You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

February 22, 2018

First Official Guidelines on Food Recall in Indonesia

Informed Counsel

The Indonesia National Agency of Drug and Food Control (NADFC) has issued the nation’s first official guidelines for food recall in the Head of NADFC Regulation No. 22 of 2017, which entered into force on November 28, 2017. The regulation establishes food recall procedures for manufacturers, importers, and distributors who are obligated to recall food products that are not in accordance with requirements set forth in prevailing laws and regulations.

Food recall is applicable to registered and unregistered processed food products, both local and imported. These include exported food products that have problems in the designated exporting country, and domestic processed food products registered with Indonesian municipal government authorities.

Mandatory Recall

Mandatory food recall requires an order from the NADFC, and may occur if a distributed product poses risk of causing disease or injury; a product does not meet food safety laws or regulations; or the recall is deemed necessary to protect public health.

The NADFC may utilize information from the following sources to determine whether to order a mandatory product recall:

  1. Balai Besar/Balai POM (i.e., provincial-level authority of NADFC);
  2. Nongovernmental organizations;
  3. Research institutions or universities;
  4. Mass media;
  5. Consumers;
  6. Food business operators;
  7. Overseas and international food safety organizations (e.g., International Food Safety Authorities Network, the European Union Rapid Alert System for Food and Fee, etc.); and
  8. Other official sources.

Voluntary Recall

A food business operator such as a manufacturer, importer, distributor, or retailer, may use information from the following sources to determine whether to conduct voluntary recall of a food product:

  1. Test data;
  2. Consumers;
  3. Supplier of food ingredient used by a manufacturer;
  4. Federal and provincial government agencies; and
  5. Other sources.

The manufacturer, importer, or distributor must provide the following information to the NADFC in order to conduct a voluntary recall:

  1. Identity of food product to be recalled;
  2. Reason for recall;
  3. Risk assessment of shortage of product supply in the market;
  4. Quantity of food produced or being produced;
  5. Quantity of food estimated to be in distribution;
  6. Distribution information, including contact persons’ details if necessary;
  7. Records of communication related to the food recall;
  8. Plan/strategy for food recall; and
  9. Contact details of responsible persons at the company conducting the food recall.

The intent to recall a food product must be communicated to the NADFC through its 24-hour call center, and to buyers and consumers through letters, emails, or fax.

Recall Classifications

Based on information received, the NADFC will conduct a health risk assessment to determine the classification of the food recall, with three classification types:

Class I recall. To qualify as a Class I recall, consumption of or exposure to the food product is presumed to cause serious health problems or even death. The timeline for a Class I Recall is as follows:

  • Issuance of a public warning by the NADFC within 24 hours after determination of the  classification of the recall;
  • Recalled products are prohibited for sale or purchase and must be secured immediately after the public warning;
  • Food products to be recalled must be cleared from markets within 14 calendar days after issuance of the NADFC’s recall order.

Class II recall. In a Class II recall, consumption of or exposure to the food product is presumed to cause temporary disruption to health, recoverable disruption to health, or a small possibility of serious disruption to health. This classification includes food that does not meet the mandatory Indonesian National Standard for quality, packaged food products that are distributed without a marketing permit, and food products that contain pork but fail to disclose this information on their food label. Food products to be recalled under Class II must be cleared from markets within 30 calendar days of issuance of the NADFC’s recall order.

Class III recall. In a Class III recall, consumption of or exposure to a food product is not detrimental to health, but there is a breach of regulation other than those mentioned under Class I and II recalls. Food products to be recalled under Class III must be cleared from markets within 60 calendar days of issuance of the NADFC’s recall order.

Recall Procedure

The process for a food recall in Indonesia consists of several steps. First, the NADFC will issue a recall order to the food manufacturer or importer after completing its health risk assessment. The NADFC will then issue a circular to all Balai Besar/Balai POM to instruct them to coordinate with local government agencies in the recall. In the case of a Class I recall, the circular will also include instructions to secure and destroy food products.

A public warning is subsequently issued by NADFC in a Class I recall, or by the relevant business operator in a voluntary recall. The recall is then executed within the provided timeline and recalled products are handled in accordance with official guidelines. If the recall has been effectively executed, the NADFC will issue an order letter to cease the recall; otherwise, an order letter to repeat the recall will be issued.

The NADFC will determine the next course of action on the recalled products for products in mandatory recalls, while products in voluntary recalls may be handled in the following ways as determined by the company: destroyed; used for other purposes besides human consumption (e.g., as animal feed); reprocessed to ensure food safety; relabeled; or returned to suppliers (in the case of imported food products).

Reporting

All activities related to a food recall must be documented and reported to the NADFC by the manufacturer, importer, or distributor. There are two types of reports:

A progress report must be provided to confirm that the responsible party has identified all products to be recalled, and has communicated about the recall to all related parties. The progress report must be provided within 10 working days from the start of a Class II or III recall. For a Class I recall, the NADFC will determine the timeline for providing a progress report.

A final report must be provided within 10 working days after the recall is completed. It will be used by the NADFC to assess the effectiveness of the recall process.

Simulation Exercise

As part of food recall guidelines, business operators are required to perform a food recall and food traceability simulation exercise at least once a year, and document the exercise activities and results. This requirement is intended to measure the effectiveness of current food recall and food traceability systems.

