You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

March 9, 2012

Food Registration with the Thai FDA: Overcoming Pitfalls

Bangkok Post, Corporate Counsellor Column

With its diverse range of consumers seeking both traditional wares and more modern Western-influenced products, Thailand, like Vietnam and many other Asean countries, has become a hugely attractive and a lucrative market for foreign and local food manufacturers alike.

But for foreign companies that want to import products into Thailand, their first interaction with the Thai Food and Drug Administration (FDA) too often ends with a firm rebuttal, as their products are rejected for registration or they face significant delays. This is especially true if the food and drug regulators in the countries they are used to dealing with lack a strong pre-marketing review system but instead rely only on a post-marketing process to protect consumers in the event of product liability lawsuits, such as the US.

Although these FDA obstacles can be frustrating, companies can achieve success by familiarizing themselves with Thai FDA practices and preparing for potential pitfalls.

New Food Ingredients

Prior to starting the registration process for a food product, a company must first determine whether all its ingredients have already been approved by the Thai FDA. An ingredient that is commonly registered in another country may not necessarily have been registered with the FDA.

For new ingredients, the FDA will request additional supporting documents. For example, a product used in food consumption must be able to show a history of use for more than 15 years in a foreign country and/or safety data.

Companies need to make strategic decisions about whether to retain the new food ingredient in a formula. On the one hand, the new ingredient can be helpful in differentiating the product from competitors, but on the other hand companies face an extended registration process when new ingredients are included.

Misclassification of Food

Companies often have a misconception that if their products are classified and registered in a certain category in a country such as Singapore, then they would fall into the same category in Thailand. This is not necessarily the case. Prior to FDA submission, an applicant must be fully aware of: (1) the ingredient list for its products; (2) the source of the ingredients; (3) the manufacturing process; (4) the objectives of use; and (5) the targeted consumer group. These factors will allow the company to:

  • Preliminarily classify the product; and
  • Assist in answering registration questions from the Thai FDA.

Misclassifying the product will delay the registration process, because companies are not permitted to transfer a dossier from one category to another. If a category change needs to be made, then the company must restart the application.

Requirements differ from one category to another. For example, if you misclassify a dietary supplement in the food supplement category, which does not require any analysis, when it is in fact a beverage in a sealed container, then this would mean additional documents and a detailed analysis are required. This causes further delays.

These delays can be avoided by carefully preparing and reviewing product ingredients and information before considering the classification.

Preparing Your Dossier Carefully

Asean lacks a system for harmonization of food products, and thus the product dossier requirements differ between member countries. In addition, some other countries, including the US, do not necessarily issue the same types of documents required by the Thai FDA.

The Thai FDA conducts a careful substantive examination of the documents provided, and any discrepancies will further delay the registration process. Companies should ensure that all documents, as requested by the FDA, are complete and consistent. If some documents are unavailable, then be prepared to provide a suitable response to the FDA.

Health Claims on Labels

The Thai FDA takes a stricter approach to claims on labels than in other countries, including the US. For example, the Thai FDA permits nutrition claims if appropriate analysis is conducted. However, health claims—that is, claims relating to benefits, efficacies and functions of the product—are forbidden.

Foreign companies perceive the Thai FDA interpretation as very strict, as it requires a complete amendment of their labels when they are designed abroad. In some cases, however, it is worth negotiating with the FDA, as its officials are willing to learn from industry specialists. It is important for industries to work closely with the FDA in providing assistance on how to differentiate between health claims, slogans and other advertising statements.

Regional Market

Food manufacturers and importers should no longer view Thailand as a stand-alone market when targeting it for their products, but rather part of the overall Asean Economic Community that is due to take effect in 2015. Using this approach, companies can maximize efficiency by planning to register their products across several Asean countries.

Understanding the mechanisms adopted by local Asean FDAs may appear cumbersome, but with assistance from technical experts any company can enjoy a smooth product launch and reap the considerable benefits offered by the increased integration of Asean markets.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

