You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

August 21, 2017

Foreign Business Act: Relaxation of Restrictions on Representative Offices and Regional Offices in Thailand

Informed Counsel

In 2016, Thailand was listed as the 46th most favorable country in which to do business by the World Bank in its Ease of Doing Business  report. Thailand’s ranking—an improvement of three spots over its 2015 position—places the country third in Southeast Asia, indicating that Thailand has a strong competitive position vis-à-vis its neighbors.

Despite the strong ranking, the Thai government has publicly expressed its intention to do more to improve a variety of business mechanisms and legislation in a bid to further boost the Kingdom’s attractiveness to potential investors, as well as to stimulate both domestic and inbound investments.

Restrictions on Investment

The first barriers usually faced by potential foreign investors are the restrictions imposed under the Foreign Business Act B.E. 2542 (FBA). Enacted in 1999, the FBA plays a significant role in influencing inbound movements of foreign funds into Thailand, as it determines which activities are permissible for foreigners or majority foreign-owned companies that are registered in Thailand, whereby half, or more than half, of the shares are held by foreigners.

List 3 of the FBA identifies a number of businesses restricted to foreigners, including wholesale, retail, and engineering services, etc. List 3 (21) concludes with a broad catchall provision that restricts “other service businesses” as being an area in which Thai businesses are not yet ready to compete with foreign investors whether in terms of finance or technology.

Since the enactment of the FBA, the services undertaken by a representative office (REP) or a regional office (RO) have long been categorized as a “service business” under the catchall provision of List 3 (21). Along with other service businesses that are foreign or foreign majority-owned companies registered in Thailand, REPs and ROs were required to apply for and obtain a Foreign Business License (FBL) or a Foreign Business Certificate (FBC) prior to commencing any restricted activity under List 3 of the FBA.

Foreign investors have long questioned the reasoning behind these FBA requirements for REPs and ROs. Foreign investors often ask why the non-income-generating activities undertaken by REPs and ROs require a license application and compliance with certain license conditions (e.g., the requirement to bring minimum capital and transfer technology into Thailand). This requirement would seem to run counter to the very limited scope of activities undertaken by REPs and ROs, investors have argued.

Ministerial Regulations Lifting Restrictions

In recent years, the Thai government has taken steps to further liberalize the investment environment set out under the FBA. This has been accomplished through the issuance of Ministerial Regulations (MR) that exclude certain service businesses from List 3 (21) of the FBA, thus exempting them from the list’s restrictions.

A first wave of regulations, enacted in 2013, excluded businesses under Thailand’s securities and exchange law from the FBA list. In 2016, MR No. 2 excluded businesses under the financial institution business law, as well as life insurance and casualty insurance businesses, from the list.

Most recently, in June 2017, MR No. 3 amended MR No. 1 and No. 2 by removing REPs and ROs, as well as service businesses that have a government agency or a state enterprise as a counterparty under the budgetary law, from List 3 (21), exempting these businesses from foreign business licensing requirements. This addresses the long-held concern among foreign investors about why REPs and ROs were being included in the restricted business under List 3 (21).

As part of MR No. 3, the table below lists the scope of REP and RO activities that are exempt from FBL:

 

Activities Exempt from Foreign Business Act Requirements

 

Representative Office

Regional Office

  • Finding sources for the purchase of goods or services in Thailand for the head office and/or affiliates/subsidiaries of the head office.
  • Checking and controlling the quality and quantity of goods purchased or ordered to be manufactured in Thailand by the head office and/or affiliates/subsidiaries of the head office.
  • Providing advice and assistance related to goods of the head office and/or affiliates/subsidiaries of the head office which are sold to agents or consumers in Thailand.
  • Disseminating information concerning new goods or services of the head office and/or affiliates/subsidiaries of the head office.
  • Reporting on movements of businesses in Thailand to the head office and/or affiliates/subsidiaries of the head office.
  • Coordinating and supervising the operations of branches, and/or subsidiary companies in the same region, on behalf of the  head office.
  • Providing services to the head office’s branches and subsidiary companies, with such services including:
    • Consultation and management services;
    • Personnel training and development;
    • Financial management;
    • Control of marketing and sales promotion planning;
    • Product development; and
    • Research and development services.

 

It should be noted, however, that although REPs and ROS are no longer subject to an FBL, they must still prepare and maintain their books and accounts, and file audited financial statements with competent authorities within the prescribed period set by laws. REPs and ROs must also notify the Department of Business Development (DBD), Ministry of Commerce, to obtain a registration number for a juristic person before they commence activities in Thailand. This process is not complicated, and it takes only a few business days to obtain a certified document from the DBD. 

This relief for REPs and ROs could further encourage foreign investment in Thailand, because the proceedings required to be undertaken by foreign companies will become more streamlined and convenient. Despite these promising changes, however, foreign investors must still be aware of their continued obligation to obtain other required licenses from specific authorities before they are permitted to operate a service business in Thailand.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

