You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

June 20, 2024

Forced Labor and Supply Chain Due Diligence in Southeast Asia

Subscribe to Updates

“Forced labor” has many incarnations. Some forms are shocking, such as a case in 2021 where Vietnamese guest workers were brought to a Chinese-owned factory in Serbia that manufactured tires sold to European car companies. The guest workers allegedly had their passports taken away and were subjected to horrible living conditions, including a lack of food, forcing them to resort to hunting small animals in the nearby forest to survive. However, forced labor more often takes subtler forms, so that most people do not even recognize it as such. For example, a factory may receive an order with an extremely short production deadline, and the workers are instructed to work overtime hours. If the employees refuse to do so and stop working when their regular shift ends, they receive warning letters the next day. While less shocking than the situation of the guest workers forced to hunt squirrels to survive, it is also forced labor.

ILO Convention No. 29 on Forced Labor defines forced labor as “all work or service…extracted from any person under the menace of any penalty and for which the said person has not offered…[them]self voluntarily.” The ILO names 11 indicators of forced labor: abuse of vulnerability, deception; restriction of movement, isolation, physical/sexual violence, intimidation and threats, retention of identity documents, withholding of wages, debt bondage, abusive working or living conditions, and excessive overtime.

Excessive overtime in particular is common in the manufacturing sector in Southeast Asia, and debt bondage is also prevalent. Some companies demand employees provide a “training deposit” when they commence their employment, which they will have repaid provided they continue working for a minimum period. However, these common practices may soon be eradicated due to new supply chain due diligence legislation. Two such examples demonstrating this greater focus on forced labor within supply chains are the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) in the US and the Forced Labor Regulation in the EU.

The UFLPA

The Xinjiang region of China has been subject to scrutiny due to the government’s practice of applying poverty alleviation and employment programs aimed at the Uyghur minority, which many human rights groups claim involve forced labor. In response to this, the US government enacted the UFLPA in 2021, and the law went into effect in June 2022. Under the UFLPA, products with any components or production originating in the Xinjiang region, or sourced from an entity blacklisted under the UFLPA, are subject to a rebuttable presumption that forced labor was used in their supply chain and are banned from import into the US. To rebut this presumption, the importer of the relevant product must provide extensive evidence that no forced labor was present at any stage of its supply chain.

The UFLPA is not a paper tiger, and has been actively enforced by the US Customs and Border Patrol. This active enforcement has significantly impacted Vietnam. Of garment exporters, Vietnam has been the most significantly impacted by the UFLPA to date, surpassing even China. This appears to be because many of Vietnam’s garment manufacturing plants are Chinese-owned, and 90% of China’s cotton supply is sourced from Xinjiang. Thus, garments manufactured in Vietnam are subject to strict scrutiny from the US Customs and Border Patrol. In general, Vietnam’s close trade relationship with China has resulted in many of its products being denied import into the US due to suspicion of these products having links to the Xinjiang region. Vietnam has the highest volume of shipments by value denied entry into the US under the UFLPA.

The implementation of the UFLPA compels manufacturers in Asia wishing to import their products into the US to map their supply chains. There are two different routes an importer may take to ensure its goods are not barred from entry into the US under the UFLPA: (1) for products with no links to the Xinjiang region, provide evidence that the product has no inputs sourced from the Xinjiang region, which requires tracing the entire supply chain with detailed evidence for each tier of the supply chain; or (2) for products that include components sourced from the Xinjiang region, map the entire supply chain and provide information on due diligence, supply chain management measures, and workers and working conditions at each stage of the supply chain, resulting in clear and persuasive evidence that there is no forced labor in the supply chain. Companies engaging in manufacturing garments or other sensitive products, such as solar panels (half of the world’s polysilicon, which is used in 95% of all solar panels, is sourced from Xinjiang), may have no choice but to map their entire supply chains to avoid having their products denied entry into the US.

