You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

August 28, 2014

Good Manufacturing Practices in Thailand

Informed Counsel

In Thailand, Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) were first implemented in 1979 for local pharmaceutical manufacturers under the Drug Act 1967 (B.E. 2510). In 1984, the Thai Food and Drug Administration (FDA) campaigned seriously for the pharmaceutical industry, and ultimately managed to update pharmaceutical standards, with the first Guidelines to Good Manufacturing Practices being issued in 1987. Also, as a way to standardize pharmaceutical factories, the Thai FDA began to officially grant GMP Certificates in 1989. 

By 2001, Thailand had adopted GMP Guidelines based on internationally recognized World Health Organization (WHO) standards, and in the same year, the Thai FDA applied the new guidelines to all local manufacturers and overseas manufacturers that intended to export drugs into Thailand.

GMP Accreditation

As an ASEAN member, Thailand has implemented ASEAN GMP. In order to comply with the ASEAN Sectorial Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA), which was signed on April 10, 2009, Thailand must standardize its GMP guidelines to be in line with those of other ASEAN countries. In 2011, the Thai FDA issued GMP regulations and launched GMP Guidelines that complied with ASEAN GMP standards and the Pharmaceutical Inspection Convention and Pharmaceutical Inspection Co-operation Scheme (PIC/S)—this provided guidance to local manufacturers and raised overall standards.

In order to maintain the same GMP standards for both local and overseas manufacturers, the Thai FDA launched the Notification of GMP Accreditation of Overseas Manufacturers on October 1, 2012. Under this Notification, overseas pharmaceutical manufacturers which had never before been recorded in the Drug Product Registry of Thailand needed to be accredited by the Thai FDA before Marketing Authorization (MA) could be obtained. Pharmaceutical import companies must also submit an application for GMP accreditation before or at the same time as drug registration.

Required Documents

The documents to be submitted to the Thai FDA for GMP accreditation are separated into two schemes, Non-PIC/S members and PIC/S members, based on the overseas manufacturer’s country. If the overseas manufacturer is from a country that is a PIC/S member, the documents for GMP accreditation will be the PIC/S member checklist. The amount of documents for a PIC/S member to submit is less than that for a Non-PIC/S member. The required documents include:

  1. A Plant Master File for PIC/S or Non-PIC/S members or Certified/Audited by PIC/S, complying with the requirements stated in the Notification of the Ministry of Public Health Re: Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) and Requirements for Manufacturing of Modern Drugs in accordance with the Drug Act 2012 (B.E. 2555).
  2. The production details of the imported product, including details about the place and manufacturing area, production equipment involved in the manufacturing of each category of imported product, plant layout, and a flowchart and other relevant information indicating all manufacturing processes, including the premises.
  3. The latest GMP inspection report, issued by the authorized government agency of the country of origin or the International Certificate Organization (if applicable).
  4. A current Certificate of GMP, issued by the authorized government agency of the country of origin.

Under the four topics above, there are more than 100 documents to be submitted for PIC/S members and more than 200 documents to be submitted for Non-PIC/S members to the Thai FDA for GMP accreditation. All documents are reviewed by an FDA team of experts. Afterwards, all questions, requests, or suggestions will be sent to the applicant to answer and/or submit additional documents. A slide or video presentation of the manufacturer needs to be prepared to explain the manufacturing process, such as important zones of production, flow of production, etc.

The applicant is required to arrange for the translation of certain information which needs to be in Thai and submit it together with the English version. A company representative may be requested to meet with the subcommittee to explain and answer the expert team’s questions. A Corrective Action and Preventative Action (CAPA) proposal may need to be presented to the subcommittee for evaluation. In complex cases, an inspection at the site of manufacturing may be required by the Thai FDA.  

If manufacturing practices are considered to be GMP compliant and the CAPA proposal meets requirements, the Thai FDA will issue a GMP Certificate to an overseas manufacturer for the purpose of product registration. The same GMP Certificate may be used for other product registration applications if they have the same scope/type of manufacturing during the validity of the GMP Certificate, which is normally three years after the date of issuance. The GMP Certificate of an overseas manufacturer must therefore be renewed every three years.

