You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

August 28, 2014

Good Manufacturing Practices in Thailand

Informed Counsel

In Thailand, Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) were first implemented in 1979 for local pharmaceutical manufacturers under the Drug Act 1967 (B.E. 2510). In 1984, the Thai Food and Drug Administration (FDA) campaigned seriously for the pharmaceutical industry, and ultimately managed to update pharmaceutical standards, with the first Guidelines to Good Manufacturing Practices being issued in 1987. Also, as a way to standardize pharmaceutical factories, the Thai FDA began to officially grant GMP Certificates in 1989. 

By 2001, Thailand had adopted GMP Guidelines based on internationally recognized World Health Organization (WHO) standards, and in the same year, the Thai FDA applied the new guidelines to all local manufacturers and overseas manufacturers that intended to export drugs into Thailand.

GMP Accreditation

As an ASEAN member, Thailand has implemented ASEAN GMP. In order to comply with the ASEAN Sectorial Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA), which was signed on April 10, 2009, Thailand must standardize its GMP guidelines to be in line with those of other ASEAN countries. In 2011, the Thai FDA issued GMP regulations and launched GMP Guidelines that complied with ASEAN GMP standards and the Pharmaceutical Inspection Convention and Pharmaceutical Inspection Co-operation Scheme (PIC/S)—this provided guidance to local manufacturers and raised overall standards.

In order to maintain the same GMP standards for both local and overseas manufacturers, the Thai FDA launched the Notification of GMP Accreditation of Overseas Manufacturers on October 1, 2012. Under this Notification, overseas pharmaceutical manufacturers which had never before been recorded in the Drug Product Registry of Thailand needed to be accredited by the Thai FDA before Marketing Authorization (MA) could be obtained. Pharmaceutical import companies must also submit an application for GMP accreditation before or at the same time as drug registration.

Required Documents

The documents to be submitted to the Thai FDA for GMP accreditation are separated into two schemes, Non-PIC/S members and PIC/S members, based on the overseas manufacturer’s country. If the overseas manufacturer is from a country that is a PIC/S member, the documents for GMP accreditation will be the PIC/S member checklist. The amount of documents for a PIC/S member to submit is less than that for a Non-PIC/S member. The required documents include:

  1. A Plant Master File for PIC/S or Non-PIC/S members or Certified/Audited by PIC/S, complying with the requirements stated in the Notification of the Ministry of Public Health Re: Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) and Requirements for Manufacturing of Modern Drugs in accordance with the Drug Act 2012 (B.E. 2555).
  2. The production details of the imported product, including details about the place and manufacturing area, production equipment involved in the manufacturing of each category of imported product, plant layout, and a flowchart and other relevant information indicating all manufacturing processes, including the premises.
  3. The latest GMP inspection report, issued by the authorized government agency of the country of origin or the International Certificate Organization (if applicable).
  4. A current Certificate of GMP, issued by the authorized government agency of the country of origin.

Under the four topics above, there are more than 100 documents to be submitted for PIC/S members and more than 200 documents to be submitted for Non-PIC/S members to the Thai FDA for GMP accreditation. All documents are reviewed by an FDA team of experts. Afterwards, all questions, requests, or suggestions will be sent to the applicant to answer and/or submit additional documents. A slide or video presentation of the manufacturer needs to be prepared to explain the manufacturing process, such as important zones of production, flow of production, etc.

The applicant is required to arrange for the translation of certain information which needs to be in Thai and submit it together with the English version. A company representative may be requested to meet with the subcommittee to explain and answer the expert team’s questions. A Corrective Action and Preventative Action (CAPA) proposal may need to be presented to the subcommittee for evaluation. In complex cases, an inspection at the site of manufacturing may be required by the Thai FDA.  

If manufacturing practices are considered to be GMP compliant and the CAPA proposal meets requirements, the Thai FDA will issue a GMP Certificate to an overseas manufacturer for the purpose of product registration. The same GMP Certificate may be used for other product registration applications if they have the same scope/type of manufacturing during the validity of the GMP Certificate, which is normally three years after the date of issuance. The GMP Certificate of an overseas manufacturer must therefore be renewed every three years.

