You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

March 9, 2012

Food Registration with the Thai FDA: Overcoming Pitfalls

Subscribe to Updates
Bangkok Post, Corporate Counsellor Column

With its diverse range of consumers seeking both traditional wares and more modern Western-influenced products, Thailand, like Vietnam and many other Asean countries, has become a hugely attractive and a lucrative market for foreign and local food manufacturers alike.

But for foreign companies that want to import products into Thailand, their first interaction with the Thai Food and Drug Administration (FDA) too often ends with a firm rebuttal, as their products are rejected for registration or they face significant delays. This is especially true if the food and drug regulators in the countries they are used to dealing with lack a strong pre-marketing review system but instead rely only on a post-marketing process to protect consumers in the event of product liability lawsuits, such as the US.

Although these FDA obstacles can be frustrating, companies can achieve success by familiarizing themselves with Thai FDA practices and preparing for potential pitfalls.

New Food Ingredients

Prior to starting the registration process for a food product, a company must first determine whether all its ingredients have already been approved by the Thai FDA. An ingredient that is commonly registered in another country may not necessarily have been registered with the FDA.

For new ingredients, the FDA will request additional supporting documents. For example, a product used in food consumption must be able to show a history of use for more than 15 years in a foreign country and/or safety data.

Companies need to make strategic decisions about whether to retain the new food ingredient in a formula. On the one hand, the new ingredient can be helpful in differentiating the product from competitors, but on the other hand companies face an extended registration process when new ingredients are included.

Misclassification of Food

Companies often have a misconception that if their products are classified and registered in a certain category in a country such as Singapore, then they would fall into the same category in Thailand. This is not necessarily the case. Prior to FDA submission, an applicant must be fully aware of: (1) the ingredient list for its products; (2) the source of the ingredients; (3) the manufacturing process; (4) the objectives of use; and (5) the targeted consumer group. These factors will allow the company to:

  • Preliminarily classify the product; and
  • Assist in answering registration questions from the Thai FDA.

Misclassifying the product will delay the registration process, because companies are not permitted to transfer a dossier from one category to another. If a category change needs to be made, then the company must restart the application.

Requirements differ from one category to another. For example, if you misclassify a dietary supplement in the food supplement category, which does not require any analysis, when it is in fact a beverage in a sealed container, then this would mean additional documents and a detailed analysis are required. This causes further delays.

These delays can be avoided by carefully preparing and reviewing product ingredients and information before considering the classification.

Preparing Your Dossier Carefully

Asean lacks a system for harmonization of food products, and thus the product dossier requirements differ between member countries. In addition, some other countries, including the US, do not necessarily issue the same types of documents required by the Thai FDA.

The Thai FDA conducts a careful substantive examination of the documents provided, and any discrepancies will further delay the registration process. Companies should ensure that all documents, as requested by the FDA, are complete and consistent. If some documents are unavailable, then be prepared to provide a suitable response to the FDA.

Health Claims on Labels

The Thai FDA takes a stricter approach to claims on labels than in other countries, including the US. For example, the Thai FDA permits nutrition claims if appropriate analysis is conducted. However, health claims—that is, claims relating to benefits, efficacies and functions of the product—are forbidden.

Foreign companies perceive the Thai FDA interpretation as very strict, as it requires a complete amendment of their labels when they are designed abroad. In some cases, however, it is worth negotiating with the FDA, as its officials are willing to learn from industry specialists. It is important for industries to work closely with the FDA in providing assistance on how to differentiate between health claims, slogans and other advertising statements.

Regional Market

Food manufacturers and importers should no longer view Thailand as a stand-alone market when targeting it for their products, but rather part of the overall Asean Economic Community that is due to take effect in 2015. Using this approach, companies can maximize efficiency by planning to register their products across several Asean countries.

Understanding the mechanisms adopted by local Asean FDAs may appear cumbersome, but with assistance from technical experts any company can enjoy a smooth product launch and reap the considerable benefits offered by the increased integration of Asean markets.