Since its implementation in October 2012, only 10 manufacturers from PIC/S member countries have received GMP accreditation. Meanwhile, manufacturers from Non-PIC/S member countries are still pending accreditation. Due to limited staff and expert teams in the Thai FDA, along with the requirement to submit a large number of documents for manufacturers from Non-PIC/S member countries, it is more difficult for a Non-PIC/S member to be granted a GMP Certificate than it is for a PIC/S member.

Overseas manufacturers are not required to pay for GMP accreditation at any stage of the application.

Renewal and Ongoing Audits

As the GMP Certificate issued for an overseas manufacturer has to be renewed every three years, it seems that the Thai FDA is trying to control/audit all manufacturers with products registered in Thailand. Meanwhile, local manufacturers normally have to renew their GMP Certificates every two years.

The GMP accreditation regulation of overseas manufacturers does not, however, affect manufacturers with products that were submitted for drug registration before October 1, 2012, because the manufacturer’s name and address are available in the Thai FDA database. It would be possible to have them audited if product registration renewal was required. Unfortunately, there is no requirement in Thailand for product registration renewal every five years, unlike other countries in ASEAN such as Singapore, Malaysia, etc. Therefore, these overseas manufacturers are still awaiting audit by the Thai FDA. For the time being, there are no measures to manage the audit of these manufacturers. To complete the GMP system in Thailand, the Thai FDA has the burden to eliminate the gap between new and old overseas manufacturers. This leaves many observers wondering how best to control products from overseas manufacturers that have never been audited by the Thai FDA.

Comparisons among ASEAN Countries

Thailand is not currently a PIC/S member, so in order to ascend to the accepted list of ASEAN MRA, Thailand must develop its pharmaceutical GMP system to be on par with other ASEAN countries. This will reduce pharmaceutical trade barriers before the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) is implemented in December 2015.         

ASEAN countries have country-specific regulations that differ due to the laws and regulations of each country. As in Thailand, GMP accreditation in Singapore came into effect on April 1, 2004, and all overseas manufacturers registering medicinal products in Singapore after that date have to meet the PIC/S GMP standard. Malaysia, too, now requires the GMP accreditation of manufacturers outside Malaysia to be taken into consideration before products are registered. Malaysia adopted the PIC/S Guide to GMP for medicinal products in 2002.

In Malaysia and Singapore, old manufacturers with products that have already been registered, but have never been audited, will be audited and inspected when Marketing Authorization is renewed. If the manufacturer does not pass inspection, Marketing Authorization will not be granted. For Cambodia, Lao PDR, Myanmar, Philippines, and Indonesia, however, the GMP accreditation requirements for new overseas manufacturers are not as stringent as those seen in Malaysia and Singapore. The development of GMP accreditation in those countries will likely grow in the future to be on par with other ASEAN countries.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