The Forced Labor Regulation

The EU’s Forced Labor Regulation may also make supply chain mapping a necessary aspect of manufacturing in Southeast Asia. On April 23, 2024, the European Parliament approved the Forced Labor Regulation, and it now needs to receive final formal approval from the European Council (expected in the third quarter of 2024). It will take effect three years after it passes into law, so it is anticipated to be effective from 2027 onward.

The Forced Labor Regulation similarly casts a wide net and applies to all industry sectors, products, and economic operators. Products with forced labor at any stage in their supply chain will be banned from import into the EU. However, unlike the UFLPA, it does not apply a rebuttable presumption that forced labor was used based on a product’s geographic origin. Instead, the competent authority—either the national authority of the EU country where the forced labor allegedly took place, or the European Commission, which will investigate forced labor cases outside of the EU—bears the burden of establishing that forced labor was used in producing the goods.

Over the next 18 months or so, the EU Commission will provide guidelines on assessing the likelihood of a product being made with forced labor and will draw up a database of specific economic sectors in specific geographical areas in which state-imposed forced labor exists. (For example, the renewable energy sector in the Xinjiang region may be considered a high-risk area.) This will then become a criterion to assess the need to open an investigation. At the same time, the European Commission will issue directions to economic operators outlining their due diligence obligations and requiring additional information for high-risk products, such as the products’ suppliers and manufacturers.

The effectiveness of the Forced Labor Regulation may largely depend upon the EU Commission’s ability to conduct investigations outside of the EU. The EU has created the Union Network against Forced Labor Products to facilitate communication and information-sharing among foreign countries, intended to build cooperation with foreign countries through existing dialogues or implementing trade agreements. However, under the principles of sovereignty, any third-party country would have to consent to the European Commission’s investigation—but would likely have strong economic incentives to deny this consent, as welcoming an investigation into forced labor could result in major industries having their exports to the EU denied.

Conclusion

The UFLPA is actively enforced and is changing the way manufacturers do business in Southeast Asia. Now supply chain tracing is essential, and manufacturers are also assessing labor law compliance not only within their own operations but also within those of their suppliers. The EU’s new Forced Labor Regulation, though possibly less enforceable than the UFLPA, will also encourage companies to pay greater attention to labor standards within their supply chains. Issues that have long been ignored, such as excessive overtime, will now need to be addressed. Some industries may be reshaped by these new laws; for example, fast fashion may need to slow down if the excessive overtime necessary to meet short production deadlines results in their products being barred from the EU or the US.

Hopefully these new laws will foster conditions in which it is no longer economically profitable to strand guest workers in a foreign country, deprive them of food, and force them to work under atrocious conditions in order to manufacture car tires at a cheaper price. Under these conditions, maintaining good labor standards will no longer be viewed by businesses as a luxury or a useful PR tool; instead, it will become essential to accessing major consumer markets.