April 22, 2026
A new decree in Vietnam brings significant implementation clarity to the country’s existing extended producer responsibility (EPR) legal framework. An EPR mechanism was first codified in Vietnam in the 2020 Law on Environmental Protection amid ongoing challenges surrounding the collection and treatment of product and packaging waste. The mechanism was progressively detailed through Decree No. 08/2022/ND‑CP and its successive amendments, but the regulatory framework remained insufficiently developed, notably in terms of support mechanisms for waste collection, recycling, and treatment. The newly launched regulations in Decree No. 110/2026/ND-CP (Decree 110), issued on April 1, 2026, and taking effect on May 25, 2026, stipulate fully and clearly the responsibility of manufacturers and importers to recycle products and packaging and to treat waste. Some key provisions of Decree 110 for manufacturers, importers, and related stakeholders are presented below. Subjects of EPR The Law on Environmental Protection assigns responsibility to manufacturers and importers for product and packaging recycling (under Article 54) or waste collection and treatment (under Article 55), depending on the type of products and packaging they produce or import. Decree 110 elaborates on these EPR provisions by specifying the responsible entities and listing out the types of products and packaging subject to recycling and waste treatment responsibilities. Decree 110 clarifies the responsible entities in special cases, such as when products under the same brand are made by multiple manufacturers, when there is a contract manufacturing or entrusted import relationship, and when the manufacturer or importer is part of a corporate group. Notably, exemptions may be applied in some scenarios, such as for manufacturers and importers of products and packaging exclusively for export, temporary import and re-export, or research and testing purposes, as well as for entities with annual revenue from related products not exceeding VND 30 billion. Recycling Responsibilities Decree 110
April 15, 2026
On March 31, 2026, Vietnam’s government issued Decree 102/2026/ND-CP (Decree 102), which amends Decree 75/2019/ND-CP on administrative sanctions for competition law violations (Decree 75). Effective from May 20, 2026, the new decree introduces a number of significant changes aimed at strengthening enforcement, revising penalty structures, and broadening the range of remedial measures, primarily for violations related to economic concentration. Revised Penalties for Economic Concentration Violations Decree 102 significantly revises the penalties for violations related to economic concentration. Failure to notify an economic concentration; implementing an economic concentration before clearance Under the new framework, Articles 14 and 15 of Decree 75 have been amended to impose a range of monetary fines, rather than relying solely on percentage‑based penalties as under the previous regime, for violations involving the failure to notify an economic concentration or the implementation of an economic concentration prior to clearance. The fines range from VND 500 million to VND 1 billion for each enterprise participating in a concentration with combined assets, revenues, or purchase value below VND 3,000 billion in the preceding fiscal year, capped at 5% of the violating enterprise’s total turnover in the relevant market. For concentrations meeting or exceeding the VND 3,000 billion threshold across those same metrics, the fines increase to VND 1 billion to VND 2 billion per enterprise, also subject to the 5% cap. These differentiated thresholds allow penalties to better reflect the size of the transaction and its potential competitive impact. Non-compliance with conditional approvals Enterprises that do not implement or only partially implement the conditions specified in a conditional economic concentration approval decision face fines ranging from 1% to 3% of total turnover in the relevant market during the fiscal year preceding the violation. Decree 102 also adds a new remedial measure requiring enterprises to fully implement all conditions
March 31, 2026
Against the backdrop of Vietnam’s rapid economic and technological transformation and its ambition to build a knowledge-driven economy, the National Assembly of Vietnam adopted Law on Higher Education No. 125/2025/QH15 on December 10, 2025, The new law took effect on January 1, 2026, replacing Law on Higher Education No. 08/2012/QH13 of 2012 and its subsequent amendments after more than a decade of implementation. The new law reflects a significant policy shift toward enhancing the institutional autonomy of higher education institutions (“HEIs”)—universities and other university-level institutions. By granting broader autonomy, Vietnam aims to enable HEIs to operate more proactively, better respond to market needs, and improve the quality and efficiency of education and research activities. Comprehensive Institutional Autonomy in HEIs The new law marks a significant shift by granting HEIs comprehensive autonomy as a statutory right, within the bounds of the licensed scope of educational operation and the legal framework, rather than a conditional right as provided under the former law. Under the new law, HEIs are empowered to exercise autonomy over their academic expertise, training, scientific research, international cooperation, organizational structure, personnel, finance, and other higher education activities. The expansion of institutional autonomy is also accompanied by a correspondingly strengthened framework of institutional accountability. However, Vietnam maintains a certain degree of control and imposes restrictions on institutional autonomy in sensitive and strategically important areas. These controls and restrictions include limitations on training autonomy in the majors of teacher training, national defense, and security; and restrictions on financial and personnel management autonomy for HEIs under the administration of the Ministry of National Defense and the Ministry of Public Security. New Model for Curriculum Development The new law removes the concept of “opening a training major” and focuses regulation on how training programs are developed and delivered. Under the previous regime,
March 31, 2026
Thailand’s Department of Business Development (DBD) has issued a regulation imposing additional requirements for amending a company’s directors and signatory power to designate a foreign national as an authorized signatory of the company. This measure, effective April 1, 2026, has been introduced in response to the widespread use of Thai nationals as nominees to conduct business on behalf of foreigners, a practice considered to have an adverse impact on the country’s economic stability and security. The new measures are particularly concerned with changes to the authorized signatory structure of companies that originally had only Thai directors authorized to sign for and bind the company. Under the new rules, any amendment that results in a foreign national becoming an authorized signatory—whether solely or jointly—for such a company will be subject to additional verification. Directors signing an application to register such an amendment to the company’s authorized signatory structure are now also required to provide a statement confirming that all shareholders of the company have made genuine contributions and no Thai national has assisted with, supported, or participated in business activities in a nominee capacity. Implications Companies intending to appoint foreign directors as authorized signatories should be aware of the increased regulatory requirements and assessments. Additional documentation and confirmations may be required as part of the registration process.