The guidelines set forth in the Head of NADFC Regulation No. 22 of 2017 appear to provide a comprehensive framework for business operators to follow when a recall is deemed necessary. Although the guidelines are still relatively new, it is hoped that they will contributed to more effective food recalls and promote the confidence of food and beverage investors in Indonesia.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

July 24, 2026
As food innovation continues to accelerate, manufacturers are increasingly introducing ingredients derived from new sources, produced using novel technologies, or lacking a significant history of human consumption. While these innovations create new opportunities for the food industry, they also raise important questions regarding consumer safety. For this reason, many jurisdictions, including Thailand, the European Union, Australia and New Zealand, Canada, and Singapore, require a premarket safety assessment for novel food ingredients before they can be placed on the market. The objective of this assessment is to ensure that each ingredient is safe for its intended use and level of consumption, does not present toxicological, allergenic, microbiological, or nutritional concerns, and will not mislead consumers. Scientific authorities typically evaluate the ingredient’s identity, manufacturing process, composition, specifications, anticipated dietary exposure, toxicological information, nutritional impact, and history of use before determining whether it can be marketed. Against this background, the Thai Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently took an important step toward improving regulatory transparency by publishing, for the first time, a consolidated public list of substances that have successfully completed the Thai FDA’s safety assessment process, including substances determined to be novel foods and those determined not to fall within the novel food category. The list identifies the approved substances, the corresponding manufacturers or importers, approval dates, and the approved conditions of use. Although the publication does not change the existing legal framework governing novel food approvals, it provides businesses with greater visibility into the Thai FDA’s regulatory precedents and the types of substances that have previously been accepted through the safety assessment process. The full announcement is available on the Thai FDA’s website. As the list is now publicly available, it also provides useful insight into the types of substances that have successfully completed the Thai FDA’s safety assessment process.
July 24, 2026
For businesses in Thailand’s regulated industries, the problem of “too many licenses” is one of the most familiar hurdles to getting a product to market. Take a simple example: importing the materials necessary to sell teriyaki chicken skewers. To legally do this, a business may need approvals from several different agencies—separate permits for the chicken (Department of Livestock Development), the dipping sauce (Thai FDA), the wooden skewers (Department of Forestry), and other ingredients, each under a different authority. This kind of overlap is often cited to argue for a “regulatory guillotine”—a systematic review to cut outdated or duplicative rules that slow investment and business activity. The Facilitation of Licensing and Public Service Consideration Act B.E. 2569 (2026) (Licensing Facilitation Act 2026) is Thailand’s most significant response yet to that concern. This article looks at the Facilitation Act 2026 through a life sciences and regulatory affairs lens—what it may mean for the manufacturers, importers, and distributors of food, drugs, medical devices, cosmetics, and similar products who routinely deal with several regulators to bring a single product to market. The Super License: One Approval Standing in for Many The reform with the clearest potential for regulated-product businesses is the law’s “super license” mechanism, referred to as a “main license” in the statute. Once a business obtains the main license for a regulated activity, it is automatically deemed to hold all related sublicenses issued by other agencies for that same activity, provided the activity has been designated as eligible in the Government Gazette. The Licensing Facilitation Act 2026 also creates a central application center, allowing applicants to submit a single application and pay all relevant fees at one point of contact, with the center routing the application to each agency through a shared information system. The potential benefits of this for businesses
July 13, 2026
Indonesia’s Halal Product Assurance Agency (BPJPH) has issued new regulations establishing clearer procedures for imposing administrative sanctions on businesses that violate halal product assurance requirements. BPJPH Regulation No. 2 of 2026 on the Imposition of Administrative Sanctions for Violations of Halal Product Assurance Implementation, issued on June 5, 2026, strengthens Indonesia’s halal compliance framework, as mandated under Law No. 33 of 2014 on Halal Product Assurance and Government Regulation No. 42 of 2024 on the Implementation of Halal Product Assurance. BPJPH Regulation No. 2/2026 also supports the upcoming mandatory halal compliance deadline of October 17, 2026, which will apply to a broad range of products and services, including imported food and beverages, slaughtering products and services, natural and quasi-drugs, health supplements, cosmetics, chemical and genetically engineered products, clothing and accessories, household goods, prayer equipment, stationery, and class A medical devices. Scope BPJPH is authorized to impose administrative sanctions for violations of halal product assurance requirements committed by businesses, halal inspection agencies (LPH), halal auditors, halal product process companion institutions (lembaga pendamping PPH), and halal product process companions (pendamping PPH). The head of BPJPH has authority to determine, cancel, or amend the imposition of administrative sanctions, including upon receipt of objections. This authority covers revocation of Halal Certificates (including foreign halal certificate registration numbers), withdrawal of goods from circulation, freezing of LPH operations, freezing of halal product process companion institutions, revocation of PPH companion institution registration numbers, revocation of halal auditor registration numbers, and revocation of LPH accreditation status. Administrative Sanctions Businesses may be subject to any of the following administrative sanctions: Written warning; Administrative fine; Revocation of the halal certificate, including revocation of foreign halal certificate registration numbers; and Withdrawal of goods from circulation. The regulation sets out the types of violations that may trigger these sanctions, with each
July 1, 2026
Obtaining marketing authorization is a fundamental requirement for bringing pharmaceutical products to the Thai market. Companies must navigate the Thai Food and Drug Administration’s registration procedures while also complying with post-approval pharmacovigilance obligations, licensing requirements for manufacturing and importation, data protection rules, and other regulatory requirements. This guide provides an overview of Thailand’s regulatory framework for pharmaceutical marketing authorization, including available registration pathways, review timelines, application fees, postmarketing surveillance obligations, licensing requirements, exemptions, data exclusivity, freedom of information, and parallel import considerations. It is intended as a practical reference for pharmaceutical companies, regulatory affairs professionals, and others involved in bringing medicinal products to the Thai market. Download the guide below for a concise overview of the current requirements and procedures governing pharmaceutical marketing authorization in Thailand.