Related Professionals

Practices

Employment

Locations

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

March 27, 2024
Cambodia’s Ministry of Labor and Vocational Training issued the Notification on the Compensation for Terminating an Employment Contract on March 21, 2024, clarifying the compensation due to employees upon the termination of their employment contracts. The notification outlines different requirements depending on the nature of the termination and the type of employment contract, as laid out below. Termination without Valid Reason and in Absence of Serious Misconduct If an employment contract has been terminated by an employer without a valid reason and the employee did not commit any serious misconduct as defined under the relevant article of the Labor Law, the employer must compensate the employee as follows: Fixed-Duration Contract: Wages that have not yet been paid; Unused and unpaid annual leave through the termination date; Severance payment equal to at least 5% of the wages paid to the employee during the length of the contract; and Damages for being laid off before the expiration date of the fixed-duration contract, at least equal to the wages the employee would have received had he or she completed the original contracted term of employment. Unspecified-Duration Contract: Wages that have not yet been paid; Unused and unpaid annual leave through the termination date; Compensation in lieu of notice if the employer did not give prior notice in accordance with the Labor Law; Seniority indemnity for the semester that the employee is terminated and total seniority back payments that have not been paid; and Damages for being laid off, in an amount equal to the seniority payment received during the employment contract. Termination in Cases of Serious Misconduct Employees who commit any serious misconduct as defined under the Labor Law (regardless of whether they are under a fixed-duration or unspecified-duration contract) are entitled only to the following compensation: Wages that have not yet
Read More
March 18, 2024
Lawyers from Tilleke & Gibbins’ labor and employment team have contributed a new Vietnam chapter to Thomson Reuters Practical Law’s Employment and Employee Benefits Global Guide. The guide provides a high-level comparative overview of employment laws and regulations across various jurisdictions around the world. Tilleke & Gibbins also contributed the Myanmar chapter of the guide. The Vietnam chapter covers a wide range of typical employment matters, such as limitations on working hours, paid leave requirements, minimum wage, and health and safety obligations. In addition, the guide provides insight on a number of topics of special interest to foreign investors doing business in Vietnam, including the following: Mandatory contents of a labor contract; Visas and permits required for expatriate employees; Employers’ obligations for protecting employees’ privacy and personal data; Procedural requirements for the dismissal of an employee; Employer and parent company liability. To view the latest version of Employment and Employee Benefits, please visit the Practical Law website and enroll in the free Practical Law trial to gain full access.
Read More
February 28, 2024
The Myanmar Investment Commission (MIC) has announced the opening of the trial period for MIC-permitted or MIC-endorsed companies to reenter investment data for using the Myanmar Investment Online (MyInO) system. The trial period is open until June 30, 2024. The MyInO system allows for the submission and recordal of applications for investment under the Myanmar Investment Law. With the implementation of phase 2 from September 1, 2023, applications for the appointment or resignation of foreign experts and employees within MIC-permitted or MIC-endorsed companies can now be submitted manually or through the Investment Monitoring System available on MyInO. To initiate the application process in MyInO, applicants are required to create an account on the platform. Subsequently, companies holding an MIC permit or endorsement must reenter all investment-related data since the obtaining of the relevant permits/endorsements, in compliance with the announcement. Following this data update, applications can be filed through MyInO. After this trial period, the submission of applications for appointments will be available online. The benefit of using MyInO to submit a foreign expert or employee appointment or resignation application is that the application can be submitted within 30 days of the foreign expert’s arrival in Myanmar. In contrast, hard copy applications must be submitted within seven working days of arrival. According to the Myanmar Investment Law, a foreign expert is one who qualifies as a senior manager, technical or operational expert, or advisor in permitted or endorsed companies within Myanmar. For assistance with completing the investment data reentry process or filing applications for appointment or resignation of foreign experts or employees, or for further details on any aspect of the Investment Monitoring System under MyInO, please contact Tilleke & Gibbins at [email protected].
Read More
February 9, 2024
Tilleke & Gibbins employment specialists in Myanmar have contributed an updated Employment and Employee Benefits in Myanmar overview for Thomson Reuters Practical Law, an online publication that provides an overview of employment and employee benefits in jurisdictions worldwide. The Myanmar overview was written by members of Tilleke & Gibbins’ Yangon office, including Yuwadee Thean-ngarm, director; Nwe Oo, senior associate; and Kyaw Min Tun, associate. The chapter covers a wide range of key employment topics, including employment status, background checks, regulation of the employment relationship, minimum wage, working hours and holidays, illness and injury of employees, discrimination and harassment, termination of employment, resolution of employer-employee disputes, redundancy/layoffs, employee representation and consultation, business transfer and insolvency, employee relocation, health and safety obligations, taxation of employment income, intellectual property issues, and more. Practical Law, one of the many legal reference resources from Thomson Reuters, publishes a wide range of guides for hundreds of jurisdictions and practice areas. The Employment and Employee Benefits Global Guide covers 44 jurisdictions around the world, with Tilleke & Gibbins also providing the Vietnam chapter of the guide. To view the latest version of the Employment and Employee Benefits in Myanmar overview, please visit the Practical Law website and enroll in the free Practical Law trial to gain full access.
Read More