February 21, 2023
On December 28, 2022, the Ministry of Health of Laos issued Decision No. 3789/MOH on the Control of Hemp for Medication and Products (the “Decision”). The Decision approves the regulated cultivation, extraction, production, processing, storage, distribution, utilization, import-export, and transport of hemp. The Decision also authorizes the use of hemp and hemp-related products by the general population, although use of certain products is limited to those with medical prescriptions. Background In 2019, the Lao government established an ad hoc committee to consider the legalization of cannabis, as reported previously. The government permitted certain local companies to grow cannabis in specific zones under pilot programs, although it continued to strictly prohibit the use and commercialization, as well as consumption, of cannabis-related products, regardless of the level of psychoactive tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in the products. Overview of the Decision The Decision was issued by the Ministry of Health (which led the ad hoc committee) and permits authorized companies to engage in certain activities involving the use of hemp and the consumption of hemp and hemp-related products. The Decision defines hemp (“porkeo” in Lao) as a “plant that belongs to the same family as ganja and bears the scientific name Cannabis Sativa L. (Cannabis sativa L. subsp. sativa var. sativa) which is a subspecies of ganja (Cannabis Sativa L.).” This definition aims at differentiating hemp from the general definition of ganja or marijuana, which continues to be listed as a prohibited narcotic in Laos. The Law on Narcotics (2007) and the Penal Code (2017) still prohibit the production, trade and use of all types of cannabis. These laws will need to be amended to ensure that they are aligned with changes set out in the Decision.  Authorized Hemp Activities The Decision allows approved companies to engage in the cultivation, extraction, production, processing, storage,
February 9, 2023
Vietnam’s Ministry of Finance is drafting a circular on determining the origin of imported and exported goods. This circular, a draft version of which has been released for public comment (“Draft Circular”), consolidates prevailing regulations and guidelines on determining the origin of imported and exported goods that are stipulated in the following legal documents, which the Draft Circular would replace when it comes into effect: Circular No. 38/2018/TT-BTC dated April 20, 2018, of the Ministry of Finance regulating the determination of origin of imported and exported goods, as amended by Circular No. 62/2019/TT-BTC dated September 5, 2019, of the Ministry of Finance; Circular No. 47/2020/TT-BTC dated May 27, 2020, regulating the time to submit documents proving the origin of goods and form of the documents proving the origin of imported goods applied during the Covid-19 pandemic; and Circular No. 07/2021/TT-BTC dated January 25, 2021, regulating the time to submit documents proving the origin of imported goods under the EU-Vietnam Free Trade Agreement (EVFTA). Generally speaking, the Draft Circular does not increase the administrative procedures for importers and exporters, but rather seeks to codify the recent practices implemented by the customs authorities. The Draft Circular focuses on providing comprehensive guidance for importing/exporting companies when carrying out administrative procedures to certify the origins of imported and exported goods to be in line with current trade practices and international commitments under new-generation free trade agreements. In particular, the Draft Circular supplements guidelines on declaring origins and submitting Certificates of Origin (C/Os) of imported goods under the EVFTA and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (RCEP). The Draft Circular also provides some new guidelines to facilitate exports (and imports) and overcome some obstacles and issues when implementing the prevailing regulations. For example, the submission of C/Os online, which was only applicable during the
January 27, 2023
The opening weeks of 2023 have already seen a sharp increase in enforcement against violations of product labeling and advertising rules in Cambodia, in line with a notice issued by the country’s Directorate-General for Consumer Protection, Competition, and Fraud Repression (CCF) last year. Since the Law on Consumer Protection was adopted in 2019, a major legislative push has been seen, with general rules coming out focusing on providing consumers with sufficient information on products and services, for example via product labeling or advertising rules. Then, more detailed regulations were adopted for specific product categories, for example for food products and cosmetics. Khmer language requirements have been a key feature of the recently adopted rules on advertising and labeling. Despite the Khmer language mandates in consumer protection laws and regulations, enforcement and compliance was low. Most products on the market—especially imports—did not comply with the language requirement. In line with the revamped regulatory framework, the CCF has increased its enforcement, enabled by recent substantial budget increases. They have adopted clear implementing regulations for their officers to enforce in a practical yet effective manner, and they have been issuing notices reminding companies to comply with the new rules. A September 2022 notice announced that increased CCF enforcement of product labeling rules would start on January 1, 2023. As noted above, this has already proven to be true, and enforcement is now proceeding in earnest. Companies should take heed of this notice and ensure compliance with the Khmer language requirements (detailed below), as the CCF has shown that it readily acts against violators, from small retailers to large conglomerates. Khmer Language Requirement A sub-decree issued November 4, 2022 requires all commercial advertising of products and services—by any channel—to use Khmer as the primary language. If foreign-language text is used in advertisements, it
January 10, 2023
On January 9, 2023, Vietnam’s National Assembly voted to approve a draft resolution on the continued implementation of policies for the prevention and control of the Covid-19 pandemic. Under this resolution, marketing authorizations (MAs) for the following drugs and medicinal ingredients will be extended to December 31, 2024, allowing continued use in Vietnam: Drugs and medicinal ingredients whose MAs expire from January 1, 2023, to December 12, 2024, and whose extension dossiers have been submitted but have not yet been approved in accordance with the Law on Pharmacy; and Drugs and medicinal ingredients whose MAs have been extended as per Resolution No. 12/2021/UBTVQH15 and have not been extended in accordance with the Law on Pharmacy. The extension does not apply to the following cases: Drugs and medicinal ingredients that have been recalled by the Law on Pharmacy; Drugs with signs of being unsafe for users that have been suspended from circulation/use and sealed for preservation in accordance with the Law on Pharmacy; and Drugs with MAs having a validity term of three years in accordance with the Law on Pharmacy. The Ministry of Health will announce the list of drugs and medicinal ingredients whose MAs are subject to be extended as described above.