Since its implementation in October 2012, only 10 manufacturers from PIC/S member countries have received GMP accreditation. Meanwhile, manufacturers from Non-PIC/S member countries are still pending accreditation. Due to limited staff and expert teams in the Thai FDA, along with the requirement to submit a large number of documents for manufacturers from Non-PIC/S member countries, it is more difficult for a Non-PIC/S member to be granted a GMP Certificate than it is for a PIC/S member.

Overseas manufacturers are not required to pay for GMP accreditation at any stage of the application.

Renewal and Ongoing Audits

As the GMP Certificate issued for an overseas manufacturer has to be renewed every three years, it seems that the Thai FDA is trying to control/audit all manufacturers with products registered in Thailand. Meanwhile, local manufacturers normally have to renew their GMP Certificates every two years.

The GMP accreditation regulation of overseas manufacturers does not, however, affect manufacturers with products that were submitted for drug registration before October 1, 2012, because the manufacturer’s name and address are available in the Thai FDA database. It would be possible to have them audited if product registration renewal was required. Unfortunately, there is no requirement in Thailand for product registration renewal every five years, unlike other countries in ASEAN such as Singapore, Malaysia, etc. Therefore, these overseas manufacturers are still awaiting audit by the Thai FDA. For the time being, there are no measures to manage the audit of these manufacturers. To complete the GMP system in Thailand, the Thai FDA has the burden to eliminate the gap between new and old overseas manufacturers. This leaves many observers wondering how best to control products from overseas manufacturers that have never been audited by the Thai FDA.

Comparisons among ASEAN Countries

Thailand is not currently a PIC/S member, so in order to ascend to the accepted list of ASEAN MRA, Thailand must develop its pharmaceutical GMP system to be on par with other ASEAN countries. This will reduce pharmaceutical trade barriers before the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) is implemented in December 2015.         

ASEAN countries have country-specific regulations that differ due to the laws and regulations of each country. As in Thailand, GMP accreditation in Singapore came into effect on April 1, 2004, and all overseas manufacturers registering medicinal products in Singapore after that date have to meet the PIC/S GMP standard. Malaysia, too, now requires the GMP accreditation of manufacturers outside Malaysia to be taken into consideration before products are registered. Malaysia adopted the PIC/S Guide to GMP for medicinal products in 2002.

In Malaysia and Singapore, old manufacturers with products that have already been registered, but have never been audited, will be audited and inspected when Marketing Authorization is renewed. If the manufacturer does not pass inspection, Marketing Authorization will not be granted. For Cambodia, Lao PDR, Myanmar, Philippines, and Indonesia, however, the GMP accreditation requirements for new overseas manufacturers are not as stringent as those seen in Malaysia and Singapore. The development of GMP accreditation in those countries will likely grow in the future to be on par with other ASEAN countries.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

