You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

June 30, 2022

First Set of Subordinate Regulations Enacted for Thailand’s PDPA

Subscribe to Updates

Thailand’s Personal Data Protection Act B.E. 2562 (2019) (PDPA) became fully effective and enforceable on June 1, 2022. To ensure that the PDPA will be smoothly and efficiently enforced, the Personal Data Protection Commission (PDPC) is issuing various subordinate regulations. On June 20, 2022, the first set of these regulations was issued and published in the Government Gazette, and according to the Ministry of Digital Economy and Society (MDES), another set of subordinate regulations is expected to be issued by the end of June 2022.

The first set consists of the following four subordinate regulations:

 

1) Notification of the PDPC Re: Exemption to the Record of Processing Activities Requirement for Data Controllers that Are Small Businesses B.E. 2565 (2022) (“ROPA Exemption Notification”)

Under the PDPA, data controllers are obligated to prepare and maintain a record of processing activities (ROPA) containing information specified in Section 39 of the PDPA, including the personal data collected, the purposes of the processing of the personal data, the retention period, etc.

However, under this ROPA Exemption Notification, a data controller will be exempted from the obligation to prepare and maintain a record of such required information (except information related to the rejection of a request from a data subject to exercise (i) right of access; (ii) right to data portability; (iii) right to object; and (iv) right to rectification), if its business falls within the scope of any of the following:

  • Small or medium-sized business according to the law on small and medium-sized enterprise promotion, defined as follows:

  • Community enterprise or social enterprise, as referred to under the law on community enterprise promotion.
  • Social enterprise, as referred to under the under the law on social enterprise promotion.
  • Cooperative, cooperative union, or agriculturist’s group under the law on cooperatives.
  • Foundation, association, religious body, or non-profit organization.
  • Household business or other business of the same nature.
  • Internet cafe service provider.

This exemption will not apply to small businesses in certain circumstances, such as when the processing of personal data is required by law related to a computer crime to retain computer traffic data, when it involves personal data having a risk of affecting the rights and freedom of an individual, or when the data controller processes the personal data on a regular basis.

The ROPA Exemption Notification came into force on June 21, 2022.

 

2) Notification of the PDPC Re: Rules and Procedures for the Preparation and Maintenance of the Record of Processing Activities by the Data Processor B.E. 2565 (2022) (“Data Processor Notification”)

The PDPA also imposes an obligation on data processors to prepare and maintain a ROPA, without further explanation. With the enactment of the Data Processor Notification, it is now clear that the data processor must ensure that its ROPA will include at least the following information:

  • Information on the data processor;
  • Information on the local representative of the data processor (if any);
  • Information on and contact details of the data protection officer (if any);
  • Information on the data controller on whose behalf or pursuant to whose instruction the data processor acts, and on the local representative of the data controller (if any);
  • Types or characteristics of the collection, use, or disclosure of personal data conducted by the data processor on behalf of or pursuant to the instruction of the data controller, including the category of personal data and purpose of the collection, use, or disclosure;
  • If personal data is transferred outside of Thailand, the category of the person or entity receiving the personal data; and
  • A description of the security measures implemented by the data processor.

The ROPA must be maintained in written or electronic form, and must be easily accessible and promptly available for inspection by the Office of the PDPC, the data controller, or their designated person, when requested.

The Data Processor Notification will only become enforceable 180 days after the date of publication in the Government Gazette, i.e., December 17, 2022. Therefore, data processors are given a grace period to prepare themselves to be in compliance with this ROPA requirement.

 

3) Notification of the PDPC Re: Security Measures of the Data Controller B.E. 2565 (2022) (“Security Measures Notification”)

The minimum required security standards prescribed by the Security Measures Notification are generally in alignment with the previous Notification of the MDES on Security Measures which ceased effectiveness on May 31, 2022 (“MDES Notification”). Data controllers who have prepared themselves to be in compliance with the MDES Notification will therefore find it easy to comply with the Security Measures Notification, which took effect on June 21, 2022.

The key requirements under the Security Measures Notification include the following:

  • Data controllers must ensure that security measures will be applied to personal data in any form whatsoever.
  • Data controllers must ensure that security measures consist of appropriate organizational measures and technical measures, which may also include physical measures, if necessary, whereby the level of risk and possibility of occurrence of data breach incidents and the consequences of data breach incidents are taken into consideration.
  • When preparing the security measures, the data controller must consider the identification of possible risk to significant information assets, prevention of the occurrence of significant risk, monitoring of threats and data breach incidents, encounters with threats and data breach incidents, risk treatment, and recovery, as appropriate and in accordance with the level of risk.
  • Data controllers must be able to maintain the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of personal data as appropriate and in accordance with the level of risk, taking into account technological factors, context, circumstances, and standards accepted by similar types of businesses.
  • Security measures for personal data in electronic form must cover the components of the relevant information system such as servers, clients, storage system and devices, software, etc., as appropriate and in accordance with the level of risk.
  • Security measures in relation to the access, use, alteration, modification, deletion, or disclosure of personal data are substantially similar to the requirements under the MDES Notification – for example, access control, user access management, user responsibilities, audit trails, etc. However, the Security Measures Notification sets forth further requirements.