Download Full Article
Related Professionals

Industries

Life Sciences

Practices

Regulatory Affairs

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

January 5, 2026
On December 31, 2025, Vietnam’s Ministry of Health (MOH) issued Circular No. 57/2025/TT-BYT providing guidance on the classification of medical devices according to technical standards and quality requirements (Circular 57), applicable to procurement activities for medical devices in Vietnam. According to the MOH, the purpose of the classification is to establish a principle-based legal framework and regulations that enable purchasers to easily identify groups of medical devices aligned with their professional requirements and financial capacity. Some of the key stipulations of Circular 57 are outlined below. Basis for Determining Technical Standards and Quality Under Circular 57, the technical standards of medical devices are determined in accordance with Vietnamese laws on standards and technical regulations, through the following means: Certification of conformity with standards in accordance with Vietnamese laws on standards and technical regulations; Results of conformity assessment conducted by an internationally recognized conformity assessment organization or a legally established domestic or foreign conformity assessment organization operating in Vietnam; and Documentation evidencing compliance provided by the medical device owner. The quality of medical devices is determined based on whether the device has been approved for circulation by the relevant marketing authority of one or more jurisdictions. Classification of Medical Devices Circular 57 classifies medical devices into six groups (from Group 1 to Group 6) based on technical standards and quality. Medical devices subject to classification must simultaneously meet technical standards and quality requirements in accordance with professional specifications and user needs, and must be lawfully marketed in Vietnam. Medical devices manufactured in Vietnam may participate in all corresponding groups, provided they meet the technical standards required by the user and are lawfully marketed in Vietnam. Outlook Circular No. 57 will take effect on February 15, 2026, while the classification requirements will become effective on January 1, 2027. Holders of medical
Read More
December 30, 2025
The Intellectual Property Office of Vietnam (IP Office), with support from the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), is drafting additional annexes to its Guidelines for Patent Examination, focusing on the examination of patent applications in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors. The new annexes are expected to be officially issued in early 2026 as Annexes III and IV, following the successful issuance in 2023 of Annexes I and II addressing computer program-related inventions. The IP Office recently organized a seminar to gather feedback on the draft annexes from intellectual property representatives, academic institutions, research institutes, and other interested parties, emphasizing its intention to receive further constructive opinions to refine the guidelines for pharmaceuticals and biotechnology. Why These Guidelines Matter Patent examination in Vietnam has traditionally relied on the Guidelines for Patent Examination issued under Decision No. 487/QD-SHTT (2010), recently supplemented by Annexes I and II. While these documents provide a solid foundation, they do not fully address practical challenges in examining pharmaceutical and biotech inventions, particularly issues related to clarity, sufficiency of disclosure, enablement, features of function and utility, combination therapies, and inventions involving artificial intelligence (AI) applications in these fields. Annexes III and IV aim to close these gaps by introducing structured principles and illustrative examples. Guidance on Patent Specification Requirements Annex III provides detailed guidance on the requirements for patent specifications in pharmaceuticals and biotechnology, covering two main parts: Part A addresses sufficiency of disclosure, clarity of specifications, and consistency between claims and descriptions. Part B covers inventions related to Markush-type compounds, claims containing exclusion statements (disclaimers), and additional experimental data submitted during examination. The Guidelines outline specific disclosure requirements for subject matters such as compounds, formulations, pharmaceutical compositions, genes, polypeptides, proteins, vectors, transgenic organisms, modified organisms, and hybrid cells. Annex III emphasizes that disclaimers are not accepted
Read More
November 25, 2025
Food safety incidents can emerge without warning, requiring businesses to act swiftly to protect consumers and comply with regulatory obligations. Across Southeast Asia, Thailand, Vietnam, and Indonesia have each developed comprehensive food recall frameworks designed to ensure rapid removal of unsafe products from the market while holding businesses accountable for compliance failures. While these three jurisdictions share common objectives—protecting public health and ensuring food safety—each has crafted distinct regulatory approaches reflecting their unique administrative structures, enforcement priorities, and legal traditions. Understanding these differences is essential for food businesses operating in the region, as recall procedures, timelines, reporting requirements, and penalties vary significantly across borders. This guide, available through the button below, examines the food recall regulations in Indonesia, Thailand, and Vietnam, providing practical guidance on legal requirements, procedural steps, and compliance obligations in each market.
Read More