July 24, 2026
For businesses in Thailand’s regulated industries, the problem of “too many licenses” is one of the most familiar hurdles to getting a product to market. Take a simple example: importing the materials necessary to sell teriyaki chicken skewers. To legally do this, a business may need approvals from several different agencies—separate permits for the chicken (Department of Livestock Development), the dipping sauce (Thai FDA), the wooden skewers (Department of Forestry), and other ingredients, each under a different authority. This kind of overlap is often cited to argue for a “regulatory guillotine”—a systematic review to cut outdated or duplicative rules that slow investment and business activity. The Facilitation of Licensing and Public Service Consideration Act B.E. 2569 (2026) (Licensing Facilitation Act 2026) is Thailand’s most significant response yet to that concern. This article looks at the Facilitation Act 2026 through a life sciences and regulatory affairs lens—what it may mean for the manufacturers, importers, and distributors of food, drugs, medical devices, cosmetics, and similar products who routinely deal with several regulators to bring a single product to market. The Super License: One Approval Standing in for Many The reform with the clearest potential for regulated-product businesses is the law’s “super license” mechanism, referred to as a “main license” in the statute. Once a business obtains the main license for a regulated activity, it is automatically deemed to hold all related sublicenses issued by other agencies for that same activity, provided the activity has been designated as eligible in the Government Gazette. The Licensing Facilitation Act 2026 also creates a central application center, allowing applicants to submit a single application and pay all relevant fees at one point of contact, with the center routing the application to each agency through a shared information system. The potential benefits of this for businesses
July 13, 2026
Indonesia’s Halal Product Assurance Agency (BPJPH) has issued new regulations establishing clearer procedures for imposing administrative sanctions on businesses that violate halal product assurance requirements. BPJPH Regulation No. 2 of 2026 on the Imposition of Administrative Sanctions for Violations of Halal Product Assurance Implementation, issued on June 5, 2026, strengthens Indonesia’s halal compliance framework, as mandated under Law No. 33 of 2014 on Halal Product Assurance and Government Regulation No. 42 of 2024 on the Implementation of Halal Product Assurance. BPJPH Regulation No. 2/2026 also supports the upcoming mandatory halal compliance deadline of October 17, 2026, which will apply to a broad range of products and services, including imported food and beverages, slaughtering products and services, natural and quasi-drugs, health supplements, cosmetics, chemical and genetically engineered products, clothing and accessories, household goods, prayer equipment, stationery, and class A medical devices. Scope BPJPH is authorized to impose administrative sanctions for violations of halal product assurance requirements committed by businesses, halal inspection agencies (LPH), halal auditors, halal product process companion institutions (lembaga pendamping PPH), and halal product process companions (pendamping PPH). The head of BPJPH has authority to determine, cancel, or amend the imposition of administrative sanctions, including upon receipt of objections. This authority covers revocation of Halal Certificates (including foreign halal certificate registration numbers), withdrawal of goods from circulation, freezing of LPH operations, freezing of halal product process companion institutions, revocation of PPH companion institution registration numbers, revocation of halal auditor registration numbers, and revocation of LPH accreditation status. Administrative Sanctions Businesses may be subject to any of the following administrative sanctions: Written warning; Administrative fine; Revocation of the halal certificate, including revocation of foreign halal certificate registration numbers; and Withdrawal of goods from circulation. The regulation sets out the types of violations that may trigger these sanctions, with each
July 1, 2026
Obtaining marketing authorization is a fundamental requirement for bringing pharmaceutical products to the Thai market. Companies must navigate the Thai Food and Drug Administration’s registration procedures while also complying with post-approval pharmacovigilance obligations, licensing requirements for manufacturing and importation, data protection rules, and other regulatory requirements. This guide provides an overview of Thailand’s regulatory framework for pharmaceutical marketing authorization, including available registration pathways, review timelines, application fees, postmarketing surveillance obligations, licensing requirements, exemptions, data exclusivity, freedom of information, and parallel import considerations. It is intended as a practical reference for pharmaceutical companies, regulatory affairs professionals, and others involved in bringing medicinal products to the Thai market. Download the guide below for a concise overview of the current requirements and procedures governing pharmaceutical marketing authorization in Thailand.
June 24, 2026
Patent enablement requirements are provided under Article 102 of Vietnam’s Law on Intellectual Property (IP Law). In particular, a patent specification must “fully and clearly disclose the nature of the invention to such an extent that, based on the specification, a person having ordinary skill in the relevant art can implement the invention.” In pharmaceutical and biotechnology patents, this requirement is more complicated and subject to more rigorous assessment. The Patent Examination Guidelines (Guidelines) of the Intellectual Property Office of Vietnam (IP Office) were amended in March 2026 to introduce Annexes III and IV for the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors, in which Annex III provides detailed guidelines on the assessment of specification requirements. These amendments were made under a project for strengthening capacity in industrial property examination between the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) and the IP Office. Annex III provides detailed instructions on how examiners assess enablement in a pharmaceutical or biotechnology application, and offers examples of acceptable and unacceptable descriptions with regard to the enablement aspect. Enablement Requirements in Pharma and Biotech Patents Article 12.7 of Circular 10/2026/TT-BKHCN (Circular 10) adds to the requirements of Article 102 of the IP Law that the description must demonstrate the novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability of the technical solution. For pharmaceutical composition subject matters, Article 12.9 of Circular 10 sets out that the description must present the results of clinical trials and/or the pharmacological effects of the claimed pharmaceutical composition, and must include at least the following information: Substance/mixture used. Testing method (system) employed. Information on the test results. Correlation between the pharmacological effects obtained from the tests and the application of the pharmaceutical product in the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases. The Guidelines note that pharmacological study results should be presented in a quantified manner, and pharmacological