Apart from the above, the Security Measures Notification also requires the data controller to: (i) build privacy and security awareness for its personnel and users; (ii) review security measures when necessary or when there is a change in technology or a data breach incident; and (iii) set requirements on security measures for its data processor.

 

4) Notification of PDPC Re: Rules for the Consideration of the Imposition of Administrative Penalties by the Expert Committee B.E. 2565 (2022) (“Administrative Penalties Notification”)

In addition to imposing administrative fines on the offender, the Expert Committee which will be appointed under the PDPA will also be empowered to issue orders on the enforcement of administrative penalties, including seizure, confiscation, and sale by auction.

The key points of the Administrative Penalties Notification, which took effect on June 21, 2022, are as follows:

  • In determining the administrative fine or administrative measure, the Expert Committee is to consider certain factors such as whether the offense was committed willfully or out of gross negligence, the severity of the offense, the size of the business, the benefits which the data subject will receive if the administrative measures are enforced against the offender, the value of damages, the level of responsibility and standards at the time of commission of the offense, etc. One of the crucial factors that will be considered by the Expert Committee is the record of administrative fines or administrative measures already imposed or enforced on the offender and, if the offender is a legal entity, on the person associated with such legal entity.
  • The Administrative Penalties Notification categorizes offenses into two categories, non-serious offenses and serious offenses, which are treated differently by the Expert Committee.

Non-Serious Offense:

The Expert Committee may issue the following orders to the data controller, data processor, or other related person:

– Warning or order to the offender to rectify, cease, suspend, refrain or abstain from the violation or non-compliance with the PDPA within the time specified.

– Order to prohibit the offender from causing any damage to the data subject, or to perform any act to remedy the damages.

– Order to restrict the collection, use, or disclosure of personal data upon which an offense has been committed in order to remedy damages within the time specified.

In addition to the above, the Expert Committee may set forth conditions or procedures for the improvement of personnel, process, or technology to ensure its efficacy and suitability as the Expert Committee deems appropriate.

Serious Offense:

The Expert Committee shall impose administrative penalties on the data offender by taking into account the severity of the offense and other circumstances as deemed appropriate.

The Expert Committee may also issue orders similar to those for the non-serious offense.

  • If an administrative fine has been imposed on the offender and the offender failed to make payment within the time specified, the Expert Committee may issue a warning to the offender to make such payment within a period of not less than seven days, and if the offender still fails to make such payment in full, the provisions of the administrative procedures law will be applied.

It is vital to note that any failure to comply with the requirements under these subordinate regulations may lead to the data controller or data processor being subject to penalties specified under the PDPA, depending on the violation.