July 20, 2022
What does “digital health” include within each jurisdiction? Thailand: For the most part, the idea of “digital health” or “telemedicine” has generally fallen within the area of medical device regulation in Thailand. The normal sort of digital health components you would think of—like software and device accessories for diagnosis, monitoring, prevention, or treatment of illnesses—would fall into medical device classification, so long as they do not achieve their intended function by immunological, metabolic, or pharmacological means. The “digital health” devices you commonly think of, like mobile medical apps, wearable technologies and software, fall mainly within this definition. After the last update to the Medical Device Act in 2008, Thailand next looked at digital health in 2019, with the Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA)—which is largely aligned with GDPR principles—and the Cybersecurity Act. These deal with important issues arising from “digital health” and “telemedicine” like personal data protection, consent to use and consent to transfer data, and privacy. Vietnam: Similarly, in Vietnam, while there’s not a clear definition of “digital health” in the law, it is understood to include various types of medical devices, software, and online services used for healthcare purposes—including diagnosis and treatment as well as medical records and telemedicine. There’s no law on digital health, per se, but many of these areas are covered by separate circulars issued by the Ministry of Health. There’s a circular (referred to as “Circular 49”) from late 2017 on telemedicine, for example, that actually uses the term “telemedicine” to identify the industry and sets out licensing and technical requirements. Indicators such as this show that Vietnam is definitely embracing the concept. Indonesia: In Indonesia, there is also no precise definition of “digital health.” Digital health is regulated under several laws and regulations, such as provisions concerning medical devices under the health
July 6, 2022
Patent is an essential piece of the amended Law on Intellectual Property (“Amended IP Law”), which was passed by the National Assembly of Vietnam on June 16, 2022, and will take effect on January 1, 2023 (except for the regulation on protection of experimental data for agrochemical products, which will take delayed effect on January 14, 2024). Among the amended and supplemented contents of the Amended IP Law, there are notable patent-related amendments to Article 60 on assessing the novelty of inventions and Article 96 on grounds for invalidating patent protection titles. We discuss these changes below. Secret Prior Art Under Article 60.1 A significant amendment to Clause 1, Article 60 of the Amended IP Law on the novelty of inventions is to broaden the scope under which an invention can be considered to have lost its novelty. For the first time in Vietnam, “secret prior art” –a patent application with an earlier filing date or priority date but published on or after the filing date or priority date of an examined patent application – is introduced as a prior art document. In the diagram above, at the time of filing of the A2 application, secret prior art A1 has been filed but not yet published, making it inaccessible to the public. At this point, only the A1 applicant and the IP Office are aware of the A1 application. Under the current provisions of the 2005 IP Law, as amended in 2009 and 2019, the A1 patent application is not eligible to be a prior art document when assessing the novelty of A2. However, based on the “first-to-file principle” and the principle of priority, the IP Office has still had other approaches to bar the patentability of an A2 patent application if there is such an A1 application. By
June 13, 2022
Thailand’s cannabis cultivation licensing scheme for the country’s transition toward legalization of the plant has now come to an end. The Ministry of Public Health (MOPH) announced in the Government Gazette that from June 9, 2022, “only cannabis extract with tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) of more than 0.2% by weight will be considered a narcotic.” This means that now anyone can grow, sell, or purchase cannabis seeds, plants, and inflorescence freely in Thailand, and licenses for the cultivation, possession, and distribution of cannabis are no longer required. Neither the number of cannabis plants nor the place of cultivation is restricted. It is thus the beginning of a new chapter for cannabis cultivation in Thailand, with many opining that now is a good time to enter this exciting and growing industry. The journey to this point began in 2019, when Thailand amended its laws on cannabis to allow for treatment for medical purposes, with one of the prerequisite conditions being that the cannabis must be grown in Thailand. The law was further amended to promote commercialization of the cannabis industry, allowing for cannabis to be added to food and beverages, cosmetics, and herbal products. In addition, three traditional cannabis-based formulas were listed in the universal healthcare coverage scheme, which means that almost all Thais have access to traditional cannabis recipes without cost. The successful launch of medical cannabis and its applications, and its viability as an economic industry, have become a national agenda and priority policy of the MOPH. In order to achieve the above outcomes, several legal frameworks and guidelines throughout the product’s lifecycle have been developed. For example, the Thai Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has so far granted licenses to cultivate cannabis (also known as a license to manufacture a narcotic) on more than 1,977 acres (around 800 hectares).
April 19, 2022
New technologies and production processes in the food industry have led to novel foods becoming increasingly important to both food manufacturers and the consuming public worldwide. This is very much the case across a number of jurisdictions in Southeast Asia. “Novel foods” refer to new food production processes, foods, and ingredients that have not yet been commonly used for human consumption, so these innovative foods require safety assessments before companies can produce and market them. While rules for these safety assessments are already part of novel food regulations in several other jurisdictions—such as the novel food regulations in the United Kingdom and European Union adopted in 2003, and the major reform of food safety laws in the United States passed in 2011 under the Food Modernization Act—similar rules governing the assessment of novel foods are relatively new or yet to be introduced in many parts of Asia. Nevertheless, it is important to understand the laws and practices that apply to safety assessments and the process of bringing novel foods to market in jurisdictions in the region. This article provides some clarity in this regard by summarizing important practical information on novel foods and the relevant required safety assessments in Indonesia, Thailand, and Vietnam.   Indonesia Regulator National Agency for Drug and Food Control (NADFC); frequently referred to as BPOM (Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan). Relevant Measures BPOM Regulation No. 27 Year 2018 concerning Public Service Standards in BPOM; Decision of the Director of Processed Food Standardization No. HK.02.02.51.511.06.21.21 Year 2021 concerning Public Service Standard Directorate Processed Food Standardization Definitions General “food ingredients” are basic fresh or processed ingredients that can be used to produce food; novel food is any food ingredient not listed in BPOM’s positive list of ingredients. Official Fees None   Process and Timeline Before submitting an