companies looking at Thailand and Southeast Asia right now? A: Two reasons stand out. First, diversification has moved up the agenda. Many Canadian companies want options outside North America due to tariff volatility and policy uncertainty in the United States, as well as questions around the next Canada–United States–Mexico Agreement mandatory joint review. At the same time, the shift of global production from China to Southeast Asia is accelerating, driven by rising costs, geopolitics, and the need to avoid overreliance on a single market. As a result, Canadian companies are looking for a second production base or a regional hub, and Thailand and its neighbors are natural choices given their manufacturing depth, location, and established supply chains. Second, Canada’s own efforts in the region are gaining traction. The Indo-Pacific Strategy has led to more on-the-ground support, including larger trade missions, upgraded diplomatic posts, and new financing options. Export Development Canada (EDC) now has a presence in Bangkok, giving Canadian companies a direct line to financing and insurance in Thailand. There’s also steady progress on trade frameworks like the recently signed Canada–Indonesia Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (which will come into effect pending domestic procedures), ongoing negotiations of a Canada–ASEAN FTA, and the exciting announcement about the launch of negotiations of a Canada–Thailand FTA. Together, these developments have the potential to make it much easier
Read More
January 20, 2026
Arbitrations seated in Thailand are governed principally by the Arbitration Act B.E. 2545 (2002) and, where applicable, the rules of institutions such as the Thailand Arbitration Center (THAC) and the Thai Arbitration Institute (TAI). While these instruments set the core procedural structure, they are not comprehensive. To fill in these procedural gaps, arbitral tribunals often look to the Thai Civil Procedure Code (CPC) and apply its principles when the Arbitration Act or institutional rules are silent. This hybrid system is familiar to local practitioners but can surprise international parties who expect a more self-contained arbitral procedure. Examples of How CPC Principles Are Applied Evidence Management: Section 25 of the Arbitration Act requires equal treatment of the parties and guarantees each side a full opportunity to present its case. At the same time, it grants tribunals broad discretion to conduct proceedings “as it deems appropriate” and expressly suggests that arbitrators may apply the CPC evidence rules where appropriate. In practice, tribunals frequently apply CPC evidence rules when addressing: submission of evidence lists, late or additional evidence, questions of admissibility and relevance, and assessment of witness and expert testimony. Amendments to Pleadings: Because the Arbitration Act and institutional rules provide limited guidance on amending pleadings, tribunals often rely on CPC principles when parties seek to amend a statement of claim or defense. Amendments may be permitted if they are sought in a timely manner, do not unfairly prejudice the opposing party, do not cause undue delay, and do not alter the nature of the dispute. These conditions closely mirror the standards applied by Thai courts under the CPC. Subpoenas and Court Assistance: Arbitral tribunals seated in Thailand generally do not have inherent subpoena powers. Section 33 of the Arbitration Act fills this gap by permitting the tribunal, an individual arbitrator, or a
Read More
January 20, 2026
Thailand’s Board of Investment (BOI) has imposed new restrictions on foreign-majority shareholding and land ownership for companies in certain promoted activities. The changes took effect on September 1, 2025, but were not published in the Government Gazette until December 30, 2025, under Notification of the Board of Investment No. Sor. 7/2568 on the Amendment to List of Activities Eligible for Investment Promotion under Notification of the Board of Investment No. 9/2565, dated July 22, 2025. Foreign Land Ownership Restrictions Generally, foreign land ownership is one of the privileges granted to BOI-promoted companies, allowing them to own land to engage in the promoted activities. However, with these new restrictions, the BOI will no longer grant land-ownership privileges to foreign-majority-owned companies that conduct business activities in the following categories: Rolling, drawing, casting, or forging of nonferrous metals (category 5.4.9) Manufacturing of ferrous metal products or ferrous metal parts (category 5.4.11.2) Manufacturing of nonferrous metal products and/or nonferrous metal parts for industrial use (category 5.4.11.4) Manufacturing of other metal products, including other metal parts for industrial use (category 5.4.11.5) Manufacture of chemical products for industry (category 6.2) Manufacture of plastic products for industrial goods and parts (category 6.4.1) These restrictions do not apply to existing BOI-promoted companies that have at least three projects granted promotion under the same juristic person during the past 15 years (2011–2025) with total investment of at least THB 5 billion, excluding the cost of land and working capital. Foreign Shareholding Restrictions For companies to be eligible for BOI promotion in three other categories of business activities, at least 51% of the company’s registered capital must be held by Thai individual shareholders, unless the BOI-promoted activity is located within a special border economic zone as designated by the BOI. These three categories are: Manufacture of bags made of
Read More
January 14, 2026
Employers operating in Thailand can enforce post-employment noncompete covenants, but success depends on precise drafting and strong evidentiary support. Thai courts will uphold restraints that protect legitimate employer interests and are fair and reasonable in duration, geographic reach, and substantive scope. Overbroad covenants, however, draw judicial skepticism and may fail unless they are drafted in severable, defensible components tied to the employee’s actual role. This article synthesizes recent trends in Thai case practice, explains how Thai courts assess reasonableness in employment restraints, and provides a practical litigation-focused framework for drafting enforceable covenants, preparing evidence, and pursuing relief through the Labor Court. The Legal Framework and Its Practical Implications Thai courts evaluate noncompete covenants under general principles of contract enforceability and public policy, with particular focus on whether a restraint is necessary to protect a legitimate employer interest and proportionate to that objective. In employment matters, this analysis is shaped by the employee-protective tenor of Thai labor law and by the Labor Court’s equitable discretion in determining appropriate remedies. The practical takeaway is that standardized or broadly drafted covenants rarely survive scrutiny. Courts look for a demonstrable nexus between the employee’s actual exposure to confidential information, trade secrets, or customer relationships and the scope of the restraint. Where that nexus is weak or the restraint operates as a blanket prohibition, courts are inclined to decline enforcement or limit relief to a narrowly tailored prohibition. The employer interests most commonly recognized as legitimate in Thai practice include the protection of trade secrets, confidential business information, and goodwill tied to identifiable customer segments or territories. Courts are more likely to enforce restraints where employers can clearly document what information is at risk, why particular customer relationships matter, and how the employee was involved with those assets. Judges also look closely at the
Read More