Related Professionals

Industries

Technology

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

August 25, 2026
Vietnam has enacted a new decree establishing administrative penalties for violations in the fields of cybersecurity and personal data protection. Decree No. 330/2026/NĐ-CP (Decree 330), issued and effective from August 19, 2026, provides a detailed sanctions framework for noncompliance with the Law on Personal Data Protection (including its implementing regulations under Decree 356/2025/ND-CP) and the Law on Cybersecurity, together with their guiding decrees. The issuance of Decree 330 signals that the practical grace period previously perceived by many businesses may be drawing to a close, with active regulatory enforcement in these areas expected to commence in earnest. Scope and Key Provisions Decree 330 has extraterritorial effect and applies to both onshore and offshore companies. For offshore companies, it applies to those that (1) provide telecommunications, internet, online-content, information-technology, cybersecurity, or cross-border services and (2) are involved in or related to the processing of personal data of Vietnamese citizens and certain other people of Vietnamese origin. Decree 330’s key provisions cover the following areas: Administrative penalties for violations relating to the protection of national security and public order in cyberspace, including the dissemination of unlawful, false, or unverified information. Sanctions for cyberattacks, unauthorized access, introduction of harmful code or programs, and failure to cooperate with specialized cybersecurity forces. Sanctions for personal data protection violations, such as consent, cross-border data transfers, impact assessments, breach notification, and data-subject rights, among others—with maximum fines of up to 5% of an organization’s preceding-year revenue for cross-border transfer violations, or up to VND 3 billion for other data-protection breaches. Personal Data Protection Penalties The key sanctions for personal data protection violations are as follows: Consent violations: Fines of up to VND 70 million (approx. USD 2,642), plus potential additional sanctions and remedial measures including irreversible deletion of personal data collected without consent and confiscation of
Read More
August 25, 2026
Thailand’s Electronic Transactions Development Agency (ETDA) is studying potential new regulatory measures for digital platform services that could significantly expand the country’s digital platform governance framework. The ETDA has already conducted one public consultation session on the proposed measures and will hold additional sessions on August 25 and September 2, 2026, covering five types of platform services under the Royal Decree on Digital Platform Services B.E. 2565 (2022). The measures under study are preliminary and may be changed based on consultation outcomes. Foundational Measures Applicable to All Platform Types Seven baseline obligations would apply across all digital platform categories: Transparency reports. Platforms must prepare and publish statistical reports on platform governance activities, including the number of content items removed or restricted and appeal outcomes, in a comparable format. Notice and action mechanism. Platforms must establish minimum standards for channels to report potentially illegal content or goods, conduct case-by-case review, provide explanations when content is removed or restricted, and maintain an internal appeals channel. Rights over automated decision-making. Users significantly affected by automated decisions are granted rights to request an explanation, request human review, and contest the decision. Service level agreements (SLAs). Platforms must publish minimum standards for response times, processing timelines, progress notifications, and remedies for incidents on the platform. Labeling of AI-generated content. Content generated or modified by AI must carry visible labels and machine-readable metadata, with exceptions for creative works that disclose AI use in a nonmisleading manner. Prohibition of dark patterns. User interface designs that deceive, coerce, or distort user decision-making are prohibited, including hiding critical information, creating false urgency, or making service cancellation unreasonably difficult. Business user fairness. Platforms must meet minimum standards for the treatment of sellers, workers, and content creators, including advance notice of term changes, explanation of account suspensions or visibility reductions,
Read More
August 20, 2026
Thailand has established a new cross-ministerial committee to oversee data center operations nationwide. On August 5, 2026, the Thai cabinet approved the Prime Minister’s Office Regulation on the Data Center Business Policy Committee, which was published in the Government Gazette on August 13, 2026, and is now in effect. The regulation reflects the government’s policy to elevate Thailand’s digital economy and promote investment in digital infrastructure and AI. The key features of the new committee are outlined below. Definition of “Data Center” Under the regulation, “data center” is defined as a building, premises, or structure that uses electronic equipment to provide services related to the collection, storage, processing, hosting, or transmission of data by electronic means to third parties that are not affiliates, as further determined by the Data Center Business Policy Committee. Committee Composition The committee will be chaired by a deputy prime minister designated by the prime minister, and will have three vice-chairs comprising the ministers of digital economy and society, interior, and energy. The committee also includes 12 ex-officio members: the permanent secretaries of finance, agriculture, natural resources, energy, interior, digital economy, industry, and commerce; the secretaries-general of the Board of Investment (BOI), Energy Regulatory Commission, National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission (NBTC), and National Water Resources Office; and the director of the Energy Policy and Planning Office. Up to three expert members may be appointed by the prime minister for two-year terms, renewable once. The secretary-general of the National Economic and Social Development Council (NESDC) serves as member and secretary, with up to two NESDC officials serving as assistant secretaries. Powers and Duties The committee is empowered to: Propose policies, standards, and operational frameworks for government agencies in approving, licensing, issuing investment promotion certificates, or providing services to data center operators in Thailand; Study, analyze, and
Read More
August 14, 2026
Thailand’s Office of the Insurance Commission (OIC) has issued guidelines clarifying the boundaries between permissible and prohibited activities for unlicensed individuals—including influencers, bloggers, and content creators—when communicating about insurance products on social media. The Good Practice Guidelines for Persons Not Licensed as Insurance Agents or Brokers Regarding the Dissemination of Insurance Content Through Digital Media B.E. 2569 (2026) took effect on July 24, 2026. Activities Requiring a License The guidelines reserve the following activities for licensed agents and brokers: Soliciting or facilitating insurance contracts. Providing personalized advice on product suitability. Recommending policy cancellation to purchase promoted products. Creating links that facilitate contract formation. Receiving performance-based compensation tied to policies or premiums generated. Importantly, boilerplate disclaimers such as “this is not a recommendation to buy insurance” will not shield individuals from liability if the OIC views the content as personalized advice or solicitation. Permitted Activities Unlicensed persons may present general educational content about insurance—such as explaining terminology, sharing industry statistics, reporting news, or sharing personal experiences—provided the content does not target specific individuals to purchase from specific companies. The guidelines also set out best practices for communication, including presenting information in a fair and balanced manner that covers both benefits and limitations, encouraging consumers to read policy terms and consult licensed professionals, verifying information from credible sources before dissemination, and exercising special care when the audience may include vulnerable groups such as persons aged 60 and older. Prohibited Practices Prohibited practices include fear-based marketing, creating artificial urgency, omitting material limitations, making exaggerated claims, falsely claiming professional credentials, using fake engagement mechanisms, and sharing false or misleading content. The guidelines also reinforce the prohibitions under section 83 of the Life Insurance Act B.E. 2535 and section 78 of the Non-Life Insurance Act B.E. 2535 against soliciting insurance contracts with foreign operators
Read More